Isn't the "Occupy" protests a Worldwide Communist Revolution??

Yes.

You poor deluded/frightened souls keep telling yerselves that.


Maybe more prayer will help.

lol
Z

Defeating the hippies may be humanity's the last chance for nationalism, closed borders, pride in one's own culture.

No

Yes,...lets imprison the [US]population behind Iron border bars, and defeat/kill everyone that disagrees with hate and fear of the other standing/protesting in our way!!!

Let's just Fucking A do it!!!


Not.
Z

Last Edited by zacksavage on 10/25/2011 12:51 AM

Anarchist vs statist.

Same war, different generation.

Most likely. They would have us believe it is all a wonderful accident not an organized effort.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Pal you can't make use of humanity and nationalism in the same statement. Either you want mankind to be united as a race or united as a nation...
There is no room for both, and adopting a globalist view doesnt mean one has to give up regional culture...

Listen,...How many of your fellow citizens have to take to the streets before you begin to piss yourself in fear???

Do you have a set number cause this freight train is picking up steam,...

Apparently.


Z

nope, just a bunch of mixed whiners. thats what they were here anyway. the type of person with

rich parents who read nexus magazine while refusing to get a job.

they have vowed to disrupt the queens security tomorrow, it should be funny if they turn up.

it's illegal to camp in a public place in a city or town here, so they are going to 'occupy' major

intersections on the motorcades route and will expect their parents to bail them out of jail.

amongst their crowd, and ive had experience with them, whoever leads the life of the most

wronged by society gets the most women.

take a look at their clothing and expensive musical instruments in brand new cases, they are the

bored offspring of the inner city elite in the most part.

"Occupy The Rothschild and Rockefeller Estates" New War..different outcome?

No.

Fuck the globalist view, it only brings enrichment to the Anglo-American/Ashkenazim establishment.

The future is strong countries securely and proudly nationalistic. Good fences make good neighbors.

My house is my house. I don't let my neighbor sleep here, but I am friendly to my neighbor and we can still help each other when we need to. See how that works?

Nation is the biggest abstraction people can truly feel and follow. If you try to "work for the benefit of all" you will be ripped off by the lowest common denomenator. Happens all the time. Try an experiment: Open the door of your home and say anyone can come in and go, freely, and take or give what they want. There will be a lot more taking than giving, I assure you! Eventually your home will be destroyed.

Its exactly what it is the filthy commie lunatics have hijacked every single thing you can imagine.

Love how people like to put names to thing to try and make them self understand something they don't understand. Either way communist revolution or not ITS HAPPENING. So please if you have nothing to do with the occupy other then post threads or stories about it is showing your support for the group.


ITS HAPPENING and NO ONE can DO NOTHING ab IT> :)

I don't know about all of that, but it's the same battle that's been going on for centuries, and it doesn't have anything to do with "communists" vs "capitalist". These are just economic theories.

The real battle is between individuals who want to control their own lives, and individuals that want to use the violence of the State to centrally plan and control everything.

Anarchist vs statist.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Anarchist communists support communism as a means for ensuring the greatest freedom and well-being for everyone, rather than only the wealthy and powerful...
Anarchist communism as an anarchist philosophy is against hierarchy in all its forms....Some...reject the concept of work altogether in favor of turning necessary subsistence tasks into voluntary free play.

Peter Kropotkin said that the main authoritarian mistakes in communist experiments of the past were their being based on "religious enthusiasm"[59] and the desire to live "as a family"[60] where the individual had to "submit to the dictates of a punctilious morality".

...to recognise a variety of occupations as the basis of all progress and to organise in such a way that man may be absolutely free during his leisure time, whilst he may also vary his work, a change for which his early education and instruction will have prepared him — this can easily be put in practice in a Communist society — this, again, means the emancipation of the individual, who will find doors open in every direction for his complete development.


Boy, that sounds just aweful. Oops, I'd better get to sleep otherwise I might get fired tomorrow and not get to eat because my boss is an asshole.

IF at some point the movement is hijacked towards an actual freedom agenda such as anti UN and CFR then they would be rounded up and sent to FEMA camps.

As it is the movement is not "bringing us freedom" or working towards any real change for the better.

From the reports 80% are homeless tools to be used for an agenda of the political elite!

[link to www.youtube.com]

[link to www.youtube.com]

They get shunned by society. They don't get to join in any reindeer games. So, you say, them and the other "cast outs" get together and form an army. I would say that that is heirarchy and disallowed. A hierarchy removing posse is formed by the group temporarily to disban it.

The movement has and is being funded and fomented by international socialists/Marxists.

Most of the protesters themselves are just useless idiots.

Last Edited by Evil_Twin on 10/25/2011 02:13 AM

Once again someone spouting off at the mouth that don't know what there talking about. Sad world we live in.


Don't worry no one will stand up for you when wrong has been done. Cause no one will be left to stand up for u.

Agreed!!

Down with the Tea Party!!!:)




Z

Go back to school and learn to formulate a sentence, moron.

Are they useful or useless? I know what you mean by useful. What do you mean by useless? That they don't become a slave to make someone else born into money more rich for a pittance? Let me guess, you don't like their hair style. They are not in uniform as you prefer, mr. anti-communist?

See you have no ground for an argument so you find the cheapest shot and take it. Does not bother me just show what kinda life you live and how you treat people and most likely your family to.

Last Edited by God1337 on 10/25/2011 02:16 AM

I wonder if we could have a "money" system where you just got deducted 100 deed points for calling him a moron.

I personally don't see how anarchy and communism would work together.

Anarchy, by definition, is against any central government or group of people using force to control a given population.

A commune of people always has some form of hierarchy where the dominate personalities use "consensus" to force their will on the collective.

I don't think anarchy and communism could ever co-exist. It would be easier for democracy and communism to exist together, because they both rely on a central government to operate.

Remember, communism is an economic theory that requires a strong central government.

Anarchy is the absence of a central government.

Last Edited by Shingen on 10/25/2011 02:20 AM

Why? Truth is priceless.

They are all useless, IMO. I already edited my first post to reflect that. What I mean by "useless" is that they contribute nothing of value to society.