Evolution has been supported by archaeology, anthropology, paleontology, paleoanthropology and biology. You could say that no discipline, discovery, theory or philosophy of science provides any challenge to evolution. In fact, evolution has been argued to be the most solidly and widely supported theory in science.
That has absolutely nothing to do with it being pushed like a dogma.Now, for example, some random guy comes along and says all you guys must be wrong: all he has to support his claims are some crazy interpretations of some tablets and texts that does not even use the "dictionary" we have found that tells us what they say, nor even address' it.
Then you wonder why people like this are not taken seriously?
Why they are told to GTFO by the scientific community?
I wonder how many scientific papers regarding the origins of coded DNA OP has read?
Does he even understand the theories that attepmt to explain it?
Because he didn't even understand the basic accpeted Evolution position which has nothing to do with origins of life...
Come correct, man...
Excuse me, "and all the guy has is tablets"
Dear sir, I think today, I posted .0001 of direct memory.
And If you are only trying the means of Intervention to credit the existence of ET's let me spare you some time.
I wonder how many scientific papers regarding the origins of coded DNA OP has read?
How about you read mine...
a few hints, if you wish, (speaking) as a
“DNA Deep Throat.” First, look up the huge
discontinuities between humans and the
various apes for: (1) Whole mitochondrial
DNA; (2) genes for the Rh Factor; (3) and
human Y chromosomes, among others.
Regarding #3, I refer you to K.D. Smith’s
1987 study titled “Repeated DNA sequences
of the human Y chromosome.” It says “Most
human Y chromosome sequences thus far
examined do not have homologues [same
relative position or structure] on the Y
chromosomes of other primates.”
Human female X chromosomes do look
somewhat apelike, but not the male’s Y.
This means that if humans are a crossbred
species, the cross had to be between a
female ape-like creature (i.e, “creature of
Earth”) and a male being from elsewhere.
What the evolutionists do is find certain
genes which look very similar between man
and ape, then they make a “tree of descent”
while ignoring those huge impassable
abysses of difference elsewhere.
Also, by certain methods of DNA dating, one
can tell that numerous genes have been
recently added to the human genome.
If workers in my field were to say such
things openly, we would be ostracized and
forced to live in a tent. Any work along
these lines would be rejected without any
form of appeal. So what can we do?
Sincerely,
DNA Deep Throat
To make a hybrid creature, a female species of Earth with 48 and a species with elsewhere with 46.
They just went to the second chromosome and fused two homologues together to take only one space.
MY ENTIRE DNA analysis shall bore alot of people. So please let me stick with the bittersweet bigfeetsies for the next couple days. Its simpler to understand.
