WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

You have never had any level of credibility , and being wrong a statistically insignificant percentage of the time does nothing to destroy a scientists credibility on an un edited of the cuff discussion board. you're blowing hot air if you claim otherwise. As I have repeatedly stated and will one more time, the title of this thread has nothing to do with the cleansing, and the ascertain made in the title has been proved beyond doubt with a large amount of supporting evidence.


.As for a scientist like me being wrong about a specific prediction, Most of us recognize and admit we are in a state of constantly changing flux where learning is concerned, we don't 'know it all', we don't even know 1% of what there is to know, but some of us are right and some of us are wrong about our basic pretexts about what we do claim to know. You don't know jack shit.

I don't want you to go away, it must be psychologically difficult to outnumber a guy 100 to one and get kicked in the nuts repeatedly, and I must admit I quite enjoy it. You are deserving, and the fact that a "sophisticated group of disinformation operatives" has to resort to using a sock puppet user id is really kind of humorous, conference 74444

I see so you are admitting you lied. Would be pretty simple to prove me wrong with one little link wouldnt it, then I would have to admit to everyone that you are right about everything.

Pinocchia - the female version of Pinocchio?

How long is your nose in the meantime?


Did you get the photos from Poleshit-Nancy LIEder?


.

REAL EYES or REAL LIES, it's up to you. THINK FOR YOURSELF and turn against the evil that is using you

You are not a scientist by the largest stretch to which one could extend ones mind.

How are you making out with your home brew tachyon detector?

I will once again make my offer...if you post pictures of your "instruments" I will leave the thread for ever and I will not bother you ever again.

I know you won't because you don't have any and your bragging that you can make a tachyon detector proved that.

I will say it is of course attractive to believe that the evil doers in the world will get justice but great cleansings are not something I can hang my hat on.

Your stereotyping of all people of Jewish blood is not right for there is NO tribe of any kind that is all good.

In a way when I see so many things that are just plain wrong and sickening in the world I too almost wish god would clean it up

Please, take your plaything and put it on someone else's thread. And by the way Nancy Leider turned out to be a NASA employee.

Nancy Leider has never been a NASA employee.

You read some whacked out web sources and take them as true

For all I know you could have started that rumor yourself

Did I talk to you, jerk ?


.

Please reference my post where i claimed to attempt to construct a tachyon detector. I don't even believe there is a such thing, why would I try to detect it?//////////////////////////////////////////////////// As for you blanket statement that I am not a scientist, I have this retort: NO ONE who subscribes to mathematical based theoretic physics like quantum mechanics, SR and GR is a real scientist, they are writers of complex and paradoxical fiction understood by no one including themselves.. A realscientist is one who utilizes empirical observation and experimentation to draw conclusions , and by that measure I am most certainly a scientist, because a real scientist is oe who concentrates his study singularly towards these ends, and yes you fucking jew sucking liar I am a scientist.

It does when you claim a between 98.5 and 99.98 percent chance of being right, and ignore all contrary data -- and then make up excuses *after the fact.*

And it isn't statistically insignificant: One test of a specific claim made by you yielded a specific result. There are *so few* specific claims by you, and the lesson you have learned is *not to give any more specific claims.*

That doesn't represent any scientific methodology I've ever read.




Okay, *that* one made me howl. I have yet to *see* you apply the scientific method in all the time we've engaged. You haven't. Not *once.*

Give ways to falsify your conclusions? Propose experiments that can falsify your hypothesis? Alter your hypothesis in the light of differing on contrary evidence? Give what information could change your opinion? You do none of these things.

You are many things, IDW/A.A. But I don't think a scientist numbers among them.





Yes. December 21st demonstrated that quite well.

Dammit dont forget about his december 25th hurricane.

There are still plenty of us that are able to do that AA.

Disqualify my theory of electromagnetic radiation. There are an almost unlimitted number of ways to falsify it, bit not of it is right
That isn't my problem. ALL of the empirical observations and evidence support it and none of it disqualifies it, however I can disqualify the existence of the photon using he basic laws of physics and the definition of kinetic energy.

If I am right about this, I am probably right about Apollo being a hoax, and that is why you are here, to protect the web of interlaced lies.

I never claimed there was hurricane. I said there was a unusual cyclonic storm that produced hurricane force downdraft winds and there was. I was here, I saw it, I heard it, and sawed up the tree branches that fell all over my yard while the power was out for over a day. I gave you several references and you even provided some yourself claiming trees and power poles were snapped like twigs. Snow doesn't do that and there WAS NO ICE , so what did it dipshit? Why did the power outages and damage PRECEED the freezing weather

Here you go dumbass, hour by hour wind reports with freezing rain and snow all recorded by lda. Explain the data.

Wichita Falls
[link to www.weatherbase.com]

sheppard air force base

sherman:
[link to www.weatherbase.com]

North Texas Regional Airport

paris:
[link to www.weatherbase.com]

Cox Field Airport


Mount Pleasant:
[link to www.weatherbase.com]

Mount Pleasant Regional Airport

I think these cheap tricks are despicable and the acts of desperate child like mentalities with mental issues. Leave my posts as I wrote them.

How? Be VERY specific. Give an *experiment you would accept,* step by step, line by line, that would disqualify the theory *to you.* You have never done this.

And, given that the December 21st cleansing was a prediction of that theory, that seems to be falsifying it right there.

I believe I already did explain it , this being the fourth time. Ammeters measure wind speeds and though they can measure wind speeds coming from any direction horizontal to the ground , they cannot and do not measure downdraft winds accurately. Looking at one it is easy to see why. Airports measure wind speeds using ammeters.
During normal thunderstorm activity we frequently have hurricane force winds not associated with tornadoes, but with downdrafts. If the area of downdraft is large enough, it will produce horizontal winds in excess of hurricane strength, and this is quite common in the spring, summer and early fall months.

If the downdrafts are localized, they DO NOT produce horizontal hurricane force winds because they dissipate as they hit the ground and spread out.

Did I not point out that these are all LDA facilities? The information was reported by laser doppler anemometer instrumentation. So explain again, i went by YOUR preferred method.

the prediction I made had absolutely no connection to the electromechanical theory of electromagnetic radiation.

Here is a simple experiment to disqualify and falsify my theory. If light really is electrons vibrating in a passive osculation to an oscillating magnetic field, they will exert pressure on an object they strike. Do they?

Does light possess kinetic energy and momentum? If it does it has mass, if it doesn't my theory is wrong.

Can light of all wavelengths be used to produce a flow of electrons (think transducers, photovoltaic cells, radio waves, thermocouples etc etc) If it can't then you have falsified my theory. Can it? I could go on and on and on and on, but that is your job. I have given you proof there are ways to falsify my theory if it is indeed false. APOLLO WAS A HOAX, and the guy who explained the wave particle paradox of light knows it. That's why you are here, isn't it?

The problem form your point of view is not that there is no way to falsify my theory if it is incorrect, the problem is there is no way to disqualify it because it is correct.

Have a nice night now.

Show your references to these "facts" and your data.

I happen to know the Mount pleasant airport and the Paris airport don't even have towers , much less lase doppler instrumentation. You are a bullshiter thinking I won't take the time to call you because I am fielding several coordinated and unrelated attacks from your group. Ypu were wrong, and you are FULL OF SHIT

There you go in all your googling glory not realizing that tachyons cannot be detected because they are only a hypothetical "particle" yet you said you could learn to build one but it wouldn't be cheap.

You are if nothing else entertaining

I think I made it quite clear that I did not believe there was a unique particle "tachyon" and that attempts to detect it were actually detecting an already discovered particle. There should be no trouble detecting these. You are an idiot and have the reading comprehension ability of a third grader, and you are in the wrong fucking business.

These airports use AWX using fully automated information recieved from NADI which happens to include doppler weather information for wind sheer readings.

Also to dispute your claim that snow cant cause outages, directly from the power company:

[link to www.ksla.com]

AA uses ammeters to measure wind speed though