Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,314 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,872,005
Pageviews Today: 2,564,768Threads Today: 611Posts Today: 12,963
10:14 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
10/04/2012 11:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I want you to give me a one word answer to simple question forgetting all of the history we have and the personal hatred we have for each other:
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330

I have no hatred toward you. If you do, towards me, you should probably get that checked. Surely there is an Anger Management course nearby.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

Fucking lying bastard.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330


Temper, temper, IDW! Must control ourselves.

Sorry -- don't hate you. Apologies if that sticks in your craw, but there you go.


Do you admit my predictions made on this thread have been extremely accurate.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330


You did predict it was going to be a hot Summer. But you were hardly alone.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

No sire,(SIC) I did not simply predict it was going to be a hot summer, I predicted it would be the hottest summer ever recorded, and I was correct. The main reason I despise you so much is illustrated right here, in this comment, where you refuse to acknowledge a very significant fact that qualifies me and gives me credibility. You simply refuse to ever admit I am extremely accurate in my predictions and knowledgeable about the subjects I discuss, ever.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1176568


Sigh. Link to it, then.

including going way out on a limb and predicting the total breakup of the polar ice cap
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330

To be honest, I DON'T remember you predicting that, but you certainly might have.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

It's right here, on this thread, and I am nearly certain you remember.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1176568


I don't.

I'm not going to search out the page out of over 300, but if you wish to deny what you know is true go right ahead. I know damned well you read it, and I'm sure if you deny it someone will find it and post it. I will myself if it comes to it.. That's why you issued a disclaimer with your denial.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1176568


I said exactly what is true: I don't remember seeing that specific prediction of yours, but I was pretty late coming to this thread, so you might of. Sorry -- it's the best I can do. If you link to where you said it, I'll certainly admit it. And don't you have archived everything you've ever written on this thread? You've claimed that, too. So search your archive.

If you predicted it, good on you. You *still* weren't alone, and thus...

(please note the PEER REVIEWED paper referenced here where the worlds leading TRADITIONALLY EDUCATED experts say this has been the most melting of the polar ice cap in over a million years and the many visual satellite images that graphically show the total breakup)), thousands of all time record temperatures worldwide,and the hottest summer on record have all been correct?
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330

Yes. But, again, traditional climatologists have been warning about warming for decades.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

Not a goddamned one of them predicted the total breakup of the polar icecap or the hottest summer ever recorded. You are doing it again, minimizing my accuracy and attempting to make it appear as if I were simply reading a weather forecast. What a fucking asshole.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1176568


Sorry to offend you. But others WERE predicting it. In the last 12 years, nine of them have been the hottest ever recorded. The trend is pretty clear.


Now, I have one more question for you, assuming you're not going make and ass out of yourself an attempt to claim these predictions were not correct, WHAT THE HELL MAKES YOU THINK I AM WRONG ABOUT THE PREDICTIONS I MADE THAT TAKE PLACE CHRONOLOGICALLY IN THE FUTURE FROM THIS TIME FORWARD?
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330

Because THAT is where you break from the 'traditional science' climatologists, and go onto huge predictive limbs all alone, citing the Mayan stuff, the 2012 stuff, and make a lot of other predictions sans evidence, and come up with outrageous 98.5% figures. That's where you part company with the traditionalists, and I think you will be wrong.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

Yes, I am not running with the herd, I'm not a herding animal. But you STILL have avoided answering the question with the skillful application of deceptive language, none of these climatologists came close to the accuracy I did. I said point blank this would be the hottest summer on record and the polar ice cap would totally disintegrate, and not a single soul besides me did.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1176568


Please link to this claim, and I will admit you were right. But if I link to other climatologists making similar claims, will you admit you are wrong?



Now that the astrophysics and meteorology columns in "GLP JEOPARDY" have been expended, let me ask you this question and you are welcome to reference any post I have made on the internet. When have you OR ANY OF THE INDIVIDUALS YOU INSISTED I APOLOGIZE TO IF I LOSE MY ONES SIDED NO WIN POSSIBLE BET WITH YOU EVER proved me wrong?
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1176568


Before we get to that, I explained exactly why the bet isn't one sided. If you are right about the future, which you are **98.5%** certain of, and the fate of the world, you'd literally be rid of me UNTIL THE INTERNET FAILED.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

To be honest with you agent 74444, I find it therapeutic kicking you in the nuts repeatedly,
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1176568


Then why have you made numerous requests for my departure? Why have you threatened pointless legal actions and supposed investigations into my background? Do you want me to stick around, or don't you?

