glitch appears on SOHO image prior to Comet Lovejoys perehelion | |
Daersoulkeeper User ID: 1159767 United States 12/21/2011 10:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | this... seriously dude i bet you see aliens in the clouds and think its real the real reason most people on this planet are the most ignorant gullible people that have ever lived is a little thing called the TELL-LIE-VISION television when you watch it, you put the I(you) in television and you get tel(i)evision tell lie vision |
RTS REDUX (OP) User ID: 1388392 United States 12/21/2011 10:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Artlicious User ID: 7395118 United States 12/21/2011 10:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 658249 Netherlands 12/21/2011 11:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
closing eyes User ID: 1530062 United States 12/21/2011 11:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Boy Genius User ID: 1223916 United States 12/21/2011 12:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 922113 United States 12/21/2011 12:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It appears to be a data transmission error that they filled in with data from a previous point in time. Here's JPG I converted from the raw unprocessed fits file (the only alteration I made was to the histogram levels for down-conversion to an 8 bit image): [link to i319.photobucket.com] Always, always check the raw original files. Besides, the automated processing frequently does a poor job of handling the levels (note the areas that are blown-out and completely white in the OP image). You can get more detail out of the raw fits files by adjusting the levels yourself. Last Edited by Astromut on 12/21/2011 12:19 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1410244 United States 12/21/2011 12:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I wouldn't doubt it.. someone on another thread called Lovejoy the arrow of Sagittarius.. I looked into that and Sagittarius is located at the galactic center of the Milky Way which is where the famous WOW! signal emanated from [link to en.wikipedia.org] What is this about Sagittarius? It sounds interesting |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1410244 United States 12/21/2011 12:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It appears to be a data transmission error that they filled in with data from a previous point in time. Here's JPG I converted from the raw unprocessed fits file (the only alteration I made was to the histogram levels for down-conversion to an 8 bit image): Quoting: Astromut [link to i319.photobucket.com] Always, always check the raw original files. Besides, the automated processing frequently does a poor job of handling the levels. You can get more detail out of the raw fits files by adjusting the levels yourself. Thanks Astromut, you are the best |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1457794 United States 12/21/2011 12:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Korzen User ID: 1174378 United States 12/21/2011 12:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wouldn't you have to have a heavy spinning object to create a wormhole? Perhaps the mass created by generating a large wormhole can only be contained by a large mass object ie a sun. So an alien from another solar system trying to create a wormhole to this solar system would have to use the sun somehow. |
RTS REDUX (OP) User ID: 1388392 United States 12/21/2011 12:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I wouldn't doubt it.. someone on another thread called Lovejoy the arrow of Sagittarius.. I looked into that and Sagittarius is located at the galactic center of the Milky Way which is where the famous WOW! signal emanated from [link to en.wikipedia.org] What is this about Sagittarius? It sounds interesting He never did explain what he meant by that but he seemed to know what he was talking about judging by his previous post on that thread.. here's his post and my response back to him..you have fill in the blanks yourself regarding the meaning NiFe core, high rotational speed and great elmag. field. Aiming only 5 degrees under ecliptic with at least 10x speed. AND CERTAINLY - NO COMET - the arrow of Sagittarius. Wow that's quite a claim..I've been trying to figure out what you mean by that and haven't had much luck yet.. very interesting theory edit to add: I think it's interesting that Sagittarius is located in the Galactic Center of the Milky way and there are sites out there that associate it with 2012 [...]With 22 stars in this constellation known to have planets, Sagittarius has more known planetary host stars than any other constellation. ..The Milky Way is at its densest near Sagittarius, as this is where the galactic center lies ..Sagittarius A*, is associated with a supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy. [link to en.wikipedia.org] the 'WOW! signal' originated from Sagittarius.. [link to en.wikipedia.org] I'm still not sure what you mean by the Arrow of Sagittarius I'm aware that in the picture below it resembles an arrow..so I'm assuming that you consider it to be some sort of spacecraft? Thread: Comet Lovejoy survives perihelion! (Page 11) Last Edited by RTS REDUX on 12/21/2011 12:38 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7497731 United States 12/21/2011 12:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7496731 United Kingdom 12/21/2011 12:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I changed the title to something a little more generic (for now) since it was attracting the one star bandits..if this is legit I think it deserves serious discussion these things are simply digital errors. I love that we have soho and internet, but some people who have not watched, create issues where they do not exist. so you're claiming that couldn't possibly be a 'sign' of some sort? It is a sign you are an idiot! |
