Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,166 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,036,264
Pageviews Today: 1,861,121Threads Today: 811Posts Today: 14,268
09:03 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?

 
Manu-Koelbren
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 8305424
Spain
01/09/2012 06:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
Ok so I found this most interesting passage in the First Book of Adam and Eve. Check it out:

"GOD said to Adam, "I have ordained on this earth days and years, and thou and thy seed shall dwell and walk in it, until the days and years are fulfilled; when I shall send the Word that created thee, and against which thou hast transgressed, the Word that made thee come out of the garden and that raised thee when thou wast fallen.

Yea, the Word that will again save thee when the five days and a half are fulfilled."

But when Adam heard these words from God, and of the great five days and a half, he did not understand the meaning of them.

For Adam was thinking that there would be but five days and a half for him, to the end of the world.

And Adam wept, and prayed God to explain it to him.

Then God in His mercy for Adam who was made after His own image and similitude, explained to him, that these were 5,000 and 500 years; and how One would then come and save him and his seed."

Now check this passage from the Kolbrin:

"These and many other things were taught by Habaris, but many of his teachings displeased the people of Krowkasis who were then as they were before Herthew's forefather was led away. So Habaris concealed many things from them and taught, by simple tales, things within their understanding. He taught them the mysteries concerning the wheel of the years and divided the year into a Summer half and a Winter half, with a great year circle of fifty-two years, a hundred and four of which was the circle of the Destroyer. He gave them the Laws of Weal and Woe and established the folkfeasts of harvest-tide and seeding-tide. He taught them the ritual of Ulisidui."

104*52 is 5408 years.

Is this significant or what?

Last Edited by Manu-K on 01/09/2012 10:21 PM
Banned as usual.

“It is far easier to be a weakling than to be a Real Man. Were the Earth less harsh or the circumstances of life less austere, man would destroy himself before the shrine of the languid goddess. Only Real Men can with safety destroy the tangled forests and wilderness of Earth and make from them gardens, but will those who inherit the gardens be Real Men? The law decrees that they must be, or the wilderness will reclaim its own.”
Manu-Koelbren  (OP)

User ID: 8305424
Spain
01/09/2012 07:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
OK folks, you're going to flip out with this.

Check it out, the Kolbrin tells us that the last time the Destroyer flew by Earth was around the time of the Israelite exodus out of Egypt. It was been established by geological and archeaological evidence that around 1550 BC there was a natural catastrophe that destroyed Ancient Egypt, just as the Kolbrin tells.



So check this out. If we use the date of 1550 BC as the last flyby of the Destroyer and we substract 5500 years of the cycle of the destroyer, what do we get?

7050 BC

What is speculated to have happened sometime around this date?

"According to a study by Giosan et al.,[11] the level in the Black Sea before the marine reconnection was 30 m below present sea level, rather than the 80 m, or lower, of the catastrophe theories. If the flood occurred at all, the sea level increase and the flooded area during the reconnection were significantly smaller than previously proposed. It also occurred earlier than initially surmised, ca. 7400 BC, rather than the originally proposed 5600 BC. en no sudden waterfall-style transgression."

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

The Kolbrin again points out that the Great Flood was actually a localized event:

"The Land of the Little People and the Land of Giants, the Land of the Neckless Ones and the Land of Marshes and Mists, the Lands of the East and West were all inundated. The Mountain Land and the Lands of the South, where there is gold and great beasts, were not covered by the waters".

And what if we substract 5500 years again from 7050 BC?

12550 BC

What significant event happened at this date?

"The end of the last glacial period was about 12,500 years ago"

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

I might be grasping at straws here, but seems like a good match.

IF this theory is correct the return of the Destroyer would be around the year 3950 AD ohyeah
Banned as usual.

“It is far easier to be a weakling than to be a Real Man. Were the Earth less harsh or the circumstances of life less austere, man would destroy himself before the shrine of the languid goddess. Only Real Men can with safety destroy the tangled forests and wilderness of Earth and make from them gardens, but will those who inherit the gardens be Real Men? The law decrees that they must be, or the wilderness will reclaim its own.”
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1471397
United States
01/09/2012 07:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
IF this theory is correct the return of the Destroyer would be around the year 3950 AD ohyeah
 Quoting: Manu-Koelbren


i personally think humans wont even BE here in 3950AD.
Manu-Koelbren  (OP)

User ID: 8305424
Spain
01/09/2012 07:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
IF this theory is correct the return of the Destroyer would be around the year 3950 AD ohyeah
 Quoting: Manu-Koelbren


i personally think humans wont even BE here in 3950AD.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1471397


I think humans will always be around while the Earth remains inhabitable in the least. We are creatures who refuse to die off easily. We've been around for a LONG time.
Banned as usual.

