|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
"Chemtrails" in 1979
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
...
Do you have any evidence to the contrary?
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9861563 As I clearly stated, and most sane people understand... You want me to prove a negative... Maybe this is easier for you... When did you stop beating your wife?  Still waiting for you to prove that "they" whoever they maybe are not using high sulfur content fuel to create persistent contrails. That is called a burden or proof fallacy. The burden of proof is being placed on the wrong party. Those claiming the existence of chemtrails have to provide the evidence suppoting their claim. No one has to prove that they don't exist anymore they you have to prove there isn't a pink elephant in your living room. Again, I have never mentioned chemtrails, I am asking the debunkers here to prove that jet fuel does not contain high content sulfur fuel which given the right atmospheric conditions creates persistent contrails and that the high content sulfur fuel is not being used for a geoengineering program.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
