Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,646 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 805,247
Pageviews Today: 1,222,953Threads Today: 381Posts Today: 6,751
01:03 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

 
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1312799
United States
12/25/2012 12:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I can. The next alignment of the Sun and Earth with the galactic center and the next possibility occurs june 22
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist



What evidence can you give for this remarkable assertion?
 Quoting: Agent 74444


I hardly find it a remarkable assertion , since every competent astronomer and astrophysicist is aware of it and it can be interpolated from the alignment on December 22 by anyone with half a functioning brain, which you have clearly demonstrated does not include yourself.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist

(since I do not have editing "privileges", I had to correct automatically created 'errors' in the quoting.)
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1312799
United States
12/25/2012 12:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
And so:

IDW has failed to name Mayan artifacts he claimed were discovered in South America.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


I think the fact that I referenced material that showed their influence extended throughout South and north America would suffice other than naming ten artifacts found in south America. You ARE an idiot.
IDW has failed to quantify a different starting date for the Mayan calendar, and seemingly doesn't understand why or how the starting date has been verified.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


Perhaps you can enlighten us as to how the starting date has been verified. I doubt it though, In fact I challenge you to do do, you bag of wind.
IDW has implied that TPTB are lying about the starting date of the Mayan calendar specifically to make IDW/A.A look bad.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


I did not imply that they had lied about this date, I stated it outright as fact. However, I never made the claim they did it to "make me look bad", I said they did it to get us to let our guard down and to make us ALL believe the end of the Mayan long count has come and gone without incident. You ARE A LIAR.

IDW has failed to show evidence that the Sunspot was lined up when IDW claimed it was.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

Actually I did. Though I could not reference the MDI continuum movie from SOHO, they DID leave the data from the magnetogram up, which I referenced. SInce Sunspots represent magnetic anomalies, the position of the Sunspot at 11:11 am EST time was easy to see on the magnetogram "movie"
IDW's predictions about December 21st have proven utter folly.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


Yes they have, because I made a critical error in judgement and broke my own rules by accepting lamestream archaeology's and therefor lamestream jewish science's conclusions as to the end date of the Mayan long count calender.
List updated. Have a nice day.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


Just make sure you include all of the facts when you do and don't use the "artistic license" you have in the past.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
12/25/2012 02:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
And so:

IDW has failed to name Mayan artifacts he claimed were discovered in South America.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


I think the fact that I referenced material that showed their influence extended throughout South and north America would suffice other than naming ten artifacts found in south America. You ARE an idiot.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1312799


You cited two tourist pages, which went on to mention cities only in Mexico. Nice try. Perhaps you can cite even a single educational or archeological paper that supports your position that the Mayans reached the tip of South America?

And I still want ten Mayan artifacts discovered in South America. If you can't cite sources with that, the Maya were never in South America.

You made the claim. Now back it up.

IDW has failed to quantify a different starting date for the Mayan calendar, and seemingly doesn't understand why or how the starting date has been verified.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


Perhaps you can enlighten us as to how the starting date has been verified. I doubt it though, In fact I challenge you to do do, you bag of wind.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1312799


It wasn't immediately obvious to me, either. But every day on the Mayan Calendar now corresponds to a day on any other calendar. And, think hard: for *YOU* proved it on this thread. I'll let you chew on that one for awhile, but then I'll let you know if you can't figure it out. It is pretty cool, actually.

IDW has implied that TPTB are lying about the starting date of the Mayan calendar specifically to make IDW/A.A look bad.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


I did not imply that they had lied about this date, I stated it outright as fact. However, I never made the claim they did it to "make me look bad", I said they did it to get us to let our guard down and to make us ALL believe the end of the Mayan long count has come and gone without incident. You ARE A LIAR.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1312799


Very well. However, they did no such thing to let our guard down when the dates were translated in 1966.

C'mon, think about it. How are you going to know what dates the Mayan calendar systems (for there are several) corresponds with? How would you go about doing it?


