Cancer, the key to immortality. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3758944 United States 12/21/2011 04:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Loose Canon User ID: 1500511 Australia 12/21/2011 04:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Plasmare (OP) User ID: 1066790 Australia 12/21/2011 04:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If we could get around the need for some bodily systems to work as intended this would make perfect sense Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3758944 Make a cancer to infuse the blood with oxygen and remove waste is one example one fault/characteristic of cancer is unchecked growth otherwise sounds good op Researchers with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)'s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab), through a combination of time-lapse live imaging and mathematical modeling of a special line of human breast cells, have found evidence to suggest that for low dose levels of ionizing radiation, cancer risks may not be directly proportional to dose. This contradicts the standard model for predicting biological damage from ionizing radiation - the linear-no-threshold hypothesis or LNT - which holds that risk is directly proportional to dose at all levels of irradiation. "Our data show that at lower doses of ionizing radiation, DNA repair mechanisms work much better than at higher doses," says Mina Bissell, a world-renowned breast cancer researcher with Berkeley Lab's Life Sciences Division. "This non-linear DNA damage response casts doubt on the general assumption that any amount of ionizing radiation is harmful and additive." [link to medicalxpress.com] If you take this new finding into consideration, higher doses of ionizing radiation actually help DNA repair but large doses can cause much damage and with every repair, their is a chance that something goes wrong and the process is somehow disrupted and causes cancer. Are there people out there who are trying to use cancer to become immortal? Sounds like a bad hollywood movie. |
Plasmare (OP) User ID: 1066790 Australia 12/21/2011 04:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thanks, getting bored of the same old crap being posted here, so I thought I'd introduce something new and interesting. I only found out about the HeLa cells from a pinned post here and looked into it, there is much research going into cancer but not for the reasons people believe. Next time you donate to a cancer foundation wouldn't you like to know if that is going to research for curing cancer rather than making some rich old guy immortal? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3758944 United States 12/21/2011 05:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If we could get around the need for some bodily systems to work as intended this would make perfect sense Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3758944 Make a cancer to infuse the blood with oxygen and remove waste is one example one fault/characteristic of cancer is unchecked growth otherwise sounds good op Researchers with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)'s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab), through a combination of time-lapse live imaging and mathematical modeling of a special line of human breast cells, have found evidence to suggest that for low dose levels of ionizing radiation, cancer risks may not be directly proportional to dose. This contradicts the standard model for predicting biological damage from ionizing radiation - the linear-no-threshold hypothesis or LNT - which holds that risk is directly proportional to dose at all levels of irradiation. "Our data show that at lower doses of ionizing radiation, DNA repair mechanisms work much better than at higher doses," says Mina Bissell, a world-renowned breast cancer researcher with Berkeley Lab's Life Sciences Division. "This non-linear DNA damage response casts doubt on the general assumption that any amount of ionizing radiation is harmful and additive." [link to medicalxpress.com] If you take this new finding into consideration, higher doses of ionizing radiation actually help DNA repair but large doses can cause much damage and with every repair, their is a chance that something goes wrong and the process is somehow disrupted and causes cancer. Are there people out there who are trying to use cancer to become immortal? Sounds like a bad hollywood movie. This would explain how modern treatments contribute to cancer growth.. If only the thing that makes cancer so incessant could be combined with the good things about stem cells..your premiss is a good one! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1828456 United States 12/21/2011 05:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What if cancer research was not about curing cancer but to figure out how to use cancer to become immortal? Quoting: Plasmare So how were scientists able to make cells immortal? The secret to producing cell immortality lay in their realizing that all cells possess a gene, known as the telomerase gene, which can add DNA back to the tip of telomeres, restoring them to their original youthful length. In almost all cells this gene is turned off early in development, rendered permanently inactive in an event that commits that cell to eventual sure death. This sad decision is a very necessary one, as it protects the adult human body from developing tumors whenever a cell's division controls are disabled. Only when this added protection against runaway growth is also lost, the switch stopping production of telomerase turned back "ON," can a cell proceed