I am very fascinated by the concepts OP is laying out, but there are things that confuse me. Not everything you disagree with is "patently absurd". My questions are sincere questions, but the christians couldn't/wouldn't leave me alone to ask them.

I am trying to understand how OP can both say it's a blueprint for the usurpers, yet also say it's good. I suspect that my questioning of that is related to something I do not understand about his information, and I was hoping for an answer to that confusion.

My perspective and view of the bible is different from yours... but so is the OP's different from either of us.

I appreciate that your view says that any view such as mine is automatically "absurd", but that doesn't make it absurd, it just means YOU SEE IT THAT WAY.