IDW has failed to show evidence that the Sunspot was lined up when IDW claimed it was.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

Actually I did. Though I could not reference the MDI continuum movie from SOHO, they DID leave the data from the magnetogram up, which I referenced. SInce Sunspots represent magnetic anomalies, the position of the Sunspot at 11:11 am EST time was easy to see on the magnetogram "movie"
IDW's predictions about December 21st have proven utter folly.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


Yes they have, because I made a critical error in judgement and broke my own rules by accepting lamestream archaeology's and therefor lamestream jewish science's conclusions as to the end date of the Mayan long count calender.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1312799


Oh, just keep digging that hole, it's *PRICELESSLY* funny.

List updated. Have a nice day.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


Just make sure you include all of the facts when you do and don't use the "artistic license" you have in the past.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1312799


They always have been factual, which just drives you more bananas.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
12/25/2012 02:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
It's is amusing how you called me a liar , that I had claimed the end of the world would coincide with the end of the Myan long count, and then proceeded to provide all of the evidence to the contrary. The end of the world would mean the total destruction of this planet and all life on and in it. Where did I say that>
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1312799


Ah, the hair splitting. It would only mean the loss of 95% of the population. The End of the World As We Know It.

And how do YOU know when the long count began? From some jewish archaeologist?

 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1312799


Nope. *YOU* supplied the evidence, back when you were pro-December 21st with your 98.5% accuracy. You know -- up to the DAY that nothing happened.

I am *loving* that your supposed hyper-intellect is thus far unable to figure this out.

And tell me, when June 22nd comes and goes with the same awe-inspiring nothing that December 22nd came and went with, what date will you fall back to NEXT?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
12/25/2012 02:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I just love how pro-Maya you were right up to the point where their calendar pulled the rug out from under you. Up til that moment, you were such a huge fan, only to discover that their astronomers were allied with us debunkers (and reality) after all.

Also, since you seem to have missed it above -- you said your decision on the December 21 date PREDATED your knowledge that the Maya had that same date, remember?

I also KNOW that on 12/21/12, a solar event will occur that will make none in the known history of man compare. Remember, I made these predictions before I correlated them to the Mayan long count or studied the prophecies of the cleansing.
 Quoting: AA


So you can't blame the Maya, or interpretations of their calendar ANYWAY. You claimed you made the predictions before you correlated them. Unless you were lying, of course.
poopface
User ID: 30818452
United States
12/25/2012 02:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
DAAAAYYYYYYYUUUUUUUUUUUUUMMMMMMMMMMMMMm


MAJOR BUMPAGE

MAJOR OWNAGE

bumppropoganda
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 29341887
United States
12/25/2012 08:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
It actually only applies to predictions and theoretics. This comment was probably the single most ignorant comment that he has made.

In fact another famous razor applies to him---Hanlon's Razor: ``Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity''.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29341887


Actually that is not correct. Occams razor is usually referenced when discussing the validity of various theoretical conclusions and theories in general in science and most certainly was not the product of a jewish mind, and simply means the simplest explanation is usually the most correct.

Let me ask you this, when you compare my model of the universe with that of jewish lamestream quantum physics, how does it stack up when Occams razor is applied?

BTW, Occams razor NEVER applies to predictions or prognostications
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1312799


Here is the definition of Occam's razor just so he can refresh his memory.

A rule in science and philosophy stating that entities should not be multiplied needlessly. This rule is interpreted to mean that the simplest of two or more competing theories is preferable and that an explanation for unknown phenomena should first be attempted in terms of what is already known. Occam's razor is named after the deviser of the rule......the simplest hypothesis proposed as an explanation of phenomena is more likely to be the true one than is any other available hypothesis, that its predictions are more likely to be true than those of any other available hypothesis, and that it is an ultimate a priori epistemic principle that simplicity is evidence for truth.
Dr. Astro
Comet Hustler

User ID: 1524705
United States
12/25/2012 08:09 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I just love how pro-Maya you were right up to the point where their calendar pulled the rug out from under you. Up til that moment, you were such a huge fan, only to discover that their astronomers were allied with us debunkers (and reality) after all.

Also, since you seem to have missed it above -- you said your decision on the December 21 date PREDATED your knowledge that the Maya had that same date, remember?