You are *so* bi-polar on this issue...


and since you will simply post under another user id number, what's the point? Do you believe I am stupid?
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1176568


I can't post under another ID. If I did spoof my address, some important equipment would break: equipment that's a heck of a lot more important than your ramblings on a Conspiracy board.

So, sorry, wrong again. Unlike you, I keep my promises. If you agree to the wager, I will not post to your thread until after December 22nd, when you claim most of us will all be dead anyway.


You have made it perfectly clear that you wish my speedy departure, you supposedly have filed complaints with government agencies because a person is posting counter to you on the internet (again, the horror!), you have wished for and attempted to silence me in a number of amusing and ineffective ways. Well, here is your chance to be rid of me, forever.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

Sire, you are not capable of outsmarting me.
You just have to be *right.*
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

I have repeatedly admitted I was wrong, just not when I wasn't/ You don't recognize that. There are several instances in this thread.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1176568


You are misreading me. I am saying you can be rid of me forever, but your specific prognostications about the internet, the December 22nd date, and the 9/10th of the population wiped out must be right to do it. I have been *very* specific in explaining, but your reading comprehension seems to dip in proportion to how annoyed you get. Again, deep breathing. Don't pop anything.


And I fully admit the 98.5% chance i put on the events I forecast coming to past is an estimate based on all of the information I have available to me. ( I actually think the odds are even greater, but I am being conservative in my estimate)
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1176568


Finally, the CRUX of the matter. If you are SO sure, why aren't you willing to wager on it? You go on to say the failure of the internet is inevitable. But you STILL aren't willing to wager on it. You don't believe your own crap, and you know it, and I've merely forced you to demonstrate it numerous times on this thread.

You don't have the courage of your convictions. I do. PROVE the courage of your convictions, and I won't post in your thread, under any ID whatsoever, until December 22nd. But, if I am right and you are wrong, and 90% of the human race is NOT wiped out, and the Internet and GLP are STILL here, you have to post the apologies I outlined before. That's the price for 3 months of being 74444-free.

The fact that you AREN'T game speaks very, very loudly about exactly how much faith you have in that December 22nd date. And your lack of faith in your own convictions isn't *my* fault.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1485181
United States
10/05/2012 06:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I want you to give me a one word answer to simple question forgetting all of the history we have and the personal hatred we have for each other:
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330

I have no hatred toward you. If you do, towards me, you should probably get that checked. Surely there is an Anger Management course nearby.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

Fucking lying bastard.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330


Temper, temper, IDW! Must control ourselves.

Sorry -- don't hate you. Apologies if that sticks in your craw, but there you go.


Do you admit my predictions made on this thread have been extremely accurate.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330


You did predict it was going to be a hot Summer. But you were hardly alone.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

No sire,(SIC) I did not simply predict it was going to be a hot summer, I predicted it would be the hottest summer ever recorded, and I was correct. The main reason I despise you so much is illustrated right here, in this comment, where you refuse to acknowledge a very significant fact that qualifies me and gives me credibility. You simply refuse to ever admit I am extremely accurate in my predictions and knowledgeable about the subjects I discuss, ever.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1176568


Sigh. Link to it, then.

including going way out on a limb and predicting the total breakup of the polar ice cap
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330

To be honest, I DON'T remember you predicting that, but you certainly might have.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

It's right here, on this thread, and I am nearly certain you remember.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1176568


I don't.

I'm not going to search out the page out of over 300, but if you wish to deny what you know is true go right ahead. I know damned well you read it, and I'm sure if you deny it someone will find it and post it. I will myself if it comes to it.. That's why you issued a disclaimer with your denial.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1176568


I said exactly what is true: I don't remember seeing that specific prediction of yours, but I was pretty late coming to this thread, so you might of. Sorry -- it's the best I can do. If you link to where you said it, I'll certainly admit it. And don't you have archived everything you've ever written on this thread? You've claimed that, too. So search your archive.

If you predicted it, good on you. You *still* weren't alone, and thus...

(please note the PEER REVIEWED paper referenced here where the worlds leading TRADITIONALLY EDUCATED experts say this has been the most melting of the polar ice cap in over a million years and the many visual satellite images that graphically show the total breakup)), thousands of all time record temperatures worldwide,and the hottest summer on record have all been correct?
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330

Yes. But, again, traditional climatologists have been warning about warming for decades.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

Not a goddamned one of them predicted the total breakup of the polar icecap or the hottest summer ever recorded. You are doing it again, minimizing my accuracy and attempting to make it appear as if I were simply reading a weather forecast. What a fucking asshole.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1176568


Sorry to offend you. But others WERE predicting it. In the last 12 years, nine of them have been the hottest ever recorded. The trend is pretty clear.


Now, I have one more question for you, assuming you're not going make and ass out of yourself an attempt to claim these predictions were not correct, WHAT THE HELL MAKES YOU THINK I AM WRONG ABOUT THE PREDICTIONS I MADE THAT TAKE PLACE CHRONOLOGICALLY IN THE FUTURE FROM THIS TIME FORWARD?
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist. 1292330

Because THAT is where you break from the 'traditional science' climatologists, and go onto huge predictive limbs all alone, citing the Mayan stuff, the 2012 stuff, and make a lot of other predictions sans evidence, and come up with outrageous 98.5% figures. That's where you part company with the traditionalists, and I think you will be wrong.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

Yes, I am not running with the herd, I'm not a herding animal. But you STILL have avoided answering the question with the skillful application of deceptive language, none of these climatologists came close to the accuracy I did. I said point blank this would be the hottest summer on record and the polar ice cap would totally disintegrate, and not a single soul besides me did.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1176568


Please link to this claim, and I will admit you were right. But if I link to other climatologists making similar claims, will you admit you are wrong?



Now that the astrophysics and meteorology columns in "GLP JEOPARDY" have been expended, let me ask you this question and you are welcome to reference any post I have made on the internet. When have you OR ANY OF THE INDIVIDUALS YOU INSISTED I APOLOGIZE TO IF I LOSE MY ONES SIDED NO WIN POSSIBLE BET WITH YOU EVER proved me wrong?
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1176568


Before we get to that, I explained exactly why the bet isn't one sided. If you are right about the future, which you are **98.5%** certain of, and the fate of the world, you'd literally be rid of me UNTIL THE INTERNET FAILED.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

To be honest with you agent 74444, I find it therapeutic kicking you in the nuts repeatedly,
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1176568


Then why have you made numerous requests for my departure? Why have you threatened pointless legal actions and supposed investigations into my background? Do you want me to stick around, or don't you?

You are *so* bi-polar on this issue...


and since you will simply post under another user id number, what's the point? Do you believe I am stupid?
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1176568


I can't post under another ID. If I did spoof my address, some important equipment would break: equipment that's a heck of a lot more important than your ramblings on a Conspiracy board.

So, sorry, wrong again. Unlike you, I keep my promises. If you agree to the wager, I will not post to your thread until after December 22nd, when you claim most of us will all be dead anyway.


You have made it perfectly clear that you wish my speedy departure, you supposedly have filed complaints with government agencies because a person is posting counter to you on the internet (again, the horror!), you have wished for and attempted to silence me in a number of amusing and ineffective ways. Well, here is your chance to be rid of me, forever.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

Sire, you are not capable of outsmarting me.
You just have to be *right.*
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

I have repeatedly admitted I was wrong, just not when I wasn't/ You don't recognize that. There are several instances in this thread.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1176568


You are misreading me. I am saying you can be rid of me forever, but your specific prognostications about the internet, the December 22nd date, and the 9/10th of the population wiped out must be right to do it. I have been *very* specific in explaining, but your reading comprehension seems to dip in proportion to how annoyed you get. Again, deep breathing. Don't pop anything.


And I fully admit the 98.5% chance i put on the events I forecast coming to past is an estimate based on all of the information I have available to me. ( I actually think the odds are even greater, but I am being conservative in my estimate)
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1176568


Finally, the CRUX of the matter. If you are SO sure, why aren't you willing to wager on it? You go on to say the failure of the internet is inevitable. But you STILL aren't willing to wager on it. You don't believe your own crap, and you know it, and I've merely forced you to demonstrate it numerous times on this thread.

You don't have the courage of your convictions. I do. PROVE the courage of your convictions, and I won't post in your thread, under any ID whatsoever, until December 22nd. But, if I am right and you are wrong, and 90% of the human race is NOT wiped out, and the Internet and GLP are STILL here, you have to post the apologies I outlined before. That's the price for 3 months of being 74444-free.

The fact that you AREN'T game speaks very, very loudly about exactly how much faith you have in that December 22nd date. And your lack of faith in your own convictions isn't *my* fault.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

Why do care? Just wondering. You have a possibly dangerous obsession.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25000443
United Kingdom
10/05/2012 07:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
agent 74444, you are officially obsessed with AA.

I really do think this guy is a mis/dis info agent or government agent type...
seriously.....he is stalking AA on this thread like a man possessed.

agent 74444 your stalking like posts do far worse to your credibility than AA swearing now and then.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
10/05/2012 01:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
agent 74444, you are officially obsessed with AA.

I really do think this guy is a mis/dis info agent or government agent type...
seriously.....he is stalking AA on this thread like a man possessed.

agent 74444 your stalking like posts do far worse to your credibility than AA swearing now and then.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25000443


Fascinating. So when IDW/AA was engaging others with far more zeal than I ever have posted here, THAT was okay. When someone engages IDW/AA with the same tenacity, that ISN'T okay.

I am, admittedly, enthusiastic about the posts at present and for the next few months because it has been very rare that IDW/AA has made such a *concrete* prediction about the future that can be tested with a date -- and predictions directly about my own person, I might add. And I'm not going to pass that opportunity up.

I only have a few months to wait, and continually point out that IDW/AA doesn't have the strength enough in his convictions to wager his poor ego.

I will also venture to guess that there could be no posts whatsoever that opposed IDW/AA that 25000443 WOULDN'T claim come from a mis/dis info agent, and that 25000443 can't qualify the difference between an 'appropriate' disagreement and 'stalking' disagreement. Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
Reality420
User ID: 23400173
United States
10/05/2012 10:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
The ratio of view to posts is approximately 250 to 1
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1104458


Views = 259,593
Replies = 9,707

In the alternate universe that the Incredible Dim Wits inhabits 259593/9707 = ~250, not ~27 as we dwellers in this universe would think.

Off by a factor of 10.
About par for the course for IDW.

Now, explain again how sheep's bladders may be employed to prevent earthquakes.
... and how photons are just really, really fast electrons.
<snicker>


R.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22290042
United Kingdom
10/06/2012 03:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
The ratio of view to posts is approximately 250 to 1
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1104458


Views = 259,593
Replies = 9,707

In the alternate universe that the Incredible Dim Wits inhabits 259593/9707 = ~250, not ~27 as we dwellers in this universe would think.

Off by a factor of 10.
About par for the course for IDW.

Now, explain again how sheep's bladders may be employed to prevent earthquakes.
... and how photons are just really, really fast electrons.
<snicker>


R.
 Quoting: Reality420 23400173


You've calculated the wrong way round, it should be
9707/259593
as the ratio is replies per views the replies figure should be first. At a ratio of 1 reply to 250 views the number of views would be 2,426,750. (9707 x 250).
hf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22290042
United Kingdom
10/06/2012 11:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
The ratio of view to posts is approximately 250 to 1
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1104458


Views = 259,593
Replies = 9,707

In the alternate universe that the Incredible Dim Wits inhabits 259593/9707 = ~250, not ~27 as we dwellers in this universe would think.

Off by a factor of 10.
About par for the course for IDW.

Now, explain again how sheep's bladders may be employed to prevent earthquakes.
... and how photons are just really, really fast electrons.
<snicker>


R.
 Quoting: Reality420 23400173


You've calculated the wrong way round, it should be
9707/259593
as the ratio is replies per views the replies figure should be first. At a ratio of 1 reply to 250 views the number of views would be 2,426,750. (9707 x 250).
hf

Sorry, quoted the wrong post!
 Quoting: Elemental
ehecatl

User ID: 25067547
Mexico
10/06/2012 01:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I found this image on GLP posted by Bowman interesting and thought maybe it should be posted here. Is it authentic do you think?
rthqkchrt2
WO
User ID: 21971153
Canada
10/06/2012 01:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I'm pretty sure its all going to go downhill from here due to the "magnetic ribbon" in the "fluff".
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9833586


12 things and counting - all bets are off

[link to beyondprophecy.blogspot.ca]
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1173966
United States
10/06/2012 11:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
The ratio of view to posts is approximately 250 to 1
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1104458


Views = 259,593
Replies = 9,707

In the alternate universe that the Incredible Dim Wits inhabits 259593/9707 = ~250, not ~27 as we dwellers in this universe would think.

Off by a factor of 10.
About par for the course for IDW.

