Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,553 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 506,649
Pageviews Today: 688,770Threads Today: 154Posts Today: 3,374
07:58 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Iowa Caucus 2012 - Why no recount?

 
Girl Genius
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 1133676
United States
01/05/2012 09:25 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Iowa Caucus 2012 - Why no recount?
[link to thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com]

DES MOINES — It was, perhaps, the closest finish ever between two candidates in a presidential caucus.

At just before 3 a.m. Eastern time on Wednesday, the chairman of the Iowa Republican Party went on television to announce the official result: Mitt Romney had beaten Rick Santorum by eight votes out of 60,022 cast for the two men.

So why no recount?

1dunno1

More damage control...

[link to mediamatters.org]

Nothing to see here ...


Apparently, Iowa really is irrelevant because no one seems to care about who wins or if there was any fraud.

Last Edited by Girl Genius on 01/05/2012 09:31 PM
For nothing is secret that will not be revealed…

:blue-faeries:
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8345940
United States
01/05/2012 09:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Iowa Caucus 2012 - Why no recount?
Because they would have to recount Ron Paul's votes too.... of which, I'm sure quite a few were miscounted.
Bob the Monkey

User ID: 625379
United States
01/05/2012 09:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Iowa Caucus 2012 - Why no recount?
Because Iowa is a caucus. It's primarily done by a bunch of people writing their vote on a piece of paper and slipping it into a box and counted at each precinct. Watch the videos. It's like your highschool council contest. No one is going to recount it.

There is no law for a recount anyway.
Bob the Monkey

User ID: 625379
United States
01/05/2012 09:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Iowa Caucus 2012 - Why no recount?
Because they would have to recount Ron Paul's votes too.... of which, I'm sure quite a few were miscounted.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8345940


Yeah, I'm sure thousands were miscounted so he would lose rolleyes

News








Proud Member Of The Angry Mob