I also KNOW that on 12/21/12, a solar event will occur that will make none in the known history of man compare. Remember, I made these predictions before I correlated them to the Mayan long count or studied the prophecies of the cleansing.
 Quoting: AA


So you can't blame the Maya, or interpretations of their calendar ANYWAY. You claimed you made the predictions before you correlated them. Unless you were lying, of course.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


Bumping the awesome pwnage.
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 29341887
United States
12/25/2012 08:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
IDW has failed to show evidence that the Sunspot was lined up when IDW claimed it was.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

Actually I did. Though I could not reference the MDI continuum movie from SOHO, they DID leave the data from the magnetogram up, which I referenced. SInce Sunspots represent magnetic anomalies, the position of the Sunspot at 11:11 am EST time was easy to see on the magnetogram "movie"

 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1312799


When shown the image that he used to verify the sunspot from spaceweather.com was old he claims NASA doctored the photo, or changed the time. YET now instead of using his OWN magnetogram, he claims he is using the NASA magnetogram to verify the location.

Do you have a magnetogram or are you just using NASA images to confirm other NASA images? You havent been very clear.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 29341887
United States
12/25/2012 12:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Well, as predicted at 11:30 AM EST spaceweather finally updated their sunspot picture. Guess what, its the same photo i showed you yesterday at 3 pm est. So the image updated at 11:30 as the sunspot picture for the day is 19 hours old as I said it would be. So AA explain how the photo you saw on YOUR source site on the 21st was only 5 hours old at the most, and you confirmed this with your magnetogram, or maybe you didnt, and just used NASA images.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 29820852
United States
12/25/2012 12:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
First off Merry Christmas you ornery knucklehead AA.


I guess you need a more obvious hint on getting to the start of the Maya long count calendar.

What data goes along with the calendar and is to use your words "accurate to within seconds" and "more precise than modern methods"

It was a measure not of time but rather of event cycles.


Do you get it yet?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30717724
United States
12/25/2012 12:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
You can't argue/reason with fags, AA ! They simply change topics, obfuscate and call names, UNLESS, they are bending over to enjoy the pain, lol !
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 29820852
United States
12/25/2012 12:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
You can't argue/reason with fags, AA ! They simply change topics, obfuscate and call names, UNLESS, they are bending over to enjoy the pain, lol !
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30717724


So you are in effect calling AA a fag?

blink
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 29341887
United States
12/25/2012 12:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
First off Merry Christmas you ornery knucklehead AA.


I guess you need a more obvious hint on getting to the start of the Maya long count calendar.

What data goes along with the calendar and is to use your words "accurate to within seconds" and "more precise than modern methods"

It was a measure not of time but rather of event cycles.


Do you get it yet?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29820852


Of course he didnt, if he had he would have realized all the eclipses, alignments etc that the Mayans predicted would have been off by a year if the start date of the calendar was off. Obviously this fact has eluded his genius intellect.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
12/25/2012 02:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
First off Merry Christmas you ornery knucklehead AA.


I guess you need a more obvious hint on getting to the start of the Maya long count calendar.

What data goes along with the calendar and is to use your words "accurate to within seconds" and "more precise than modern methods"

It was a measure not of time but rather of event cycles.


Do you get it yet?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29820852


Of course he didnt, if he had he would have realized all the eclipses, alignments etc that the Mayans predicted would have been off by a year if the start date of the calendar was off. Obviously this fact has eluded his genius intellect.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29341887


Awwww... like, spoiler alert?!?! I was hoping IDW/A.A could come up with this answer himself.

Ah, well. Yes, that's it. Besides eclipses and alignments which do line up perfectly with the b'ak'tun, as well as the other Mayan calendars, the Mayans were also very interested in Venus, and its transits and movements. All those astronomical phenomena line up in the calendars with breathtaking accuracy, just as IDW/A.A himself was alluding to.

However, that accuracy doesn't even matter. Since you seem to have missed it above -- you said your decision about the December 21 date PREDATED your knowledge that the Maya had that same date, remember?