Now, explain again how sheep's bladders may be employed to prevent earthquakes.
... and how photons are just really, really fast electrons.
<snicker>


R.
 Quoting: Reality420 23400173


You've calculated the wrong way round, it should be
9707/259593
as the ratio is replies per views the replies figure should be first. At a ratio of 1 reply to 250 views the number of views would be 2,426,750. (9707 x 250).
hf
 Quoting: Elemental


My error didn't occur that way but I can see how you came to that conclusion. Somehow i entered the wrong number of views or responses into my calculator, either adding a decimal place inadvertently in the in the number of views or leaving one out of the number of responses I used the same method as you , I recall, so that is the only explanation for being off my a decimal place..

This is why one should always double check and triple check his work when using calculators, and they in my experience tend to frequently result in these kinds of mistakes when using scientific notation. It wasn't really that important to the subject matter of the thread and and again, I admit error. of I didn't make errors I would be "god", a claim I don't recall making, but it should be kept in mind the more you do the more likely you will make a mistake.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1173966
United States
10/06/2012 11:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I found this image on GLP posted by Bowman interesting and thought maybe it should be posted here. Is it authentic do you think?
:rthqkchrt2:
 Quoting: ehecatl


It is in fact authentic.
It is also very predictable.
The connection between electromagnetic forces form space and geological activity is well established in part as a result of my contributions.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1173966
United States
10/06/2012 11:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I found this image on GLP posted by Bowman interesting and thought maybe it should be posted here. Is it authentic do you think?
:rthqkchrt2:
 Quoting: ehecatl


One of the things I would be interested to see is the graph entries post 2008,, which oddly and without explanation has been left out. What is the date that graph was generated, can anyone do the footwork on this?
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1173966
United States
10/06/2012 11:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
The ratio of view to posts is approximately 250 to 1
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1104458


Views = 259,593
Replies = 9,707

In the alternate universe that the Incredible Dim Wits inhabits 259593/9707 = ~250, not ~27 as we dwellers in this universe would think.

Off by a factor of 10.
About par for the course for IDW.

Now, explain again how sheep's bladders may be employed to prevent earthquakes.
... and how photons are just really, really fast electrons.
<snicker>


R.
 Quoting: Reality420 23400173


Hey 74444 and company, you jumped on that like a vulture in an abandoned caucus . So Since In made a mistake entering am incorrect figure into a calculator EVERYTHING I have said must be totally discounted as having any credibility. I see.
cruise

THE MANNED MOON LANDING WAS A TOTAL FRAUD AND GIVEN 30 MINUTES OF UNEDITED DEBATE ON TELEVISION WITH NASA'S MOST KNOWLEDGEABLE PROPAGANDIST, I CAN CONVINCE THE WORLD USING ONLY UNIMPEACHABLE DATA AND FACTS AND THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD, AND THIS IS EXACTLY WHY YOU HOUND ME
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1173966
United States
10/06/2012 11:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
The ratio of view to posts is approximately 250 to 1
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1104458


Views = 259,593
Replies = 9,707

In the alternate universe that the Incredible Dim Wits inhabits 259593/9707 = ~250, not ~27 as we dwellers in this universe would think.

Off by a factor of 10.
About par for the course for IDW.

Now, explain again how sheep's bladders may be employed to prevent earthquakes.
... and how photons are just really, really fast electrons.
<snicker>


R.
 Quoting: Reality420 23400173


Hey 74444 and company, you jumped on that like a vulture on an abandoned carcass . So Since I made a mistake entering an incorrect figure into a calculator EVERYTHING I have said must be totally discounted as having any credibility. I see.
cruise

THE MANNED MOON LANDING WAS A TOTAL FRAUD AND GIVEN 30 MINUTES OF UNEDITED DEBATE ON TELEVISION WITH NASA'S MOST KNOWLEDGEABLE PROPAGANDIST, I CAN CONVINCE THE WORLD USING ONLY UNIMPEACHABLE DATA AND FACTS AND THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD, AND THIS IS EXACTLY WHY YOU HOUND ME
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1173966


