Why do you keep blaming at Chinese who pretended not to see the injured girl? *updated*

I am a chinese and believe me china people is like that.

That is fireman it's their job.
My friend went to China the first day and his wallet was stolen on the street. True story. Thank you.

I think that the problem is that the people of China are just so used to killing baby girls, that they don't care about girl toddlers.

The sick Chinese culture seems to care only about male children, which is why there are 20 million more males than females right now.

(There are parts of the American culture that is sick as well, I'm not letting us off the hook.)

That is fireman it's their job.
My friend went to China the first day and his wallet was stolen on the street. True story. Thank you.

We are not talking about 1-2 person but 18!

18/100 = 18%

Went I see a dead cat by the street my heart will hurt.

18/1.3billion,that is the point thanks
and thanks for you concern on our China
ex-Chinese boy

In the western world someone may get beaten up or drop dead of a heart attack an no one will help.
But NO PERSON, no person would stand by after a 2 year old child was hit by a car.
NO PERSON!

Its just a like a dirty bathroom.
The crap keeps getting added up but the house person will not notice. Everyday the bathroom keeps getting dirty, and nobody who stays there will notice it. Until one day a guest walks in and 'wow! why is your bathroom so filthy??'
Stagnant societies are like that. Barricaded from outside influence, there is no air passing by, and slowly but surely the society morphs into something inhumane.
So inhumane, that a dying two year old child is ignored. This is morphing of the mind into something else.
But living inside China, you will not notice it.
Far from being horrified, they like OP above, will only defend it.

Wake up china man.
You are being changed into something not human.
They will only use you in their dirty wars, you will only be fit for that. Like pit bulls being trained to kill.

Hey OP!

I understand everyone in China is an individual and are different.
But when it comes to brutal crimes such as cold merciless crimes, the Chinese top it.

The video was shocking!

why do you care what americans think?

america has the highest rates of child abuse of any developed nation

heck, bohemian grove "cremation of care" goes on annually where they openly admit they are "burning their cares away" meaning they are removing the guilt complex from all their evil deeds

the US with NATO just killed like 20,000 libyans with airstrikes to spread "liberty" and "freedom" there

these people are hypocrites, they cry over one girl in china who they secretly hate and ignore the countless murders they engage in all over the world due to their foreign policies!

I could not say Americans are bad people
the killers do not represent you and all the other people in US.
the The Mastermind is the Complany~

i knew you were going to say that because Chinese have higher IQ than most stereotypical brainwashed Americans

Americans will demonize everyone if they are from a certain country, region or religion.

It's our job.

Thank you, come again.