I also KNOW that on 12/21/12, a solar event will occur that will make none in the known history of man compare. Remember, I made these predictions before I correlated them to the Mayan long count or studied the prophecies of the cleansing.
 Quoting: AA


So you can't blame the Maya, or interpretations of their calendar ANYWAY. You claimed you made the predictions before you correlated them. Unless you were lying, of course. Care to address this? I'd really like to know.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 29820852
United States
12/25/2012 02:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
First off Merry Christmas you ornery knucklehead AA.


I guess you need a more obvious hint on getting to the start of the Maya long count calendar.

What data goes along with the calendar and is to use your words "accurate to within seconds" and "more precise than modern methods"

It was a measure not of time but rather of event cycles.


Do you get it yet?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29820852


Of course he didnt, if he had he would have realized all the eclipses, alignments etc that the Mayans predicted would have been off by a year if the start date of the calendar was off. Obviously this fact has eluded his genius intellect.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29341887


Awwww... like, spoiler alert?!?! I was hoping IDW/A.A could come up with this answer himself.

Ah, well. Yes, that's it. Besides eclipses and alignments which do line up perfectly with the b'ak'tun, as well as the other Mayan calendars, the Mayans were also very interested in Venus, and its transits and movements. All those astronomical phenomena line up in the calendars with breathtaking accuracy, just as IDW/A.A himself was alluding to.

However, that accuracy doesn't even matter. Since you seem to have missed it above -- you said your decision about the December 21 date PREDATED your knowledge that the Maya had that same date, remember?

I also KNOW that on 12/21/12, a solar event will occur that will make none in the known history of man compare. Remember, I made these predictions before I correlated them to the Mayan long count or studied the prophecies of the cleansing.
 Quoting: AA


So you can't blame the Maya, or interpretations of their calendar ANYWAY. You claimed you made the predictions before you correlated them. Unless you were lying, of course. Care to address this? I'd really like to know.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


Near as I can figure it is the ancient Jewish Maya that decided to make AA look bad?

Perhaps he is partially coming clean about believing hype by his fellow "tards" that seem to inhabit so much of the internet.

I am sure that there are a few web sites that consider AA to be what he claims and buy into his stories and he can work out all kinds of predictions from that collection of fellow doom tards.

There are also several sites that know him quite well and to this day need to excise their sites from his vitriol and in some cases threats.

He is indeed quite a character and is pretty easy to pick out by his manner alone when he takes the time to use spell check.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 29341887
United States
12/25/2012 02:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I am soooo sorry, I just figured since he claims to have an IQ of above 160(if the long term us of opiods didnt kill off all his brain cells)--he would have figured this out after 4 days since everyone else in the thread already had. Obviously it was his "other" data that was way off if he even had any other data, lol.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 29820852
United States
12/25/2012 02:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
It appears that AA has simplified it down too far to his thinking that the end of the Maya calendar really means a catastrophe/cleansing.

I guess that stems from his genuine belief in his near inerrant predictions of the past of which none of us are able to accept from what is offered as facts and evidence from AA.

I come to the conclusion that he really does believe his own stuff.
Anonymous astrophysicist
User ID: 1533200
United States
12/25/2012 09:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
It appears that AA has simplified it down too far to his thinking that the end of the Maya calendar really means a catastrophe/cleansing.

I guess that stems from his genuine belief in his near inerrant predictions of the past of which none of us are able to accept from what is offered as facts and evidence from AA.

I come to the conclusion that he really does believe his own stuff.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29820852


....And yet I remain far more important to you than you do to me.

Odd that...

I have rarely seen a display of ignorance combined with arrogance as I have seen since I made my last post. There is not a single factual statement nor anything of any meaning.
Anonymous astrophysicist
User ID: 1533200
United States
12/25/2012 09:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Open the thread. Gee whiz, it's pretty obvious when the only computer I can post to the thread without being autobanned is this one, and yet the trolls and shills are given free rein.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
12/25/2012 10:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I have rarely seen a display of ignorance combined with arrogance as I have seen since I made my last post. There is not a single factual statement nor anything of any meaning.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1533200


Really? I disagree. Factual statements about the Maya and their accuracy have confirmed what you were claiming *before* December 21st, though you have changed your tune since your prediction failed.

