*JUST AIRED* on LINK TV: Physician thinks lung cancer will begin in as soon as 2 years

MORE: All countries with nuclear reactors have nuclear bomb factories — Includes Syria, Saudia Arabia, Iran, Pakistan — Nuclear power a “camouflage” for nuclear weapons

LINK TV, Oct. 21 — Dr. Helen Caldicott appeared on the LINK TV program Earth Focus to discuss the Fukushima crisis and other nuclear issues.

Caldicott received her medical degree from the University of Adelaide Medical School. In 1977 she joined the staff of the Children’s Hospital Medical Center in Boston, and taught pediatrics at the Harvard Medical School from 1977 to 1978. She worked to establish the group International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War which was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1985. -Wikipedia

At 4:15 in

Nuclear power is a ‘Trojan Horse’, a camouflage for the nuclear weapons industry…
Japan did not want nuclear power after Hiroshima and Nagasaki…
Any country that has a nuclear reactor — be it Syria,Saudi Arabia, etc. — has a nuclear bomb factory.
Each reactor makes 500 pounds of plutonium a year… all you need is 5 pounds to make a nuclear weapon.

[link to www.linktv.org]

Fukushima Update with Arnie Gunderson - 2011/10/20

[link to radioactive.eu.com]

You watched a 13 minutes video in 7 minutes?

Slap Chop LOL

This is important as fuck...has been predicted here, and is about to hit home.

Spin This Pit! :pinthis:

Cool....Dont be surprised about the denial and apathy...until it begins

Agree. Takes me back to the goot ol' days 7 months ago. :)

I hear ya

Wont really matter whether he gets Roswelled or not....its going to happen either way.

BTW....Cuba developed a drug that halts lung cancer, they give it free to their people.
Wonder if they might share the glory

Inositol has been proven to cure lung cancer and prevent it as well.

Not trying to minimize Inositols valuable positive effects in certain areas....But I doubt it will help Radiation Damaged Cellular failure..I personally dont think Cubas "Miracle" lung cancer remissive agent will work either.

Shoot, here in the U.S. you can make a one megaton nuclear bomb with just 9/10 ths of a gram...the type they put in those cruise missiles.

Shes a stupid crazy lady ive seen her before and researched some of her facts and she gets even basic things totally wrong.

the BASIC FACT of nuclear reactors being THEIR TROJAN horse for nuclear weaponry
should be easily SEEN.

and we have north kOreuuuh etc.

Listen to Arnie. Thanks.

[link to video.godlikeproductions.com]

Arnie Gundersen Interview by Helen Caldicott



[link to video.godlikeproductions.com]



[link to video.godlikeproductions.com]

[link to video.godlikeproductions.com]

Thread: ARNIE GUNDERSEN: Reactors continue to emit significant quantities of radioactive gases — Latest figure is a Gigabecquerel per day (AUDIO)

Thread: High internal radiation exposure detected in young children — 16 people with internal exposure over 1 millisievert

Thread: “Geiger counters going off their scales” in Watari during recent survey — Radiation levels rise once again after decontamination

Just joined GLP, and I`m wondering how many of you on the west coast are changing their lifestyles because of the radiation or who are using their own monitoring devices. No doubt that the levels spike when it rains...

[link to video.godlikeproductions.com]

Children with radioactive piss is a clue.
~

Post Fukushima: All the King's Horses and All the King's Men...

Fairewinds' Chief Engineer Arnie Gundersen testifies to the NRC Petition Review Board detailing why the 23 BWR Mark 1 nuclear power plants should be shut down following the accidents at Fukushima. True wisdom means knowing when to modify something and knowing when to stop. Sometimes, all the King’s horses and all the King’s men should not try to put Humpty Dumpty together again.

[link to fairewinds.com]

Nuclear Power Now..........

Nuclear power is the world's largest source of emission-free energy. Nuclear power plants produce no controlled air pollutants, such as sulfur and particulates, or greenhouse gases. The use of nuclear power in place of other energy sources helps to keep the air clean, preserve the Earth's climate, avoid ground-level ozone formation and prevent acid rain.

Nuclear power has important implications for our national security. Inexpensive nuclear power, in combination with fuel cell techology, could significantly reduce our dependency on foreign oil.

Nuclear power plants have experienced an admirable safety record. About 20% of electricity generated in the U.S. comes from nuclear power, and in the last forty years of this production, not one single fatality has occurred as a result of the operation of a civilian nuclear power plant in the United States. In comparison, many people die in coal mining accidents every year and approximately ten thousand Americans die every year from pollution related to coal burning.

The nuclear power industry generates approximately 2,000 tons of solid waste annually in the United States. In comparison, coal fueled power plants produce 100,000,000 tons of ash and sludge annually, and this ash is laced with poisons such as mercury and nitric oxide.

Even this 2,000 tons of nuclear waste is not a technical problem. Reprocessing of nuclear fuel, and the implementation of Integral Fast Reactor technology, will enable us to turn the vast majority of what is currently considered waste into energy.

Unfortunately, the voting public has been victimized by forty years of misinformation regarding the safety of nuclear power. The graphs on nuclear energy showing it to be safe, economical, and in our national interest are countered by anti-nuclear activists using fear tactics to frighten the electorate into inaction.

Until we can successfully educate the American electorate on the real pros and cons of nuclear power, we will not be able to engage in a healthy national discussion on the topic.

[link to www.nuclearnow.org]

Unfortunately, the voting public has been victimized by forty years of misinformation regarding the safety of nuclear power. The graphs on nuclear energy showing it to be safe, economical, and in our national interest are countered by anti-nuclear activists using fear tactics to frighten the electorate into inaction.
/quote]

Fukushima. Three Mile Island. Chernobyl.