|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
How the Illuminati Really Began.
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
...
And that my friend is the essence of magic and control mechanisms at once. Hiding the apparent in plain sight. Psychology and the flow of time renders moot that which is just percieved to belong. It becomes a black box and a default mechanism, requiring no thought. Seeing it once again is learning to see once again.
Quoting: Dionysian Fullaflatus I love this shit, because I can somehow visualize these concepts in my mind. The above came with a feeling that I can put into a structured image, and SEE what the disconnect looks like! I'm trying to create a new language which incorporates preprogrammed norms with the fuzzy (personal bias and valuation). It has to be based on monolithic trans cultural symbolism, however allowing for aforementioned bias and cultural bent or tact/stratagem. It also needs balancing as both side of the incidence symbol (=) . Allowing ,incrementally to wash biases and leave the data pure. It's been my pet project inspired by the theosophical idea of intermingled tone and hue. A GREAT influential tool...hiding the bias in the stratagem of trans cultural symbolism. Only a small percentage of people would be knowledgeable enough to see YOU when the trans cultural values block the bias from their sight. OOF! And then (=) comes along and merges the unseen bias into the new language base. How? Through incremental pieces of the language that build upon each other. Quite a project! This is the why of it. The how is there in familial groupings of programming. Say, the incidence of hidden programming to unleash the icon on say an Ipad or somesuch smart device. The generation is based on tone and complex colour and the associations they inherently imbue the viewer. Ultimately, it's driven by archetype. Oddly enough, the key is probably left in deciphering glossalallia (sp?).
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