psychologists believe that when you touch other people to be extra careful when thinking of, because you can never be sure you will find something.Over the years, regarding the subject of a large number of psychological experiments have reached a surprising conclusion.
Please note that we are not the object to be discussed with mental illness are intermittent; In fact, we are talking about is you.Following the results of these experiments will not speak for themselves:
five experiments, Asch Conformity Experiment (1953)
experimental steps: psychologists Ash (Solomon Asch) has made a series of studies to verify the conformity effect, the experimental results can be read so that all the people whom it depressed endless.
Subjects were told that they would participate together with another group of people a vision test, then show some pictures and asked each to answer some very easy and obvious problems.The trap of this test is, in addition to the subjects I, the room for other experimental collaborators of the test, they will be given as required obviously wrong answers.So, most people are guilty but mentally retarded is plain wrong, subjects with other people give different results What
results: the subjects were asked to answer the"problems" can refer to the figure below
they had to do only that which the right side and left side of a line segment of equal length.You see, Ash what questions are far from the kind of difficult to design the next space station.Indeed, as a similar length of the line in this issue of people who got it wrong, unless you take the morning, two doses of ecstasy, also rub on the eyeball on it (of course this will lead to other more fearful of the"test", we skip talking about).
Regrettably, however, when you see the other three people involved in the test gives the wrong answer, 32% of the subjects would give the same wrong answer, even if the line length difference to a few inches also remains the same.No doubt as the proverbial three tiger has been verified.
Analysis: Just imagine, when the answer to this question is not so black and white, it is obvious when the proportion of this 32% will be up to much.Even if we did not understand a joke, we are more willing to laugh along with most people; when we find they are not recognized by most people, we tend to believe that his point of view.Primary school we have ever experienced the peer pressure of competition and the"courage to be yourself" sort of encouragement seems to be missing.
"ah, I should be away from the road by a lone rebel who, so good."Most of us always say that.Of course, it is also for everyone of us, the next move is to watch other"loners" are doing......
......and then, make sure you fully consistent with what they do not go against.
experiment four, Good Samaritan test
experimental steps: If you have not heard of the"Good Samaritan" (the Good Samaritan) of the biblical story, this can be briefly described as follows: a jewish is robbed and the robbers Sustaining serious injuries, lying side of the road, there are priests and Levites are indifferent passing, only a passing Samaritan despite barriers, kindness helped him move the story to show that the standard identification of people and the people non-identity.Therefore, the psychologist John Daly (John Darley) and C · Danny Alba Patterson (C.Daniel Batson) hope to religion's influence in helping behavior test.
their subjects were a group of seminary students, half of which give"Good Samaritan" story and asked them to another theology in a sermon, and the other half were asked the same question about job opportunities in a sermon.
as an additional variable, subjects were asked at different times to the sermon, so some of them may be on the road will seem hurried.
Then, on the way to the, subjects would pass a person slumped in an alleyway, looking desperate need of help.We may think that Dali and Batson is only helpful on some tests of random phenomena, but research data shows that the poor passers-by is arranged in advance, and have been very realistic.
Results: Compared to prepare speech on job opportunities to those students who were given a"Good Samaritan" story of the students have not allegorical and more extended educational out of hand.Factors that really works the way they turned out just how a hurry.
In fact, if pressed for time, only 10% of the students stopped to provide assistance, even if they are about to stop preaching to the topic of how important assistance.But be fair, if you late for class, the professor would believe"the way I had to stop to help a wounded traveler" as an excuse it? Probably not, unless you can produce a man with blood on their shirts as evidence.
Analysis: As we like to joke, put it, an anti-gay male members can be found bathing in love with a man, appeal to environmentally-friendly former U.S.Vice President Al Gore (Al Gore) may have an energy expensive mansion......
......In fact, we, as ordinary people and politicians of hypocrisy.After all, with the face of a whole body with blood dripping stench even compared to the homeless, facing a public talk should help listeners strangers apparently easier.Therefore, even if that their hypocrisy is a hypocrisy.
If you think the results of these studies is limited to hypocritical seminary students, then please take a look at news.Remember a few years ago, the camera photographed the car refused to carry at least 12 injured woman lying on the roadside scene it?
and just as these students do, they always feel compelled to place.Drivers may also feel lucky, because I just Guaige Wan passing by her, rather than in a car accident that crushed her tragedy.