<Path> User ID: 774195 United States 12/21/2011 12:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Isn't it mind boggling the number of people who hang out on a conspiracy forum - only to parrot scientific 'facts'? Nice catch OP. 5 stars for an observant and open minded brother. The dreamer and the dream One awakens inside the other Rediscovering universal truths |
meat and taters User ID: 1522192 United States 12/21/2011 12:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It appears to be a data transmission error that they filled in with data from a previous point in time. Here's JPG I converted from the raw unprocessed fits file (the only alteration I made was to the histogram levels for down-conversion to an 8 bit image): Quoting: Astromut [link to i319.photobucket.com] Always, always check the raw original files. Besides, the automated processing frequently does a poor job of handling the levels (note the areas that are blown-out and completely white in the OP image). You can get more detail out of the raw fits files by adjusting the levels yourself. so if the raw data has this door shaped hole in it, why should we assume its a transmission error? I mean maybe it is, but then again, maybe its not. I consider myself to be a very conservative christian but Im tellin ya, God told me the sun is hollow. Hard to be conservative when you serve a God who is so weird. Last Edited by discombooberated on 12/21/2011 12:57 PM Acts 3:21 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7497731 United States 12/21/2011 12:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It appears to be a data transmission error that they filled in with data from a previous point in time. Here's JPG I converted from the raw unprocessed fits file (the only alteration I made was to the histogram levels for down-conversion to an 8 bit image): Quoting: Astromut [link to i319.photobucket.com] Always, always check the raw original files. Besides, the automated processing frequently does a poor job of handling the levels (note the areas that are blown-out and completely white in the OP image). You can get more detail out of the raw fits files by adjusting the levels yourself. Your image doesn't look like the original. The locations are not the same and the size is not proportionate with the original. Nice try. |
Skyeford User ID: 3177816 United States 12/21/2011 01:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 12/21/2011 01:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It appears to be a data transmission error that they filled in with data from a previous point in time. Here's JPG I converted from the raw unprocessed fits file (the only alteration I made was to the histogram levels for down-conversion to an 8 bit image): Quoting: Astromut [link to i319.photobucket.com] Always, always check the raw original files. Besides, the automated processing frequently does a poor job of handling the levels (note the areas that are blown-out and completely white in the OP image). You can get more detail out of the raw fits files by adjusting the levels yourself. Your image doesn't look like the original. The locations are not the same and the size is not proportionate with the original. Nice try. It is a direct JPG conversion from the raw original file. Anyone can download the original and see for themselves: [link to umbra.nascom.nasa.gov] You lie. |
RedlicoriceRedux User ID: 1284555 Canada 12/21/2011 01:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4741454 Australia 12/21/2011 01:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "A compression artifact (or artefact) is a noticeable distortion of media (including images, audio, and video) caused by the application of lossy data compression." |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 12/21/2011 01:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It appears to be a data transmission error that they filled in with data from a previous point in time. Here's JPG I converted from the raw unprocessed fits file (the only alteration I made was to the histogram levels for down-conversion to an 8 bit image): Quoting: Astromut [link to i319.photobucket.com] Always, always check the raw original files. Besides, the automated processing frequently does a poor job of handling the levels (note the areas that are blown-out and completely white in the OP image). You can get more detail out of the raw fits files by adjusting the levels yourself. Your image doesn't look like the original. The locations are not the same and the size is not proportionate with the original. Nice try. It is a direct JPG conversion from the raw original file. Anyone can download the original and see for themselves: [link to umbra.nascom.nasa.gov] You lie. Just in case anyone's too lazy to fill out the form, here's a link to it. It's the only file in this FTP directory: ftp://umbra.nascom.nasa.gov/soho/eit/data/web/astronut/ As you can see, my JPG is a direct conversion of the original image, all I did was adjust the histogram levels to bring it into a reasonable range for an 8 bit image without blowing anything out. |
