Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,497 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,408,699
Pageviews Today: 3,453,727Threads Today: 919Posts Today: 17,117
11:26 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22290042
United Kingdom
10/12/2012 12:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I have a question for the solar savvy. I've not been the only one paying attention to the weirdness of the sun lately. I suspect it's even causing some physical symptoms but that's not my question.

I have a little solar 'dancing sunflower' on my desk at work. I have recessed flourescent lights and a compact fleurescent lamp on my desk. There is no sunlight. Generally it doesn't dance but only manages a twitch under these conditions but today it's going faster. I have no idea what wavelengths it responds to and no sophisticated comprehension of solar events but what could come through a metal building with complete cloud cover to increase its movement?
 Quoting: Flapping Chicken Little


Good god. Talk about debasing the thread (surely not intentional?). Dancing fecking sunflowers......sorry Flappage....I mean Flapping! No offence intended!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22290042
United Kingdom
10/12/2012 12:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
“If your hate could be turned into electricity, it would light up the whole world.”
― Nikola Tesla

most of the posters replies on this thread could light up los vagas for a night...

idws replies could launch a lightspeed starship...

and power it for generations...

:-(
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25422267


clappa
Flapping Chicken Little

User ID: 2834258
United States
10/12/2012 01:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I have a question for the solar savvy. I've not been the only one paying attention to the weirdness of the sun lately. I suspect it's even causing some physical symptoms but that's not my question.

I have a little solar 'dancing sunflower' on my desk at work. I have recessed flourescent lights and a compact fleurescent lamp on my desk. There is no sunlight. Generally it doesn't dance but only manages a twitch under these conditions but today it's going faster. I have no idea what wavelengths it responds to and no sophisticated comprehension of solar events but what could come through a metal building with complete cloud cover to increase its movement?
 Quoting: Flapping Chicken Little


Good god. Talk about debasing the thread (surely not intentional?). Dancing fecking sunflowers......sorry Flappage....I mean Flapping! No offence intended!
 Quoting: Elemental


Well, wouldn't it be useful if an inexpensive toy was able to detect incoming radiation. At least I'm not bashing anybody or posing as a 'sexual intellectual' ( an Fing know-it-all)
Flapping Chicken Little
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
10/12/2012 01:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!


Carefully and completely spell out five different experiments that would specifically falsify and disqualify your theory.

And watch my surprise when you can't.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
10/12/2012 01:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Doh. Take 2.


No one has ever attempted to disqualify this theory, though it is falsifiable hundreds of different ways experimentally.

 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist


Carefully and completely spell out five different experiments that would specifically falsify and disqualify your theory.

And watch my surprise when you can't.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25438660
United Kingdom
10/12/2012 03:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
H30 IS in fact an ion of the water molecule. It has an extra proton giving it a positive charge, and it meets the definition of an ion.

However, a proton is a sub atomic particle and the H+ designation represents what is supposed to be both an proton and a positive ion of hydrogen. This is incorrect. An ion is defined as a charged atom or molecule and a proton as a sub atomic particle. Sub atomic means it is not a complete atom. The concentration of H3O ions in water determines the PH of the water, but an un bonded proton IS NOT AN ION.


This dumbing down is intentional.

As most of you who have a certain level of intelligence and who received a traditional academic 'education' as a science major probably noticed, there are endless discrepancies and inconsistencies taught in the various disciplines.

As a prime example, in chemistry when one writes a balanced equation of an oxidation reduction reaction, the electromagnetic energy given off in the form of heat and light MUST be represented by an electron symbol, there are NO PHOTONS IN CHEMISTRY.

But when you cross the hall to physics lecture, the energy released in such a reaction MUST be described as photons. The photon was postulated out of thin air with no evidence to explain (without actually doing so) the wave/particle duality paradox of light.

BUT, it is an inescapable fact that the 'photon' defies the basic laws of physics by possessing energy and momentum without mass. This is simply not possible Mass and relative motion are BOTH components of Kinetic energy and momentum, this is basic PROVED physics.

The theory I wrote, "The Electromechanical Theory of Electromagnetic Radiation" , explains not only the wave/particle duality paradox of light succinctly, it also provides simple mathematical equations that explain why the higher frequencies of electromagnetic energy (known generically as light in physics regardless of frequency) can transmit more energy at equal amplitudes.

No one has ever attempted to disqualify this theory, though it is falsifiable hundreds of different ways experimentally.

A goal I set for myself before my death was to dethrone the fraudulent "God Of Science", Albert Einstein.
Unfortunately, I have met with an organized conspiracy to systematically suppress any theory which would provide a real, uncomplicated disqualification of quantum physics and its origin, special and general relativity, both of which are complex nonsense fictions that are self disqualifying by the many unexplained paradoxes they produce and the fact that no consensus whatsoever exists among even two people in the world on what these theories actually mean.


I believe this to be the result of the placement of Jewish gatekeepers in both academic and publishing positions who systematically suppress, oppress, and in some cases kill individuals who attempt to expose this huge fraud. The purpose isn't really all of that hard to understand, as long as this un-penetrable stumbling block exists, the human race will remain enslaved.

For those of you who doubt what I have just told you, I suggest you read about Nicola Tesla. This man is the father of ALL MODERN ELECTRONICS, and goes completely unrecognized because he was a 'Gentile" Serbian. You will frequently hear jews claim modern computers and such were made possible by quantum physics, but they can't explain how and the truth is every single component in it that makes it work was developed by Nicola Tesla.