third experiment, bystander apathy test
experimental steps: in 1964 women with the murder incident, news reports said 38 people had witnessed or heard the case did not take any action occurs.John Daly (John Darley) and 比伯拉坦纳 (Bibb Latane) want to verify through research, when people in the group environment, whether reluctant to lend a helping hand.
The two psychologists invited volunteers to participate in the test.They told participants, the talks could involve a very private view of the content (such as the size of the class to discuss genital topic), so everyone will be separated in different rooms, only walkie-talkie to communicate with each other.
During the meeting, participants will pretend a sudden illness, of course, can be heard by other participants.We do not fully determine the call information is communicated to the other side of their disease, but we sure like"Oh my seizures of the" kind of thing will be the subjects heard.
results: When the incidence of those subjects that in addition, they are the only one who participate in the discussion, 85% of people will pretend disease in the other volunteered to leave the room when to seek help.With another person, a very personal talks (again, likely to mention issues such as genital size) is already very difficult, compared to the rest of the time if a person himself was forced to it is just sad.In any case, 85% of people willing to help; this result is not bad, is not it?
but the experiment is not over.When the experiment environment changes, there is another four subjects that participate in the discussion, only 31% of people seeking help after the onset of the other party, and the rest of the subjects guess someone else will take care of the person.So in a way,"the more the better" This word has lost its true meaning, but the correct interpretation should be"a lot of death benefit" (one more case, there is higher incidence of the probability of dying.)
Analysis: this push and, in case of emergency, if you are the only client side, you participate in assistance will greatly increase the power, you will feel this something with 100% responsibility.However, when you are only 10 people in a time, you will only feel 10% of the responsibility; problem is that everyone else was only 10% of the responsibility.
This has provided us with an explanation before the example.If the injured woman lying on a deserted highway, the driver had turned a blind eye may be more willing to stop to help.The way, of course, they may be more willing to disregard, because they know no one in the next monitoring (this is different with the subjects of this experiment, because the subjects knew at least someone in the recording and analysis of their behavior.)
perhaps, this problem can also be attributed to excuse us for their own rationality.We will say,"Obviously, this road will always be people passing by to save her." Or,"Clearly, protecting the environment is always someone to do something" or"Clearly, the shark always full, so to a certain degree will not eat him." We just need to find their not as the slightest excuse.
the second experiment, the Stanford Prison (1973)
Setup: Psychologist Philip Zimbardo (Philip Zimbardo) want to study how the impact of prison life in which the police and prisoners.It sounds stupid enough; problem is that there will be any problems with
Zimbardo of Stanford University Psychology Department in the basement will be converted into a mock prison.Only through the newspaper ads from the volunteers have passed the physical health and mental stability test, the test subjects during the screening prison experiment is a critical factor.The subjects were male college students were randomly distributed 12 guards and 12 prisoners.Zimbardo himself to want to participate in the experiment, and his appointment of himself as the prison director.The mock prison experiment lasted only two weeks.
Yes, on this point will not be any problems.
results: Each participant had to spend a day or so to adapt to this life and start to get crazy.Only the next day, the prisoners will be set up in this man launched a prison riot, with the beds set up obstacles in the cell and ridiculed COs.See this situation, guards opened fire to prisoners if found (in fact, use of fire extinguishers alternative) the perfect excuse, hey, why not so damn dry
Thus began the Stanford Prison has been really hell, day after day in this hell staged riots.Some guards began forcing inmates to sleep naked on the concrete floor, and to limit the use of the bathroom as a privilege (often deprived of the privilege) threat.They forced the prisoners to do humiliating training and hands to clean the toilet.
Incredibly, when"prisoners" were told they have a chance to be paroled, but was again denied parole cases, they are not simply to terminate this hell experiment.Remember, they have absolutely no legal reason for imprisonment, this is just a role-playing experiment.This means that they will continue to sit naked in their own excrement on their heads set the bag.
more than 50 non-laboratory personnel involved in observation and attention to the prison, but the moral of the trial has never been questioned until Zimbardo's girlfriend, Kerry Sidi Na ; Ma Sila (Christina Maslach) lodged a strong protest.After only 6 days, Zimbardo had to terminate the experiment (several of the"guards" expressed disappointment.) If you want to praise Ba Sila is the only experiment in this hell of wise men, then you should also know that she was married to the planning of this experiment Zimbardo.
