Call it a theory. All good theories are predictive in some way. If I'm right then we will see: more volcanic eruptions (even more than we are already seeing), more landslides, more buildings collapsing, more quakes in unusual places like Oklahoma and Virginia, more cities flooding like Bangkok, more tsunamis from underwater landslides. We can all watch and see what happens, see if that prediction holds true or doesn't.

But another indication of the validity, from an entirely different source. The scientists who measure the mass of the reference kilogram (the one locked in a vault that takes two keys to access) are getting erratic results. Boring science stuff, on the surface. But they measure that mass by first taking into account ALL possible affecting tidal forces (the Moon, Jupiter, Mars, Venus, etc). And yet...that's not working now. There is only one explanation for that: they are like us, and those who know what is here have not told THEM about it either, so they have a garbage-in garbage-out problem.

The variation is 50 micrograms, out of a kilogram. In other words, 50 billionths of a kilogram. That sounds like a rather inconsequential amount of mass discrepancy...until you realize that EVERY kilogram on or in the Earth is being affected by that amount, and the Earth masses almost six SEPTILLION kilograms. Spelled out, that's 5,900,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 kilograms. Multiply THAT by 50 micrograms and you have a significant tidal force pulling on the Earth, perhaps enough to throw the Earth itself out of its orbit.

Oh yeah, they have no explanation for the discrepancy. They probably have come to the same conclusion I have, the simplest: there's a new variable in the equation now. But they won't be allowed to SAY that, of course.