“It is far easier to be a weakling than to be a Real Man. Were the Earth less harsh or the circumstances of life less austere, man would destroy himself before the shrine of the languid goddess. Only Real Men can with safety destroy the tangled forests and wilderness of Earth and make from them gardens, but will those who inherit the gardens be Real Men? The law decrees that they must be, or the wilderness will reclaim its own.”
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7057750
United States
01/09/2012 07:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
Ok so I found this most interesting passage in the First Book of Adam and Eve. Check it out:

"GOD said to Adam, "I have ordained on this earth days and years, and thou and thy seed shall dwell and walk in it, until the days and years are fulfilled; when I shall send the Word that created thee, and against which thou hast transgressed, the Word that made thee come out of the garden and that raised thee when thou wast fallen.

Yea, the Word that will again save thee when the five days and a half are fulfilled."

But when Adam heard these words from God, and of the great five days and a half, he did not understand the meaning of them.

 Quoting: Manu-Koelbren


Word vs words

all about Adam's answer for transgressions....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7057750
United States
01/09/2012 07:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
many writings state that Nibiru is planet Jupiter
Manu-Koelbren  (OP)

User ID: 8305424
Spain
01/09/2012 07:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
many writings state that Nibiru is planet Jupiter
 Quoting: Sugarelf


Well forget about the name Nibiru, it's confusing, Nibiru was a name Sitchin use but no other Scholar in Sumerian mythology agrees it was referred to as a planet. Yet regarding a recurring comet which causes destruction on earth, many sources exist.
Banned as usual.

“It is far easier to be a weakling than to be a Real Man. Were the Earth less harsh or the circumstances of life less austere, man would destroy himself before the shrine of the languid goddess. Only Real Men can with safety destroy the tangled forests and wilderness of Earth and make from them gardens, but will those who inherit the gardens be Real Men? The law decrees that they must be, or the wilderness will reclaim its own.”
BadMoonRising
User ID: 727864
United Kingdom
01/09/2012 07:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
I think humans will always be around while the Earth remains inhabitable in the least. We are creatures who refuse to die off easily. We've been around for a LONG time.
 Quoting: Manu-Koelbren


You're very wrong.

If the history of the Earth could be condensed into a 24 Hour clock, humans would have appeared on the scene at about 23.58

The Earth dosen't need Humans.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7057750
United States
01/09/2012 08:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
many writings state that Nibiru is planet Jupiter
 Quoting: Sugarelf


Well forget about the name Nibiru, it's confusing, Nibiru was a name Sitchin use but no other Scholar in Sumerian mythology agrees it was referred to as a planet. Yet regarding a recurring comet which causes destruction on earth, many sources exist.
 Quoting: Manu-Koelbren


i guess the best description of the 'Nibiru' concept is when the gods/god are visible or able to be seen


"The one who crosses the middle of the sea without calm, may his name be Nibiru, for he takes up the center of it".
Manu-Koelbren  (OP)

User ID: 8305424
Spain
01/09/2012 08:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
many writings state that Nibiru is planet Jupiter
 Quoting: Sugarelf


Well forget about the name Nibiru, it's confusing, Nibiru was a name Sitchin use but no other Scholar in Sumerian mythology agrees it was referred to as a planet. Yet regarding a recurring comet which causes destruction on earth, many sources exist.
 Quoting: Manu-Koelbren


i guess the best description of the 'Nibiru' concept is when the gods/god are visible or able to be seen


"The one who crosses the middle of the sea without calm, may his name be Nibiru, for he takes up the center of it".

 Quoting: Sugarelf


"Then came the day when all things became still and apprehensive, for God caused a sign to appear in the Heavens, so that men should know the Earth would be afflicted, and the sign was a strange star".

"The star grew and waxed to a great brightness and was awesome to behold. It put forth horns and sang, being unlike any other ever seen. So men , seeing it, said among themselves, 'Surely, this is God appearing in the Heavens above us'. The star was not God, though it was directed by His design, but the people had not the wisdom to understand'.
Banned as usual.

“It is far easier to be a weakling than to be a Real Man. Were the Earth less harsh or the circumstances of life less austere, man would destroy himself before the shrine of the languid goddess. Only Real Men can with safety destroy the tangled forests and wilderness of Earth and make from them gardens, but will those who inherit the gardens be Real Men? The law decrees that they must be, or the wilderness will reclaim its own.”
HANGFIRE

User ID: 8539609
United States
01/09/2012 02:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
abduct
Manu-Koelbren  (OP)

User ID: 8305424
Spain
01/09/2012 05:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
sumerians
Banned as usual.

“It is far easier to be a weakling than to be a Real Man. Were the Earth less harsh or the circumstances of life less austere, man would destroy himself before the shrine of the languid goddess. Only Real Men can with safety destroy the tangled forests and wilderness of Earth and make from them gardens, but will those who inherit the gardens be Real Men? The law decrees that they must be, or the wilderness will reclaim its own.”
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3023846
Sweden
01/09/2012 05:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
You came to the same conclusion as Sitchin, so how was he wrong?
Manu-Koelbren  (OP)

User ID: 8305424
Spain
01/09/2012 05:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
You came to the same conclusion as Sitchin, so how was he wrong?
 Quoting: sgtbaker


Sitchin argued that the Destroyer comes back every 3600 years, I just argued that it does every 5400 years.
Banned as usual.

“It is far easier to be a weakling than to be a Real Man. Were the Earth less harsh or the circumstances of life less austere, man would destroy himself before the shrine of the languid goddess. Only Real Men can with safety destroy the tangled forests and wilderness of Earth and make from them gardens, but will those who inherit the gardens be Real Men? The law decrees that they must be, or the wilderness will reclaim its own.”
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3023846
Sweden
01/09/2012 06:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
You came to the same conclusion as Sitchin, so how was he wrong?
 Quoting: sgtbaker


Sitchin argued that the Destroyer comes back every 3600 years, I just argued that it does every 5400 years.
 Quoting: Manu-Koelbren


Ah, I see.
But you both agree that it's gonna take more than 1000 years before it returns, if at all.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3558872
United States
01/09/2012 06:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
...but what if the 5500 years is start to finish, with Earth in the middle - sort of like a big infinity sign - earth is at the crossing. So no, earth feels the wrath every half time, or 2750 years...
Manu-Koelbren  (OP)

User ID: 8305424
Spain
01/09/2012 06:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
You came to the same conclusion as Sitchin, so how was he wrong?
 Quoting: sgtbaker


Sitchin argued that the Destroyer comes back every 3600 years, I just argued that it does every 5400 years.
 Quoting: Manu-Koelbren


Ah, I see.
But you both agree that it's gonna take more than 1000 years before it returns, if at all.
 Quoting: sgtbaker


Obviously more than 1000 years, in fact I had thought about 3600 years being to short of a cycle to fit into realistic models. Sitchin based a lot of his theories on what the cuneiform tablets said about the Annunaki's activities, but that's not as reliable as actually considering big, scientifically corroborated catastrophic events as I just did in my second post.
Banned as usual.

“It is far easier to be a weakling than to be a Real Man. Were the Earth less harsh or the circumstances of life less austere, man would destroy himself before the shrine of the languid goddess. Only Real Men can with safety destroy the tangled forests and wilderness of Earth and make from them gardens, but will those who inherit the gardens be Real Men? The law decrees that they must be, or the wilderness will reclaim its own.”
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3736817
United States
01/09/2012 06:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
Ok so I found this most interesting passage in the First Book of Adam and Eve. Check it out:

"GOD said to Adam, "I have ordained on this earth days and years, and thou and thy seed shall dwell and walk in it, until the days and years are fulfilled; when I shall send the Word that created thee, and against which thou hast transgressed, the Word that made thee come out of the garden and that raised thee when thou wast fallen.

Yea, the Word that will again save thee when the five days and a half are fulfilled."

But when Adam heard these words from God, and of the great five days and a half, he did not understand the meaning of them.

For Adam was thinking that there would be but five days and a half for him, to the end of the world.

And Adam wept, and prayed God to explain it to him.

Then God in His mercy for Adam who was made after His own image and similitude, explained to him, that these were 5,000 and 500 years; and how One would then come and save him and his seed."

Now check this passage from the Kolbrin:

"These and many other things were taught by Habaris, but many of his teachings displeased the people of Krowkasis who were then as they were before Herthew's forefather was led away. So Habaris concealed many things from them and taught, by simple tales, things within their understanding. He taught them the mysteries concerning the wheel of the years and divided the year into a Summer half and a Winter half, with a great year circle of fifty-two years, a hundred and four of which was the circle of the Destroyer. He gave them the Laws of Weal and Woe and established the folkfeasts of harvest-tide and seeding-tide. He taught them the ritual of Ulisidui."

104*52 is 5408 years.

Is this significant or what?
 Quoting: Manu-Koelbren


somewhat significant, yes.

but the five and a half days is an approximation.

the actual number is approximately 5.5304586 days and the days are years, but not thousands of years.

and what i say right here and now is gold and all other books suck.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1471397
United States
01/09/2012 06:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
IF this theory is correct the return of the Destroyer would be around the year 3950 AD ohyeah
 Quoting: Manu-Koelbren


i personally think humans wont even BE here in 3950AD.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1471397


I think humans will always be around while the Earth remains inhabitable in the least. We are creatures who refuse to die off easily. We've been around for a LONG time.
 Quoting: Manu-Koelbren


not really..
Manu-Koelbren  (OP)

User ID: 8305424
Spain
01/09/2012 06:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
Ok so I found this most interesting passage in the First Book of Adam and Eve. Check it out:

"GOD said to Adam, "I have ordained on this earth days and years, and thou and thy seed shall dwell and walk in it, until the days and years are fulfilled; when I shall send the Word that created thee, and against which thou hast transgressed, the Word that made thee come out of the garden and that raised thee when thou wast fallen.

Yea, the Word that will again save thee when the five days and a half are fulfilled."

But when Adam heard these words from God, and of the great five days and a half, he did not understand the meaning of them.

For Adam was thinking that there would be but five days and a half for him, to the end of the world.

And Adam wept, and prayed God to explain it to him.

Then God in His mercy for Adam who was made after His own image and similitude, explained to him, that these were 5,000 and 500 years; and how One would then come and save him and his seed."

Now check this passage from the Kolbrin:

"These and many other things were taught by Habaris, but many of his teachings displeased the people of Krowkasis who were then as they were before Herthew's forefather was led away. So Habaris concealed many things from them and taught, by simple tales, things within their understanding. He taught them the mysteries concerning the wheel of the years and divided the year into a Summer half and a Winter half, with a great year circle of fifty-two years, a hundred and four of which was the circle of the Destroyer. He gave them the Laws of Weal and Woe and established the folkfeasts of harvest-tide and seeding-tide. He taught them the ritual of Ulisidui."

104*52 is 5408 years.

Is this significant or what?
 Quoting: Manu-Koelbren


somewhat significant, yes.

but the five and a half days is an approximation.

the actual number is approximately 5.5304586 days and the days are years, but not thousands of years.

and what i say right here and now is gold and all other books suck.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3736817


Why are you trying to interpret the amount of years in that passage? God explains it not as a riddle but he says the exact amount of years, so you don't need to intepret anything, it's 5500 years, period.
Banned as usual.

“It is far easier to be a weakling than to be a Real Man. Were the Earth less harsh or the circumstances of life less austere, man would destroy himself before the shrine of the languid goddess. Only Real Men can with safety destroy the tangled forests and wilderness of Earth and make from them gardens, but will those who inherit the gardens be Real Men? The law decrees that they must be, or the wilderness will reclaim its own.”
Manu-Koelbren  (OP)

User ID: 8305424
Spain
01/09/2012 06:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
IF this theory is correct the return of the Destroyer would be around the year 3950 AD ohyeah
 Quoting: Manu-Koelbren


i personally think humans wont even BE here in 3950AD.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1471397


I think humans will always be around while the Earth remains inhabitable in the least. We are creatures who refuse to die off easily. We've been around for a LONG time.
 Quoting: Manu-Koelbren


not really..
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1471397


"Nintursu was the last of the line of Sisuda (Noah). Ten thousand generations had passed since the beginning and a thousand generations since the recreation. The Children of God and The Children of Men had passed into dust and only men remained. One hundred generations had passed since the overwhelming deluge and ten generations since The Destroyer last appeared. Once man lived for less than two score years, now his years were three score and ten. Once God had walked with men and men knew only God. Now He was hidden behind many veils and few saw Him, and then but dimly and with great distortion. Where once there was one God now gods were as numbered as the stars."

Men was already there at the beggining, do the calculation, you will go back around 400.000 years at least. Pretty much the same as the Sumerian records tell was the time that the Annunaki first arrived.

Word.
Banned as usual.

“It is far easier to be a weakling than to be a Real Man. Were the Earth less harsh or the circumstances of life less austere, man would destroy himself before the shrine of the languid goddess. Only Real Men can with safety destroy the tangled forests and wilderness of Earth and make from them gardens, but will those who inherit the gardens be Real Men? The law decrees that they must be, or the wilderness will reclaim its own.”
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3736817
United States
01/09/2012 06:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?

Ok so I found this most interesting passage in the First Book of Adam and Eve. Check it out:

"GOD said to Adam, "I have ordained on this earth days and years, and thou and thy seed shall dwell and walk in it, until the days and years are fulfilled; when I shall send the Word that created thee, and against which thou hast transgressed, the Word that made thee come out of the garden and that raised thee when thou wast fallen.

Yea, the Word that will again save thee when the five days and a half are fulfilled."

But when Adam heard these words from God, and of the great five days and a half, he did not understand the meaning of them.

For Adam was thinking that there would be but five days and a half for him, to the end of the world.

And Adam wept, and prayed God to explain it to him.

Then God in His mercy for Adam who was made after His own image and similitude, explained to him, that these were 5,000 and 500 years; and how One would then come and save him and his seed."

Now check this passage from the Kolbrin:

"These and many other things were taught by Habaris, but many of his teachings displeased the people of Krowkasis who were then as they were before Herthew's forefather was led away. So Habaris concealed many things from them and taught, by simple tales, things within their understanding. He taught them the mysteries concerning the wheel of the years and divided the year into a Summer half and a Winter half, with a great year circle of fifty-two years, a hundred and four of which was the circle of the Destroyer. He gave them the Laws of Weal and Woe and established the folkfeasts of harvest-tide and seeding-tide. He taught them the ritual of Ulisidui."

104*52 is 5408 years.

Is this significant or what?
 Quoting: Manu-Koelbren


somewhat significant, yes.

but the five and a half days is an approximation.

the actual number is approximately 5.5304586 days and the days are years, but not thousands of years.

and what i say right here and now is gold and all other books suck.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3736817


Why are you trying to interpret the amount of years in that passage? God explains it not as a riddle but he says the exact amount of years, so you don't need to intepret anything, it's 5500 years, period.
[/quote}

its not an interpretation its the cycle you are on, right now.

and its 5.5304 years or 2020 days, period.

you people don't know anything about God and really aren't in any position to tell me about God.
Manu-Koelbren  (OP)

User ID: 8305424
Spain
01/09/2012 06:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?

Ok so I found this most interesting passage in the First Book of Adam and Eve. Check it out:

"GOD said to Adam, "I have ordained on this earth days and years, and thou and thy seed shall dwell and walk in it, until the days and years are fulfilled; when I shall send the Word that created thee, and against which thou hast transgressed, the Word that made thee come out of the garden and that raised thee when thou wast fallen.

Yea, the Word that will again save thee when the five days and a half are fulfilled."

But when Adam heard these words from God, and of the great five days and a half, he did not understand the meaning of them.

For Adam was thinking that there would be but five days and a half for him, to the end of the world.

And Adam wept, and prayed God to explain it to him.

Then God in His mercy for Adam who was made after His own image and similitude, explained to him, that these were 5,000 and 500 years; and how One would then come and save him and his seed."

Now check this passage from the Kolbrin:

"These and many other things were taught by Habaris, but many of his teachings displeased the people of Krowkasis who were then as they were before Herthew's forefather was led away. So Habaris concealed many things from them and taught, by simple tales, things within their understanding. He taught them the mysteries concerning the wheel of the years and divided the year into a Summer half and a Winter half, with a great year circle of fifty-two years, a hundred and four of which was the circle of the Destroyer. He gave them the Laws of Weal and Woe and established the folkfeasts of harvest-tide and seeding-tide. He taught them the ritual of Ulisidui."

104*52 is 5408 years.

Is this significant or what?
 Quoting: Manu-Koelbren


somewhat significant, yes.

but the five and a half days is an approximation.

the actual number is approximately 5.5304586 days and the days are years, but not thousands of years.

and what i say right here and now is gold and all other books suck.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3736817


Why are you trying to interpret the amount of years in that passage? God explains it not as a riddle but he says the exact amount of years, so you don't need to intepret anything, it's 5500 years, period.
[/quote}

its not an interpretation its the cycle you are on, right now.

and its 5.5304 years or 2020 days, period.

you people don't know anything about God and really aren't in any position to tell me about God.
 Quoting: Manu-Koelbren


I don't even understand what you're talking about, sorry.
Banned as usual.

“It is far easier to be a weakling than to be a Real Man. Were the Earth less harsh or the circumstances of life less austere, man would destroy himself before the shrine of the languid goddess. Only Real Men can with safety destroy the tangled forests and wilderness of Earth and make from them gardens, but will those who inherit the gardens be Real Men? The law decrees that they must be, or the wilderness will reclaim its own.”
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3558872
United States
01/09/2012 06:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
The problem is in the two passages you site - only one can be correct given the time lines of when supposedly they were said, not both. So assuming they both point to a certain time frame of 5500 years is not viable... given that they were sited who knows how long apart from each other - one at creation the other at Egypt...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3558872
United States
01/09/2012 06:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
Also, if you believe in the Bible, Adam lived for almost a thousand years... at which point in Adams life did "god" utter these words???
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8033633
United States
01/09/2012 06:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
There is no shortage of people who will tell you about god here

hence the name
Manu-Koelbren  (OP)

User ID: 8305424
Spain
01/09/2012 06:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
Also, if you believe in the Bible, Adam lived for almost a thousand years... at which point in Adams life did "god" utter these words???
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3558872


This was told to Adam right after he and Eve were kicked out of Eden.
Banned as usual.

“It is far easier to be a weakling than to be a Real Man. Were the Earth less harsh or the circumstances of life less austere, man would destroy himself before the shrine of the languid goddess. Only Real Men can with safety destroy the tangled forests and wilderness of Earth and make from them gardens, but will those who inherit the gardens be Real Men? The law decrees that they must be, or the wilderness will reclaim its own.”
Enlilson

User ID: 1066398
United States
01/09/2012 06:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
NO... 3600 years is the cycle
It doesn't matter who I m it's who U R so ChoOse
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3055162
United States
01/09/2012 06:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
God's abode is so distant it would take a journey of 3,500 years to reach
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8399009
United States
01/09/2012 06:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
OP, adam and eve were here 38000 years ago.

Nibiru is not the destroyer. It was here at the time of Christ 2000 years ago. It has never caused destruction, the destroyer is a totally different object and it hasn't done that much either, except when it dragged what became venus into our solar system long ago.
Manu-Koelbren  (OP)

User ID: 8305424
Spain
01/09/2012 06:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Was Sitchin wrong about the cycle of Nibiru/The Destroyer?
The problem is in the two passages you site - only one can be correct given the time lines of when supposedly they were said, not both. So assuming they both point to a certain time frame of 5500 years is not viable... given that they were sited who knows how long apart from each other - one at creation the other at Egypt...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3558872


The problem is in the two passages you site - only one can be correct given the time lines of when supposedly they were said, not both. So assuming they both point to a certain time frame of 5500 years is not viable... given that they were sited who knows how long apart from each other - one at creation the other at Egypt...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3558872


That's inconsequential, the Egyptians recorded the last passing of the Destroyer during the Israelite exodus and that gives us the last flyby which we can use to calculate previous flybies. The time that Adam lived was too far back to calculate and we cannot know, but if we could it's quite certain that, granted the path of the destroyer has remained stable all those thousands of years, we could calculate it's passings by earth and find those dates I calculated to fall within the model.
Banned as usual.

“It is far easier to be a weakling than to be a Real Man. Were the Earth less harsh or the circumstances of life less austere, man would destroy himself before the shrine of the languid goddess. Only Real Men can with safety destroy the tangled forests and wilderness of Earth and make from them gardens, but will those who inherit the gardens be Real Men? The law decrees that they must be, or the wilderness will reclaim its own.”





GLP