RedlicoriceRedux User ID: 1284555 Canada 12/21/2011 01:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 12/21/2011 01:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It appears to be a data transmission error that they filled in with data from a previous point in time. Here's JPG I converted from the raw unprocessed fits file (the only alteration I made was to the histogram levels for down-conversion to an 8 bit image): Quoting: Astromut [link to i319.photobucket.com] Always, always check the raw original files. Besides, the automated processing frequently does a poor job of handling the levels (note the areas that are blown-out and completely white in the OP image). You can get more detail out of the raw fits files by adjusting the levels yourself. so if the raw data has this door shaped hole in it, why should we assume its a transmission error? I mean maybe it is, but then again, maybe its not. It's a transmission error, there's literally no data there. If it were true data you'd at least have some kind of data there from the read noise of the chip and from the background light level of the sun (even if there were a door-shaped pitch black hole in the sun at that spot you'd still have a background light level from the rest of the sun surrounding it, ie, glare). I consider myself to be a very conservative christian but Im tellin ya, God told me the sun is hollow. Hard to be conservative when you serve a God who is so weird. Quoting: meatMaybe you should consider seeking some help. The sun is not hollow, it's moment of inertia is about 0.059, completely incompatible with the claim that it's hollow. A hollow sphere would have a moment of inertia of about 0.66 and a sphere of uniform solid density would have a moment of inertia of about 0.4. 0.059 indicates it's anything but hollow and that the core is denser than the outer layers. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7367664 Australia 12/21/2011 01:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have lots of past 'experience' with synchronicity so yea I guess you could say I'm sort of hypersensitive to seeing 'signs' for what it's worth.. never saw aliens in the clouds though Well don't let us stop you! Go, go now, and look at some clouds. Report back ASAP with new findings of interstellar beings in the water vapour encircling the planet Earth. It's as good as a door in the sun... crikey.. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1267833 Netherlands 12/21/2011 01:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov] Picrure 3 there is the fucking door.. [link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov] Picture 4 and then it's gone, yeah sure a door in the sun.. [link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov] |
RTS REDUX (OP) User ID: 1388392 United States 12/21/2011 01:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It appears to be a data transmission error that they filled in with data from a previous point in time. Here's JPG I converted from the raw unprocessed fits file (the only alteration I made was to the histogram levels for down-conversion to an 8 bit image): Quoting: Astromut [link to i319.photobucket.com] Always, always check the raw original files. Besides, the automated processing frequently does a poor job of handling the levels (note the areas that are blown-out and completely white in the OP image). You can get more detail out of the raw fits files by adjusting the levels yourself. Your image doesn't look like the original. The locations are not the same and the size is not proportionate with the original. Nice try. It is a direct JPG conversion from the raw original file. Anyone can download the original and see for themselves: [link to umbra.nascom.nasa.gov] You lie. Just in case anyone's too lazy to fill out the form, here's a link to it. It's the only file in this FTP directory: ftp://umbra.nascom.nasa.gov/soho/eit/data/web/astronut/ As you can see, my JPG is a direct conversion of the original image, all I did was adjust the histogram levels to bring it into a reasonable range for an 8 bit image without blowing anything out. so in your opinion was it 1. done deliberately 2. done accidentally 3. computer error 4. something else if I didn't phrase that exactly right forgive my ignorance..as you know I'm not that technically minded.. I'm just curious as to what ultimately caused the glitch in your opinion thanks in advance |
<Path> User ID: 774195 United States 12/21/2011 01:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Maybe it was the same door this guy leaped out of. Thread: Giant 'Firecat' Leaps Out of The Sun The dreamer and the dream One awakens inside the other Rediscovering universal truths |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7427801 United Kingdom 12/21/2011 01:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6022566 United States 12/21/2011 01:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |