First I shall give you my take on this, from what I have read, as it is rather tricky in discerning.
OK first of all the RH component of blood types, is not an evolutionary gene from monkeys. That is a blatant mislabeling of the created gene of our blood that makes sure our oxygen carrying capacities of our human blood co-ogulates when it is exposed (or cut or is flowing openly in the air). This is life saving , as it means cuts do not have to drain all our life living blood from a cut, so that we can survive and live. This is the Lord gene, and not the Rh positive gene of monkeys or evolutionary beings of the past.
RH negative just means that life saving oxygen clotting characteristic is not there. In other words, it is the Hemophiliac gene that kills or can kill embryos or those that get it dominant as children.
All RIGHT, now we have the semantics discerned…. And separated.
Quoting: Davidjayjordan I'm certainly not trying to argue this. You know more about this than I, but I have some questions.
I'm AB- , with what I believe, are clots in my leg.
I don't see doctors, and don't have one, so I can't say that they are or are not there. (the clots) I know the pain and swelling I go through.
I did go to the ER very recently because of something else though, and asked about my legs, and blood.
The results ended up being that all my symptoms were due to Anemia.
There were/are no clots in my leg, the doc says.
I still say that's exactly what they are. I also am constant cutting myself, or running into something, and have plenty of experience with bleeding, and have never had a problem with something just constantly bleeding, and not clotting.
I guess I'm just confused about where you say, "RH negative just means that life saving
oxygen clotting characteristic is not there. In other words, it is the Hemophiliac gene that kills or can kill embryos or those that get it dominant as children."
Do you mean this only as it pertains to passing this along to a child, or for the RH neg themselves...
I just don't get how it is my blood does clot so well, but I am AB neg?
I'm really curious about this subject and read what I have time to read on it, but alot of this confuses me. My mother, also being AB neg, has never had any issues with her blood not clotting. Maybe you mean here that it is just much thinner, and takes longer to clot?
