|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
CHEMTRAILs are what???
|
|
Poster Handle
|
George B |
|
Post Content
|
...'Trails' is a generic term which can apply to contrail or Chemtrail. . . . and yes if a trail is left by a new high efficiency jet engine I consider it to be a low grade Chemtrail. . . Because there was an intentional decision to produce a higher possibility of a persistent trail and cirrus cloud bank while reducing the amount of CO2 . . . Which I believe was a mistake or intentional geoengineering. ...  Quoting: George B *Sigh* Thank you for admitting what you denied earlier. And it's YOU who broke down CHEMTRAILS into 3 types. It's right there in YOUR own words. "IMO there are at least three types of CHEMTRAILS" Then you list the three types. And no, contrails are contrails...not "trails". You may "believe" you can interchange the terms...but you're wrong. It's obvious you are trying to confuse the terms purposely to get others to join your bandwagon of ignorance. Not all persistent trails are left by high efficiency jet engines. . . .so not all persistent trails are CHEMTRAILs. . . And how are you able to determine which is which from the ground?! And the only reason a high efficiency engine is more likely to leave contrails is because it's able to push the saturation level past supersaturation. Is THAT a requirement for a trail to be called a "chemtrail" instead of a contrail?! If so...that's fucking STUPID! And so are you! I nor you can determine anything from the ground . . . And yes the equipment and engine efficiency is the issue. . . .the use of said engines was a conscious decision with full knowledge that their use would lead to more persistent trails and cloud banks. . .
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