Analysis: The results showed that the rebels planned to play the role of prisoners to play the role of the prison guards became a violent.Could it be that because the play was tortured by prison guards who were riots darn, do not ask a matter of course as they were free to manipulate it? Scientific research shows that if the roles were reversed, you will take the same approach.
As it verify it, this is usually out of fear of each other gives us back our fellow human beings being tortured.When we have absolute power over certain people or empty promises from above, the Abu Ghraib prison (Translator's Note: the prisoner abuse scandal, was forced to ask some of the prisoners naked and stacked into a pyramid-shaped) optical Dodo's & ldquo ; pyramid"will abide by.Oh, if this is a group of Vietnam-era hippie college students, then this will definitely be hell to occur in your body.
first experiment, Milgram experiment (1961)
experimental steps: When the followers of the Nazi massacre of jewish people was indicted at the Nuremberg trials, many of the defense seems to revolve around"I am not the real killer," the argument that"In fact, I'm simply following orders." Therefore, the Yale University psychologist Milgram (Stanley Milgram) would like to subjects on the orders of the subordinate authority figures will be tested.You might think that he was only asked to the subjects? Oh, I can not do; that was not enough cruel.
and you think different, organized by the Milgram experiment, participants were told to play"teacher" role, need to do is to give the next room Another memory test subjects were.In fact the"other subjects" is a fake by the laboratory personnel, all this is just a layout of Mill Glen Council.
subject was also informed that, as long as the other gives the wrong answer, he will press a button, the controller will next door"students" an electric shock.In addition, a lab coat staff will be on the side for guidance and supervision (must be noted, and no real shocks occur, of course, the subjects did not know this).
subjects believe that a 45 volt electric start, once the answer wrong, the voltage value will rise with it.Each time you press the button subjects,"students" will be issued in the next room screaming, asking the subjects to stop the test.
then you can predict how the experiment will go on What
Results: In the experiment to a certain degree (such as electric shock of 330 volts), the number of subjects that began to feel uncomfortable, and questioned continuing the experiment.However, workers wearing lab coat suspended on every request to encourage them to continue.Be no need to take any responsibility in the security assurances, most subjects chose to continue to enhance the electric voltage, electric shocks to victims again and again.Some participants in the hearing"students" screams out after a nervous laugh; because when power passed to another person's body but could do nothing, I am afraid laughter is the best medicine.
the end, next to the"students" will start to beat the wall in pain, pleading for his heart condition checked.Continue to enhance the shock after, from the"students" of the room sound will suddenly disappear, to suggest that he was dead or unconscious.If you have to give guess, then what percentage of subjects would continue to give electric shocks it
5%? 10%?
in the"students" may have been in a coma or death cases, approximately 61-66% of the subjects choose to continue the experiment until the shock reaches the maximum voltage of 450 volts.Experimental studies have shown that repeated the same results: as long as the laboratory staff believe that there is no problem, the subjects will unconsciously imposed on the suffering of an innocent stranger.
most of the subjects before the electric shock of 300 volts will not be questioned or opposed, 0% of the subjects in the experiment had to stop (please note that in some cases under 100 volts is enough to kill people).
Analysis: You may be more willing to think of themselves as defenders of a free thinking, but in the final analysis, the key still lies in"the man" idea is enough to make you insist, this is from behind,"that person" will always make you adhere to those ideas, even if it is only a man wearing a lab coat - imagine if he was wearing a uniform or wearing a badge will be.
check Charles Sheridan and Richard King which was further experiments, but the requirements of the subjects into, Once the puppies in a manner that is inappropriate given electric shocks.Milgram experiment with different, this shock was real.The results show that 26 to 20 subjects in the highest voltage.
almost as high as 80%.Imagine, when you walk in the mall - you around 80% of people are willing to impose the extreme torture of a puppy, as long as a man wearing a lab coat asked them to do so.

indians throw dead bodies into the water, infect a whole village that lives downstream with the carcasses, and then say it's vishnu that punishes them for being outcast

heck, a aboriginal cult in india EATS PEOPLE because their religion demands it

don't talk india, you are the head quarters of ROTSCHILD raping and looting company right now

your politicians have sold you out and turn your once organic farms into MONSANTO SEEDLING PARADISE

fuck off brownie

This is nothing but a sick reflection of what kind of society China is...

Defending it by saying it would happen anywhere is just lame...

The way of thinking there is just that... its a girl who cares... One less mouth to feed... and good another job will open up for my one kid...

I am a chinese and believe me china people is like that.