Isn't the "Occupy" protests a Worldwide Communist Revolution??

I personally don't see how anarchy and communism would work together.

Anarchy, by definition, is against any central government or group of people using force to control a given population.

A commune of people always has some form of hierarchy where the dominate personalities use "consensus" to force their will on the collective.

I don't think anarchy and communism could ever co-exist. It would be easier for democracy and communism to exist together, because they both rely on a central government to operate.

Remember, communism is an economic theory that requires a strong central government.

Anarchy is the absence of a central government.

They are all useless, IMO. I already edited my first post to reflect that. What I mean by "useless" is that they contribute nothing of value to society.

I don't agree that a hierarchy always has to form by dominating personalities. I believe dominating personalities is a byproduct of the current system.

That's because you're a moron. Dominant Alphas exist in every Mammalian species on the planet.

They are all useless, IMO. I already edited my first post to reflect that. What I mean by "useless" is that they contribute nothing of value to society.

Stateless communism:
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

It is the end goal of Marxism.

I don't agree that a hierarchy always has to form by dominating personalities. I believe dominating personalities is a byproduct of the current system.

Oh I see. You're one of those guys. You are those guys who have to let everyone know there's bad guys out there so we NEED to have a hierarchy, right? Perhaps you know deep down that it would be you who would be the bad guy if the hierarchy is gone.

The movement has and is being funded and fomented by international socialists/Marxists.

Most of the protesters themselves are just useless idiots.

I didn't say anything about needing hierarchy. Hierarchy is simply the natural order of things. Hierarchy exists and will ALWAYS exist. Get used to it, Wallflower.

You already accept some form of hierarchy by believing in 'good guys' and 'bad guys'.

What's with the wallflower shit retard? I've had more wives than you've had girlfriends.

Yeah.. that's another theory. They are all theories.

I'm not a Marxists. I don't think individual freedom is possible without private property.

The stateless society I'm all for, but Marxism and the communist manifesto are alive and well in the current U.S. government and that doesn't seem to working all that great for the average individual.

I'm not saying I'm up for any of it. I'm just up for discussing it in a rational civil way without resorting to name calling like mr alpha male wannabe over here.

A commune of people always has some form of hierarchy where the dominate personalities use "consensus" to force their will on the collective.

What's with the wallflower shit retard? I've had more wives than you've had girlfriends.

eh.. that's the "entertainment" part of the Lunatic Fringe.

Every asylum has it's bullies!

I never take them personally. They are mainly good for a belly laugh!

and i don't mean i was married to them.

What's with the wallflower shit retard? I've had more wives than you've had girlfriends.

and i don't mean i was married to them.


Of course you have, Waldo.

Does that put you higher up the social ladder than me? Make you more dominant, Frances?

Within the current system where your wallflower adhominem holds basic connotation, yes it does. Anything else?

My experience with 'concensus" decision making was that if you didn't go along with the dominant personalities they just formed a smaller group and "consensed" to kick you out.

Anarchist vs statist.

Same war, different generation.

Just so we agree that you are perfectly happy with hierarchy when it suits you...

You still want to go at it with me, eh? ok.

Who said I was happy with having to play the game you subscribe to.

You're playing it.

You could show your displeasure by refusing to participate, since you didn't get to make the rules. Kinda like the dipshits who are shitting in Zucotti Park and refusing to bathe.

I could have, but I chose to engage your disruptive tactic instead.

Disagreeing with The Borg is now a 'disruptive tactic'.

Disagreeing with The Borg is now a 'disruptive tactic'.

Perhaps I should've just DownTwinkled you, but you're right. I'm an agressive, dominant, Alpha type. Always will be.

Twinkles for me.