Despite the magnificent advancements he made in the world of electronics and empiricism based science in general, he died penniless and government goons seized his work and whisked it away.

Some day my theories will be recognized as fact, and Nicola Tesla recognized as the true father of modern scientific achievement, but it's going to take a revolution to remove Jewish gatekeepers permanently and this is what will free the human race from its current bondage empowered by deception and oppression of truth.

THIS COMPLETES MY RAVE FOR TONIGHT
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1112620


bump for AA.
I intend to download this whole thread soon, as I think you may be correct AA.

When I sit in my rocking chair at 80 years (if I make it to that age), I am 46 now,, I can say I was alive during this period and have spoken to you albeit virtually.
ehecatl

User ID: 25245811
Mexico
10/14/2012 10:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Doh. Take 2.


No one has ever attempted to disqualify this theory, though it is falsifiable hundreds of different ways experimentally.

 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist


Carefully and completely spell out five different experiments that would specifically falsify and disqualify your theory.

And watch my surprise when you can't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

It is generally more difficult to prove a negative, to prove something false, than to prove it true. (at least till Dec.21st comes around in this case)

So I would have to disagree with AA here too, I doubt that people have falsified, or proved his theory false, and in hundreds of way no less.

Just my 26 centavos. Good try AA, but you can't debunk yourself that easy. Try giving us some real proof, just 5 examples like 74444 says, that your theories are false.

Either that, or VERIfy your theory in 5 ways, rather than FALSIfy it in 5 ways.

tootless

Last Edited by ehecatl on 10/14/2012 03:16 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22290042
United Kingdom
10/15/2012 07:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I have a question for the solar savvy. I've not been the only one paying attention to the weirdness of the sun lately. I suspect it's even causing some physical symptoms but that's not my question.

I have a little solar 'dancing sunflower' on my desk at work. I have recessed flourescent lights and a compact fleurescent lamp on my desk. There is no sunlight. Generally it doesn't dance but only manages a twitch under these conditions but today it's going faster. I have no idea what wavelengths it responds to and no sophisticated comprehension of solar events but what could come through a metal building with complete cloud cover to increase its movement?
 Quoting: Flapping Chicken Little


Good god. Talk about debasing the thread (surely not intentional?). Dancing fecking sunflowers......sorry Flappage....I mean Flapping! No offence intended!
 Quoting: Elemental


Well, wouldn't it be useful if an inexpensive toy was able to detect incoming radiation. At least I'm not bashing anybody or posing as a 'sexual intellectual' ( an Fing know-it-all)
 Quoting: Flapping Chicken Little


Aw, I'm just jealous.....I'm not allowed toys at work!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1406242
United States
10/15/2012 09:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Doh. Take 2.


No one has ever attempted to disqualify this theory, though it is falsifiable hundreds of different ways experimentally.

 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist


Carefully and completely spell out five different experiments that would specifically falsify and disqualify your theory.

And watch my surprise when you can't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


Doh. Take 2.


No one has ever attempted to disqualify this theory, though it is falsifiable hundreds of different ways experimentally.

 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist


Carefully and completely spell out five different experiments that would specifically falsify and disqualify your theory.

And watch my surprise when you can't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


1)Prove the production of electricity from a photovoltaic cell is not the result of electrons in the form of light being intercepted by the atomic structure of the photovoltaic material and converted to normal low electrons. (By the way, the function of photovoltaic cells is most succinctly explained by my theory)

2)Prove that light frequency energy cannot be conducted by the same materials as electricity in the non EMR form. Radio antennae and wires being used to conduct EMR are in almsot every electronic device, and are conductors of electrons. Repeated experiments mentioned in early debates involving plants producing photosynthesis in total darkness using metal plates and conductors will get in your way though,as well

3)Prove that the energy of electromagnetic radiation is not directly related to it's velocity, speed amplitude and frequency, in other words prove that the particle I suggest is not moving the precise distance and velocity to produce the energy it does using the classic 1/2M X V2 formula. (I give the simple math proving this in my theorem)

4)Prove that and momentum can exist without mass

5)Isolate and fully describe the "photon"


Agent, I could go on an on and on if you wish.
AnonPhysicist
User ID: 1406242
United States
10/15/2012 09:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Doh. Take 2.


No one has ever attempted to disqualify this theory, though it is falsifiable hundreds of different ways experimentally.

 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist


Carefully and completely spell out five different experiments that would specifically falsify and disqualify your theory.

And watch my surprise when you can't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

It is generally more difficult to prove a negative, to prove something false, than to prove it true. (at least till Dec.21st comes around in this case)

So I would have to disagree with AA here too, I doubt that people have falsified, or proved his theory false, and in hundreds of way no less.

Just my 26 centavos. Good try AA, but you can't debunk yourself that easy. Try giving us some real proof, just 5 examples like 74444 says, that your theories are false.

Either that, or VERIfy your theory in 5 ways, rather than FALSIfy it in 5 ways.

:tootless:
 Quoting: ehecatl


I was banned so I couldn't answer, but there are hundreds if not thousands of ways to scientifically disqualify my theory is if IS INDEED FALSE.
I have already disqualified quantum physics using basic classic (and proved) physics. Energy and momentum cannot exist without mass, and light moves at light speed. Einey states emphatically a speed limit for mass >light speed. Mass is a component of K.E. yet the mythological photon has no mass and carries K.E.

