DUTCHSINSE — Moon verified to be out of place — ‘Lunar Anomaly’ — Planet X / Tyche / Nemesis would have to be 30AU

I am sure you got the meaning, regardless.

Want to hear a very phony saying that everyone uses, and means nothing? How about "Have a good day?" First of all, a “good day” cannot be given away by anyone. You can wish, or hope someone has a good day, but the meaning “have” promotes the idea you are handing something to someone. If I had twenty dollars, and said, “Have twenty dollars”, you would be very happy with my gift. Right? Have a good day, or have twenty dollars means you are giving, or trying to give something away. Then again, you can’t give away a “day”, since a day is exactly 24 hours. The rest of the day, in this case, would be appropriate, when thinking you could give away a day. Again, the saying is useless, since you cannot personalize “have a good day”, by putting “I” in front of it, like “I hope you have a good day”, or “I wish you a good day”.

The proper saying, and the politically correct way to say this incorrect , worn out, cliché is “I HOPE THE REST OF THE DAY GOES WELL FOR YOU’. If the words “Have a good day” continues to irritate you, with its obvious inaccuracy, when a simple “thank you” would have more than sufficed, as it always has, in the past....you are definitely not alone.

[link to www.washingtonpost.com]

[youtube] [link to www.youtube.com]

Yup.

The Moon is still where it is supposed to be.

Dutchinse and the Zetas wrong again!.



No.

Just sun-lensflare video #3,873.

Hey Astromut Planet X, Nibiru or as you prefer on the horizon, and you silent?

[link to arxiv.org]

Exxxxcellent smithers

I've already dealt with that paper at length. From the paper:
"We must conclude that not even the hypothesis of
Planet X is a viable one to explain the anomalous increase
of the lunar eccentricity of eq. (1)."
They ruled that out as a possibility because it would not only be directly detected long before now, but indirectly as well by its effects on the positions of the other planets.

Dutch is a damn SCAMMER, period.

He is toying with you all in parroting forecasts and stuff other people above him say ... and passing it off as "Haarp" rings etc.

Total scam

Last Edited by KMartin on 11/22/2011 06:52 PM

Clearly you do care because you posted. As far as shill, a that is laughable but that is all you got. Throw out the standard lie in an emotional appeal. Just because I disagree with you does not make me a shill, and you need to look up the word.

How about an internal reflection

so moon is doing something weird but not caused by planet X

is that what the consensus is after 14 pages?

It is on the order of millimeters.

Well, then that makes it official bullshit

Astromut knows his shit.

Nothing here. Get a job. Go to school.

Page has disappeared on the other site as well. My guess, rehab.

I think I must need to get my eyes tested. I've watched a load of these videos and seen loads more pictures that supposedly show undeniable proof of buildings on the Moon, water on Mars, etc. The one thing all of them seem to have in common is that I can never, ever see the thing that is undeniably right there in front of me!

Not once have I been able to make out the conservatory on the Moon. The "path" on the Mars video looks very much like a ridge line to my eyes, the "dome structure" looks like a big rock and the "shore line" looks suspiciously like the edge of a giant impact crater.

I looked at the pics in the facebook link somebody posted with pics of the Moon. One of them supposedly proves the Moon is "crawling with people". Where are the people? Are they invisible people? I don't see the people!

I'm not here to judge anyone or debunk anything. I just want to know why people post pictures and videos of stuff that isn't there, and then say "look! People on the Moon! Undeniable evidence!!", and then when I look, then look harder, then squint a bit, zoom in, squint harder, zoom in again... There's never anything there that looks even remotely like the thing that it is supposed to be undeniable evidence of.

Are my eyes fucked, or what?

ZETAS RIGHT AGAIN

like when the planet x came around in early 2000... or when Nancy Liardeer told people to kill dogs... should we all continue?

No because this is about the MOON not ZETA..

Oh NOooss...

Someone actually contacted Dr. Lorenzo Iorio!

Here's what he had to say;

I know what you mean. Just as soon as I can clean my computer, I will do a little more research, an get better photos. Last night, someone slipped me a Trojan, or something with a Trojan on it, and maintenance, or a new restore point is needed to nurse it back to health.

NASA air brushes most of the evidence that show artificial structures, or signs of life....so fuzzy, or smeared pictures, is what they are trying to achieve, in order to cover up their previous lies. So....stay tuned....I will be back with better, and undeniable evidence.

The title of the thread is "conveniently" misleading. The article deals with the eccentricity of the Moon's orbit and its evolution over time. NOT THE SAME as the claims by retarded threads here that "the Moon is out of place".

This person contacted Dr. Iorio via Email and got a very revealing response. This paper has been severely misinterpreted. Many see the word Nibiru/Planet X/Tyche in a scholarly article and think that is Proof. It is quite the contrary. Dr. Iorio has been researching the possible existence of such a large body and in our solar system by using physics and astrophysics for quite some time now. It's called science. We form a hypothesis (an educated guess) and then test the hypothesis using mathematics/laws, other theories, physics, measurements and empirical evidence (to name a few) before they are even considered to be a any kind of proof.

Unfortunately, his research conclusion was that it would be impossible for such a planet to exist. I have read several of his Thesis's.

Theoretical research is very in- depth and scientific. You must present every amount of possible causes for a certain phenomenon to prove or in this case "Disprove" a theory. In Dr. Iorio's paper he lays out several possible causes EVEN a "HYPOTHETICAL" existence of a Planet X.. IF you actually read his research paper, ***specifically the Abstract and the Conclusions for this particular study, you will CLEARLY see he says it is completely unrealistic. He says it several times in this Theoretical Paper. This study disproves the cause of the slight anomalous eccentricity of the moon. The moon has been studied and known to have a strange orbit. We have been studying this for 2000 years. Lunar Theory explains this. It is not a new phenomenon however the eccentricity happened to be a new finding which is only 3.5mm a year. This has to do with the ORBIT not the rotation of the moon. The moon does not rotate. The claims about the moon tilting is called "Field Rotation".

Why do people fail to comprehend this? Why do people have selective reading? Personally, I do not think most of these people have even read his paper in entirely nor do they have the proper education to comprehend it. Furthermore. it is a VERY complex study with a lot of physics. If you have no clue about any of this I can see how it could be misinterpreted. Please watch the video. Dr. Iorio is VERY UPSET at the false claims people are making about his research. This video clearly shows that.

It really is perplexing to me how people claim to be seekers of truth, think outside of the box and have an open mind when quite frankly they are just the opposite. In order to find evidence of anything we must research UNBIASED. This is how we learn.

Seeing patterns in random data is a common illusion known as apophenia.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]
Some people are "better" at it than others.

And that's why scientists use statistical analysis to actually measure randomness.


IOW it doesn't show what you want it to show hence cover-up.
Classic the-dog-ate-my-evidence excuse.


Promises, promises...



Most of them have never learned how to do that.
Some of them are just stirring the pot, they don't care about truth at all.


Last Edited by Halcyon Dayz, FCD on 11/23/2011 07:06 PM

Bahaha! Nice find.

Nice. I had one of the Youboob idiots just a couple days ago telling me to Call Cornell to talk to Iorio. There is no other way to say it. The people who thing Iorio's paper supports the 'Nibiru' or 'tilted moon' claims are imbeciles.