Besides eclipses and alignments which do line up perfectly with the b'ak'tun, as well as the other Mayan calendars, the Mayans were also very interested in Venus, and its transits and movements. All those astronomical phenomena line up in the calendars with breathtaking accuracy, just as IDW/A.A himself was alluding to. That's how the dates can be correlated so perfectly.

However, that accuracy doesn't even matter. Since you seem to have missed it above -- you said your decision about the December 21 date PREDATED your knowledge that the Maya had that same date, remember?

I also KNOW that on 12/21/12, a solar event will occur that will make none in the known history of man compare. Remember, I made these predictions before I correlated them to the Mayan long count or studied the prophecies of the cleansing.
 Quoting: AA


So you can't blame the Maya, or interpretations of their calendar ANYWAY. You KNEW that a solar event was to occur on 12/21 until it didn't. You claimed you made the predictions *before* you correlated them with the Long Count calendar.

Unless you were lying, of course. Care to address this? I'd really like a response.
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
12/25/2012 10:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Thread: THIS IS IT ... The reason for all the extreme weather across the world, plus every other anomaly currently happening.
Anonymous astrophysicist
User ID: 1533200
United States
12/26/2012 12:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I'd really like a response.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

I see absolutely nothing but evil in you. The only response you will get from me is disgust. Your whole purpose in living is to promote evil parasitism.

You and your kind are the target of the cleansing and you know it. You believe by controlling the collective conscious, you can forestall the inevitable.
It is hard for me to imagine an individual having only one purpose in life and that being to try to snuff out a single light shining in the darkness.

The prediction I made that was in error is something you will try to capitalize off of to it's fullest extent. There is not a single person no matter how intelligent that has not made repeated errors, it is simply a reflection of your dishonesty to imply that a failed prediction means everything else I have stated or theorized is also in error.

It will never change the fact that 911 was done by the same ones that faked the Apollo "moonlandings" and who are putting fluoride in our water and poisoning our children , and theirs and your time is short, I ASSURE YOU.

Your effect on my spirit is to strengthen it against evil and to harden my resolve to realize by opposing it I give it recognition and power. Without me what would you be agent 74444> NOTHING. Therefore, from this point forward you will be ignored. I will refrain from reading a single word you post or responding to it, and in doing so I will erase your deceptive force of evil.

The evil you represent wasn't destroyed on December 21st, but it will be soon, and I think you know it and feel it. All of your kind does, and you think if you can create hate in my heart you can take me with you. You think if you make me hate I will be your equal spiritually.

The difference is WHAT I HATE IS WORTHY OF CONTEMPT AND HAS NO REDEEMING QUALITIES.
Anonymous astrophysicist
User ID: 1533200
United States
12/26/2012 01:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!


Thanks for posting that, it is a very interesting read that seems to correlate with my own hypothesis.

I also believe there are sources of energy besides the Sun at work, increasing the energy reaching the Earths surface and deep into it's core along magnetic field lines, and penetrating to varying depths in the crust and mantle. I believe that the plasma in interplanetary space is amplifying solar radiance, and that it marks the entrance into the concentration of matter of the galactic plane.

I provided a detailed explanation somewhere on this thread of the mechanism by which I believe the plasma amplifies solar radiance.

I realize I have somewhat impinged upon my credibility with a failed prediction and placing such high odds on it, and I have no one to blame but myself for trusting that which i warned all of you not to, academia and "traditional" science, and any sources of information originating from individuals educated by this system of deception.

I still believe the cleansing I foresee will occur during this solar maximum on a solstice when the Earth, Galactic center, and Sun align perfectly, and that this date will mark the true end of the Mayan long count.

With all of the solar activity occurring on the opposite side of the Sun, June the 22nd is the next possibility we should be concerned with but I am going to refrain from making a prediction from this point forward. If we do see increased solar activity as we come around to the opposite side of our orbit of the Sun, it will be a strong indicator.

I don;t think the 'things' know when the appointed time is , but they know it is near judging by all of the underground bunkers they are making and the desperation in their overall activities.
Anonymous astrophysicist
User ID: 1533200
United States
12/26/2012 01:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I noticed someone here (I don't recall who nor do I care) attempted to imply the date traditional academia set for the end of the Mayan long count correlates with solar and lunar eclipses and that the date was in part confirmed by this.

THIS IS A COMPLETE AND TOTAL LIE

The Mayans had several calenders , all based on celestial movements of the planets, stars, moon and Sun. Their lunar/solar calender is the most accurate calender ever devised , it does not require any "adjustments" like the Gregorian calender does because it recognizes the precise period of time it takes fro the Earth to make a complete orbit of the sun and correlates it perfectly with how long the moon takes to orbit the Earth. THIS IS THE MAYAN CALENDER THAT PREDICTS LUNAR AND SOLAR ECLIPSES, and although it is "engaged" with the long count, no correlation that was claimed has ever been established.

The long count calender DOES NOT predict solar or lunar eclipses nor mark any of these events in it's cycle.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
12/26/2012 01:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I'd really like a response.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

I see absolutely nothing but evil in you. The only response you will get from me is disgust. Your whole purpose in living is to promote evil parasitism.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1533200


Ad hominem noted. How unusual from you.

You and your kind are the target of the cleansing and you know it. You believe by controlling the collective conscious, you can forestall the inevitable.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1533200


What on Earth are you talking about?

It is hard for me to imagine an individual having only one purpose in life and that being to try to snuff out a single light shining in the darkness.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1533200


You are many things, IDW, but not a light in the darkness. On the contrary, your ways of thinking, your abuse of other people, and your inability to separate your ego from your ideas makes you the worst kind of pseudoscientist -- and even *that* title is a stretch.

The prediction I made that was in error is something you will try to capitalize off of to it's fullest extent.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1533200


Which one? There are so many different predictions in error, now -- many of which you were *absolutely certain* of. You have repeatedly demonstrated on this thread exactly what your certainty should be worth: nothing.

People should be highly skeptical of the claims you make when you don't present evidence, and *lots* of it. This thread has made that crystal clear, and were this critique of any other poster, you'd agree with it in a heartbeat. For you do not believe what you are told without proof, but expect everyone else to believe *YOU WITHOUT* proof.

And when the chips were down, your 98.5% prediction failed, your 99.98% prediction failed, your absolutely certain prediction failed. You tried to blame it on jewish scientists, you tried to blame it on SOHO, on NASA, on debunkers, on conspiracies, on me. But you forgot to blame your own self.

You were wrong, IDW. There's no sin in that. But there is in the hubris of blaming others for *your* own galactic failures.

There is not a single person no matter how intelligent that has not made repeated errors, it is simply a reflection of your dishonesty to imply that a failed prediction means everything else I have stated or theorized is also in error.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1533200


I don't make that claim. What I *do* claim is that your pronouncements are suspect without supporting evidence, and lots of it. Your absolute certainty on any given subject is not proof or evidence -- and, in fact, is detrimental to the validity of the idea, if that is *all* that is supporting it.


It will never change the fact that 911 was done by the same ones that faked the Apollo "moonlandings" and who are putting fluoride in our water and poisoning our children , and theirs and your time is short, I ASSURE YOU.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1533200


As this thread has now shown, dozens of times: your assurance is worth bupkis.


Your effect on my spirit is to strengthen it against evil and to harden my resolve to realize by opposing it I give it recognition and power. Without me what would you be agent 74444> NOTHING.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1533200


Well, I'd have to find something else to entertain me. My ego doesn't ride on what happens here at GLP. My ideas and my sense of self are seperate things. That is why all your toothless fallacious arguments don't trouble me in the slightest. Why should your opinion about me personally matter? You don't even know me -- as aptly demonstrated by your inability to identify myself or my father, as you claimed you could do but failed.

Therefore, from this point forward you will be ignored. I will refrain from reading a single word you post or responding to it, and in doing so I will erase your deceptive force of evil.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1533200


I'll answer this last.

The evil you represent wasn't destroyed on December 21st, but it will be soon, and I think you know it and feel it. All of your kind does, and you think if you can create hate in my heart you can take me with you. You think if you make me hate I will be your equal spiritually.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1533200


Ad hominem noted. My kind? What's that? Create hate? How? I can't make you do *anything,* and never have, IDW. You reveal the content of your own character every time you post like this.

As for me? I don't hate anyone. Sorry to disappoint you.

The difference is WHAT I HATE IS WORTHY OF CONTEMPT AND HAS NO REDEEMING QUALITIES.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1533200


Just like when *you* are sure of something, you don't *need* supporting evidence.

After December 21, you do. And lots of it. Anyone who has rationally watched your responses should see that. Your ideas are worthy only of the highest skepticism -- and the more sure *you* are of their validity, the higher the burden of proof should be.

Now then, you said your decision about the December 21 date PREDATED your knowledge that the Maya had that same date, remember?

I also KNOW that on 12/21/12, a solar event will occur that will make none in the known history of man compare. Remember, I made these predictions before I correlated them to the Mayan long count or studied the prophecies of the cleansing.
 Quoting: AA



So you can't blame the Maya, or interpretations of their calendar ANYWAY. You KNEW that a solar event was to occur on 12/21 until it didn't. You claimed you made the predictions *before* you correlated them with the Long Count calendar.

Do you have any explanation of this? I will take your inability to answer rationally that you have, in fact, no defense for your behavior, your failures, your predictions, your accuracy. The blame, based on the above, is 100% your own -- and no one else's. Take responsibility for it.

Your are refusing to engage me, because a single person of fairly typical I.Q. has, patiently and completely, intellectually demolished your erroneous and fallacious claims and ideas. The fact that you feel it necessary to ignore me demonstrates that you cannot stand the least intellectual heat or criticism -- demonstrating nothing but your own weak ideas drawn from a weak mind.

Coward.
Anonymous astrophysicist
User ID: 1533200
United States
12/26/2012 02:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
IMPORTANT NEW INFORMATION PREVIOUSLY OVERLOOKED PRESENTED IN THIS POST, READ CAREFULLY
------------------------------------------------------
I have overlooked a fact which I feel compelled to disclose now, and perhaps found the error in my conclusions concerning the timing of the predicted solar event.

The orbit of the Earth around the Sun is not a circle, but an ellipse. I mentioned this earlier, stating that the Earth is actually closest to the Sun in winter, which it is.

To me it seemed logical that since my model for predicting the appearance and location of Sunspots on the Solar surface indicated a nearly perfectly geo effective Sunspot would be present on that date at the precise same time the Mayan long count was purported and pulmulgated to end, the Sun Earth and galactic center would be aligned, and we would be closest to the Sun, that this must be "it".

There is no argument even among my most venomous critics that I predicted a perfectly geo effective Sunspot on that date many years in advance....that is why they went as far as to censor the MDI continuum at SOHO and alter data after the fact.
This is why I placed such high odds on this being the date of the cleansing and a massive solar event, but there was a wild card that I overlooked and that was the source of the information concerning the end of the Mayan long count.

To me it seemed there were too many indicators occurring simultaneously to be coincidence, I think even my most outspoken critics must have some doubt about the "big bang" bullshit when considering this seemingly intelligently arranged and timed series of simultaneous events.

All of this being said, while the Sun IS in fact closest to the Sun in winter, the pull of the forces holding the galaxy together causes the Earth to be closest to the galactic center in the Summer in the northern hemisphere at the same time it is farthest from the Sun. This is also the time when the Earth is actually between the Sun and the galactic center and would be on the galactic plane were the Sun to be. Since on the solstices, we know the three line up, we can assume also that this is the time when the Earth would cross the galactic plane if the Sun were located precisely on it, even though the galactic plane and the ecliptic plane are inclined approximately 60 degrees to each other.

It is at this time that the Earth reaches the point in it's orbit around the Sun that it is between the Galactic center and the Sun. I believe after carefully consideration of various facts that the position of the galactic center relative to the Sun is the causative factor in why all of the solar activity is occurring on the galactic center side of the Sun. It seems logical, since nearly all of the solar flares and CME's are erupting in this direction.

