NATO Preparing For World War 3

That's not much time left. Don't you think they will attack Syria and Iran before turning against Russia? I also wonder why Russia and China did not veto the no-fly-zone in Libya. NATO has destroyed another country. Why didn't they stop them?

The western countries are all bankrupt. A good cause to go to war against a virtual enemy with plentiful natural resources.

Exporting one´s own hyperinflation was the cause of all wars in history.

no freaking neutrality

i want my land back

Yeah, and so much more to gain. War is the highest profitable action for a country like the U.S. To take. Not that I agree with war at all. Just putting that out there

Quick, ship all the remaining Eastern European beauties to London before we run out of time. My housemaid is a stunner, think Milla Jovovich but blonde grrrrrrr. Needless to say I did the interview not the wife lol.

I dont care what you say. If it comes to WW3 RUSSIA is on OUR Side NOT China's.

Deep down we are the same. But chinese, they are a different race.

[link to nsnbc.wordpress.com]

Here is the link to the original article by christof Lehmann...

Russia will be on China's side.
Anyway, who cares. People who take sides are weak.
People who think another nation are a total different race and narrow minded eejits.
They need to learn to live more and actually get out and see the world for what it really is.
Stupid people.
People who say Russia will be on our side just say that because they are just scared that they will be totally fucked.
Wishful thinking. I say dumbasses.

you're a chinese student in England. its plainly obvious.

But you can take it to the bank, Russia will be on our side.

And chinese are a genetically much further away from white/british than the russians are.

Yes they have the Chinese chromosome count so they are human, but they are a sub species.

Libya was not our client. Gaddafi think, that after peace with western Libya have not enemy total. And reject all deals with Russia. He is wrong. And it is error cost live himself Gaddafi.
If NATO attack Sirya then NATO attack Russia. So our forces defend independent Syria. If you would be in war with Sirya you would be in war with Russia. Iran is bording country with Russia. And if NATO attack Iran and hits russian territiry Russia hits NATO countryes. It means WWIII. It is reasons so NATO not attack DPRK for example.

Can i ask why you're country takes such interest in Iran?
And can they be trusted with nuclear technology?

Wow. You sound very narrow minded.
Just because I did not agree with your narrow minded comment you immediately jump to the conclusion that I am apparently a "chinese student" living in the UK. LOL.
Seriously? That really does tell you something about yourself and everybody can see that! No I am not even chinese you idiot. It's no wonder idiots like you always jump to a conclusion without thinking. People like you who cannot hold a decent conversation and debate because you're way of thinking is so one sided.
Russia will always side with China whether you like it or not. Wishful thinking to suggest Russia will side with us.
My advice; go outside your box and start seeing and living the world. Be open minded with everything because it appears you have a lot of hatred towards people of a different nationality and "race". I bet you haven't even been to China have you.
You sound very ignorant and narrow minded with your one sided way of thinking.

Iran is our allied. Iran president sure, that nuclear weaps is not need, so no one not use this weaps during wars. And him not wish pay for building nuclear weapos total. Him prefer building conventional forces. Today read, that US admiral say, that Iran navy more dangerous then hipotetical Iran nuclear weapons. And if Iran continue building today speed, so after 5 years US politic in Persian Gulf collapse. So Iran would have powerful naval forces in region. For example Iran have 19 submarines and 5 midgets + building more 4 submarine. It is more dangerous than Iran can be have 1-2 nuclear weapons in sich money.

Last Edited by Denis_469 on 10/30/2011 07:08 AM

I agree, too many biggots around without passports. I love China and the Chinese. Also love the ex soviet block countries that I have visited. No way I'd want any ills on those peoples or their countries. They cant be blamed for being prudent while the West loaned money to losers through Banks that loaned 40 times what they held in deposits for the purchase of 4 litre gas guzzlers or overvalued property inflated by peoples greed.

Yep you're a chinese living in Britain.
And not once have i suggested hatred towards your race. All i suggested was that Russia will actually be on our side not yours.

So you're the one jumping to conclusions.
There is a thing that i resent about some of the Chinese though.
And that is they insist on killing critically endangerd Tigers( specifically the south china tiger which is now functionally extinct) to grind up their bones to make medicine!

We know the CIA drew the map and founded most of those countries after ww1.

We know Iran was overthrown in 1956 by CIA.

We know Iran's Amhajabber is Illuminati.

The question is, where does Assad stand with the globalists.

I suspect the entire ME revolution is contrived in a plan to relocate Islam into Europe and the USA and Australia. This is further supported by the Illuminati in those countries allowing Islam migrate here.

You leave us no choice, Mongolian bloodscukers. Remember pre - WWII, when Baltic states wanted to stay neutral, but USSR occupied us.

NOWAY!!! China is the future NWO standard module for the rest of the world......US keep exporting many surveillance and censor tech to chinese goverment,cooperating with communism party since 1979 in order to rule the chinese people...why should NATO planning to attack China,after all, they are making profit from chinese labor...

Every move is done against the weakest link, now its the EU, islamic countries and Israel, next it will be the USA, after that...

USSR not occupied Baltic states. If you searh in internet you can find many foto where peoples Baltic countryes wish insert in to USSR. I know, that this information delete from western sources, and you need search in Russian segment in russian linquage.

F.e. see: [link to socialday.ru]
Can read what write in placate?

Last Edited by Denis_469 on 10/30/2011 07:34 AM

New Government lifted bans on the activities of the Communist parties and demonstrations and appointed extraordinary parliamentary elections. In elections held on 14 July in all three States won by Communist Units (unions) of the labour of the people are the only voters admitted to election [3] [43]. According to official figures, turnout in Estonia 84.1%, while the Union of working people was 92.8% of the vote [44] in Lithuania turnout 95.51%, of whom 99.19% voted for the Union of the working people [45] in Latvia 94.8% turnout, the bloc of working people was 97.8% of the votes [46].


Historian Mikelis Rutkowski wrote that in contemporary historiography is generally accepted that "election campaigns in the republics organized by" Moscow "scenario, violated the democratic guarantees of the constitutions of sovereign Baltic States that the elections were not free, not democratic." These assessments are the official State position as in the Baltic countries and in virtually all the leading countries of the world. "[47] Elections in Latvia, according to the information in the. Mangulisa [48], were rigged.


Newly elected parliaments have already 21 — 22 July announced the creation of the Estonian SSR [49] [50] the Latvian SSR and Lithuanian SSR [51] and adopted the Declaration on the entry in the USSR [52] [53] [54]. 3 — 6 August 1940, in accordance with the decisions of the [55] [56] [57] the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, these Republics were taken into the Soviet Union. From Lithuanian, Latvian and Estonian armies were formed [58] Lithuanian (29 7th rifle), Latvian (24-th rifle) and Estonian (22 7th rifle) territorial Corps, included in the PribOVO.
Translate from: [link to ru.wikipedia.org]

So, I think, Russia is working under cover withe USA. If there was somethig bad with Gaddafi, who was a freemason by handshake, they both wanted to get it. I prefer to think, that all money the Soviet Union had, was bunked in the USA and Swiss banks, so,there is no need, to fight the USA really.
Yes, Syria and Iran might be the next countries to be "attacked", only for make an exemple for the folks, because we all are thinking till now in old pictures....the above us, have usually some meters more, and we only are followers.

You need know true information, but now in western is full propaganda and false information about this.

Get a grip! Look what is going on. There are wars everywhere. I have read and agree with(esp. after Libya) that the U.S. and NATO are getting ready to go into resource rich Africa(as in war). TPTB feel China has invested too much there and taken control of too many Nat. Resources(although that could simply be a cover for dividing up all of Africa's NR and killing of millions of already starving people. You decide!

WAR IN AFRICA IS COMING SOON. THOSE POOR PEOPLE.

Last Edited by WOMAN WHO RUNS W/ WOLVES on 10/30/2011 07:56 AM

Is NATO a branch off CIA?

No, but judging form its performance in Libya I would liken it to F-TROOP if you are old enough to remember it.

"The Treaty of Brussels, signed on 17 March 1948 by Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, France, and the United Kingdom, is considered the precursor to the NATO agreement. The treaty and the Soviet Berlin Blockade led to the creation of the Western European Union's Defence Organization in September 1948.[11] However, participation of the United States was thought necessary to counter the military power of the USSR, and talks for a new military alliance began almost immediately.

These talks resulted in the North Atlantic Treaty, signed in Washington, D.C. on 4 April 1949. It included the five Treaty of Brussels states plus the United States, Canada, Portugal, Italy, Norway, Denmark and Iceland. Popular support for the Treaty was not unanimous; some Icelanders commenced a pro-neutrality, anti-membership riot in March 1949.

The members agreed that an armed attack against any one of them in Europe or North America[note 1] would be considered an attack against them all. Consequently they agreed that, if an armed attack occurred, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence, would assist the member being attacked, taking such action as it deemed necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area".

I guess they are like the 3 Musketeers "as in all for one and one for all". How convenient.

Last Edited by WOMAN WHO RUNS W/ WOLVES on 10/30/2011 08:05 AM

Too much to lose for who though?

The richest people would be profiteering during any war most likely.

Wanna buy some gunz? We Swedes are allways nootral ya know.

I don't consider conventional war to include the mass use of biologicals.