Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,510 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,760,863
Pageviews Today: 2,385,656Threads Today: 626Posts Today: 9,346
06:03 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

 
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1104458
United States
10/01/2012 07:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
agent 74444,
do you realise how much time you are spending with all your attacking posts to AA? I mean just the reply above is huge to pick apart everything...I mean if you are as you say just an average poster unconnected with the .govs, than why do you spend so much time on THIS thread??
what do you do exactly that would give you so much of an interest on the subject and thread? what do you do for a living? (this needs answering imo now)

people this needs answering because agent 74444 takes over EVERY page on this brilliant thread.

also I hope EVERYONE notices that agent 74444 always starts every spat with AA, & I mean every one.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24735063


From now on as far as I am concerned he is talking to himself. He has managed to completely interrupt the exchange of information here by having posters banned and continually caterwauling, the best thing to do I suppose is to ignore him and simply continue to post information as it develops.
It seems people are able to read the thread but not respond to it, except in some cases where they get the server problem message. If you have been getting this message after attempting to vein a page here or post, look at your history and it will say 'your IP is banned', yet you can navigate from that page by pushing the 'back' button and access anything else on the forum. It is simply a way to ban people from posting to or reading this thread without reducing the websites revenue.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212242


I just had a thought AA.

Has any administrator EVER posted on this thead??
I don't think they have....not one....hmmm

how many pages and views does this thread have again(& AA's other one)??
hmmm
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24735063


There are obviously many more people reading the thread than responding to it, which is quite normal in of itself, but the ratio here is quite unusual, as is the norm for most of my posts on glp.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1104458
United States
10/01/2012 07:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
The ratio of view to posts is approximately 250 to 1
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1104458
United States
10/01/2012 07:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
The highest ratio of views to posts on any other thread I could find was 35 to one and 20 to one seems to be about average.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1104458
United States
10/01/2012 07:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
What we have is a lot of government operatives and 'scientists' trying to glean information without giving up who they are.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1104458
United States
10/01/2012 07:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
You want to know what I know in detail , it's going to cost you. Information is not free. Perhaps directing a bit of the billions in funding for pseudoscience my way and calling off the dogs might persuade me a bit more effectively than force. With a team of my own doing research based on purely allegorical science , i can guarantee results. The direction you're taking now is a road to nowhere.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1104458
United States
10/01/2012 07:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
You want to know what I know in detail , it's going to cost you. Information is not free. Perhaps directing a bit of the billions in funding for pseudoscience my way and calling off the dogs might persuade me a bit more effectively than force. With a team of my own doing research based on purely allegorical science , i can guarantee results. The direction you're taking now is a road to nowhere.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1104458
United States
10/01/2012 07:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
LOL, they replaced the word "empirical" with "allegorical"., which is obviously not a typo or a spelling issue..
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1104458
United States
10/01/2012 10:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
The data on this page has been redacted since earlier in the say an now shows a rather robust geomagnetic storm occurred during the late evening to early morning hours in the US. This was previously NOT registered at this level on the kp index, which peaked out at 3 or 4 when I looked at this morning( I believe it was 3).

Now I see they have changed the data to show a maximum kp index of 7, which is a radical difference. I hope others were noting the data when I mentioned these charts this morning and can confirm what I just stated. Why they would understate the seriousness of a geomagnetic disturbance in my opinion is to prevent the loss of revenue in the airline industry by the canceling and re routing flights where it would have been prudent to do so.

As I stated before, expect solar activity to go into overdrive in the immediate future, with nitro boost and supercharging for those of you who prefer metaphoric description. Also I would be surmised if the elite went to ground very soon, they are already hiding out in isolated areas and I know of more than a few who are heading to the now infamous DENVER area, which is a confirmed massive underground bunker.

.The mansions of the rich,famous and 'elite' on the east coast high society areas in places like Martha's vineyard and Long Island are simply abandoned, being taken care of by professional house sitters and grounds keepers, I know this for a FACT through my own sources of information.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1104458
United States
10/01/2012 10:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
The data on this page has been redacted since earlier in the say an now shows a rather robust geomagnetic storm occurred during the late evening to early morning hours in the US. This was previously NOT registered at this level on the kp index, which peaked out at 3 or 4 when I looked at this morning( I believe it was 3).

Now I see they have changed the data to show a maximum kp index of 7, which is a radical difference. I hope others were noting the data when I mentioned these charts this morning and can confirm what I just stated. Why they would understate the seriousness of a geomagnetic disturbance in my opinion is to prevent the loss of revenue in the airline industry by the canceling and re routing flights where it would have been prudent to do so.

As I stated before, expect solar activity to go into overdrive in the immediate future, with nitro boost and supercharging for those of you who prefer metaphoric description. Also I would be surmised if the elite went to ground very soon, they are already hiding out in isolated areas and I know of more than a few who are heading to the now infamous DENVER area, which is a confirmed massive underground bunker.

.The mansions of the rich,famous and 'elite' on the east coast high society areas in places like Martha's vineyard and Long Island are simply abandoned, being taken care of by professional house sitters and grounds keepers, I know this for a FACT through my own sources of information.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1104458


I forgot the link, LMAO!:

[link to www.n3kl.org]
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1104458
United States
10/01/2012 11:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I would like to make a statement in my own defense since several persons have stated things are normal and as usual in their areas. This is not evidence of anything but that they are either in areas I suspect are being cooled by cloud formation due to excessive evaporation, or they are reporting transient conditions as continuous patterns.

What is evidence of the validity of my predictions is though is some cases I was off by a few degrees (the maximum temperature recorded in the country was only 125 degrees and that took place in Missouri. However , as I predicted there were tens of thousands of high temperature records set world wide, and this WAS the hottest summer on record in recorded history.