Could this mean the Summer Solstice is the actual end of the Mayan calender? Could this hypothetical "fact" be intentionally concealed, and if the "things" in control knew a precise date would they tell us, or would they promulgated a false date to throw us all off, fooling even the most intelligent of researchers and observers? YOU BET YOUR ASS THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT THEY WOULD DO< and I am shamed by the fact that I was taken for a ride by the very thing I mistrust and repeatedly warned others not to trust.
Like I said, I will not make any predictions nor place any odds on specific events occurring at specific times other than generalizations, but I think we need to consider the fact that the above information is strongly indicative that we were all intentionally mislead concerning the end date of the Mayan calender, and an increase in solar activity as Summer approaches will give us a strong indicator that this is exactly what they did, and now nearly no one will take note of any warning. It is very important to remember how extremely accurate the Mayans methods of keeping time and predicting celestial events was and is, and there are strong indicators that the end of the long count marks a catastrophe event that "restarts" the Earth and marks a beginning of new power structure and way of living.
Anonymous astrophysicist
User ID: 1533200
United States
12/26/2012 02:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444
Anonymous astrophysicist
User ID: 1533200
United States
12/26/2012 03:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Here is the definition of Occam's razor just so he can refresh his memory.

A rule in science and philosophy stating that entities should not be multiplied needlessly. This rule is interpreted to mean that the simplest of two or more competing theories is preferable and that an explanation for unknown phenomena should first be attempted in terms of what is already known. Occam's razor is named after the deviser of the rule......the simplest hypothesis proposed as an explanation of phenomena is more likely to be the true one than is any other available hypothesis, that its predictions are more likely to be true than those of any other available hypothesis, and that it is an ultimate a priori epistemic principle that simplicity is evidence for truth.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29341887


The above clearly states Occams razor is NOT applied to predictions, BTW.

So this definition being accepted and accurate, how does Einsteins complex fiction of paradoxical mathematical nonsense and quantum theory stack up against my theory of electromagnetic energy and the universe in general?

Let us consider the weak theory of the photon and compare it to my explanation of light, tell us , which does Occams razor heavily favor?

Has anyone ever falsified my theory? Is it possible to do so using an almost infinite number of experiments? {YES}.

Do the vast majority of observations indicate "photons" in fact have mass and follow the same energy/mass/velocity relationship as every other moving object, reacting to gravity and effecting and effected by their environment in precisely the same manner as any other mass possessing kinetic energy? Is the reason I am so important to discredit the fact that I disproved and disqualified Einsteins mathematical nonsense and postulated a theory of light that is known to be correct and completely disqualifies quantum theory and proves billions of dollars are being doled out for useless research?

Is the fact that I am stalked by NASA disinformation operatives have anything to do with my having proved using empirical evidence that the moon landings were faked? [Use Occams razor]

cruise

No one is right about everything consistently, but it seems to me the reason so much money is spent on disinformation operatives on my threads and they are frequently deleted, altered, edited and otherwise altered , they are closed to genral users whose posts are automatically deleted while they are autobanned, and I am banned from posting realted to the fact that my theories and my statements of fact cannot be successfully called into question by any other method?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 26717673
Korea, Republic of
12/26/2012 04:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I'm still getting to all the replies since the 21st so that I'm up to speed.

About my own personal story if anybody's interested.

I went to a mtn in korea that was nearest me on the night of the 21st that had the highest elevation. Of course, the highest for this country is still not very high, but I figure have to make due with what we got.

Anyhoot...

There was this underground bunker that I found. I'm like Holy Shi*! So I camped the night out there and then the next day just to make sure. Friggin freezing of course, since it's been -10C at least. From shock to anger to just pure glee that I'm at least here to see another day!

I hate to say it, but this is why one of my questions to you AA before was how did you know it was the 21st? I had a hunch back then that they gave us an erroneous date, and you didn't offer a conclusive answer then I'm sorry to admit. I forgive you for it seems you've learned your lesson at the present moment.

I'm with you though at any rate. the white boys played with the calendar, so that we'd look like fools. Shit, do you know how many threads they came on to make it a point that if we were wrong, to offer an apology? This was like a point for all the shills to do on many a thread, this being of course the pinnacle of them all imo.

News