WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

That is your choice if you choose to be wrong yet again.




The solstice occurs on the same date in both the north and southern hemisphere. The fact that you do not know the simplest of facts involved makes your input and your opinion useless

Have a nice day, agent 74444. What is this, the fourth time you been found ignorant and in error while calling me an idiot?:


[link to www.onejungle.com]

I read the title SLOWLY, what I dont get is that you used a magnetogram on the 21st to confirm a photo taken on the 20th as legit for 21st? Was time travel involved? If the pictures were censored then you wouldnt have seen it on the 21st now would you have, especially concidering that sunspot activy photos are taken once a day. So at 11:11 on the 21st, you were looking at a photo from 5:54 the day before, but at least you confirmed the photo to be real by using your magnetogram.

Hm. Unfortunately, all the cities and sites referred to in the article are in Mexico -- decidedly North of South America. So I think the single reference isn't enough to support your claim, as it might be a simple error.

Keep right on digging. Ten Mayan artifacts discovered in South America. Won't the Incas be surprised.

Well, then, what does your claim about the differing Solstices mean, in terms of not knowing when the Long Count Calendar starts?

And there is a good reason scholars know when it starts, by the by, and is really obvious -- I feel silly for not having figured it out. Put bluntly, this was the 13.0.0.0.0 b'ak'tun, and it bears out Mayan astronomical accuracy as well.

I'll see if you can figure it out, but be happy to share if you can't.

He is out of his element with your questions, he is having problems with fastballs in his wheel house on his sunspots and NASA coverups of photos he has personally confirmed with his own data, there is a snowballs chance in hell he is going to be able to prove any of his Myan artifact claims if he cant even get simple facts about his sunspot allegation correct. I should have said a snowballs chance on the north pole concidering his claim that there will be no winter this year. I doubt people in Yakutsk, Russia agree with him right now at -50 degrees F.

The question is, why would you employ this obviously unbalanced and unfair tactic? Also, if you read the thread you will see where I emphatically stated there will be radical extremes in weather. Overall averages though will amount to no real winter, just as last year and the year before. Aberrations are to be expected with the radical downdrafts that are occurring bringing stratospheric air to the surface an d making weather prediction increasingly impossible beyond a half day or less.

[link to www.onejungle.com]
Excerpt from the link: " The power of the Mayan civilization stretched for almost the entire length of South America."

I was taught this in the sixth grade, btw.

It would be all good except for the fact that the average low in Yakutsk for todays date is -48, doest really sound like an abberation, just a normal winter. Do research before attempting to discredit me. Also explain how any of this is unfair and unbalanced, I am calling you out on your obvious lack of research on your sunspot claim, and 7444 is calling you out on your lack of knowledge on the Myan civilization. You made the claims, I am handing you the facts. If you make untrue claims or use faulty research then you should expect people to call you out on it.

And yet temperatures worldwide are well above normal and within a few days the coincidence you mention will be a memory.
Let us do a little experiment and see what the weather is like there in a week, shall we?

That isn't what you claimed before. Post Hoc AGAIN...



Your backpedaling/changing claims is getting more amusing by the post.

And all you actually accomplished is helping me by confirming not only was I right, but that the data was intentionally altered afterword. Nice job,


And he has utterly failed and be proven to be ignorant and completely wrong,

You made the claims, I am handing you the facts.

You are shoveling shit as fast as you can to defeat me with volumes of unrelated information requiring me to do off the cuff research to prove what I already know and providing links. It is an old tactic, but you're going to need more than three of you to succeed at this tactic.


And you have completely failed at showing one example of where I have done so.

Then you were taught badly. The tourist page you cite gives no sources, is at odds with educational sites about the Maya, and even the cities they mention specifically on the page are all in Mexico.

The Incan civilization was down in South America, and were *quite* different than the Maya, too.

So. You claimed Mayan artifacts were discovered in South America. Prove it. Name ten.

Actually, this is precisely what I have been claiming all throughout this thread very consistently and precisely.

No. I am demanding that *before* you make the claims you make, you have your evidence and links lined up and ready to go. Your research shouldn't be off the cuff, it should be *already done.* And that means citing sources that other people can check. Your word is simply not enough.

After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. If that's a rule for you, surely it can be a rule for me.

And yet against IDW's certainty we have:

- Actual Snow.

- Winter temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere.

- NOT warmer than Fall.

You fail.

You are shoveling shit as fast as you can to defeat me with volumes of unrelated information requiring me to do off the cuff research to prove what I already know and providing links. It is an old tactic, but you're going to need more than three of you to succeed at this tactic.


And you have completely failed at showing one example of where I have done so.


Please give me one link to a LIVE sunspot photo. The site you gave doesnt have LIVE links, just links to photos from SOHO. Yet this site is where you saw a LIVE photo at 11:11 a.m. or at least this is your claim.

[link to www.enjoyguatemala.com]

Snip:
"The ancient Maya occupied a vast geographic area in Central and South America from around 2000 BC until 1500 AD."

Demand in one hand and shit in the other, asshole

Boys, you're screwing up the quotes, whats wrong, can't more thana dozen of you working together overpower my ability to respond in such a way as to make you look like baying jackasses?


Face it, a dozen idiots cannot add up thier IQ's cumulatively and have the total be higher than one true genius.

Do you read any of these things you snip and post?
continued from your snip.....

The ancient Maya occupied a vast geographic area in Central and South America from around 2000 BC until 1500 AD. The Mayan culture extended to parts of what is now Mexico, Honduras, and El Salvador, and most of Guatemala and Belize.


Now obviously their definition of south america is much different than what I was taught. Even though Honduras at one time covered much of the northern part of south america, the farthest south the mayan empire reached were the ruins in Chalchupa in hondurus, which is still central america. Check the map out.

None of you have been right a single time or defeated me on a single point in this 'debate' all night. You are consistently wrong and prove only one thing, you are no match for me in any respect, and you have made fools of yourselves and what you represent consistently.

Can you show me where the live image you saw on spaceweather.com is? I see no live links. Are you sure it was a live link? Well it had to be concidering you confirmed it with your own equipment.

The mayan influence reached as far south as the southern tip of south america and as far north as the Dakotas. Wanna be wrong again?
It is an idiot that makes the same mistake over and over and over.

How can you show a live link from two day past, idiot?

As a matter of fact the only equipment you need to see the location of a sunspot is a welders hood or cutting goggles with an number ten or eleven lens.The Sunspot was in fact manually verified as to be positioned precisely in the center oif the Suns disk at 12:11 CST on 12/21/12 by my own personal observation. Nice swing, what a whiff.

You claim that spaceweather.com has live sunspot video correct? Please show me where. That is all I am asking, how about a live sunspot vidoe or photo from 2:21 am EST today, like now.

A taciturn admission you do not have the evidence you claimed you had.

IDW - Champeen Asspulling of the WOOOORLD!

I made no such claim, show me where I did. However, SOHO DOES in fact show live images, and they are well known for altering and removing them when they have something to hide.

Spaceweather can be used to locate the approximate location of a sunspot, but manual observation is the obviously the most accurate method since you are only 9 minutes off the precise location.

Get back to your bath salts and give it up, any intellect you might have once had has long since been destroyed by chronic chemical intoxication.