Funny thing about no-money people, the more they debate the more illogical their ideas are shown to be.
You claim some resources are infinite. Ha! None are.
You claim people will 'just work' but show no evidence of that ever happening
There will be other motivation??? What is it?
Money causes crime? Like rape? Theft? Taking your free food is easier (better) than me going to get my own.
Everything will be free? Then it must be rationed. A money system does that already, things are rationed by price.
Quoting: Real list no i said food was infinite as we can grow an abundant amount given newer tech...sure we cant put a "grow tower" on every surface of the land and create a world sized ball of food...thats not what im saying...im saying we can create an abundance that is more than enough for everyone therefor making it an infinite amount.
ive given you the different incentive...its that everyone is fed...everyone is educated...everyone is clothed...sheltered ect. and the evidence of people just working...go down to your local soup kitchen ask why those people are volunteering. money doesnt ration anything it says i have more therefor i can get more and you who have less can scrape the scum off my boot and hope to get a spare no gmo nutrient off it.
Infinate means no limit. Words have meanings. We can't debate if we make up our own definations.
Yes, we can grow eneough for the current population. And money exist to fund (motivate0 people to produce it. Convince enough people to contribute money to a food suppling charity, the charity will offer the money for food, farmers will be motivated to grow it. Simple. It's not lack of money, it's lack of charity. Other factors too, politics for one.
Do you remember hurrican Katrina and the Joplin Ms tornado? Katrine wiped out a section of a city, Joplin was mostly destroyed. Joplin happened last year and is well on it's way to recovery, NOLA is still a mess. Why? Because the people of Joplin took action, they even turned away government help. The people of NOLA could have done their own cleanup, or tried to anyway.
The difference is how the people had been taught to live. NOLA is a place where it's easy to be poor, life's necessities are easy to come by. Free for the most part. Just like the world you want. Joplin folks earned their own way, very little was 'free' to them.
When people have their need met with little or no effort they tend to do LESS, when they earn their own way they tend to do MORE.
Which way helps the most people? Which way offers more assurance that some will continue working hard to meet mankind's needs?