*I hate that cheap trick with the auto illiterate editor, here's mud in your eye.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1384131
United States
10/07/2012 05:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
sheep's bladders prevent earthquakes? I've heard some pretty wild shit on GLP though the years and I understand the tactic, but do really think anyone who has read two or three of my posts is actually going to believe I said something like that?
And the <snicker> gave you away agent 74444, you are the ONLY person I ever saw use that series of symbols and that word in that order, which as far as I am concerned is an almost certain confirmation that you sock puppet yourself here, probably as several different posters. Your associates have been so demoralized and made fools of they cannot appear here under their old screen ids like halcyon daze an Nomuse, and the big dogs sure as hell aren't coming out from under the porch because every time they do NASA loses more credibility as I consistently make them look like lying, childish fools.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
10/07/2012 06:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
sheep's bladders prevent earthquakes? I've heard some pretty wild shit on GLP though the years and I understand the tactic, but do really think anyone who has read two or three of my posts is actually going to believe I said something like that?
And the <snicker> gave you away agent 74444, you are the ONLY person I ever saw use that series of symbols and that word in that order, which as far as I am concerned is an almost certain confirmation that you sock puppet yourself here, probably as several different posters. Your associates have been so demoralized and made fools of they cannot appear here under their old screen ids like halcyon daze an Nomuse, and the big dogs sure as hell aren't coming out from under the porch because every time they do NASA loses more credibility as I consistently make them look like lying, childish fools.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1384131


Wrong, on all counts. R420 and others here are not me. I cannot change my ID number, as I have explained before.

I don't play the views/posts game, because I feel it is irrelevant. I couldn't care less about the number of posts nor views.

I have never used the "snicker" tag in any post I have done, ever -- simply because I feel 'sound effects' detract from effective writing/communicating. So you have the wrong guy. But what else is new?

So, sorry. Your fabulous sense of sock-puppetry fails again. In my mind, there is no need for such shenanigans: fact is not determined by the majority. It is determined by the evidence. Whether I post alone, or others support my position is irrelevant.

You are merely using that excuse as a vehicle to avoid my suggested wager. I would have no problem avoiding posting on this thread altogether until after December 22nd, if you agreed to the wager, simply because the payoff *when* you failed (and you will) would be awesome (assuming you were man enough to take the wager and honor your word). This also, again, shows you how little your supposed 98.5% certainty is worth -- even to yourself.

Just like your utter failure to prove you know who I am, and who my father was (and your excuses then were equally pathetic), this also demonstrates your complete cowardice and lack of faith in your own prognostications and convictions.

Nothing more.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25115380
India
10/07/2012 07:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
AA- Can u comment on the LA sink hole and is it a ELE event ?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25117885
United Kingdom
10/07/2012 08:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I'm pretty sure its all going to go downhill from here due to the "magnetic ribbon" in the "fluff".
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9833586


12 things and counting - all bets are off

[link to beyondprophecy.blogspot.ca]
 Quoting: WO 21971153


was that link with those predictions like this in 2010?
nothing on the wayback machine:
[link to archive.org]

hmmm
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 5733522
United States
10/07/2012 03:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
AA- Can u comment on the LA sink hole and is it a ELE event ?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25115380


The LA sinkhole is not in itself and ELE and the appearance of sinkholes all over the planet is on an exponential rise. This one , however, seems to have been caused by irresponsible human activity. If I were anywhere near it i would be packing up and leaving though.

It is important to realize that geological activity of all types is on a radical rise since we have neared the galactic plane and entered it's electromagnetic and gravitational influence, as evidenced by the previous referenced chart.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 5733522
United States
10/07/2012 03:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I'm pretty sure its all going to go downhill from here due to the "magnetic ribbon" in the "fluff".
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9833586


12 things and counting - all bets are off

[link to beyondprophecy.blogspot.ca]
 Quoting: WO 21971153


was that link with those predictions like this in 2010?
nothing on the wayback machine:
[link to archive.org]

hmmm
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25117885


"predictions" 1,2,3,4,9 and 11 were all originally theorized or noted by myself and none of them are actually predictions, but more or less observations of fact confirming predictions or postulations I made in the past. Whoever is authoring that blog is closely following everything I say and has been for quite some time from the looks of things.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 5733522
United States
10/07/2012 03:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
BTW,When I first suggested a link between solar activity and geological activity, ALL of mainstreams mouthpieces openly ridiculed me. It is now known to be fact.

The same is true when I suggested the geomagnetic field had holes or voids that were allowing particle radiation easily reach Earths surface. I think many of them knew at that time but were covering it up.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 5733522
United States
10/07/2012 03:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
sheep's bladders prevent earthquakes? I've heard some pretty wild shit on GLP though the years and I understand the tactic, but do really think anyone who has read two or three of my posts is actually going to believe I said something like that?
And the <snicker> gave you away agent 74444, you are the ONLY person I ever saw use that series of symbols and that word in that order, which as far as I am concerned is an almost certain confirmation that you sock puppet yourself here, probably as several different posters. Your associates have been so demoralized and made fools of they cannot appear here under their old screen ids like halcyon daze an Nomuse, and the big dogs sure as hell aren't coming out from under the porch because every time they do NASA loses more credibility as I consistently make them look like lying, childish fools.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1384131


Wrong, on all counts. R420 and others here are not me. I cannot change my ID number, as I have explained before.

