Time travel, space and diamonds. Warning: This is INTENSE.

Time is not linear, whether vertical or horizontal. It is spherical, no beginning, no end.

great stuff OP

You should research more and stop saying ignorant things... I see you can't even imagine that what we see in movies are so close from the Truth."Hidden in plain sight" haven't you heard that expression? And why it is said? Blind sheeps don't see that.Yet.

;-)

From our perspective its like being in a diamond. That is also why in meditation we will see the crystal cities, etc.

Not from theres.

Everything upgrades. All energies have a teleos purpose.

All intellects upgrade when they reach the possibilities of higher levels too.

From a higher up point of view, the void of space, filled within infinite energy waves is an ocean.

And its filled with critters including manta rays.

Stars are diamonds. Mirrors reflecting Light from Beyond.

An Onion would be a better point of reference then a diamond.

LOL I can say...yes.

On the physical level, there are two dimensions of time, not just the fourth dimension your physicists know of. The first dimension of time is what we perceive as the passage of time along a timeline. The second dimension of time is what we
call metatime, which contains all of the timelines. Basically you can picture time as being on a flat sheet. On the sheet are drawn all of the timelines with their many
branches.

As metatime "passes", the various timelines are stiched together into a single timeline according to the precursor events that point to the timeline offshoots. The more events relevant to my timeline whose occurrence we are able to achieve, the more dominant our outcome will be in the final timeline.

I don't know if any of that was understandable, but it's the only way I can think of to explain it.

Thread: A time traveler just visited us? This is the resume I made for you.

I understand what you are saying OP, but are you sure that the 5th dimension is the outer limit? what about the 6th dimension? how does the 5th look to the 6th? or the 6th to the 7th? This continues to the 10th dimension (look up on youtube if you wish) which is the final dimension

With your level of writing accomplishment and thought process, you could write about sand flees as 5D sentient beings from Alpha Centauri and we'd be left scrathing our noggins as if G_d smacked.

Good Job Sifu.

Yes. The world and it's people are going through huge change. Those who have an enlightened consciousness/frequency will survive these changes. The sun will make the world brand new and many galactic friends will enlighten us and work with us into a utopian new age.

The sun, moon, stars are human's time, as is getting old, but, of course GOD can do anything

Many years ago (40 +) I endeavored to ascertain from the Scriptures alone as to how the universe was made up and how it is maintained. I took a very simple step: I considered NOTHING as far a spiritual was concerned and only considered the physical aspects of what was written in scripture. What I found has been posted by me for years (on Timetravel Institute and also here on Godlike.

The conclusion that I came up with several years ago shows that the Scriptures, themselves, prove that there are at least 10 dimensions and quite possibly eleven. The recent expressions of the Calibi-Yau theory (presently being experimented on at the LHC) came up with the exact conclusions as I had and even used the exact same words that I had in stating how difficult it was to PERCEIVE them with our limited senses.

I have been saying for years (from the Scriptures) that that the Standard Model is flawed on a very basic level. The entire theory depends on the speed limit of light at 186,282 mps. Since every single point in time/space is a roiling/broiling 11 dimensional unity, the measurements we use for light travel simply do not apply anymore. The recent discovery of a faster-than-light nutrino has set the entire Standard Model on its head. The very age of the universe is now at issue. If you can picture (again a perceptive problem) a photon traveling through this incredibly energetic space/time/matter matrix, it would be tossed to and fro and would be nearly impossible to travel in a straight line (in a supposed "vacuum"). Vacuum is nearly universally accepted as a "static", in-place system. In fact, it is created by the actions of all the elements in Calabi Yau spaces.

With this understanding (if we can ever truly "understand" this stuff), distances in space and the mass of objects as well as the time involved can very well PROVE that the universe is no more than several thousands of years old (considering that quantum entanglement is valid--and science says it is). Furthermore, it is possible (and I believe probable), that the objects in space are far closer than we have come to believe--or even further than we can imagine. In space, a straight line simple does not exist--not even at quantum levels. ALL of our measurements fail at the level of Calabai Yau spaces. Wouldn't it be the most ironic of things if it was actually FAITH that eventually allows us to navigate Calabi Yau Spaces. I know the new-age garbage tries to convince us that we can actually mold our world. I believe that the Scriptures give us EVERYTHING we need to not only travel in space (and time), but shows us the PHYSICAL systems; and FAITH (which is swallowed up in victory) is the MEANS by which we can traverse space/time without ever having to cross the gulf. The entire UFO phenomenon has this at its very basic understanding: that aliens somehow "manipulate" their craft by mind control. The Scriptures have a craft also. I've studied it for many years. Don't believe it? It is outlined cubit by cubit in the book of Ezekiel and throughout the rest of the Scriptures.

The truth of the matter is far stranger than any fiction. Even the innocuous little statement "Go ye out to meet Him", when taken in context, can only mean to me that we are to go out into SPACE to meet Him who is "TAMID". This is a Jewish word which means "perpetual" and involves the spiritualized concept of Jesus's perpetual presentation of His Blood to the Father (in the "Sanctuary" in heaven).

Everything is now on the table. The Standard Model is dead. We need to rethink EVERYTHING. There is no "HALL OF RECORDS" with the history of the world and all of its technology. It is hiding in plain sight. It's called The Holy Bible. All the technology is in there. The faith system needed to manipulate it is in there. The maps of the coordinate systems of space/time are in there. The FACTS of toroid shapes in energy systems is in there. The vortexes of zero-point energies is in there. It is the greatest science book I have ever read. Try doing as I have done. Leave out everything spiritual and only seek the physical. It's all there. I am STILL learning good science in there. The scriptures tell us to "do not despise the day of small things". The study of subatomic structures takes us into the realm of Biblical understanding. Perhaps this is the way it was intended for us all along. "When I was a child, I spake as a child". This is definitely the "growing pains" that the Scriptures speak of. We need to experience "woes". In the end, we "overcome" our shortcomings.

The Observer - look in the mirror.
Who's looking?
The Observer


If you had even a basic knowledge of quantum physics, you would understand the observer - it is a basic tenet. Quantum physics is proving the existence of God as the Observer.

If you truly want to understand your question, you have to start educating yourself in quantum physics.

SO: WE ARE GOD experiencing Him/Herself. WE ARE a reflexion of GOD. We are GOD.WE ARE ONE.
Long before quantum physics, I reached to that conclusion myself.But I'm glad quantum physics is the "proof" scientific atheists are looking for,if we can put it that way ;-) Nothing exists by chance.

[link to imaginingthetenthdimension.blogspot.com]

Great observation. :)

Thank You!

I'm glad this got so much conversation going. If there was any goal here, it was to start a conversation.

I really enjoyed reading your thoughts.
Here is a video I made last year, if you're interested.
You have a very good grasp on things, nice thread.

thanks man

good look on that video too

"Heya Ren1999!

You are John Titor, aren't you? Or did you just pretend that you were John?"

Truth is subjective. I am. To others I am not.

LOL what a loon!

Going to attempt to respond to criticism:



Time wasn't the sole focus of this write-up, but it certainly was discussed.



No u!



The observer which I describe is both theoretical and, in the image I put forward, real. If something exists, it is possible to be observed, perhaps not in the traditional sense, but if it's there, it can be perceived (just maybe not by us due to sensory limitations). The observer is simply the idea of looking at existence as a whole. If you could somehow have the power to see everything in existence, including every timeline, you'd likely not see it in the form of a million individual timelines, it would be zoomed out -- you'd see it as one whole object, one object that also doubles as something which symbolically represents all contained within.

When you look at someone, you aren't seeing cells. You aren't seeing atoms or neutrinos, or an arm bone -- you are seeing a person. All these things exist, but from your objective (whole) perspective, you see one person, one body, representing the overall state of everything contained within. In terms of scale, we're all universes of "stuff" walking around, yet somehow we manage to perceive the entire picture without anyone resorting to be claimed "godlike". Why is it so ridiculous that this scale would not continue into grander and grander levels?



In my original unedited post I explained how I used God as an allegory for the imagery I was trying to get across and I explained why as well. I thought it might be a bit much, but maybe I should've left it in : P

Anyways. The point is I wasn't taking a stance on God one way or the other. God was just used as an idea. To us, someone who could perceive the entire universe with ease would be considered Godlike. That doesn't make that being God, but for us, yes. It's all not literal, it's more just in terms of what the term "God" would mean in terms of perspective.



I'll check it out!



Thanks. It's good to have a reminder like this. I don't place THAT much weight in any of this (this=opinions on existence)....it's all theory/debate/discussion. Beyond that, I try not to dwell on it. But in it's own place, it's the highest importance.



I'll take a look.




The if was just because I was trying to apply my logic and mindset to the notion of time travel. I'm using time travel as a platform to get me thinking, not in a manner of uncertainty.

Yes, this is "purely speculative imagination", as is EVERYTHING THAT ANYONE ANYWHERE EVER says, thinks, does...some of this speculation just agrees with the populous more than the rest of the speculation. I'm not really a sci-fi geek. I'm more of a culture geek in general.



LOL good plan!

On my response I was referring to the observer in my example. Refer to this answer for a much better more general definition. Thank you

where are the other FOUR paragraphs??

you big tease, I know many things about diamonds, and XL structure is pure in diamond because it's ONE thing, carbon, and a cubic structure of 13 planes, of 'existence, ' if you will. Isomorphic. Diamond and Graphite are exact in composition, but not in structure.

They used to test diamond WAY back in the day by smacking them with a hammer, and the ones that didn't break were thought to be real, diamond is hard, but NOT tough, Jade is the toughest mineral on earth. We would not be here if not for Jade, and the tools it allowed. Not many people know that. Jade is made in the same manner felt is, so there you go. Know you know the rest of the story.

Four paragraphs please, why tease us with the lack of the story? sheesh.

actually write six, and then you'll be sure not to leave anything out. I can't wait.

LOL that was super randomly informative. Thanks for that. In terms of the 'other writings', it was more of a tangent, off-topic, into another topic entirely in addition to just not being necessary.