Breaking: Pelosi Admits She Lied About Having Dirt on Newt Gingrich | |
anonymous321 User ID: 9580556 United States 01/25/2012 06:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I wish that were true... But just about everyone I know here in Texas say they'd rather reelect Obama before they'd ever vote for for Newt.. And that's saying a lot. Though, in a true election between Obama and Newt, I'd rather vote for my left shoe before any of those assholes step foot into the White House.. Newt has way too many ethics violations, and absolutely no family values -- and Obama has just about done the exact opposite of everything he said he'd do during his election campaign, so in my opinion, none of them deserve even getting elected to wipe the shit from my ass. Same goes for frothy fecal mixture Santorum himself, and Obama-clone Romney. He was vindicated on his ethics violations and only idiot sheep give a fuck about family values. I guess all your friends are as dumb as you. Looks like I offended you by telling the truth about Newt But you're right about the family values, except he divorced his second wife when she could have died within days from cancer, only to get with a woman he's been cheating on the then-divorced wife. That's fucking FUCKED up. But I'm sorry, Newt doesn't deserve shit, he's such a slimy little fuck. And that's something most of everyone on GLP would agree with me on. Wow, you have no idea what you're talking about. Admit you're lying...or just ignorant of the facts. Last Edited by anonymous321 on 01/25/2012 08:03 PM |
CrazyJarhead (OP) User ID: 1498716 United States 01/25/2012 06:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You're clearly an uneducated and uniformed person spewing your own ridiculous notions rather than fact. You must be a democrat. Quoting: CrazyJarhead You either don't have a clue about politics or you are a dis-information shill. Obama has no opposition which frees up the Democratic voters to switch over and vote for someone they think they can beat. It is how it has always been done from day one. Only an idiot would claim otherwise. . In that case they should have voted for Ron Paul because he has no chance in hell of winning. Why do you bring up Ron Paul every single time? You are obviously misinformed and quite delusional. Newt as Republican nominee = 4 more years of Obummer A Paultard calling someone "delusional". That's rich! Pearl Harbor was an inside job. |
CrazyJarhead (OP) User ID: 1498716 United States 01/25/2012 06:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As I told you last night in another thread... what you do is the exact opposite of "support". Please stop claiming you are "supporting" Ron Paul until you actually learn what the word "support" means. Does support mean join his cult and walk around with my head up my ass because it's obvious that's what Paultards do. No, that's not what support means. I'll tell you what "support" doesn't mean... "support" doesn't mean shouting "HE CAN'T WIN!!!!!!" whenever someone talks about him. "Support" doesn't mean calling anyone who actually supports him "paultards". In a nutshell, "support" does not mean what you think it does. So, even if the world and I know he can't win, we should just ignore the facts and put ourselves into a delusional trance like the Paultards? BTW, I don't call all his supporters "Paultards". Just the cult members who are too blind to see the truth about Ron Paul. That includes you, Paultard. Last Edited by CrazyJarhead on 01/25/2012 06:30 PM Pearl Harbor was an inside job. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1281623 United States 01/25/2012 06:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1281623 As I told you last night in another thread... what you do is the exact opposite of "support". Please stop claiming you are "supporting" Ron Paul until you actually learn what the word "support" means. Does support mean join his cult and walk around with my head up my ass because it's obvious that's what Paultards do. No, that's not what support means. I'll tell you what "support" doesn't mean... "support" doesn't mean shouting "HE CAN'T WIN!!!!!!" whenever someone talks about him. "Support" doesn't mean calling anyone who actually supports him "paultards". In a nutshell, "support" does not mean what you think it does. So, even if the world and I know he can't win, we should just ignore the facts and put ourselves into a delusional trance like the Paultards? BTW, I don't call all his supporters "Paultards". Just the cult members who are too blind to see the truth about Ron Paul. That includes you, Paultard. If you "know" he can't win, you can just STFU about it instead of actively working against him. Again, if you want to claim to "support" him, go learn what that fucking word actually means. You can think what you want about what you call people but your posts are here for the world to see and decide if you are lying or not. I think if they look, people will see the word "paultard" in a majority of your posts. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5465453 United States 01/25/2012 06:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s office on Wednesday said the minority leader doesn’t have any dirt on Newt Gingrich. Quoting: CrazyJarhead Nancy got a call from her handlers and got told to STFU. They don't want the public to know about the dirt til after Newt wins the GOP nomination. Nancy let the cat out of the bag too soon. She got scolded. This story is damage control. Not so. Whenever someone needs to decredit another they often do this. It happens all the time. |