Since we know light carries energy through space, the mass less photon is therefore disqualified.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22290042
United Kingdom
10/15/2012 10:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
AA, one thing that I don't understand (well, one amongst many!), why do you choose to engage with your detractors? Surely self justification is totally unnecessary. Just keep putting your theories out there and ignore any bait to argument. We're all seeking answers.....those with intelligence will read, digest and make up their own mind without paying heed to the nastiness that abounds with differing opinions. Debate is healthy and necessary for progression, slanging matches the opposite.
hf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
10/15/2012 02:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Doh. Take 2.


No one has ever attempted to disqualify this theory, though it is falsifiable hundreds of different ways experimentally.

 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist


Carefully and completely spell out five different experiments that would specifically falsify and disqualify your theory.

And watch my surprise when you can't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


Doh. Take 2.


No one has ever attempted to disqualify this theory, though it is falsifiable hundreds of different ways experimentally.

 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist


Carefully and completely spell out five different experiments that would specifically falsify and disqualify your theory.

And watch my surprise when you can't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


1)Prove the production of electricity from a photovoltaic cell is not the result of electrons in the form of light being intercepted by the atomic structure of the photovoltaic material and converted to normal low electrons. (By the way, the function of photovoltaic cells is most succinctly explained by my theory)

2)Prove that light frequency energy cannot be conducted by the same materials as electricity in the non EMR form. Radio antennae and wires being used to conduct EMR are in almsot every electronic device, and are conductors of electrons. Repeated experiments mentioned in early debates involving plants producing photosynthesis in total darkness using metal plates and conductors will get in your way though,as well

3)Prove that the energy of electromagnetic radiation is not directly related to it's velocity, speed amplitude and frequency, in other words prove that the particle I suggest is not moving the precise distance and velocity to produce the energy it does using the classic 1/2M X V2 formula. (I give the simple math proving this in my theorem)

4)Prove that and momentum can exist without mass

5)Isolate and fully describe the "photon"


Agent, I could go on an on and on if you wish.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1406242


None of those experiments seem to *prove YOUR theory.* These experiments seem to be about disproving the mainstream theories. And, in fact, they aren't experiments at all. Your attempts at disqualification of the mainstream theory (which is a classic argument from ignorance) have nothing to do with experimentally verifying YOUR theories. The closest you got was with plants, in #2.

You are the one proposing the idea. Propose with each of the above a specific experiment that will be explained and predicted by your theory, and if the experiment fails, will FALSIFY your theory. Do you understand? Can you?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25613995
United Kingdom
10/15/2012 02:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Doh. Take 2.


No one has ever attempted to disqualify this theory, though it is falsifiable hundreds of different ways experimentally.

 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist


Carefully and completely spell out five different experiments that would specifically falsify and disqualify your theory.

And watch my surprise when you can't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


Doh. Take 2.


No one has ever attempted to disqualify this theory, though it is falsifiable hundreds of different ways experimentally.

 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist


Carefully and completely spell out five different experiments that would specifically falsify and disqualify your theory.

And watch my surprise when you can't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


1)Prove the production of electricity from a photovoltaic cell is not the result of electrons in the form of light being intercepted by the atomic structure of the photovoltaic material and converted to normal low electrons. (By the way, the function of photovoltaic cells is most succinctly explained by my theory)

2)Prove that light frequency energy cannot be conducted by the same materials as electricity in the non EMR form. Radio antennae and wires being used to conduct EMR are in almsot every electronic device, and are conductors of electrons. Repeated experiments mentioned in early debates involving plants producing photosynthesis in total darkness using metal plates and conductors will get in your way though,as well

3)Prove that the energy of electromagnetic radiation is not directly related to it's velocity, speed amplitude and frequency, in other words prove that the particle I suggest is not moving the precise distance and velocity to produce the energy it does using the classic 1/2M X V2 formula. (I give the simple math proving this in my theorem)

4)Prove that and momentum can exist without mass

5)Isolate and fully describe the "photon"


Agent, I could go on an on and on if you wish.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1406242


None of those experiments seem to *prove YOUR theory.* These experiments seem to be about disproving the mainstream theories. And, in fact, they aren't experiments at all. Your attempts at disqualification of the mainstream theory (which is a classic argument from ignorance) have nothing to do with experimentally verifying YOUR theories. The closest you got was with plants, in #2.

You are the one proposing the idea. Propose with each of the above a specific experiment that will be explained and predicted by your theory, and if the experiment fails, will FALSIFY your theory. Do you understand? Can you?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


agent 74444, what do you do for a living? what job do you have?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
10/15/2012 03:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
agent 74444, what do you do for a living? what job do you have?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25613995


I told you. I work in I.T. for a private firm.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25613995
United Kingdom
10/15/2012 03:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
agent 74444, what do you do for a living? what job do you have?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25613995


I told you. I work in I.T. for a private firm.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


you have never told me as I have never asked you before.

& what economic camp are you in? deflationista or inflationista.....?? or in other words, dollar is king or metals are king??
AnonPhysicist
User ID: 1406242
United States
10/15/2012 04:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Doh. Take 2.


No one has ever attempted to disqualify this theory, though it is falsifiable hundreds of different ways experimentally.

 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist


Carefully and completely spell out five different experiments that would specifically falsify and disqualify your theory.

And watch my surprise when you can't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


Doh. Take 2.


No one has ever attempted to disqualify this theory, though it is falsifiable hundreds of different ways experimentally.

 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist


Carefully and completely spell out five different experiments that would specifically falsify and disqualify your theory.

And watch my surprise when you can't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


1)Prove the production of electricity from a photovoltaic cell is not the result of electrons in the form of light being intercepted by the atomic structure of the photovoltaic material and converted to normal low electrons. (By the way, the function of photovoltaic cells is most succinctly explained by my theory)

2)Prove that light frequency energy cannot be conducted by the same materials as electricity in the non EMR form. Radio antennae and wires being used to conduct EMR are in almsot every electronic device, and are conductors of electrons. Repeated experiments mentioned in early debates involving plants producing photosynthesis in total darkness using metal plates and conductors will get in your way though,as well

3)Prove that the energy of electromagnetic radiation is not directly related to it's velocity, speed amplitude and frequency, in other words prove that the particle I suggest is not moving the precise distance and velocity to produce the energy it does using the classic 1/2M X V2 formula. (I give the simple math proving this in my theorem)

4)Prove that and momentum can exist without mass

5)Isolate and fully describe the "photon"


Agent, I could go on an on and on if you wish.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1406242


None of those experiments seem to *prove YOUR theory.* These experiments seem to be about disproving the mainstream theories. And, in fact, they aren't experiments at all. Your attempts at disqualification of the mainstream theory (which is a classic argument from ignorance) have nothing to do with experimentally verifying YOUR theories. The closest you got was with plants, in #2.

You are the one proposing the idea. Propose with each of the above a specific experiment that will be explained and predicted by your theory, and if the experiment fails, will FALSIFY your theory. Do you understand? Can you?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


You asked for me to provide five methods of disqualifying my theory, and any one of these will do.
You obviously know nothing of the scientific process. As the "Mexican" shill pointed out, it is very difficult to prove a negative, thus quantum theory is still be tacked onto with gaudy science fiction
AnonPhysicist
User ID: 1406242
United States
10/15/2012 04:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
agent 74444, what do you do for a living? what job do you have?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25613995


I told you. I work in I.T. for a private firm.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


You're goddamned shit breathed liar.
AnonPhysicist
User ID: 1406242
United States
10/15/2012 04:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
...................
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


The problem you are running into agent 74444 is that although there are countless ways to disqualify the electromechanical theory of electromagnetic radiation, none of the will or do.

Have a nice day
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
10/15/2012 06:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
agent 74444, what do you do for a living? what job do you have?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25613995


I told you. I work in I.T. for a private firm.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


you have never told me as I have never asked you before.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25613995


My apologies. I confused you with a different AC who posts from your country.

& what economic camp are you in? deflationista or inflationista.....?? or in other words, dollar is king or metals are king??
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25613995


Honestly, I am not sure. Economics has always confused the heck out of me, as much of it seems hopelessly irrational or very subjective.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
10/15/2012 06:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Doh. Take 2.

...


Carefully and completely spell out five different experiments that would specifically falsify and disqualify your theory.

And watch my surprise when you can't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


Doh. Take 2.

...


Carefully and completely spell out five different experiments that would specifically falsify and disqualify your theory.

And watch my surprise when you can't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


1)Prove the production of electricity from a photovoltaic cell is not the result of electrons in the form of light being intercepted by the atomic structure of the photovoltaic material and converted to normal low electrons. (By the way, the function of photovoltaic cells is most succinctly explained by my theory)

2)Prove that light frequency energy cannot be conducted by the same materials as electricity in the non EMR form. Radio antennae and wires being used to conduct EMR are in almsot every electronic device, and are conductors of electrons. Repeated experiments mentioned in early debates involving plants producing photosynthesis in total darkness using metal plates and conductors will get in your way though,as well

3)Prove that the energy of electromagnetic radiation is not directly related to it's velocity, speed amplitude and frequency, in other words prove that the particle I suggest is not moving the precise distance and velocity to produce the energy it does using the classic 1/2M X V2 formula. (I give the simple math proving this in my theorem)

4)Prove that and momentum can exist without mass

5)Isolate and fully describe the "photon"


Agent, I could go on an on and on if you wish.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1406242


None of those experiments seem to *prove YOUR theory.* These experiments seem to be about disproving the mainstream theories. And, in fact, they aren't experiments at all. Your attempts at disqualification of the mainstream theory (which is a classic argument from ignorance) have nothing to do with experimentally verifying YOUR theories. The closest you got was with plants, in #2.

You are the one proposing the idea. Propose with each of the above a specific experiment that will be explained and predicted by your theory, and if the experiment fails, will FALSIFY your theory. Do you understand? Can you?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


You asked for me to provide five methods of disqualifying my theory, and any one of these will do.
 Quoting: AnonPhysicist 1406242


No. Very specifically I wrote: Carefully and completely spell out five different experiments that would specifically falsify and disqualify your theory. Can you propose any?



You obviously know nothing of the scientific process.
 Quoting: AnonPhysicist 1406242


At least as much as you do, apparently.

As the "Mexican" shill pointed out, it is very difficult to prove a negative, thus quantum theory is still be tacked onto with gaudy science fiction
 Quoting: AnonPhysicist 1406242


It is difficult to prove a negative. However, it is possible to create experiments that WILL FAIL if conditions are not met, and thus allow the idea in question to be falsified/modified. For example, if you stick to the Newtonian F=G(M1*M2)/R^2 (as you seem to want to do), and use it to account for the bending of light in a gravitational field, you only yield about half the result of what is actually observed.

See? Falsifiability. Can you propose specific experiments that allow YOUR idea to be falsified?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
10/15/2012 06:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
agent 74444, what do you do for a living? what job do you have?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25613995


I told you. I work in I.T. for a private firm.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


You're goddamned shit breathed liar.
 Quoting: AnonPhysicist 1406242


Alas, I am not lying about my profession. I have no reason to be dishonest about what I do for a living, even if I am somewhat reticent about revealing any more about my identity. And, as usual, when challenged to *prove* that I am lying, by stating who I am and who my father was (as you claim to know), *you're* the one who balks.

Which is exactly what you have claimed engineers would do when challenged about the ascent stage of Apollo, by the by. Yet I see you balking with so much more frequency...
AnonPhysicist
User ID: 1406242
United States
10/15/2012 10:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
No. Very specifically I wrote: Carefully and completely spell out five different experiments that would specifically falsify and disqualify your theory. Can you propose any
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


The methodology you utilize is not my concern, nor is how you conduct your experiment, but proving any of the 5 things I outlined will disqualify my theory beyond reasonable doubt.


You obviously know nothing of the scientific process.
 Quoting: AnonPhysicist 1406242

At least as much as you do, apparently.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


If you believe qua tum physics is falsifiable and my theory is not, you don't shit from shinola about science or the sceintific method and how it has been hijacked. There is no way to disprove quantum physics because the people who control the academic process and have billions at stake have gatekeepers preventing it, killing when it becomes necessary. It is actually very simple to disqualify quantum physics, special relativity and general relativity, and has been repeatedly by empirical observations made daily.

As the "Mexican" shill pointed out, it is very difficult to prove a negative, thus quantum theory is still be tacked onto with gaudy science fiction
 Quoting: AnonPhysicist 1406242

It is difficult to prove a negative. However, it is possible to create experiments that WILL FAIL if conditions are not met,
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

I gave you five, whether you realize or acknowledge it is of no consequence to me.

and thus allow the idea in question to be falsified/modified. For example, if you stick to the Newtonian F=G(M1*M2)/R^2 (as you seem to want to do), and use it to account for the bending of light in a gravitational field, you only yield about half the result of what is actually observed.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

you pulled that figure out of your ass, it varies with frequency and though I have not fully worked out the details of why higher frequencies are bet less, it seems intuitively exactly what you would expect. You are NOT dealing with a linear motion with light, it is a particle traveling in sine waveform.


See? Falsifiability. Can you propose specific experiments that allow YOUR idea to be falsified?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

Whether you acknowledge it or not , there are thousands of ways to prove light does not consist of electrons vibrating passively to an oscillating magnetic field. The fact that you cannot falsify a theory does not mean it is not falsifiable if it is not valid. There seems to be lot of confusion among the academically educated (brainwashed)/ Tell me how to falsify quantum physics in way you will accept. If matter exceeding light speed doesn't do it, what will?If proving kinetic energy cannot exist in the absence of mass doesn't do it, what will?
DON'T YOU GET IT, I am not a simple mind and I do not commit to memory as fact that which defies reason and contradicts what I already know to be fact or that which I cannot prove to myself as fact. In the word of tradiational academia, you either do this or you fucking FAIL YOUR COURSES.
AnonPhysicist
User ID: 1406242
United States
10/15/2012 10:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

agent 74444, what do you do for a living? what job do you have?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25613995


I told you. I work in I.T. for a private firm.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


You're goddamned shit breathed liar.
 Quoting: AnonPhysicist 1406242


Alas, I am not lying about my profession.
/quote]
Yes you are, specifically you work for the NSA and post out of pine gap Australia.I have known you for over ten years. I know who and what you are, a goddamned traitor and a disgrace.

I have no reason to be dishonest about what I do for a living, even if I am somewhat reticent about revealing any more about my identity. And, as usual, when challenged to *prove* that I am lying, by stating who I am and who my father was (as you claim to know), *you're* the one who balks.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

You don't know shit about internet technology and if you do you are using it to hack loyal American citizens.
Which is exactly what you have claimed engineers would do when challenged about the ascent stage of Apollo, by the by. Yet I see you balking with so much more frequency...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

As I recall the ascent stage reaching orbit with the stated mass to fuel ratio was determined to be impossible soon after NASA published the mass of the fuel and the spacecraft by a wide variety of physics students, and at the time of the missions that the majority of adults both educated and uneducated believed them to be hoax. Try to tell me I am liar or have a poor memory.
AnonPhysicist
User ID: 1406242
United States
10/15/2012 11:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I just had a humorous thought. Jewish science very closely resembles their attire, metaphorically. It is gaudy and unattractive to the normal person, overdone in complexity and demanding attention. It tries to say "I am better than you". I can walk into a store filled with 1000 gentiles and one jewish woman and spot her from across five aisles.

I am sorry if this sounds antisemitic, maybe it is, but it is a fact. It is exactly the same with Jewish science. It has a gaudy complexity and boring science fiction like quality that stands out like a sore thumb from traditional science fact and it is ALWAYS theoretical and based on complex unfalsifiable calculus, and as anyone who knows the discipline of calculus well will tell you, you can appear to prove anything you wish in this manner and never do so.

There are no absolutes in this discipline, endless variables is what describes it best.. This is why Einstein is famous for his quote that 'logic does not exist at his level of understanding'/ Unfortunately, neither does common sense.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
10/15/2012 11:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

...


I told you. I work in I.T. for a private firm.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


You're goddamned shit breathed liar.
 Quoting: AnonPhysicist 1406242


Alas, I am not lying about my profession.
/quote]
Yes you are, specifically you work for the NSA and post out of pine gap Australia.I have known you for over ten years. I know who and what you are, a goddamned traitor and a disgrace.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


You are wrong about my employment, you are wrong where I am, you are wrong about how long we have engaged one another, and you have no evidence to support any of your hopelessly erroneous claims about me.