beyond a few divisions and become a cancer cell. Cancer cells are immortal because they produce telomerase. In the human body, only two kinds of body cells are immortal, able to divide without limit. Cancer cells are one. The other kind of immortal cell is the embryonic stem cell. [link to txtwriter.com] "Embryonic stem cells, as their name suggests, are derived from embryos. Most embryonic stem cells are derived from embryos that develop from eggs that have been fertilized in vitro—in an in vitro fertilization clinic—and then donated for research purposes with informed consent of the donors. They are not derived from eggs fertilized in a woman's body." [link to stemcells.nih.gov] There's something fascinating and yet disgusting about these immortal cells scientists have been using for decades now from the famous HeLa cells; A HeLa cell (also Hela or hela cell) is a cell type in an immortal cell line used in scientific research. It is the oldest and most commonly used human cell line.[1] The line was derived from cervical cancer cells taken on February 8, 1951[2] from Henrietta Lacks, a patient who eventually died of her cancer on October 4, 1951. The cell line was found to be remarkably durable and prolific as illustrated by its contamination of many other cell lines used in research. [link to en.wikipedia.org] to being able to order frozen immortal cancer cells online; [link to www.atcc.org] In society cancer, like nuclear radiation, is seen to be scary, frightening and something people never should discuss out of fear of getting it or something ridiculous and there isn't much out there in the way of public information as to the nature of cancer itself. There's a lot of money going into cancer research and no one has managed "cure" it but maybe that is not the goal. Human cells perform apoptosis (cell suicide) as an evolutionary response to cancer. Cancers infect cells and use them to reproduce. Cells only have a certain number of copies they can make in order to limit the ability for cancer to spread too rapidly. I've always found this interesting and thought we have always been SO close to immortality without knowing it. These links are very interesting... thanks for the post, OP! |
Plasmare (OP) User ID: 1066790 Australia 12/21/2011 05:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If we could get around the need for some bodily systems to work as intended this would make perfect sense Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3758944 Make a cancer to infuse the blood with oxygen and remove waste is one example one fault/characteristic of cancer is unchecked growth otherwise sounds good op Researchers with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)'s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab), through a combination of time-lapse live imaging and mathematical modeling of a special line of human breast cells, have found evidence to suggest that for low dose levels of ionizing radiation, cancer risks may not be directly proportional to dose. This contradicts the standard model for predicting biological damage from ionizing radiation - the linear-no-threshold hypothesis or LNT - which holds that risk is directly proportional to dose at all levels of irradiation. "Our data show that at lower doses of ionizing radiation, DNA repair mechanisms work much better than at higher doses," says Mina Bissell, a world-renowned breast cancer researcher with Berkeley Lab's Life Sciences Division. "This non-linear DNA damage response casts doubt on the general assumption that any amount of ionizing radiation is harmful and additive." [link to medicalxpress.com] If you take this new finding into consideration, higher doses of ionizing radiation actually help DNA repair but large doses can cause much damage and with every repair, their is a chance that something goes wrong and the process is somehow disrupted and causes cancer. Are there people out there who are trying to use cancer to become immortal? Sounds like a bad hollywood movie. This would explain how modern treatments contribute to cancer growth.. If only the thing that makes cancer so incessant could be combined with the good things about stem cells..your premiss is a good one! Cancer and semen, sounds more like a rock band title. |
Children of the Atom User ID: 6289470 United States 12/21/2011 05:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What if cancer research was not about curing cancer but to figure out how to use cancer to become immortal? Quoting: Plasmare So how were scientists able to make cells immortal? The secret to producing cell immortality lay in their realizing that all cells possess a gene, known as the telomerase gene, which can add DNA back to the tip of telomeres, restoring them to their original youthful length. In almost all cells this gene is turned off early in development, rendered permanently inactive in an event that commits that cell to eventual sure death. This sad decision is a very necessary one, as it protects the adult human body from developing tumors whenever a cell's division controls are disabled. Only when this added protection against runaway growth is also lost, the switch stopping production of telomerase turned back "ON," can a cell proceed beyond a few divisions and become a cancer cell. Cancer cells are immortal because they produce telomerase. In the human body, only two kinds of body cells are immortal, able to divide without limit. Cancer cells are one. The other kind of immortal cell is the embryonic stem cell. [link to txtwriter.com] "Embryonic stem cells, as their name suggests, are derived from embryos. Most embryonic stem cells are derived from embryos that develop from eggs that have been fertilized in vitro—in an in vitro fertilization clinic—and then donated for research purposes with informed consent of the donors. They are not derived from eggs fertilized in a woman's body." [link to stemcells.nih.gov] There's something fascinating and yet disgusting about these immortal cells scientists have been using for decades now from the famous HeLa cells; A HeLa cell (also Hela or hela cell) is a cell type in an immortal cell line used in scientific research. It is the oldest and most commonly used human cell line.