Psychic's predictions for 2012 -- "ALLEGEDLY" From 30 years ago. F#@*ing scary! - English subtitles

I'am sorry but that font wasn't available in 1980 video is obvious fake

Fool shill.

Maybe he lives in North Cali...


This whole age debate is fucking stupid... you are all saying that you've never met anyone 40 years old who looked a decade younger? (BTW, I think he looks every bit of 40, I would have guessed him AT LEAST 35 if I didn't know he was supposed to be 40).


Get real people.


You just don't want to accept what this entails.

You just want a doomgasm and this is doom porn. "Oh yeah, how do ya like that baby...ooh...oooh...come to Frenchy".

Has anybody emailed yet? I've only just noticed the email address and I have to go out right now.

.

Seems time stood still during this interview.

The hands on the clock on the piano never move

The interview was recorded with a CCD camera or film stock.

CCD was not a common camera in 1980. CCD became mainstream in the early 80's, but was very low res.

I would have expected an "imaging tube" camera to be used for this interview.

Notice the white reflections on the speakers eyeglasses.... If this were recorded on an imaging tube camera ... the reflections would have left "trails".

A good camera operator of this vintage would have used an umbrella to shade any "hot spots".

I say it's fake.

Too bad, it would have been an awesome hoax. I guess next time use an imaging tube camera.

It's also got combing so it was defiantly edited on a Computer by an Amature and probably using Mini DV

Last Edited by Mranger on 01/09/2012 09:24 AM

we had those long before 1980.

yes, the 80's are NOT ancient times folks.

People, please here. We had movie cameras during tape of very good resolution in color when I was a little kid. I was born in 1947.

Ok I LOL'd.

I did too.

The lighting seen in the guys glasses reflection indicates it was filmed in the 80's. Modern filming in a small room, due to advanced digital tech, requires much less light.

It also appears the film was transferred to a digital format that is greater in resolution. It is evident when the man moves rapidly, like his hand.

And I think I saw a watch, which people typically don't use anymore in lue of cell phones.




Plus, can't find anything this guy is selling. Most fakes are in it for the money. We shall see.

80s french short term doom.....my favorite

ahem.
Words .... words words words...
Psyop. NWO. brainwash. Mind control. Fear. Love? hm.

This.


Namaste.

That's true, but you also are aware of that and thus point it out...


So you see, there are two options...


Either it is legit from the 1980s...


Or it is professionally done (setting, wardrobe, lighting, etc) to look like original 1980s footage, for the purpose of a (new) movie or a TV show, or something like that.

i agree..its not exactly clear

but something is off

they had zoom on cameras in 1980 dood lol

why the f do you people think this is a fake? because one person on page one said it? Newsflash: F I L M is higher quality than HD

My grandparents are french, let me say that the body language this mans demonstrates is very, very, french. You cannot "fake" that kind of body language.

actually your wrong. VHS came out in 1975

laser disc players where around in 77.....

Other nations have adopted different television signal and display standards over the years. As it turns out, France had one of the best standards up until 1984 when they switched from a 819 line resolution to a Europe-wide 625 lines resolution.

BTW, up until this last decade, the United States had one of the lowest resolution TV signals with only 525 lines.

I always thought that German TV looked better back then because they did have more lines of resolution.

The tube cameras I used, used shutters and did not have trails left by bright images.

Sorry, but there is no way this was done on CCD.
It would have been a one or three tube professional camera.
I have used these cameras many times and they do not trial lights. Amatuer camers did, but the professional cameras did not.

Here is the source:
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Yes the ol' Gallic-bin-ass-fucked posture - dead give away.

And of course the air of "gay cheese eating surrender monkey" puts beyond all doubt that he is definitely French: ergo, the whole story is true.

:)

Who is to say that this video wasn't shot with French cameras in the US for French TV. He and the interviewer are both speaking French and without an interpreter. It must be intended for the French.

how do you know its not a prosumer cam


I have a beta cam from 1981

in a box somewhere

In 1980 there were basically 2 choices to record an interview, 16mm film or a three tube analog video camera.

The chroma and luminance look like what was possible with the very last versions of 3-tube cameras; they phased out of production around 1982, but were still used until the 90s because they were superior in resolution to the CCDs of the mid 80s. A 1" Type C studio tape as original source could easily produce a picture of this quality if it was transferred straight to digital. So could 16mm film transferred to to 1" Type C then to digital.

The distortion at the bottom of the video looks to me like the video was originally on NTSC and was transferred to PAL format, and the overscan wasn't cropped.

Either way, this isn't an amateur production. It was either recorded by professionals in 1980 as it claims, or was faked by someone with at least a modest budget much more recently.