PELOSI THREAT: NEWT WON'T BE PRESIDENT 'THERE IS SOMETHING I KNOW'

The GOP base is a distracted, unaligned mess right now.

The moderators of the debates are doing a great job painting them as war mongering thieves.

I hate this field. As much as RP is the man, he won't win bc many are told to believe this and therefore just look to mittens and newt (how is lame ass santorum even around still?!)


This should of been an easy victory against the democrats, but this is the best we have to offer? Ugh.

Gee, everyone arguing over which demon-possessed evil socialist gets to rule over the socialist empire that is Amerika. Should I vote for the republican socialist or the democrat socialist? Decisons, decisions...

The more and more liberals open their mouths the more and more I want Newt to win.

They are all in the bag for Romney.

We all know Ron will drop out soon, probably after Florida.

That leaves Santorum, Newt and Romney.

Romney is out because the media loves him and that is just bad news.

Newt is obvious choice because the media hates him.

Its really that simple.

We do? long road ahead. What everyone knew was Paul wouldnt do well in southern war mongering states like S.C. They are proud of their military background but yet ignore what the troops are saying about RP.

Its pointless for him to even try to compete in Fl because only the winner gets delegates and its such an expensive state to campaign in. It was actually a great strategic move to bypass this state for him, save that money to spend elsewhere. He will do well in Nevada and Maine.

Oh bullshit.
She's referring to the file of ethics violations and whatever it is specifically, Newt wasn't convicted of it. Most of it is public record.

You Paultards exist in your own, delusional world. You think that just because you say things, it makes it true. It would be funny if you weren't so sadly pathetic.

You have no fucking clue what the word "socialist" even means, do you?

I agree, anyone who says they love pelousy has been sippin' the kool aid too long, she is right at home with the uber-corrupt left wing liberals.

Someone probably already said it, but here goes:
"Injun Joe is ticklish".

Southern states? Look at the Gallup poll. He's doing 12% among Republicans nationwide, and he lost one percentage point following the FL debate. Stop deluding yourself.

I was wondering when the other shill was going to show up.

Hey Thailand 815, still hoping to get immunity on that Sandusky shit?

Last Edited by Alaina Ca'th on 01/24/2012 09:21 PM

Case in point. Say something intellectual or make a point about something real. Shows us your great wisdom that you claim to have and stop being such an ass clown. You dont like my political stance on something then respond with something relevant.

I call it like i see it when it comes to you and if we had a poll here on GLP the vast majority would agree.

Ladies and gentlemen....

It has be about something greater than putting an "American" into office. If we even get to election time without being shoulder deep in an even more perilous war than ones that have been fought in the last several decades, or the arrival of the ultimate in economic calamities...this needs to be about putting an upstanding American citizen into office that will actually listen to the other citizens of this country, cast aside corporate influence, and clearly adhere to the constitution.

The next person that goes into the White House will set the tone of this country not for just four or eight years...but for two decades or more. Their are Supreme Court Justices that will retire in the near future. The people to fill those empty positions *must* be of great integrity. Failure to ensure such will assure that this country continues down the increasingly troubling path that it is currently on.

They must be willing to put America first. Depending on your views of history, such has not been the case for four decades or more. We ship money to other nations while their are great challenges that have yet to be faced in any meaningful fashion here at home. Do not get me wrong, I think it is great to help thy neighbors and friends. But doing so at the expense of the health of our country is wrong. Sometimes, we should let those whom we call friends go it alone. I have the highest regard for the men and women of our military, but we have sent them into the greatest battles in the halls of history...and often too early or quite wrongly. I hold great respect for Allen West. Though what he did may not have been right, he spoke a great truth when he said that we would "go through hell with gasoline" for his men. That is dedication. He was not going to sacrifice his men. He was willing to give himself for his men.

When I stop and reflect on many of the personal discoveries and nuggets of knowledge I have gather over the last 12 years of my life...I am continually reminded that cold men will do anything to obtain power. Their are many in this country that aspire to gain power and wealth, even if it comes at the expense of integrity and the well being of many. They are wolves wearing sheeps clothing.

At this point I do not know whom to vote for. I only know who not to vote for. I know to avoid those whom continually say they will honor the will of the people of this nation, and then do anything but that. I know not to vote for those whom have taken part in activities in their past, yet call for death of those who do so now. I know better than to vote for a man who refuses to accept responsibility for his fair share of current circumstances, yet continues to pledge to circumvent congress...to "go it alone".

I ask you all, what makes Mitt Romney right for the job? What is it that makes Newt Gingrich right for the job? What is it that makes Ron Paul right for the job? What about Rick Santorum? I am not looking for an explanation. I simply am putting forth questions for all of us to reflect upon and see if these people match with what many of us claim to want...something greater for our nation and the people within it.

I leave you with this last item to ponder....

What do Barack Obama, Newt Gingrich, and Mitt Romney all have in common? They have all attended at least one Bilderberg meeting. That, my friends, is a troubling thought.

You're right, it really should be an easy victory. Besides the ideological differences that many Americans have with Obama, he's also going to take a bunch of the blame for the economy as well, so you'd think that people would be inclined to vote for almost anyone other than Obama. I'm disappointed that the two front runners (Newt & Mitt) both seem to be open to centralized medicine and some sort of climate change legislation. To me those are the two biggest issues that signal massive government takeovers in our lives, and so any actual conservative should be against them. I'm not sure what makes the front runners conservatives actually.... cause they ruthlessly enable certain corporate interests that they are aligned with? I'm not a saintly person, but it seems these days perhaps conservative is a code word for ruthless Machiaveli and nothing more.

Some people say that being conservative is naive and it has failed. But, self governance is based on being able to get good information. Never before have we been able to get the info we have now and we have an unprecedented chance to govern ourselves today using the internet and our phones and all the ways we're able to spread unfiltered info and it just takes a leader to point that out. I'd hate for us to keep moving towards a more centralized model when a free society never really had a fair chance because good info has only been made available to most people within the last decade or so. And even with the good info, it takes some time for that info to pierce through the illusions we were all bathed in before that. Anyway, I think as long as the internet remains free a move towards real conservatism in inevitable, so that's my most important issue. And Ron Paul we know took a principled stand against SOPA & PIPA while many of the other politickers had to be prodded by the voters for them to finally make a stand. That's why people should vote for Ron. You know where he stands and will stand. The others make you feel like you have to watch over them at all times and bug them incessantly just to keep them from selling you out. Who wants that?

Its not only Repubs that vote in this thing, u do realize there arent all that many closed states. Indies and demo's are allowed to vote in this thing to. The name of the game is to rack up delegates, he will continue to do well in the caucus states and has a very good chance in TX and Cali which are huge delegate states.

I dont trust gallup polls, why? because they are the biggest polling agency out there, which means the elites have their hands all over that.

my, o my. you're a happy little ray of sunshine..

who ever allowed you to escape from your idyllic sunshine world?

Not. You sound like a miserable, pathetic individual.
Sorry. You have a twisted world view....I do hope you manage to escape from it.....

great post and agreed

hahaha.

and F*** Nancy for many reasons.

A very plausible thought!

Thanks for proving my point, little delusional Paultard.

SO disappointing!!!

The GOP has a perfect opportunity to end this marxist regime, and they can't produce a viable candidate? Idiots.

WHOOOSH!

sound of the literary reference going WAY over the heads of this bunch

Moderate republicans are not elected, conservatives are.
Reagan, both Sr. and W Bush ran as conservatives.... McCain, Dole ran as moderates. I wish the GOP establishment would wake the f up.

Yes, this seems to be the thing on msm's mind, they question him about it repeatedly... hmmm.... what ARE they up to?

Are they worried and really want to know, or is it a way of pissing off die hard Republicans that would look at that as treasonous to the party itself? There are so many that vote the party line, no thought.

She smoked his pipe.

Don't worry, the GOP will win as long as Ron Paul isn't the nominee. But there's really no chance in hell of that happening so we're safe.

Pelosi has so much baggage, so many skeletons in her closet-
I say build up your arsenal on Nancy and be proactive!
Discredit the shit out of her FIRST- then dare her to shoot the load NOW.

At that point, her crap looks like tit-for-tat
with the bonus of making it look like it comes from an elitist hypocrite who has been tweaking the system to buy votes at the taxpayer expense while acting like a repugnant- above it all elitist!
Let's paint her for what she is- it will minimalize anything she could possibly say and make it seem lame

At some point, trolling and stirring shit up bc you enjoy the masses hurling insults are you, gets annoying.

OK, so go on and delude yourself into believing the Gallup polls are fixed. They have been doing polls for 50 years and have an excellent track record.

I suppose this mysterious "elite" has bought all the other independent polls as well, such as Rasmussen? They have Paul at 10%. Out of close to a hundred polls, Paul has never received more than 15% support, and that was only in one poll by CBS News/NY Times:

[link to www.realclearpolitics.com]