[1] The line was derived from cervical cancer cells taken on February 8, 1951[2] from Henrietta Lacks, a patient who eventually died of her cancer on October 4, 1951. The cell line was found to be remarkably durable and prolific as illustrated by its contamination of many other cell lines used in research. [link to en.wikipedia.org] to being able to order frozen immortal cancer cells online; [link to www.atcc.org] In society cancer, like nuclear radiation, is seen to be scary, frightening and something people never should discuss out of fear of getting it or something ridiculous and there isn't much out there in the way of public information as to the nature of cancer itself. There's a lot of money going into cancer research and no one has managed "cure" it but maybe that is not the goal. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3758944 United States 12/21/2011 05:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What if cancer research was not about curing cancer but to figure out how to use cancer to become immortal? Quoting: Plasmare So how were scientists able to make cells immortal? The secret to producing cell immortality lay in their realizing that all cells possess a gene, known as the telomerase gene, which can add DNA back to the tip of telomeres, restoring them to their original youthful length. In almost all cells this gene is turned off early in development, rendered permanently inactive in an event that commits that cell to eventual sure death. This sad decision is a very necessary one, as it protects the adult human body from developing tumors whenever a cell's division controls are disabled. Only when this added protection against runaway growth is also lost, the switch stopping production of telomerase turned back "ON," can a cell proceed beyond a few divisions and become a cancer cell. Cancer cells are immortal because they produce telomerase. In the human body, only two kinds of body cells are immortal, able to divide without limit. Cancer cells are one. The other kind of immortal cell is the embryonic stem cell. [link to txtwriter.com] "Embryonic stem cells, as their name suggests, are derived from embryos. Most embryonic stem cells are derived from embryos that develop from eggs that have been fertilized in vitro—in an in vitro fertilization clinic—and then donated for research purposes with informed consent of the donors. They are not derived from eggs fertilized in a woman's body." [link to stemcells.nih.gov] There's something fascinating and yet disgusting about these immortal cells scientists have been using for decades now from the famous HeLa cells; A HeLa cell (also Hela or hela cell) is a cell type in an immortal cell line used in scientific research. It is the oldest and most commonly used human cell line.[1] The line was derived from cervical cancer cells taken on February 8, 1951[2] from Henrietta Lacks, a patient who eventually died of her cancer on October 4, 1951. The cell line was found to be remarkably durable and prolific as illustrated by its contamination of many other cell lines used in research. [link to en.wikipedia.org] to being able to order frozen immortal cancer cells online; [link to www.atcc.org] In society cancer, like nuclear radiation, is seen to be scary, frightening and something people never should discuss out of fear of getting it or something ridiculous and there isn't much out there in the way of public information as to the nature of cancer itself. There's a lot of money going into cancer research and no one has managed "cure" it but maybe that is not the goal. Human cells perform apoptosis (cell suicide) as an evolutionary response to cancer. Cancers infect cells and use them to reproduce. Cells only have a certain number of copies they can make in order to limit the ability for cancer to spread too rapidly. I've always found this interesting and thought we have always been SO close to immortality without knowing it. These links are very interesting... thanks for the post, OP! Human cells perform apoptosis (cell suicide) as an evolutionary response to cancer. death is lifes answer to cancer/immortality death is the only answer to limitless finite cell reproduction |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7463331 United Kingdom 12/21/2011 06:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Plasmare (OP) User ID: 1066790 Australia 12/21/2011 08:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7487192 Portugal 12/21/2011 03:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Plasmare (OP) User ID: 1443244 Australia 01/30/2012 05:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