Here where I live I recorded transient temperatures in excess of 130 degrees in the hard shade on three occasions that lasted up to 20 minutes at a time during CME arrivals on windy days. I was not able to post this data due to banning, I am presuming they saw what I was writing and banned me before it became visible.


. Our highest sustained high temperature was 119 degrees, so you could say I was off by a few degrees when I predicted 130 degree temps in the south. Ok, I was wrong.
LMAO
cruise

The total disintegration of the polar ice cap DID in fact occur. This information is readily available and MAINSTREAM scientists admitted that this was the greatest melting that has occurred in over 1 million years.

There is fact and article referenced on this thread with leading scientists in the field making this statement and warning there may be no real polar ice cap within 5 years, winter or summer.

Though there was patchy ice still present , for all intents and purposes it totally disintegrated, just as I predicted. I went on to predict that the refreezing this winter would be incomplete and thus far though refreezing should be occurring by now, it isn't on any measurable scale. The temperatures across the arctic areas are still well above freezing during the daylight hours.

These are "big deals" and I deserve recognition for my accuracy,they are predictions I nailed.
The reason I can make these types of predictions and persons trained in meteorology and others trained in astrophysics couldn't is simple, their education is compartmentalized and they have no dynamic knowledge of science, like for instance they have for the most part no idea the effects a plasma field can have on temperatures, or a cme , coronal hole or x ray flare. I know through observing patterns and correlations in data for over ten years now.

. I admit, I am no expert in every discipline involved, but my dynamic knowledge of science exceeds that of ANY TRADITIONALLY EDUCATED SCIENTIST, period....(don't bother calling the cia, 'cause they don't catch turtles anyway)-quoting 'Turtle man's" banjo playing partner.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1104458
United States
10/01/2012 11:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Is this thread having 'server problems' again? Seems odd not even the hard core shit slingers aren't posting.

PHIL PLAIT IS AN INCOMPETENT 'FANCY BOY', NASA'S DISGRACE, AND THAT IS BEING NICE. COME ON IN HERE, BOY! JAY WINDLEY SUCKS COCK AND DOESN'T KNOW SUBLIMATION FROM NUCLEAR FISSION.

WHY ARE ALL OF NASA'S PROPAGANDISTS MORAL DEGENERATES?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24518278
United States
10/02/2012 01:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
AA,
Just wanted to test the posting, and say thank you for the thread. Please stick around and keep interpreting the solar data.....even though some is contrived.

I do want you to know, barring you are some GLP figment... I have lots of love/peace/hope going out to you.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22290042
United Kingdom
10/02/2012 08:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I agree that our knowledge of quantum mechanics is based purely on theory and that light speed is merely our limitation on sub atomic particles. What *we* know is the most simple shadow of what exists beyond our understanding. I have no doubt that what exists outside of our boundaries of current intelligence has the potential to overturn every theory known to man, however I can't quite get my head around it! The sub atomic world has no correlation to our material dimension. Particles can be, and are, wherever they bloody want to be. Unfortunately, even being a member of mensa and having an iq of 160 does not allow my human brain to consider these facts. I rely on well informed sources. I lean towards the galactic black hole theory where cosmic particles are emitted at a constant rate from the linear distortion. Time and space cease to exist (as we know them). As we know them. That is the fundamental crux. There is something disturbing the magnetic lines that we inhabit. Something that we appear to be moving towards or through. Thoughts please AA?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22290042
United Kingdom
10/02/2012 10:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
If cosmic particles are emitted by supernovae, unless they are in exact position, surely the side of the earth facing the primary direction of the emission would be more affected than that facing away. The earth, however, has mostly constant readings. Cosmic particles appear to vary very little in intensity, therefore is it not possible that they originate from a different source? Something with a constant output.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1125072
United States
10/02/2012 02:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I agree that our knowledge of quantum mechanics is based purely on theory and that light speed is merely our limitation on sub atomic particles. What *we* know is the most simple shadow of what exists beyond our understanding. I have no doubt that what exists outside of our boundaries of current intelligence has the potential to overturn every theory known to man, however I can't quite get my head around it! The sub atomic world has no correlation to our material dimension. Particles can be, and are, wherever they bloody want to be. Unfortunately, even being a member of mensa and having an iq of 160 does not allow my human brain to consider these facts. I rely on well informed sources. I lean towards the galactic black hole theory where cosmic particles are emitted at a constant rate from the linear distortion. Time and space cease to exist (as we know them). As we know them. That is the fundamental crux. There is something disturbing the magnetic lines that we inhabit. Something that we appear to be moving towards or through. Thoughts please AA?
 Quoting: Elemental


You and I both have a mutual understanding of our universe in common, and that is that we don't know but tiny fraction of what there is to know. I feel exactly the same way you do, basing all of my understanding of science of known facts and observation, and some conclusions can be reached in this manner. However, anyone claiming to understand quantum mechanics is lying, and those who claim they do are blowhards and messily exposed as charltains. My contention is the the foundation of science must be solid and known, and no theory built upon a foundation of another theory is even worth reading.

ALL of my conclusions are based on empirical facts, for instance that cosmic 'rays' are in fact particles accelerated beyond light speed. Until mainstream science ceases to pretend and cover up facts in order to prop up dubious theories, it is nothing more that complex fiction with highly questionable mathematical proofs.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1125072
United States
10/02/2012 02:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
If cosmic particles are emitted by supernovae, unless they are in exact position, surely the side of the earth facing the primary direction of the emission would be more affected than that facing away. The earth, however, has mostly constant readings. Cosmic particles appear to vary very little in intensity, therefore is it not possible that they originate from a different source? Something with a constant output.
 Quoting: Elemental


With billions of stars, perhaps the rate of supernovae throughout the galaxy is constant including the majority of which are obscured by the dark rift or other matter, and the particles are trapped in the energy/matter vortex that I perceive the galaxy to be. My personal favorite theory is that they are simply particles accelerated by a vortex until the reach the point where they escape it's gravitational field.
ehecatl

User ID: 24814133
Mexico
10/02/2012 07:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Hi AA,
Thank you for all your information in the last few days.