Just like so many of your ideas.

I have no reason to be dishonest about what I do for a living, even if I am somewhat reticent about revealing any more about my identity. And, as usual, when challenged to *prove* that I am lying, by stating who I am and who my father was (as you claim to know), *you're* the one who balks.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

You don't know shit about internet technology and if you do you are using it to hack loyal American citizens.
 Quoting: AnonPhysicist 1406242


'Internet Technology?' Oh, dear. That one made me laugh.

I know quite a bit more than you, obviously. Here you are, balking again about proving you know my identity. I am sure you'll bring up how IP addresses are assigned by cellular towers, soon, too.

Oooh. My side hurts.

Which is exactly what you have claimed engineers would do when challenged about the ascent stage of Apollo, by the by. Yet I see you balking with so much more frequency...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

As I recall the ascent stage reaching orbit with the stated mass to fuel ratio was determined to be impossible soon after NASA published the mass of the fuel and the spacecraft by a wide variety of physics students, and at the time of the missions that the majority of adults both educated and uneducated believed them to be hoax. Try to tell me I am liar or have a poor memory.
 Quoting: AnonPhysicist 1406242


You are either a liar or have a poor memory, or you'd be able to cite *sources* for your particular claim about the ascent stage. Perhaps I should demonstrate how it should be done...
AnonPhysicist
User ID: 1406242
United States
10/16/2012 12:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I have made this challenge in nearly every science forum I have posted to, and banned permanent and immediately afterword.I wonder why?. Well, not really. Unfortunately the internet has suffered the same fate as the media and publishing industries.
BUT
I challenge anyone posting here to explain any of the following in a universally accepted manner that is explainable by conventional empirical based and known science like my thoery does:

1) What causes time dilation.(in my theory there is no such thing, time is simply not a linear function.)
2) Explain Gravity being the result of a distortion in the "space time continuum" (My theory explains gravity as a weak electromagnetic force)
3) Define "space time continuum" (IN my model there are three dimensions, time being a non linear repeating function.)
4)Explain how and why photons transmit kinetic energy
5)Explain the transmission of kinetic energy in the absence of mass when mass is a component of kinetic energy as it is defined by proved science.
6)Explain succinctly with empirical based science (real science, real scientific method) how photons induce a flow of electrons and produce electricity without quickly draining the photovoltaic material very quickly of electrons.How does the 'photon' convert itself into an electron, and if it doesn't, where do the excess electrons come from?
7)Explain how and why photons always seem to convert to a form of energy that is also produced by electrons upon impact with atoms..
8)Explain the energy level and composition of cosmic "rays", giving a full description of their nature.

Put your thinking yarmulkes on now.


The funny thing about this is, none of these questions can really be answered with "conventional quantum theory", the answer always involves more theory, but every one can be answered succinctly and easily by MY theory with an actual empirical answer that is easily understood. Why do you suppose that is? ...Who do you suppose would want to prevent a source of almost limitless and costless energy from being put into common usage and why?

The cleansing is nessecary because these parasitic things will never relinquish their control without intervention from the creator, deception is the very act of creating an artificial reality contrary to the creators intention.
AnonPhysicist
User ID: 1406242
United States
10/16/2012 12:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

Yes you are, specifically you work for the NSA and post out of pine gap Australia.I have known you for over ten years. I know who and what you are, a goddamned traitor and a disgrace.
 Quoting: AnonPhysicist 1406242

You are wrong about my employment, you are wrong where I am, you are wrong about how long we have engaged one another, and you have no evidence to support any of your hopelessly erroneous claims about me.

Just like so many of your ideas.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

You sure seemed to show up pretty quickly seeing as this is just a hobby of yours....


I have no reason to be dishonest about what I do for a living, even if I am somewhat reticent about revealing any more about my identity. And, as usual, when challenged to *prove* that I am lying, by stating who I am and who my father was (as you claim to know), *you're* the one who balks.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444
You don't know shit about internet technology and if you do you are using it to hack loyal American citizens.
 Quoting: AnonPhysicist 1406242

1406242:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTEzOTk1XzdGNzBCMzg2]
'Internet Technology?' Oh, dear. That one made me laugh.


I know quite a bit more than you, obviously. Here you are, balking again about proving you know my identity. I am sure you'll bring up how IP addresses are assigned by cellular towers, soon, too.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

IT means information technology as it relates to the internet exclusively. What is humorous? IP addresses are not 'assigned by cell towers", they are assigned by ISP's but if you have a mobile 4g connection your IP changes as you link to another tower. How can you deny what anyone who has watched their ID number here on GLP change as they move from place to place knows, and if you are an expert in this technology how could you be unaware of this??
1406242:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTEzOTk1XzdGNzBCMzg2]
Oooh. My side hurts.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

You are the dumbest disinformation op left on the internet, I swear your intent is simply to dull my intellect.


1406242:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTEzOTk1XzdGNzBCMzg2]
You are either a liar or have a poor memory, or you'd be able to cite *sources* for your particular claim about the ascent stage. Perhaps I should demonstrate how it should be done...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


The internet has fallen prey to "IT" people like you work for, there is absolutely no place for the truth on it any more. Sources can simple be erased, is this not so?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
10/16/2012 12:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Very well. A *proper* rebuttal. You know, with *sources.*



Doh. Take 2.


No one has ever attempted to disqualify this theory, though it is falsifiable hundreds of different ways experimentally.

 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist


Carefully and completely spell out five different experiments that would specifically falsify and disqualify your theory.

And watch my surprise when you can't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


1)Prove the production of electricity from a photovoltaic cell is not the result of electrons in the form of light being intercepted by the atomic structure of the photovoltaic material and converted to normal low electrons. (By the way, the function of photovoltaic cells is most succinctly explained by my theory)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1406242


But the theory that best suits the facts is the current traditional one, and you have proposed no experiment to verify your idea while disqualifying the current theory.

[link to science.nasa.gov]

What experiment would you propose that *specifically tests the validity of YOUR model*, and then disqualifies the traditional one? Spell out the experiment!

2)Prove that light frequency energy cannot be conducted by the same materials as electricity in the non EMR form. Radio antennae and wires being used to conduct EMR are in almsot every electronic device, and are conductors of electrons. Repeated experiments mentioned in early debates involving plants producing photosynthesis in total darkness using metal plates and conductors will get in your way though,as well
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist


This seems to be the closest you got to actual experimental verification of anything. If I understand you, you are saying that if your explanation is true, and the traditional theory false, that you should be able to put plants in total darkness, and if there are metal plates and conductors, the plants will flourish anyway, proving that light is getting to them through electro-magnetic radiation. You would have, as a control, another identical room without the metal plates and conductors, and the plants should die. Is that an accurate way to describe an experiment that could qualify your theory? And does it really disprove the traditional model? Be specific.



3)Prove that the energy of electromagnetic radiation is not directly related to it's velocity, speed amplitude and frequency, in other words prove that the particle I suggest is not moving the precise distance and velocity to produce the energy it does using the classic 1/2M X V2 formula. (I give the simple math proving this in my theorem)
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist


Not sure if I understand you, here. Electromagnetic waves travel through a vacuum at a constant velocity known as the speed of light, c. The relationship between the speed of light, wavelength, and frequency is:

f=c/(lambda)

F is the freq in cycles per second, c is light velocity in meters, and (lambda) is the wavelength in meters.

[link to www.1728.org]


When light passes through other media, the velocity of light decreases. For a given frequency of light, the wavelength also must decrease. This decrease in velocity is quantitated by the refractive index, n, which is the ratio of c to the velocity of light in another medium, v:

n = c / v

Since the velocity of light is lower in other media than in a vacuum, n is always a number greater than one. which is the refractive index. Refractive index is an intrinsic physical property of a substance, and can be used to monitor purity or the concentration of a solute in a solution. The refractive index of a material is measured with a refractometer, and is usually made versus air. If the precision warrants, the measurements can be corrected for vacuum. Note that the difference between n(air) and n(vacuum) is only significant in the fourth decimal place.

[link to www.chemistry.adelaide.edu.au]

So I am not sure how your theory and the traditional theory are at odds here. Again, propose an experiment to VERIFY your idea as the better model. Knocking down the current idea is irrelevant. Giving evidence that SUPPORTS yours is what is relevant, and what you stubbornly refuse to do.


4)Prove that and momentum can exist without mass
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist


The use of words can make a lot of confusion. Unfortunately, the word "mass" has been used in two different ways in physics. One was the way Einstein used it in E=mc2, where mass is really just the same thing as energy (E) but measured in different units. This is the same "m" that you multiply velocity by to find momentum, and thus is sometimes called the inertial mass. It's also the mass that provides the source of gravitational effects. Light has this "m" because it has energy. So it is indeed affected by gravity- not just in black holes but in all sorts of less extreme situations too. In fact, the first important *confirmation* of General Relativity came in 1919, when it was found that light from stars bends as it goes by the Sun.

The other way "mass" is often used, especially in recent years, is to mean "rest mass" or "invariant mass", which is sqrt(E2-p2*c2)/c2. This is invariant because it doesn't change when you describe an object at rest or from the point of view of someone who says it's moving. Obviously that's a good type of "mass" to give when you want to make a list of masses of particles. For a light beam traveling in a single direction, E=pc, so this "m" is zero. There is no point of view from which the light is standing still.

However, once you consider light traveling in a variety of directions, the E's from the different parts just add up to give the total E but the vector p's don't. In fact the total p can be zero if there are beams traveling opposite ways. So for many purposes the older definition of m (the inertial mass) is more convenient than the invariant particle mass, since it's the inertial mass that's just the sum of the inertial masses of the parts. For light moving equally in all directions, like the light bouncing around inside a star, total p is zero, so both definitions just give m=E/c2.

[link to van.physics.illinois.edu]

Oh, and here's a first-year physics student proving momentum without mass:

"We constructed a torsion pendulum in a vacuum chamber and fired a powerful laser at a mirror attached to the pendulum. The pendulum rotated away from the laser light and we could measure the force of the light by the angle of deflection. By using a second laser to measure the
angle of deflection and a photosensor attached to a computer, we could see the effect of light on the pendulum in real-time, and were able to record precise data about its motion."

[link to www.gamma.nbi.dk]

You seem to be sticking with F=G(M1*M2)/R^2 where, m1=mass of heavenly body r=distance f=gravitational force m2=0=mass of light. If you tried to use that force equation, you'd calculate some bending of light in a gravitational field, but it would only be half the observed amount. General Relativity, which describes the distortion of space-time by mass *and* momentum, is needed to get the right answer.

[link to van.physics.illinois.edu]
[link to scienceblogs.com]



5)Isolate and fully describe the "photon"
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist


In physics, the photon is an elementary particle, the quantum of the electromagnetic field and the basic unit of light and all other forms of electromagnetic radiation. It is also the force carrier for the electromagnetic force. This force's easily visible human-scale effects and applications, from sunlight to radiotelephones, are due to the fact that the photon has no mass and thus can produce interactions at long distances. Like all elementary particles, the photon is governed by quantum mechanics and so exhibits wave-particle duality: that is, it exhibits both wave and particle properties.

The photon is massless, has no electric charge,and does not decay spontaneously in empty space. A photon has two possible polarization states and is described by exactly three continuous parameters: the components of its wave vector, which determine its wavelength (lambda); and its direction of propagation.

[link to sawaal.ibibo.com]

In 1986, Grangier, Roger, and Aspect performed an elegant
experiment to isolate single photons. Conceptually very simple, their approach was to examine correlations between photodetections at the transmission and reflection outputs of a 50/50 beamsplitter. To quote the experimenters, ‘‘a single photon can only be detected once!’’ Hence, if a single quantum of light is incident on the beamsplitter, it should be detected at the transmission output or at the reflection output, but not both: there should be no coincident detections between the two outputs.

[link to people.whitman.edu]

Others have repeated and refined the experiments.

[link to people.whitman.edu]

See also:

[link to www.tp.physique.usherbrooke.ca]

[link to www.nobeliefs.com]

[link to www.bourbaphy.fr]

[link to www-d0.fnal.gov]

[link to www.eng.yale.edu]

[link to scienceblogs.com]


You see? SOURCES.

But, again, knocking on the current theory does nothing to support yours. Do you have an experiment that would demonstrate your theory models better than experiments involving photons? Be very specific, please, and spell out an experiment that would prove massless photons exist that *you* would accept.

And hey, only 66 days left for yet another experiment to conclude, which will falsify many of your nigh-certain claims... even if you *won't* wager on it.
AnonPhysicist
User ID: 1406242
United States
10/16/2012 12:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
You are either a liar or have a poor memory,
 Quoting: Agent 74444

Since I have an extremely good memory and one of us is obviously a liar, who do you think the readers would put their money on being a liar? ESPECIALLY the ones working with you?
cruise
or you'd be able to cite *sources* for your particular claim about the ascent stage. Perhaps I should demonstrate how it should be done...
 Quoting: Agent 74444

Sure, write up one real quick on wikipedia or britanica.
lmao
you keep forgetting , I am not a 'newbie' and I KNOW how it is done.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
10/16/2012 12:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

Yes you are, specifically you work for the NSA and post out of pine gap Australia.I have known you for over ten years. I know who and what you are, a goddamned traitor and a disgrace.
 Quoting: AnonPhysicist 1406242

You are wrong about my employment, you are wrong where I am, you are wrong about how long we have engaged one another, and you have no evidence to support any of your hopelessly erroneous claims about me.

Just like so many of your ideas.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

You sure seemed to show up pretty quickly seeing as this is just a hobby of yours....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


Sometimes I am quick, when I am online, and sometimes I take days because I'm doing other things. In both cases, you cite it as positive evidence that I work for some government outfit. Tell me: what is the PROPER interval that would allow you to conclude that I don't work for any government?


I have no reason to be dishonest about what I do for a living, even if I am somewhat reticent about revealing any more about my identity. And, as usual, when challenged to *prove* that I am lying, by stating who I am and who my father was (as you claim to know), *you're* the one who balks.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444
You don't know shit about internet technology and if you do you are using it to hack loyal American citizens.
 Quoting: AnonPhysicist 1406242

1406242:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTEzOTk1XzdGNzBCMzg2]
'Internet Technology?' Oh, dear. That one made me laugh.


I know quite a bit more than you, obviously. Here you are, balking again about proving you know my identity. I am sure you'll bring up how IP addresses are assigned by cellular towers, soon, too.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

IT means information technology as it relates to the internet exclusively. What is humorous?
 Quoting: AnonPhysicist 1406242


That you had to go look it up immediately after calling it 'Internet Technology.'


IP addresses are not 'assigned by cell towers", they are assigned by ISP's but if you have a mobile 4g connection your IP changes as you link to another tower.
 Quoting: AnonPhysicist 1406242


If that were true, how could you do a long download while you were driving around?

How can you deny what anyone who has watched their ID number here on GLP change as they move from place to place knows, and if you are an expert in this technology how could you be unaware of this??
 Quoting: AnonPhysicist 1406242


Because that's not what happens -- unless you reboot or re-enable your wireless as you go from place to place. Again, how would a long download 'hand off' from one IP to a different one and not be interrupted? TCP/IP doesn't work that way.

1406242:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTEzOTk1XzdGNzBCMzg2]
Oooh. My side hurts.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

You are the dumbest disinformation op left on the internet, I swear your intent is simply to dull my intellect.
 Quoting: AnonPhysicist 1406242


You do that just fine all by yourself.

1406242:MV8xNzY4NjI5XzMzOTEzOTk1XzdGNzBCMzg2]
You are either a liar or have a poor memory, or you'd be able to cite *sources* for your particular claim about the ascent stage. Perhaps I should demonstrate how it should be done...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


The internet has fallen prey to "IT" people like you work for, there is absolutely no place for the truth on it any more. Sources can simple be erased, is this not so?
 Quoting: AnonPhysicist 1406242


No, they can't. Information published on the internet has been compared to piss in a swimming pool: once it's out there, it's out there. It can be tough to find, but it exists, if you know how to look.

Which you obviously don't. How about all those records you've kept of every post you've made... oh, yes. They were all stolen. Convenient.

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!