katinthehat User ID: 44085983 United States 07/26/2013 12:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It may be feasible to use our understanding of cancer cells to extend human life (not so sure about absolute mortality). In any case, researchers rightfully question whether this should be done. Think about it. If humans become immortal, the humans themselves become like cancer cells on the body of our planet or throughout the part of the universe we would be capable of inhabiting. In order to continue to live, humans still will require resources and will be a drain on the ecosystem in which they reside that will eventually lead to the death of that ecosystem (whether it be Earth, our solar system, galaxy, whatever). Pull back from your narcissistic view of yourself and your species for a minute and think about how the universe itself would be endangered by physical immortality of any species. Humans cannot and should not physically live forever. The consequences would be far reaching and horrible, perhaps leading the destruction of all creation. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 44355863 Australia 07/31/2013 08:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31036137 United States 07/31/2013 08:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38052225 United States 07/31/2013 08:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 44356873 United States 07/31/2013 09:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | IT IS POSSIBLE TO REACH IMMORTALITY!!! OUR BODIES ARE SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS... IN WHICH WE ARE BORN... WE WHERE BUILT TO BE IMMORTAL... WHICH IS WHERE THE DESIRE COMES FROM... THE HOPE... WE WHERE AT ONE TIME IMMORTAL... BUT NOW... THESE CONDITIONS ARE NOT CONDUCIVE TO IMMORTALITY!!! WHY??? CONDITIONS HAVE CHANGED... WHAT CONDITIONS??? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 44356873 United States 07/31/2013 09:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | IT IS POSSIBLE TO REACH IMMORTALITY!!! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 44356873 OUR BODIES ARE SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS... IN WHICH WE ARE BORN... WE WHERE BUILT TO BE IMMORTAL... WHICH IS WHERE THE DESIRE COMES FROM... THE HOPE... WE WHERE AT ONE TIME IMMORTAL... BUT NOW... THESE CONDITIONS ARE NOT CONDUCIVE TO IMMORTALITY!!! WHY??? CONDITIONS HAVE CHANGED... WHAT CONDITIONS??? THE CONDITIONS THAT DEFINE 3 DIMESIONAL... WHICH ARE CONDUCIVE TO PERFECTION... WHY??? 3 DIMENSIONAL SPACE IS ABSOULUTE... OR "THE TRUTH"!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 44356873 United States 07/31/2013 09:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | IT IS POSSIBLE TO REACH IMMORTALITY!!! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 44356873 OUR BODIES ARE SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS... IN WHICH WE ARE BORN... WE WHERE BUILT TO BE IMMORTAL... WHICH IS WHERE THE DESIRE COMES FROM... THE HOPE... WE WHERE AT ONE TIME IMMORTAL... BUT NOW... THESE CONDITIONS ARE NOT CONDUCIVE TO IMMORTALITY!!! WHY??? CONDITIONS HAVE CHANGED... WHAT CONDITIONS??? THE CONDITIONS THAT DEFINE 3 DIMESIONAL... WHICH ARE CONDUCIVE TO PERFECTION... WHY??? 3 DIMENSIONAL SPACE IS ABSOULUTE... OR "THE TRUTH"!!! SO, WHAT HAS CHANGED??? IF, YOU SAY YOUR OWN TRUTH IS "THE TRUTH"... THEN, YOU GET CANCER AND DIE!!! IF, YOU SAY YOUR TRUTH IS DEAD... AND ACCEPT "THE TRUTH".... THEN YOU LIVE FOR EVER!!! IT, IS THAT SIMPLE!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 44356873 United States 07/31/2013 09:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | IT IS POSSIBLE TO REACH IMMORTALITY!!! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 44356873 OUR BODIES ARE SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS... IN WHICH WE ARE BORN... WE WHERE BUILT TO BE IMMORTAL... WHICH IS WHERE THE DESIRE COMES FROM... THE HOPE... WE WHERE AT ONE TIME IMMORTAL... BUT NOW... THESE CONDITIONS ARE NOT CONDUCIVE TO IMMORTALITY!!! WHY??? CONDITIONS HAVE CHANGED... WHAT CONDITIONS??? THE CONDITIONS THAT DEFINE 3 DIMESIONAL... WHICH ARE CONDUCIVE TO PERFECTION... WHY??? 3 DIMENSIONAL SPACE IS ABSOULUTE... OR "THE TRUTH"!!! SO, WHAT HAS CHANGED??? IF, YOU SAY YOUR OWN TRUTH IS "THE TRUTH"... THEN, YOU GET CANCER AND DIE!!! IF, YOU SAY YOUR TRUTH IS DEAD... AND ACCEPT "THE TRUTH".... THEN YOU LIVE FOR EVER!!! IT, IS THAT SIMPLE!!! YOUR OWN TRUTH CAN NOT EXSIT IN THE SPACE... YOU WERE BORN IN... THEREFORE YOU DIE!!! ACCEPT "THE TRUTH"... AND HAVE EVERLASTING LIFE!!! |
Face Palmer User ID: 1149868 Germany 07/31/2013 09:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hmm interesting! "The world will soon wake up to the reality that everyone is broke and can collect nothing from the bankrupt, who are owed unlimited amounts by the insolvent, who are attempting to make late payments on a bank holiday in the wrong country, with an unacceptable currency, against defaulted collateral, of which nobody is sure who holds title." Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. The woman who is not pursued sets up the doctrine that pursuit is offensive to her sex, and wants to make it a felony. No genuinely attractive woman has any such desire. - H.L. Mencken, In Defense Of Women |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33598366 United States 07/31/2013 09:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If we could get around the need for some bodily systems to work as intended this would make perfect sense Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3758944 Make a cancer to infuse the blood with oxygen and remove waste is one example one fault/characteristic of cancer is unchecked growth otherwise sounds good op Researchers with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)'s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab), through a combination of time-lapse live imaging and mathematical modeling of a special line of human breast cells, have found evidence to suggest that for low dose levels of ionizing radiation, cancer risks may not be directly proportional to dose. This contradicts the standard model for predicting biological damage from ionizing radiation - the linear-no-threshold hypothesis or LNT - which holds that risk is directly proportional to dose at all levels of irradiation. "Our data show that at lower doses of ionizing radiation, DNA repair mechanisms work much better than at higher doses," says Mina Bissell, a world-renowned breast cancer researcher with Berkeley Lab's Life Sciences Division. "This non-linear DNA damage response casts doubt on the general assumption that any amount of ionizing radiation is harmful and additive." [link to medicalxpress.com] If you take this new finding into consideration, higher doses of ionizing radiation actually help DNA repair but large doses can cause much damage and with every repair, their is a chance that something goes wrong and the process is somehow disrupted and causes cancer. Are there people out there who are trying to use cancer to become immortal? Sounds like a bad hollywood movie. Thank you for explaining in layman's terms what it really means. It makes so much more sense now, as to why organic Solar rays (radiation) are beneficial, but mad scientist tried to replicate "it", the inorganic radiation) and, instead created cancer, a monster. Looking at the way the Sun is behaving, it is clear that we are in the middle of a Solar Maximum :) DEF BUMB! |
SmurfberryCrunch User ID: 44356943 United States 07/31/2013 09:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Jellyfish...the key to immortality... [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] "Turritopsis nutricula is a small (5 millimeters (0.20 in)) species of jellyfish that uses transdifferentiation to replenish cells after sexual reproduction. This cycle can repeat indefinitely, potentially rendering it biologically immortal. It originated from the Caribbean sea, but has now spread around the world." |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26766787 Philippines 07/31/2013 09:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Joker Pole II User ID: 44342022 Poland 07/31/2013 10:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10911994 United States 07/31/2013 10:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It may be feasible to use our understanding of cancer cells to extend human life (not so sure about absolute mortality). In any case, researchers rightfully question whether this should be done. Think about it. If humans become immortal, the humans themselves become like cancer cells on the body of our planet or throughout the part of the universe we would be capable of inhabiting. In order to continue to live, humans still will require resources and will be a drain on the ecosystem in which they reside that will eventually lead to the death of that ecosystem (whether it be Earth, our solar system, galaxy, whatever). Pull back from your narcissistic view of yourself and your species for a minute and think about how the universe itself would be endangered by physical immortality of any species. Humans cannot and should not physically live forever. The consequences would be far reaching and horrible, perhaps leading the destruction of all creation. Quoting: katinthehat 44085983 That's why you have to pass God's test here on earth before you receive immortality. One bad apple spoils the whole bunch. |
LT Prepper User ID: 43555851 United States 07/31/2013 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If we could get around the need for some bodily systems to work as intended this would make perfect sense Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3758944 Make a cancer to infuse the blood with oxygen and remove waste is one example one fault/characteristic of cancer is unchecked growth otherwise sounds good op Researchers with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)'s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab), through a combination of time-lapse live imaging and mathematical modeling of a special line of human breast cells, have found evidence to suggest that for low dose levels of ionizing radiation, cancer risks may not be directly proportional to dose. This contradicts the standard model for predicting biological damage from ionizing radiation - the linear-no-threshold hypothesis or LNT - which holds that risk is directly proportional to dose at all levels of irradiation. "Our data show that at lower doses of ionizing radiation, DNA repair mechanisms work much better than at higher doses," says Mina Bissell, a world-renowned breast cancer researcher with Berkeley Lab's Life Sciences Division. "This non-linear DNA damage response casts doubt on the general assumption that any amount of ionizing radiation is harmful and additive." [link to medicalxpress.com] If you take this new finding into consideration, higher doses of ionizing radiation actually help DNA repair but large doses can cause much damage and with every repair, their is a chance that something goes wrong and the process is somehow disrupted and causes cancer. Are there people out there who are trying to use cancer to become immortal? Sounds like a bad hollywood movie. And there are zombies in it. Immortal Cancer Zombies. If you cut off their head, it just grows back. Sometimes it doesn't wait to be cut off... the zombies will grow multiple heads ;P Seriously - the experimentation with cancer, radiation, and other "tweaks" to human DNA are pretty scary... this deserves a |
talkstory User ID: 44351189 Thailand 07/31/2013 10:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Joker Pole II User ID: 44342022 Poland 07/31/2013 10:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |