GOP Will Take Off the Gloves if Ron Paul Wins Iowa | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 2716241 United States 12/28/2011 12:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2763361 United States 12/28/2011 12:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 2716241 United States 12/28/2011 12:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7778858 Switzerland 12/28/2011 12:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.thepoliticalcesspool.org] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2716241 Here’s an outstanding article that details what Ron Paul is about to have to face. The Republican presidential primary has become a bit feisty, but it will get downright ugly if Ron Paul wins the Iowa caucuses. If Paul wins, how will the media and the GOP react? Much of the media will ignore him (expect headlines like “Romney Beats out Gingrich for Second Place in Iowa”). Some in the Republican establishment and the conservative media will panic. Others will calmly move to crush him, with the full cooperation of the liberal mainstream media For a historical analogy, study the aftermath of Pat Buchanan’s 1996 victory in the New Hampshire primary. “It was awful,” Buchanan told me this week when I asked him about his few days as the nominal GOP front-runner. “They come down on you with both feet.” The GOP establishment that week rallied to squash Buchanan. Just after New Hampshire, Gingrich’s hand-picked group of GOP leaders, known as the Speaker’s Advisory Group, met with one thing on their minds, according to a contemporaneous Newsweek report: “How to deal with Buchanan.” While many Republicans dismissed Buchanan’s New Hampshire win as irrelevant, arguing his support was too narrow to ever win the nomination, the neoconservative wing of the GOP darkly warned of a Buchanan menace. “People are panicked,” Bill Kristol of the Weekly Standard told Newsweek. “If they’re not, it’s only because they don’t know what’s going on.” The liberal mainstream media dutifully filled out Kristol’s picture of “what’s going on.” Newsweek put an ominously lit picture of Buchanan on the cover under the words “Preaching Fear.” The article stretched itself into contortions to paint Buchanan as a white racist. (Buchanan was campaigning in South Carolina, which still flew the Confederate flag over its capitol.) Ted Koppel, on “Nightline” in the days after New Hampshire, relied on unsubstantiated tales (for which he later apologized) about Buchanan’s father as a way of tying the son to “bigoted and isolationist radio orator Father Coughlin.” He also cited a Jewish neighbor of the Buchanans who was beaten up and called “Christ-killer” — without mentioning that Pat was off at college at the time. MORE AT LINK GOP has no gloves. 9-11-2001 WTC/Pentagon was an INSIDE JOB and if they bother Paul too much we'll roll out all the written/printed/picture evidence and there will be high leadership HEADS ROLLING. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7856278 United States 12/28/2011 01:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Evan03 User ID: 4849361 United States 12/28/2011 01:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It will backfire. The only thing they have on him are the newsletters. They can only ride that train for so long. RP 2012!! Life is tough, but its tougher when you're stupid. -john wayne Truth is the new hate speech in our age of absurdity-Ted Nougat Sarcasm is the body's natural defense against stupid. |