You Are Here. You Have Found You.

Hey, Bea. I did not realize you were there while I was writing that last post. Eh. Eris, not just the mythology, but the actual dwarf planet as a trans-Neptunian object, has remained heavily in the forethought in the back of my mind since some of our exchanges.

Did you see my question above about could you do a Debra Silverman type vid for Eris? I was joking but not really, because the planetary influence does seem all jumbled up in that Sagittarius video.

The bolded hits me as quantum entanglement, but the line of thought I am feeling out with that alignment in March is something about the ability for more people to see pattern recognition. Or something like that. I am still feeling this out.

Last Edited by A Muse Me on 01/03/2013 10:45 PM

Changing this one as well.





This particular form of the hand is the proposed astrological symbol for Eris.

Yes. It was the link I was using from where the quote came from I suppose.

The two posts were related.

Can I wear my raccoon toboggan, lol? Quantum entanglement is spooky action, that once you've come into contact you continue to influence at a distance. This applies to minute particles as well as neurons inside the gray. It's PART of what I'm talking about, but not the entirety. This starts from the inside out, so it would be more the micro affecting the macro, like the window of macro influencing the micro is closing and the reverse is becoming true. Hmm, actually, it's ALWAYS been true. In typical cryptic fashion, explaining that further seems far too complicated. It all comes from US and not the other way around, methinks we're looking at things bassackwards in many cases.

Last Edited by Bea Nameless on 01/03/2013 11:04 PM

Well, of course, silly, you can wear the raccoon toboggan. Or better yet some of those cat ears that work on neurons straight from the brainwaves. Some Japanese company came up with them. That would be quite a hoot for Eris in relation to picking up hidden frequency. Eh? Was right there in the gray matter all along.

I think you get me in relation to this line of thought. I resonate with the grey from within. Especially picking up the frequency picking up the Hindu Mudras though I were never trained in them.

My concern. Yes, concern in regards to this coming March alignment where Eris is in the mix perhaps revealing some of her hidden, is the sensation of perceiving pattern recognition, some opening portal or something for the masses.

It is one thing for those of us who have remembered the ability since birth. I suppose I am speculating on latent potentiality at species level. As was brought up last week or so. The concept of speciation.

But we all know I am not a doomer, so more in the wanting to help define language for a probability that could manifest for more people.

Look at it this way, turning outside in and inside out, bringing inner space to outer space and relegating outer space to inner space. Reconciling the opposites into an new thing entirely, bringing the dreaming into the waking. Like an hour glass flipping. Sentence fragments, bad writer, lol.

Fits with the proposed symbol for Eris being that of mathematical contradiction as I posted the link to somewhere back there. The same time period you were posting something about dimensional math as well. Curious, and consciences of linguistics, form symbols, to written. to math, to binary, to vibration into voice supposedly being our last evolution, some speciation this way does come. Polarity shift of the mind into language for pattern recognition? Next evolution?

Years of writer's indoctrination screaming, "SHOW not tell." The ability to transfer meaning to the mind of another seems a logical next step in communications. Our major downfall seems to be the lack of ability to communicate shades of meaning, words are lacking when it comes to actually describing concepts and symbols that often have a myriad of meanings. That bringing of the inside out would solve a helluva lot of problems that hinder growth in every arena by preventing miscommunication, and with it dishonesty and obfuscation. And too, much of what we see as dishonesty and obfuscation isn't actually either, it's reality tunnels colliding. Words mean different things to different people, no two people have the same exact set of communication tools. So what happens is "static" that gets in the way "frequency." We do most of the mangling trying to interpret what others are saying, seeing as how we're limited by our own tool sets.

Yes. A concern I have always shared. In my fish-eye view, why seeking information from within, or what I once referenced as the primordial soup, was why I never sought info from the astral. The static. The white space.

‘Nite. Thanks for the stimulation. The chat.

And a bonan vesperon to you, too :) (On a side note, I almost wish we used Esperanto instead of English, only because "How are you?" translates to "Kiel vi fartas?" and I could laugh all day at fart jokes while others are exchanging pleasantries. Must look up how to say "fart" in Esperanto, lol.)

Interesting. I missed this post. What you did there. Outside looking in view reminds me of entropy. A closed system.

See what I did here, lol?

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Oh, what the hell. May as well say it aloud. I missed you so much. Freaking goodnight again. And a little Muse Nite music.



[link to www.youtube.com]

Hey, it is a repeat from page 1. What can I say. Effortless indeed: Some might interpret as lazy to do such a shameless cut and paste.

Naw, sometimes simple is best. If I'd broke it down, you'd have taken my view instead of your own. Better sometimes to prevent tainted communication by presenting a nudge without the bias of my own perspective. Sometimes I say a lot, sometimes I say a little. But I will throw this selection down as well for your consideration... Keeping in mind, of course, that our own neural networks are made up of quantum goodness, as are all things ;)

[link to arstechnica.com]

[link to www.csiro.au]

Our Galaxy's "geysers" are towers of power

Conscientiousness meet Hyperconscientiousness.

Meticulous usage of language in that piece.

I was aware, as you put it, that was a word you had not met before.

My awareness began some five months before when I asked that question.

And your answer let me know alienation was not just a theory. It was built right into the theory of structural functionalism.

What You Won't Do For Love



[link to www.youtube.com]

I would like to hear more about this.

Hey, Fancy. I am still feeling it out and posting as furthering thoughts arise. I do intend to continue processing this as we get closer to the 3-10-2013 alignment. Or the 310-2-013 alignment as I noted it on previous pages. If you have any specific questions now about what I have posted already, let me know. Basically, the documentary on frequency that I posted a while back opened up this line of thought.

My guy’s name was Charlie. Yes. Charlie Brown. My dearest and most true 18 year companion.

Last Edited by A Muse Me on 01/04/2013 06:46 PM

My most precious Charlie Brown. White Feather has met him.

My roommate thinks I should change my User Name to Chocolate Pussy to match my avatar. I think not. But he did get a most hearty . But then again he knew Charlie too.

Last Edited by A Muse Me on 01/04/2013 06:56 PM