There are a few things in this post I'd like to respond to.

I would like to make a statement in my own defense since several persons have stated things are normal and as usual in their areas. This is not evidence of anything but that they are either in areas I suspect are being cooled by cloud formation due to excessive evaporation, or they are reporting transient conditions as continuous patterns.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1104458


I have stated basically what you are stating here before, but I'll state it again, that myself and the whole community of thousands of pilots are aware of a general weather pattern that is part of a constant seen over the years and decades, and having to do with how the bands of air currents arrange themselves on the globe.

The weather in the southern high Mexican plateau (a region generally from southern Mexico City southward a few hundred miles) is generally the opposite in any particular weather pattern, to northern Mexico and the greater US, in terms of temperature and humidity, but generally mirrors those general conditions for the Vancouver region.

That is to say, about 80% of the time, if it is hot and dry in the greater US, then it is also hot and dry in northern Mexico, but it is cooler and rainier in the Mexican southern high plateau where I live, and in Vancouver, and vice-verse. This summer followed that pattern exactly, with the dates of the heat wave in the US matching cooler and rainier conditions in my region and in Vancouver Canada at the same time. That pattern of opposites matched up almost to the day this summer at the start of the US heat wave, and the cold rainy conditions that hit at exactly the same time here and in Vancouver.

When I state that is it cool and rainy here, it is not meant to be an attack against you, but the view from my point of view. Our cold streak that we have had here since June is continuing this week with not too much sun and only comfortable with sweaters and warm clothes. It is usually getting warmer by now. The hottest months here are January and February. It is interesting to note however that this is not because I am south of the equator, because I am not. My latitude is about 19 degrees north. Rather it has to do with how the bands of moisture line up on the planet.

(that is not to say that it is hotter in Vancouver in in Jan-Feb when we have our hot season in mexico. Because it obviously isn't, there is snow in Vancouver during those months, but rather that means that if the Vancouver winter is dryer and warmer than usual, then is is also generally dryer and hotter during our hottest season which is Jan,Feb, and if it is colder with more precipitation in the Vancouver winter, then it will be cooler with more precipitation south of Mexico City at the same time, which is it's hotter season, etc.
So the Vancouver - Southern Mexico climate relation is that although the timing of the seasons of the two regions are 180 degrees opposite, but the deviations of those temps and humidity relative to the respective norms of those regions coincide... :) clear as mud?!)


The total disintegration of the polar ice cap DID in fact occur. This information is readily available and MAINSTREAM scientists admitted that this was the greatest melting that has occurred in over 1 million years.

There is fact and article referenced on this thread with leading scientists in the field making this statement and warning there may be no real polar ice cap within 5 years, winter or summer.

Though there was patchy ice still present , for all intents and purposes it totally disintegrated, just as I predicted. I went on to predict that the refreezing this winter would be incomplete and thus far though refreezing should be occurring by now, it isn't on any measurable scale. The temperatures across the arctic areas are still well above freezing during the daylight hours.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1104458


This data source shows that the ice pack is continuing to grow as of several weeks. What data source do you have?
[link to nsidc.org]

These are "big deals" and I deserve recognition for my accuracy,they are predictions I nailed.
The reason I can make these types of predictions and persons trained in meteorology and others trained in astrophysics couldn't is simple, their education is compartmentalized and they have no dynamic knowledge of science, like for instance they have for the most part no idea the effects a plasma field can have on temperatures, or a cme , coronal hole or x ray flare. I know through observing patterns and correlations in data for over ten years now.

. I admit, I am no expert in every discipline involved, but my dynamic knowledge of science exceeds that of ANY TRADITIONALLY EDUCATED SCIENTIST, period....(don't bother calling the cia, 'cause they don't catch turtles anyway)-quoting 'Turtle man's" banjo playing partner.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1104458


Hey AA, I'm no astrophysicist, but just from my off the cuff logic, if the Cosmic Ray, or Neutron field of view is very diffuse, not showing clear sources, it would seem logical that this would be because some force, electromagnetism, gravity, whatever, to easily causes these particles or rays to curve and alter course, whatever they may be, and that would mean that even if their sources were very specific and possibly sporadic, that they could still appear as a diffuse haze by the time they get to earth. This would probably rule out the sun as a source though.

Other thing-
Did you see this post and video about the SECCHI instruments on the STEREO sun imaging satellites? Is it of any interest to us or the topic of this thread?
Thread: Secchi HI1-A + HI1-B 2007, 2008 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 in 15 min

TY

Last Edited by ehecatl on 10/02/2012 09:06 PM
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1119198
United States
10/03/2012 02:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!


The total disintegration of the polar ice cap DID in fact occur. This information is readily available and MAINSTREAM scientists admitted that this was the greatest melting that has occurred in over 1 million years.

There is fact and article referenced on this thread with leading scientists in the field making this statement and warning there may be no real polar ice cap within 5 years, winter or summer.

Though there was patchy ice still present , for all intents and purposes it totally disintegrated, just as I predicted. I went on to predict that the refreezing this winter would be incomplete and thus far though refreezing should be occurring by now, it isn't on any measurable scale. The temperatures across the arctic areas are still well above freezing during the daylight hours.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1104458

This data source shows that the ice pack is continuing to grow as of several weeks. What data source do you have?
[link to nsidc.org]
 Quoting: ehecatl


I said refreezing isn't occurring on an measurable scale and I was in error. The amount of increase in coverage is very small for the 2012 line on the graph, but it is measurable. I was looking at the same graph you were, perhaps my wording could have been better,, that there had been no significant refreezing and daytime temperatures are still averaging well over freezing. Pleas note the article I posted on this being the least ice coverage in over a million years.But I must admit, I need to edit my posts more carefully and choose my words a bit better.

These are "big deals" and I deserve recognition for my accuracy,they are predictions I nailed.
The reason I can make these types of predictions and persons trained in meteorology and others trained in astrophysics couldn't is simple, their education is compartmentalized and they have no dynamic knowledge of science, like for instance they have for the most part no idea the effects a plasma field can have on temperatures, or a cme , coronal hole or x ray flare. I know through observing patterns and correlations in data for over ten years now.

. I admit, I am no expert in every discipline involved, but my dynamic knowledge of science exceeds that of ANY TRADITIONALLY EDUCATED SCIENTIST, period....(don't bother calling the cia, 'cause they don't catch turtles anyway)-quoting 'Turtle man's" banjo playing partner.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1104458

Hey AA, I'm no astrophysicist, but just from my off the cuff logic, if the Cosmic Ray, or Neutron field of view is very diffuse, not showing clear sources, it would seem logical that this would be because some force, electromagnetism, gravity, whatever, to easily causes these particles or rays to curve and alter course, whatever they may be, and that would mean that even if their sources were very specific and possibly sporadic, that they could still appear as a diffuse haze by the time they get to earth. This would probably rule out the sun as a source though.
 Quoting: ehecatl

Yes, precisely! A galaxy is a vortex formed by forces upon matter, electromagnetic forces and gravitational forces, the more signification being electromagnetic. To me this seems obvious and has since I was a young child of 10.
Other thing-
Did you see this post and video about the SECCHI instruments on the STEREO sun imaging satellites? Is it of any interest to us or the topic of this thread?
Thread: Secchi HI1-A + HI1-B 2007, 2008 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 in 15 min

TY
 Quoting: ehecatl

I haven't seen it but I will take a look, I must be honest with you, I am very suspicious and unconvinced by anything coming from JPL, NASA or any source filtered by them. Note the title of the thread. Also please re read the last few pages for a description of my latest easily confirmable detection of fabrication of data.

For instance few realize that the only people in 'contact' with the Voyager' probe is JPL. No one else is in contact with it (and neither is JPL). More and more we are seeing massive funding for projects that produce data that makes no sense or as in the case of the Mars probe is amateuristically (is that word? If it isn't it needs to be and is now) fabricated.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24735063
United Kingdom
10/03/2012 03:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Is this thread having 'server problems' again? Seems odd not even the hard core shit slingers aren't posting.

PHIL PLAIT IS AN INCOMPETENT 'FANCY BOY', NASA'S DISGRACE, AND THAT IS BEING NICE. COME ON IN HERE, BOY! JAY WINDLEY SUCKS COCK AND DOESN'T KNOW SUBLIMATION FROM NUCLEAR FISSION.

WHY ARE ALL OF NASA'S PROPAGANDISTS MORAL DEGENERATES?
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1104458


I have noticed they do this when a few of us AC's start posting in your support.....they leave you alone for a few days perhaps a week or so....then they return..

it is SO obvious.
Anonymous Astrophysicist.
User ID: 1237875
United States
10/03/2012 03:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Is this thread having 'server problems' again? Seems odd not even the hard core shit slingers aren't posting.

PHIL PLAIT IS AN INCOMPETENT 'FANCY BOY', NASA'S DISGRACE, AND THAT IS BEING NICE. COME ON IN HERE, BOY! JAY WINDLEY SUCKS COCK AND DOESN'T KNOW SUBLIMATION FROM NUCLEAR FISSION.

WHY ARE ALL OF NASA'S PROPAGANDISTS MORAL DEGENERATES?
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1104458


I have noticed they do this when a few of us AC's start posting in your support.....they leave you alone for a few days perhaps a week or so....then they return..

it is SO obvious.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24735063


In my experience the post you quoted would have brought them in mass. I think maybe they figured out by posting they are bumping the thread, but they won't leave it alone if it gets any significance views or posts, not a chance.
If I post new material that goes against mainstream science, this will also bring them in. I have been very busy lately with what is a distraction I cannot ignore, one 'they' created. I don't know what my future holds , but one thing that has always been dangerous is teaching revolutionary ideas. Many men have died doing so, and went through all sorts of suffering. I knew the costs going into it, and the likely outcome. It is not that I put little value on my life, it is more a hope that through knowledge will come advancement in the human condition, that more of the right people will survive instead of the hellish future our planet has in store for it if only the least worthy are preserved. It is something worth dying for.
ehecatl

User ID: 24814133
Mexico
10/03/2012 10:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I listened to half the Douglas Dietrich interview last night before I got totally bumped from the live feed.

I am interested every time I hear that guy talk, especially considering that his stories of the what really happened in the war with Japan coincide especially with stories I heard from a (step)grandfather that served with the Navy.

Douglas is rather manic, full of details, and obviously very opinionated, so I would not be surprised if AA were to disagree with him at times, or maybe not,
but I can't help finding common ground between the two opinions, and mine too, which characterizes those with government positions as mostly people who check into work but are some of the most unproductive people of all, especially in the higher echelons where they are given to all kinds of indulgences.

Dietrich's accounts of sorcery type practices of major and historic world governments is icing on the cake, and honestly I don't doubt that one bit either, and from what I know directly too.

After I got bumped I went and downloaded the last GLP DD interview, and FWIW, I did not hear very much in the first hour of the interview last night that was not covered six months earlier, but it was all interesting in any case.

I got bumped at the exact moment that Dietrich was describing how general Groves never did much of note except massive occult and symbolic things, like the design and inauguration of the Pentagon, on September 11th, 19..... and there it cut off. As auspicious a place to get cut off as any.

Here is the GLP link to the interview from six months ago.

this is a 29MB, 2hr, mp3 download -
[link to podcast.godlikeproductions.com]

Last Edited by ehecatl on 10/03/2012 11:01 AM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
10/03/2012 01:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Is this thread having 'server problems' again? Seems odd not even the hard core shit slingers aren't posting.

PHIL PLAIT IS AN INCOMPETENT 'FANCY BOY', NASA'S DISGRACE, AND THAT IS BEING NICE. COME ON IN HERE, BOY! JAY WINDLEY SUCKS COCK AND DOESN'T KNOW SUBLIMATION FROM NUCLEAR FISSION.

WHY ARE ALL OF NASA'S PROPAGANDISTS MORAL DEGENERATES?
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1104458


I have noticed they do this when a few of us AC's start posting in your support.....they leave you alone for a few days perhaps a week or so....then they return..

it is SO obvious.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24735063


In my experience the post you quoted would have brought them in mass. I think maybe they figured out by posting they are bumping the thread, but they won't leave it alone if it gets any significance views or posts, not a chance.
If I post new material that goes against mainstream science, this will also bring them in. I have been very busy lately with what is a distraction I cannot ignore, one 'they' created. I don't know what my future holds , but one thing that has always been dangerous is teaching revolutionary ideas. Many men have died doing so, and went through all sorts of suffering. I knew the costs going into it, and the likely outcome. It is not that I put little value on my life, it is more a hope that through knowledge will come advancement in the human condition, that more of the right people will survive instead of the hellish future our planet has in store for it if only the least worthy are preserved. It is something worth dying for.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1237875


But not worth something to risk your oh-so-precious-ego, I notice.

Ah, so amusing. If people post counter to you, its a conspiracy. If they don't post counter to you, it's a conspiracy. And so much drama!

If the admins had all the nifty powers you give them credit for, why don't they make this thread 'selectively visible' as you claimed they have done in the past?

I am just patiently awaiting the chance to *test* another of your supposed revolutionary ideas, the results of which are forthcoming in December. I expect to be alive and posting to the still-working internet, without the population having been reduced by ninety percent. You claim a better than 98% chance (do you have any idea what that really means?) that I will be wrong on all those counts.

Somehow, I think despite the ridiculously high odds you have given your predictions, that they will fail again. You think so, too, or you would have been willing to wager on it.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
10/03/2012 01:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
By the by, IDW...

Why isn't Anonymous Coward 24735063 a British government agent, since his ID never changes?

Oh, yes, because he supports your position. Got it.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24352898
United States
10/03/2012 08:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
s226s226s226s226vvvvvvvvbsflagvvvvvvvvvs226s226vvvvvvvvvvbsflags226s226s226s226
vvvvvvvvvbsflagwhatevervvvbsflagvvvvvvvvbsflagwhateverbsflags226
s226bsflags226vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvs226vvbsflagbsflags226vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvs226bsflag
Anonymous Astrophysicist.
User ID: 1292330
United States
10/04/2012 12:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Is this thread having 'server problems' again? Seems odd not even the hard core shit slingers aren't posting.

PHIL PLAIT IS AN INCOMPETENT 'FANCY BOY', NASA'S DISGRACE, AND THAT IS BEING NICE. COME ON IN HERE, BOY! JAY WINDLEY SUCKS COCK AND DOESN'T KNOW SUBLIMATION FROM NUCLEAR FISSION.

WHY ARE ALL OF NASA'S PROPAGANDISTS MORAL DEGENERATES?
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1104458


I have noticed they do this when a few of us AC's start posting in your support.....they leave you alone for a few days perhaps a week or so....then they return..

it is SO obvious.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24735063


In my experience the post you quoted would have brought them in mass. I think maybe they figured out by posting they are bumping the thread, but they won't leave it alone if it gets any significance views or posts, not a chance.
If I post new material that goes against mainstream science, this will also bring them in. I have been very busy lately with what is a distraction I cannot ignore, one 'they' created. I don't know what my future holds , but one thing that has always been dangerous is teaching revolutionary ideas. Many men have died doing so, and went through all sorts of suffering. I knew the costs going into it, and the likely outcome. It is not that I put little value on my life, it is more a hope that through knowledge will come advancement in the human condition, that more of the right people will survive instead of the hellish future our planet has in store for it if only the least worthy are preserved. It is something worth dying for.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1237875


But not worth something to risk your oh-so-precious-ego, I notice.

Ah, so amusing. If people post counter to you, its a conspiracy. If they don't post counter to you, it's a conspiracy. And so much drama!

If the admins had all the nifty powers you give them credit for, why don't they make this thread 'selectively visible' as you claimed they have done in the past?

I am just patiently awaiting the chance to *test* another of your supposed revolutionary ideas, the results of which are forthcoming in December. I expect to be alive and posting to the still-working internet, without the population having been reduced by ninety percent. You claim a better than 98% chance (do you have any idea what that really means?) that I will be wrong on all those counts.

Somehow, I think despite the ridiculously high odds you have given your predictions, that they will fail again. You think so, too, or you would have been willing to wager on it.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


I want you to give me a one word answr to sinple question forgetting all of the history we have nad the personal hatred we have for each other:

Do you admit my predictions made on this thread have been extremely accurate, including going way out on a limb and predicting the total breakup of the polar ice cap (please note the PEER REVIEWED paper referenced here where the worlds leading TRADITIONALLY EDUCATED experts say this has been the most melting of the polar ice cap in over a million years and the many visual satellite images that graphically show the total breakup)), thousands of all time record temperatures worldwide,and the hottest summer on record have all been correct?
If not , please give a detailed explanation of where you think my predictions failed, with PEER REVIEWED references please.
cruise

Now, I have one more question for you, assuming you're not going make and ass out of yourself an attempt to claim these predictions were not correct, WHAT THE HELL MAKES YOU THINK I AM WRONG ABOUT THE PREDICTIONS I MADE THAT TAKE PLACE CHRONOLOGICALLY IN THE FUTURE FROM THIS TIME FORWARD?

Now that the astrophysics and meteorology columns in "GLP JEOPARDY" have been expended, let me ask you this question and you are welcome to reference any post I have made on the internet. When have you OR ANY OF THE INDIVIDUALS YOU INSISTED I APOLOGIZE TO IF I LOSE MY ONES SIDED NO WIN POSSIBLE BET WITH YOU EVER proved me wrong? Not called into question, not claimed it, but Plainly and obviously using empirical evidence as your only backing proved me wrong, about anything? And don't mention anything bases on unproved mathematical based theories where I out of principal refused to give and answer or any 10^5 bullshit.

In my textbooks there is no number 10^5. I was traditionally educated during a different time, when the numbing down had not yet taken firm hold.

Quite a record you have there, sport. You're batting a thousand.
Anonymous Astrophysicist.
User ID: 1292330
United States
10/04/2012 12:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
By the by, IDW...

Why isn't Anonymous Coward 24735063 a British government agent, since his ID never changes?

Oh, yes, because he supports your position. Got it.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


I don't know, maybe he is. Then again maybe his ID will change as soon as he reboots his modem like nevermore else.
Funny you should claim I have government agents supporting my position when doing so would be counter to any logical reasoning.
Anonymous Astrophysicist.
User ID: 1292330
United States
10/04/2012 12:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Please excuse the 'auto illiterate' editing in my posts above, I should be typing them to wordpad and then copy pasting them to a post page here and hitting 'post' quickly to prevent this childish chicanery, but let them have their fun. I think it should be obvious I am not illiterate by now.
I noticed they are concentrating on replacing 'an' with 'and' a lot lately, but this would be corrected by the software I use.

As I have said, I have automated spelling and grammar correction as I am a notoriously poor English master, and some of these 'mistakes' could not possible be generated by it. What the fuck man, why do shit like this, it makes you look petty and childish, as well as unintelligent.
Anonymous Astrophysicist.
User ID: 1292330
United States
10/04/2012 12:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
By the by, IDW...

Why isn't Anonymous Coward 24735063 a British government agent, since his ID never changes?

Oh, yes, because he supports your position. Got it.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


I don't know, maybe he is. Then again maybe his ID will change as soon as he reboots his modem like nevermore else.
Funny you should claim I have government agents supporting my position when doing so would be counter to any logical reasoning.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330


Nevermore, nevermore saith the raven

cruise
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
10/04/2012 04:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I want you to give me a one word answr to sinple question forgetting all of the history we have nad the personal hatred we have for each other:
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330


I have no hatred toward you. If you do, towards me, you should probably get that checked. Surely there is an Anger Management course nearby.

Do you admit my predictions made on this thread have been extremely accurate,\
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330



You did predict it was going to be a hot Summer. But you were hardly alone.


including going way out on a limb and predicting the total breakup of the polar ice cap
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330


To be honest, I DON'T remember you predicting that, but you certainly might have.


(please note the PEER REVIEWED paper referenced here where the worlds leading TRADITIONALLY EDUCATED experts say this has been the most melting of the polar ice cap in over a million years and the many visual satellite images that graphically show the total breakup)), thousands of all time record temperatures worldwide,and the hottest summer on record have all been correct?
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330


Yes. But, again, traditional climatologists have been warning about warming for decades.

Now, I have one more question for you, assuming you're not going make and ass out of yourself an attempt to claim these predictions were not correct, WHAT THE HELL MAKES YOU THINK I AM WRONG ABOUT THE PREDICTIONS I MADE THAT TAKE PLACE CHRONOLOGICALLY IN THE FUTURE FROM THIS TIME FORWARD?
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330


Because THAT is where you break from the 'traditional science' climatologists, and go onto huge predictive limbs all alone, citing the Mayan stuff, the 2012 stuff, and make a lot of other predictions sans evidence, and come up with outrageous 98.5% figures. That's where you part company with the traditionalists, and I think you will be wrong.

Now that the astrophysics and meteorology columns in "GLP JEOPARDY" have been expended, let me ask you this question and you are welcome to reference any post I have made on the internet. When have you OR ANY OF THE INDIVIDUALS YOU INSISTED I APOLOGIZE TO IF I LOSE MY ONES SIDED NO WIN POSSIBLE BET WITH YOU EVER proved me wrong?
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330


Before we get to that, I explained exactly why the bet isn't one sided. If you are right about the future, which you are **98.5%** certain of, and the fate of the world, you'd literally be rid of me UNTIL THE INTERNET FAILED. You have made it perfectly clear that you wish my speedy departure, you supposedly have filed complaints with government agencies because a person is posting counter to you on the internet (again, the horror!), you have wished for and attempted to silence me in a number of amusing and ineffective ways. Well, here is your chance to be rid of me, forever.

You just have to be *right.*

If you are right, you'd **never hear from me again,** because the Internet would fail, utterly, before I ever had a chance to come back to your thread. You have said you are *over 98% sure* you are right, that this gigantic failure WILL occur.

But, if I am going to risk big like that, you're going to need to risk something big in return. And there seems to be NOTHING more valuable to you than your own inflated ego and sense of self importance. So, that's why I was picking that as something to wager. And with less than a supposed 2% chance of you being wrong, you balk. UTTERLY.

Shows exactly how much you believe your OWN numbers.


Not called into question, not claimed it, but Plainly and obviously using empirical evidence as your only backing proved me wrong, about anything? And don't mention anything bases on unproved mathematical based theories where I out of principal refused to give and answer or any 10^5 bullshit.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330


How about the Windows calculator thing? Totally sure it doesn't go to enough digits without looking on your OWN computer. How about the Eccentricity of orbits you still get wrong (which means *calculus* is now part of the conspiracy), or the fact that the Moon doesn't have the lowest as you have claimed? That's PROVEN, by the way, as the eccentricities are known out to several decimal places -- you just reject the proof despite telescopes worldwide COUNTING on those predictions to work and allow them to track objects. How about your claims that water is the only compound that expands on freezing? How about the *myriad* of claims that you made that Apollo couldn't launch, separate, dock, transmit, receive, orbit the Moon, land... that, essentially, *everything* on Apollo was wrong? The engineers didn't get a SINGLE aspect of the mission right, in your worldview? That NUCLEAR reactors were on Apollo -- and, I suppose the Space Shuttle as well? Your threatened subpoenas? Missing mass in atomic reactions? That boats aren't grounded? The martial law prediction you made in *2004?* Your forthcoming bestseller? Selectively visible threads on GLP? Your spectacular chess playing? The difference between a scientific law and a scientific theory, and which is 'higher?' That asteroid velocities are under 4 kps? No gravity assisted trajectories? Who I am and who my father was? That meteor crater is only THEORIZED to be from a meteor -- despite 30 *tons* of samples found at the site? That computers are based on alien technology? That Moonrocks could be *created?* Or water being an organic compound?

What's worse? This is an *excerpt!* There is SO much more!


Quite a record you have there, sport. You're batting a thousand.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330


But we're not talking about me, or my record. After all, I claim to be a fairly average guy, which I am. My record seems fine, because I have bet against you in the past, and won, and expect, come December 22, that I will win again, and win handily.

What I notice is that YOU are unwilling to wager, even though, were you correct, you'd be rid of me until the end of the world as we know it.

Quite telling.
Anonymous astrophysicist
User ID: 1176568
United States
10/04/2012 07:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I want you to give me a one word answer to simple question forgetting all of the history we have and the personal hatred we have for each other:
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330

I have no hatred toward you. If you do, towards me, you should probably get that checked. Surely there is an Anger Management course nearby.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

cruise
Fucking lying bastard.

Do you admit my predictions made on this thread have been extremely accurate.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330


You did predict it was going to be a hot Summer. But you were hardly alone.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

No sire,(SIC) I did not simply predict it was going to be a hot summer, I predicted it would be the hottest summer ever recorded, and I was correct. The main reason I despise you so much is illustrated right here, in this comment, where you refuse to acknowledge a very significant fact that qualifies me and gives me credibility. You simply refuse to ever admit I am extremely accurate in my predictions and knowledgeable about the subjects I discuss, ever.


including going way out on a limb and predicting the total breakup of the polar ice cap
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330

To be honest, I DON'T remember you predicting that, but you certainly might have.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

It's right here, on this thread, and I am nearly certain you remember. I'm not going to search out the page out of over 300, but if you wish to deny what you know is true go right ahead. I know damned well you read it, and I'm sure if you deny it someone will find it and post it. I will myself if it comes to it.. That's why you issued a disclaimer with your denial.


(please note the PEER REVIEWED paper referenced here where the worlds leading TRADITIONALLY EDUCATED experts say this has been the most melting of the polar ice cap in over a million years and the many visual satellite images that graphically show the total breakup)), thousands of all time record temperatures worldwide,and the hottest summer on record have all been correct?
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330

Yes. But, again, traditional climatologists have been warning about warming for decades.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

Not a goddamned one of them predicted the total breakup of the polar icecap or the hottest summer ever recorded. You are doing it again, minimizing my accuracy and attempting to make it appear as if I were simply reading a weather forecast. What a fucking asshole.

Now, I have one more question for you, assuming you're not going make and ass out of yourself an attempt to claim these predictions were not correct, WHAT THE HELL MAKES YOU THINK I AM WRONG ABOUT THE PREDICTIONS I MADE THAT TAKE PLACE CHRONOLOGICALLY IN THE FUTURE FROM THIS TIME FORWARD?
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330

Because THAT is where you break from the 'traditional science' climatologists, and go onto huge predictive limbs all alone, citing the Mayan stuff, the 2012 stuff, and make a lot of other predictions sans evidence, and come up with outrageous 98.5% figures. That's where you part company with the traditionalists, and I think you will be wrong.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

Yes, I am not running with the herd, I'm not a herding animal. But you STILL have avoided answering the question with the skillful application of deceptive language, none of these climatologists came close to the accuracy I did. I said point blank this would be the hottest summer on record and the polar ice cap would totally disintegrate, and not a single soul besides me did.

Now that the astrophysics and meteorology columns in "GLP JEOPARDY" have been expended, let me ask you this question and you are welcome to reference any post I have made on the internet. When have you OR ANY OF THE INDIVIDUALS YOU INSISTED I APOLOGIZE TO IF I LOSE MY ONES SIDED NO WIN POSSIBLE BET WITH YOU EVER proved me wrong?
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330


Before we get to that, I explained exactly why the bet isn't one sided. If you are right about the future, which you are **98.5%** certain of, and the fate of the world, you'd literally be rid of me UNTIL THE INTERNET FAILED.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

To be honest with you agent 74444, I find it therapeutic kicking you in the nuts repeatedly, and since you will simply post under another user id number, what's the point? Do you believe I am stupid?
You have made it perfectly clear that you wish my speedy departure, you supposedly have filed complaints with government agencies because a person is posting counter to you on the internet (again, the horror!), you have wished for and attempted to silence me in a number of amusing and ineffective ways. Well, here is your chance to be rid of me, forever.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

Sire, you are not capable of outsmarting me.
You just have to be *right.*
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

I have repeatedly admitted I was wrong, just not when I wasn't/ You don't recognize that. There are several instances in this thread. And I fully admit the 98.5% chance i put on the events I forecast coming to past is an estimate based on all of the information I have available to me. ( I actually think the odds are even greater, but I am being conservative in my estimate)
If you are right, you'd **never hear from me again,** because the Internet would fail, utterly, before I ever had a chance to come back to your thread. You have said you are *over 98% sure* you are right, that this gigantic failure WILL occur.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

It is inevitable. The internet is made to be very robust and resistant to interruptions, it utilizes buried fiber optics and I am sure the rest of the internet is just as resistant to failure, but if I am right there won't be that many people left to use it and eventually the publicly variable internet will fail completely due to the fact that most folks' computers will be damaged and they'll be more concerned with survival that what has become a useless waste of time.
But, if I am going to risk big like that, you're going to need to risk something big in return. And there seems to be NOTHING more valuable to you than your own inflated ego and sense of self importance. So, that's why I was picking that as something to wager. And with less than a supposed 2% chance of you being wrong, you balk. UTTERLY.

Shows exactly how much you believe your OWN numbers.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

As I said, a lair is a liar is a lair, I have nothing to gain. You'll continue to post, you and i both know it.
Maybe not as agent 74444, but I suspect you sock puppet yourself frequently. After a awhile, you get to where you can detect writing styles and personalities, and since you have no personality, it isn't that hard.


Not called into question, not claimed it, but Plainly and obviously using empirical evidence as your only backing proved me wrong, about anything? And don't mention anything bases on unproved mathematical based theories where I out of principal refused to give and answer or any 10^5 bullshit.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330

How about the Windows calculator thing? Totally sure it doesn't go to enough digits without looking on your OWN computer.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

it was not an issue of how many digits it could ejaculate(lmao), it was an issue of accuracy. This argument took place nearly 9 years ago, and the windows calculator was notoriously inaccurate at the time.
How about the Eccentricity of orbits you still get wrong (which means *calculus* is now part of the conspiracy), or the fact that the Moon doesn't have the lowest as you have claimed? That's PROVEN, by the way, as the eccentricities are known out to several decimal places -- you just reject the proof despite telescopes worldwide COUNTING on those predictions to work and allow them to track objects.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


No sire, I contend at those distances accurate measurements are impossible to make. Our moon has a very low eccentricity, and has the lowest *known* eccentricity. Many scientists make many claims of fact that are not facts. You are basing your science on mathematics, which is simply not valid without empirical verification. There is no telescope in existence that can measure the eccentricities of the moons you referenced, as you admitted yourself the eccentricities are calculate mathematically. Though mathematics has it's places in science, proofs is not one them.

How about your claims that water is the only compound that expands on freezing?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


Actually I think you are bit confused. You need to look up the difference between 'compound' and 'element'. Water expands by 8% and silicone beats it with 10%, but silicone is NOT A COMPOUND. I think we've covered this before.
cruise

How about the *myriad* of claims that you made that Apollo couldn't launch, separate, dock, transmit, receive, orbit the Moon, land... that, essentially, *everything* on Apollo was wrong?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


I never said any of those things. I in fact that know it launched, docked, transmitted, received. The only thing I've said it didn't and couldn't do is land a man on the moon, and all of the bullshit that went with that lie.

As i recall there was one 'mission' where the astronauts reported a high relative velocity upon repeated unsuccessful docking and I said the LEM's structural integrity would have been compromised and it would have been ripped open. A quick look at the docking mechanism will prove this.. I also stated that firing the LEMS engine with the command and service modules docked as was claimed with A 13 was not possible, the LEM was not designed for structural strength, it was made very lightweight and this would have ripped it apart. Under no circumstances could the CM or LEM engine be ignited while the two were docked, the stress upon the docking mechanism and the LEM would cause failure.
The LEM was 1/3 of a millimeter in thickness in the cabin section and had very little structural re enforcement.
The engineers didn't get a SINGLE aspect of the mission right, in your worldview? That NUCLEAR reactors were on Apollo -- and, I suppose the Space Shuttle as well? Your threatened subpoenas? Missing mass in atomic reactions? That boats aren't grounded? The martial law prediction you made in *2004?*
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

LOl, grounded boats! Yeah, I've grounded a few. Grounding means just what is sounds like, and electrical connection to the Earth. I postulated briefly (as a child)that it would be possible to create an electromagnetic field with a nuclear reactor and that there was possibly one on board Apollo. I also briefly entertained the possibility with a17, I thought for a awhile they might have actually tried it but later found evidence a17 was a fraud.

Then came the argument over whether the plutonium powered power supplies were in fact nuclear reactors. Your side ignorantly argued that artificially enhanced radioactive decay was not a nuclear reaction, and of of course as usual I proved you wrong. Nuclear decay produces heat and is therefor a nuclear reaction.
Your forthcoming bestseller? Selectively visible threads on GLP? Your spectacular chess playing? The difference between a scientific law and a scientific theory, and which is 'higher?' That asteroid velocities are under 4 kps? No gravity assisted trajectories? Who I am and who my father was? That meteor crater is only THEORIZED to be from a meteor -- despite 30 *tons* of samples found at the site? That computers are based on alien technology? That Moonrocks could be *created?* Or water being an organic compound?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

There are most definitely closed threads on GLP, proof of it has been produced on this thread, no one would take my challenge to play me a game of chess for 10,000 dollars,I don't know what you're referring to about sceintific law and theory, theories are unproved and laws are proved and universally recognized as fact by all real scientists, very simple really. I don't recall saying something as stupid as asteroids all travel under 4kps, reference please?
What's worse? This is an *excerpt!* There is SO much more!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

The only problem is sire, you are WRONG about everything and putting words in my mouth as well.





Quite a record you have there, sport. You're batting a thousand.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330


But we're not talking about me, or my record. After all, I claim to be a fairly average guy, which I am. My record seems fine, because I have bet against you in the past, and won, and expect, come December 22, that I will win again, and win handily.

No you haven't and you can't reference a single example for us all to see. You make claims , but they are always lies.
What I notice is that YOU are unwilling to wager, even though, were you correct, you'd be rid of me until the end of the world as we know it.

Quite telling.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

As I said, there is no telling how many sock puppets you already have,I've nothing to win and your honesty is on a par with Nixon. Ironic isn't it, he is the president that 'oversaw' the Apollo project.

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!