I don't play the views/posts game, because I feel it is irrelevant. I couldn't care less about the number of posts nor views.

I have never used the "snicker" tag in any post I have done, ever -- simply because I feel 'sound effects' detract from effective writing/communicating. So you have the wrong guy. But what else is new?

So, sorry. Your fabulous sense of sock-puppetry fails again. In my mind, there is no need for such shenanigans: fact is not determined by the majority. It is determined by the evidence. Whether I post alone, or others support my position is irrelevant.

You are merely using that excuse as a vehicle to avoid my suggested wager. I would have no problem avoiding posting on this thread altogether until after December 22nd, if you agreed to the wager, simply because the payoff *when* you failed (and you will) would be awesome (assuming you were man enough to take the wager and honor your word). This also, again, shows you how little your supposed 98.5% certainty is worth -- even to yourself.

Just like your utter failure to prove you know who I am, and who my father was (and your excuses then were equally pathetic), this also demonstrates your complete cowardice and lack of faith in your own prognostications and convictions.

Nothing more.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


SO your father wasn't a paper clipped NAZI scientist?
I see.
cruise

And by the way, there are examples of you using the <snicker> thang here on this post.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
10/07/2012 08:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
sheep's bladders prevent earthquakes? I've heard some pretty wild shit on GLP though the years and I understand the tactic, but do really think anyone who has read two or three of my posts is actually going to believe I said something like that?
And the <snicker> gave you away agent 74444, you are the ONLY person I ever saw use that series of symbols and that word in that order, which as far as I am concerned is an almost certain confirmation that you sock puppet yourself here, probably as several different posters. Your associates have been so demoralized and made fools of they cannot appear here under their old screen ids like halcyon daze an Nomuse, and the big dogs sure as hell aren't coming out from under the porch because every time they do NASA loses more credibility as I consistently make them look like lying, childish fools.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1384131


Wrong, on all counts. R420 and others here are not me. I cannot change my ID number, as I have explained before.

I don't play the views/posts game, because I feel it is irrelevant. I couldn't care less about the number of posts nor views.

I have never used the "snicker" tag in any post I have done, ever -- simply because I feel 'sound effects' detract from effective writing/communicating. So you have the wrong guy. But what else is new?

So, sorry. Your fabulous sense of sock-puppetry fails again. In my mind, there is no need for such shenanigans: fact is not determined by the majority. It is determined by the evidence. Whether I post alone, or others support my position is irrelevant.

You are merely using that excuse as a vehicle to avoid my suggested wager. I would have no problem avoiding posting on this thread altogether until after December 22nd, if you agreed to the wager, simply because the payoff *when* you failed (and you will) would be awesome (assuming you were man enough to take the wager and honor your word). This also, again, shows you how little your supposed 98.5% certainty is worth -- even to yourself.

Just like your utter failure to prove you know who I am, and who my father was (and your excuses then were equally pathetic), this also demonstrates your complete cowardice and lack of faith in your own prognostications and convictions.

Nothing more.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


SO your father wasn't a paper clipped NAZI scientist?
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 5733522


Nope.

I see.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 5733522


Doubtful.

And by the way, there are examples of you using the <snicker> thang here on this post.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 5733522


Please feel free to link to them. If they aren't 74444, they aren't me.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25152389
India
10/07/2012 10:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
AA- what I heard is atmosphere contracts during solar minimum and expands during solar max. Since we had a long solar minimum we need to have a strong solar max . from the looks , solar cycle 24 looks very weak. what do u say??
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1111986
United States
10/08/2012 12:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
AA- what I heard is atmosphere contracts during solar minimum and expands during solar max. Since we had a long solar minimum we need to have a strong solar max . from the looks , solar cycle 24 looks very weak. what do u say??
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25152389


It's delayed, not weak. The end of cycle 23 was delayed. It seems the 11 year cycle has been somehow skewed. Haven't I answered this before?
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1111986
United States
10/08/2012 12:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
SO your father wasn't a paper clipped NAZI scientist?
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 5733522

Nope.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


I don't really see anything dishonorable about ones father being a NAZI scientist that helped kill Americans in the war, after all you had no control over it.

But being a lying maggot is dishonorable, as is stalking a person who you know is trying his hardest to expose the truth about something that could save millions of people.

It indicates to me the apple doesn't fall far from the tree, agent 74444
ANHEDONIC

User ID: 23579473
United States
10/08/2012 02:28 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
sockpuppet

"You will not be punished for your anger, you will be punished by your anger"
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25169284
United Kingdom
10/08/2012 02:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
AA- what I heard is atmosphere contracts during solar minimum and expands during solar max. Since we had a long solar minimum we need to have a strong solar max . from the looks , solar cycle 24 looks very weak. what do u say??
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25152389


It's delayed, not weak. The end of cycle 23 was delayed. It seems the 11 year cycle has been somehow skewed. Haven't I answered this before?
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1111986


yes you have, many times.
Jap Crap
User ID: 1351603
United States
10/08/2012 03:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Look they murdered all the talented aerospace people. Dumbski tookski overski.

Now they don't even try.

Antimatter factory on sun.

Well sure if you just bore into the thing.


Its all screwed up all the angles are wrong, its all smoke and mirrors up there you know.

Raytheon is nothing to trifle with and that is just what they did. Marconi rather murder scientists than do the right thing.

Its done. Cooked to a crisp.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25169284
United Kingdom
10/08/2012 03:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
It does not really require that much force relatively here I suspect to support the ego of AA. If he had just one really dedicated sycophant that gave him the unconditional stamp of belief and backed it up, then the required force to satisfy that ego might be satisfied.

For that the blame goes clearly to the India poster, who although he (or she) seems to have pledged unconditional belief in AA's words, has not reaaaalllly backed up the pledge of belief, in the form of greater participation and cheer-leading. Just my opinion. I could be wrong.
 Quoting: ehecatl


Read the first 40 pages of the thread before the gatekeeper was installed and shut the fuck up while you're at it.

Nearly every post was supporting me with both data and personal opinions. Not until they started banning people posting here on this thread did this change occur, and it is obvious.

The exact same thing has happened to me many times on GLP, and I know precisely how and why they do it.

It is a well understood method of achieving what appears to be a consensus by repeatedly punishing anyone who goes against the idea those in control of the 'exorcise' wish to push.

In this case it is that I am a)unqualified to make the predictions I have and wrong about them (this is the main goal), b) almost always wrong despite a consistent record of being right, c)psychologically or mentally disturbed or egocentric and d) Unintelligent.

You cannot achieve this goal on a public forum by banning people because you make each and every one of them aware when you do it, and they in turn pass on this information to others.

A more intelligent strategy would be to simply ignore the thread and use the regular tactic to keep it off the front page such as flooding the front page with "my balls smell like steak sauce" threads. Every time you remove a supporting piece of information and ban it's originator, you lose more ground.

It can easily be determined what I have said in this post is the absolute truth simply by comparing the first 40 or so pages with the last 40 or so. Changes like that don't occur without active censorship. As time goes on you will see all of my detractors disappear into the darkness like cockroaches when the lights are suddenly turned on, and then this thread will simple be 'no longer in the database'. This will happen when I reveal a new previously unrevealed groundbreaking physical reality.

There are people here dwelling on every word I say day and night waiting to glean a useful piece of information, and what is so frustrating about it all is that they will never give me a single bit of credit for the advancements I have made in our understanding of our universe, a nose will simply write a 'peer reviewed paper' on it and take the credit and my original revelation removed from the internet, as has happened literally dozens of times with major groundbreaking advancements I have postulated and have been proved by empirical observation in the past.

What is funny is how they cannot steal the one major advancement I have made in physics without shooting themselves in the head metaphorically speaking and killing their whole false doctrine of the nature of the universe, which in reality is not based on mythological fairy dust 'photons' 'the space time continuum',the " bending of time and space"or "quantum mechanics", which are all total frauds.

My basic model of the universe is backed up by ALL of the empirical observations, it explains the particle wave duality paradox of light and it ADMITS THAT MATTER CAN AND DOES EXCEED LIGHT SPEED. They can never admit any of these things without erasing the names of 95% of the Nobel physics prize laureates from the books as frauds and throwing out 100 years of theory stacked upon theory with no solid empirical foundation or basis in reality, and that is why they despise me.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1111986


absolutely spot-on with that post AA.
I have followed this thread and your other from day 1. I have read every post (& I mean EVERY post).

News