CrazyJarhead (OP) User ID: 1498716 United States 01/25/2012 06:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: CrazyJarhead Does support mean join his cult and walk around with my head up my ass because it's obvious that's what Paultards do. No, that's not what support means. I'll tell you what "support" doesn't mean... "support" doesn't mean shouting "HE CAN'T WIN!!!!!!" whenever someone talks about him. "Support" doesn't mean calling anyone who actually supports him "paultards". In a nutshell, "support" does not mean what you think it does. So, even if the world and I know he can't win, we should just ignore the facts and put ourselves into a delusional trance like the Paultards? BTW, I don't call all his supporters "Paultards". Just the cult members who are too blind to see the truth about Ron Paul. That includes you, Paultard. If you "know" he can't win, you can just STFU about it instead of actively working against him. Again, if you want to claim to "support" him, go learn what that fucking word actually means. You can think what you want about what you call people but your posts are here for the world to see and decide if you are lying or not. I think if they look, people will see the word "paultard" in a majority of your posts. There are a lot of Paultards in my posts because there are a lot of Paultards on GLP. Paultards are sheep and sheep seem to flock to me. I do support Paul but he can't win. How is that actively working against him? Pearl Harbor was an inside job. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1281623 United States 01/25/2012 06:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There are a lot of Paultards in my posts because there are a lot of Paultards on GLP. Paultards are sheep and sheep seem to flock to me. Quoting: CrazyJarhead I do support Paul but he can't win. How is that actively working against him? Quit being obtuse. Constantly saying "He can't win" is actively working against him and not supporting him. How about this scenario - your child is trying to learn a song on the piano. They are struggling. If you tell them "you'll never learn that" is that supporting your child? Are you working against them in that scenario? |
CrazyJarhead (OP) User ID: 1498716 United States 01/25/2012 06:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There are a lot of Paultards in my posts because there are a lot of Paultards on GLP. Paultards are sheep and sheep seem to flock to me. Quoting: CrazyJarhead I do support Paul but he can't win. How is that actively working against him? Quit being obtuse. Constantly saying "He can't win" is actively working against him and not supporting him. How about this scenario - your child is trying to learn a song on the piano. They are struggling. If you tell them "you'll never learn that" is that supporting your child? Are you working against them in that scenario? If my child was as ignorant as Paultards, I would tell my child. Sorry but unlike Paultards, I live in a world of reality. Pearl Harbor was an inside job. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1281623 United States 01/25/2012 06:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There are a lot of Paultards in my posts because there are a lot of Paultards on GLP. Paultards are sheep and sheep seem to flock to me. Quoting: CrazyJarhead I do support Paul but he can't win. How is that actively working against him? Quit being obtuse. Constantly saying "He can't win" is actively working against him and not supporting him. How about this scenario - your child is trying to learn a song on the piano. They are struggling. If you tell them "you'll never learn that" is that supporting your child? Are you working against them in that scenario? If my child was as ignorant as Paultards, I would tell my child. Sorry but unlike Paultards, I live in a world of reality. Nice dodge. You've shown what you are now even more clearly. For everyone in the thread to see. Love it. We're done here. Have a great time trolling people and "supporting" RP, jackass. |
CrazyJarhead (OP) User ID: 1498716 United States 01/25/2012 06:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There are a lot of Paultards in my posts because there are a lot of Paultards on GLP. Paultards are sheep and sheep seem to flock to me. Quoting: CrazyJarhead I do support Paul but he can't win. How is that actively working against him? Quit being obtuse. Constantly saying "He can't win" is actively working against him and not supporting him. How about this scenario - your child is trying to learn a song on the piano. They are struggling. If you tell them "you'll never learn that" is that supporting your child? Are you working against them in that scenario? If my child was as ignorant as Paultards, I would tell my child. Sorry but unlike Paultards, I live in a world of reality. Nice dodge. You've shown what you are now even more clearly. For everyone in the thread to see. Love it. We're done here. Have a great time trolling people and "supporting" RP, jackass. No problem. I'm sure you have to get back to sucking Ron Paul's saggy balls. See you later, Paultard. Ron Paul 2012! (But he can't win) Pearl Harbor was an inside job. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9580477 United States 01/25/2012 06:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I wouldn't just sit this one out. I'd go out of my way to vote against Newt. Charlie Manson could be the democrat nominee and vote for him over Newt. Jesus, I can't believe we are even discussing the possibility that Newt might become president. Just goes to show how completely in the gutter The US has become. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4109611 United States 01/25/2012 09:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Rockarchy I wish that were true... But just about everyone I know here in Texas say they'd rather reelect Obama before they'd ever vote for for Newt.. And that's saying a lot. Though, in a true election between Obama and Newt, I'd rather vote for my left shoe before any of those assholes step foot into the White House.. Newt has way too many ethics violations, and absolutely no family values -- and Obama has just about done the exact opposite of everything he said he'd do during his election campaign, so in my opinion, none of them deserve even getting elected to wipe the shit from my ass. Same goes for frothy fecal mixture Santorum himself, and Obama-clone Romney. He was vindicated on his ethics violations and only idiot sheep give a fuck about family values. I guess all your friends are as dumb as you. Looks like I offended you by telling the truth about Newt But you're right about the family values, except he divorced his second wife when she could have died within days from cancer, only to get with a woman he's been cheating on the then-divorced wife. That's fucking FUCKED up. But I'm sorry, Newt doesn't deserve shit, he's such a slimy little fuck. And that's something most of everyone on GLP would agree with me on. Wow, you have no idea what you're talking about. Admit you're lying...or just ignorant of the facts. He cheated on his second wife with the woman who would later become his third one, and also dropped divorce papers on the second wife while she was in the hospital with cancer. That's a fact, sorry. |
anonymous321 User ID: 9587693 United States 01/25/2012 09:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: CrazyJarhead He was vindicated on his ethics violations and only idiot sheep give a fuck about family values. I guess all your friends are as dumb as you. Looks like I offended you by telling the truth about Newt But you're right about the family values, except he divorced his second wife when she could have died within days from cancer, only to get with a woman he's been cheating on the then-divorced wife. That's fucking FUCKED up. But I'm sorry, Newt doesn't deserve shit, he's such a slimy little fuck. And that's something most of everyone on GLP would agree with me on. Wow, you have no idea what you're talking about. Admit you're lying...or just ignorant of the facts. He cheated on his second wife with the woman who would later become his third one, and also dropped divorce papers on the second wife while she was in the hospital with cancer. That's a fact, sorry. Not so. You are ignorant of the facts. Almost strange to see that some people, like you, follow lies on the internet and believe them. It's both comical and sad. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4109611 United States 01/25/2012 09:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Rockarchy Looks like I offended you by telling the truth about Newt But you're right about the family values, except he divorced his second wife when she could have died within days from cancer, only to get with a woman he's been cheating on the then-divorced wife. That's fucking FUCKED up. But I'm sorry, Newt doesn't deserve shit, he's such a slimy little fuck. And that's something most of everyone on GLP would agree with me on. Wow, you have no idea what you're talking about. Admit you're lying...or just ignorant of the facts. He cheated on his second wife with the woman who would later become his third one, and also dropped divorce papers on the second wife while she was in the hospital with cancer. That's a fact, sorry. Not so. You are ignorant of the facts. Almost strange to see that some people, like you, follow lies on the internet and believe them. It's both comical and sad. Here's how fucked up Newt is.. "I cheated on my wives because I felt so passionately for this country" [link to dailybail.com] |
Burt Gummer User ID: 7702124 United States 01/25/2012 09:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s office on Wednesday said the minority leader doesn’t have any dirt on Newt Gingrich. Quoting: CrazyJarhead Pelosi has suggested in two interviews that she knows something that could prevent Gingrich from becoming president, but her office said the California Democrat doesn’t have any secrets about Gingrich, who has shot to the top of national Republican polls after winning the South Carolina primary. "The 'something' Leader Pelosi knows is that Newt Gingrich will not be President of the United States. She made that clear last night," Pelosi spokesman Drew Hammill said in a statement. "Leader Pelosi previously made a reference to the extensive amount of information that is in the public record, including the comprehensive committee report with which the public may not be fully aware,” Hammill said. Pelosi made headlines on Tuesday when she told CNN Gingrich would not be president, and that “there’s something I know.” [link to thehill.com] She denies it now because she realized....SHE COULD GO TO JAIL FOR RELEASING any so called DIRT that only SHE was privy to. Dumb witch finally realized she could do jail time. |
anonymous321 User ID: 9587693 United States 01/25/2012 09:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: CrazyJarhead He was vindicated on his ethics violations and only idiot sheep give a fuck about family values. I guess all your friends are as dumb as you. Looks like I offended you by telling the truth about Newt But you're right about the family values, except he divorced his second wife when she could have died within days from cancer, only to get with a woman he's been cheating on the then-divorced wife. That's fucking FUCKED up. But I'm sorry, Newt doesn't deserve shit, he's such a slimy little fuck. And that's something most of everyone on GLP would agree with me on. Wow, you have no idea what you're talking about. Admit you're lying...or just ignorant of the facts. He cheated on his second wife with the woman who would later become his third one, and also dropped divorce papers on the second wife while she was in the hospital with cancer. That's a fact, sorry. Please elaborate. What is this second wife's name and where was her cancer? What type of treatment did she get for her cancer? Did she survive? Just curious. I'm sure you must have the answers since you say you know the facts. Did she date him while she knew he was still married to his first wife? In other words...did she commit adultery? Waiting.... Last Edited by anonymous321 on 01/25/2012 09:36 PM |
Epic Beard Guy User ID: 1554083 United States 01/26/2012 09:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You don't have to know a secret about Newt, just use a little memory. He would probably still be in the house if it not for his problem with ethics violations. I can't imagine why anyone would think his ethics have changed enough to make him a good candidate for any office. Working for Fannie and Freddie sure as hell doesn't help the chances of him being a good president. He is the only person I can think of that would be worse than Romney for the republican party. Neither of them will get any independent voters. A lot of us will vote third party, and the rest are just not going to vote. The only way Newt or Mitt get in the oval office is if enough states disqualify the imposter in chief and keep him off the ballot. Quoting: Epic Beard Guy He was vindicated on those allegations that were brought by his political enemies trying to bring him down. You need to work on your memory. He pled guilty and was fined and reprimanded for actions he did not deny. The IRS said he did not defraud them of money. The house of reps never said anything about him being innocent or anything that resembles innocent. Newt admitted his guilt and paid the consequences. An innocent man does not admit guilt and pay the fines, or give up his career. Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst. "America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." -- Claire Wolfe |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4130082 United States 01/26/2012 09:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 764206 United States 01/26/2012 10:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yep she was told to keep quiet until after the GOP nomination...Too all you rightwingretards out there... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8378854 He ain't going to win anyway... You're right. It's a mathematical impossibility since he is not on the ballot in so many states, he cannot come up with enough delegates to GET the nomination. Ron Paul, however, CAN. |
Burt Gummer User ID: 7702124 United States 01/26/2012 10:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yep she was told to keep quiet until after the GOP nomination...Too all you rightwingretards out there... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8378854 He ain't going to win anyway... You're right. It's a mathematical impossibility since he is not on the ballot in so many states, he cannot come up with enough delegates to GET the nomination. Ron Paul, however, CAN. Apparently you have NO CLUE how SUPER-DELEGATES work. |
Patrick Bateman User ID: 9411541 United States 01/26/2012 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
SnakeAirlines User ID: 1127787 United States 01/26/2012 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 436085 United States 01/26/2012 10:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Burt Gummer User ID: 7702124 United States 01/26/2012 10:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | She didn't lie, she mentioned this before, she does have dirt. The problem, the dirt she has is from sealed congressional documents, and would commit a felony by revealing. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 436085 ^^^ This. ...which is why she clammed up. She could put HERSELF in prison. Wouldn't that be nice??? Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 01/26/2012 10:18 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9591140 United States 01/26/2012 10:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Burt Gummer User ID: 7702124 United States 01/26/2012 10:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |