WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED! | |
| Dr. Astro Not to be confused with Phil Plait User ID: 4211721 02/19/2013 12:14 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 1173362 02/19/2013 12:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have no idea why disinformation operative present arguements that are so easily disproved and destroy their credibility. It would seem to me that carefully maintaining credibility by never being outted as liar would be a high priority. Any individual who has any experience in astronomy knows that because the position of the Earth relative to the universe is moving in several different vectors, a few which are unknowns, the chandler wobble is totally unpredictable , there is no such thing as an immovable mount and that the Gregorian method of timekeeping is grossly inaccurate, that it would be impossible for clockwork or computer software to inaccurately locate celestial objects over more than few months period of time at best. *Every time* a telescope that uses computer software or clockwork is used to automatically locate various celestial objects, it must be calibrated using the CURRENT position of a constant and known celestial object such as Polaris because the telescope CANNOT do this calibration itself. Sorry, been to to many observatories and privy to the operational procedures to let you float this turd in my bowl without flushing it.. |
| Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 1173362 02/19/2013 12:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You sure do have an accurate description of yourself in your avatar, but if I were you I would go with just plain "FUCKTARD", since you obviously know nothing about astrophysics, physics or astronomy. Copy /paste /edit full of mistakes and plagiarizing the work of others is what you are *known* for. ![]() |
| BS Smeller User ID: 7127676 02/19/2013 12:32 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 1173362 02/19/2013 12:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Aren't you the reason they gave up on the GLP observatory, or was that just a scam to make money? I saw photographs of the equipment but no evidence of it actually being purchased or put into operation by the people who claimed to, just a weird looking shed. Is it true they never could calibrate it and finally gave up? ![]() |
| Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 1173362 02/19/2013 12:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Figured I share the wealth tonight. This thread has exceeded its useful life and is now only filled with repitative, 'fabricated' fear mongering nonsense. Therefore, I claim; Quoting: BS Smeller ![]() to the nth degree. To think you actually got paid with some poor hardworking sap's money to post that non effort makes me want to hurl. You are worst than useless. I don't like the term useless eater but you certainly fit the description, you suck at your job. Provide evidence of your claim or shove your flag stick up your azz. |
| Dr. Astro Not to be confused with Phil Plait User ID: 4211721 02/19/2013 12:46 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Notice: He has no answer for this. He also still has no response for this: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] And now he thinks that permanently aligned telescopes need constant adjustment. They do not. "Homing The Paramount ME can be initialized to exactly the same position using a process called homing. Essentially, the homing procedure slews the mount to an absolute position. Using this home position and an accurate time base (obtained from TheSky6 Professional Edition), the control system can be initialized very accurately from session to session. Homing provides many other benefits. • Homing (page 34) permits software imposed slew limits, or “soft limits,” so the mount cannot crashe into itself, even if an improper synchronization occurs. • Once a mapping run (page 47) has been completed, the Paramount ME can maintain extremely accurate pointing without additional synchronization." [link to www.ruf.rice.edu] ![]() |
| Dr. Astro Not to be confused with Phil Plait User ID: 4211721 02/19/2013 12:47 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You sure do have an accurate description of yourself in your avatar, but if I were you I would go with just plain "FUCKTARD", since you obviously know nothing about astrophysics, physics or astronomy. Copy /paste /edit full of mistakes and plagiarizing the work of others is what you are *known* for. Excuse me? Show me where I plagiarized the work of others! ![]() |
| Dr. Astro Not to be confused with Phil Plait User ID: 4211721 02/19/2013 12:49 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Aren't you the reason they gave up on the GLP observatory, or was that just a scam to make money? Neither. They're still working on the software. That's not my department, so to speak. I saw photographs of the equipment but no evidence of it actually being purchased or put into operation by the people who claimed to, just a weird looking shed. Quoting: IDWThere were all kinds of photos and videos of it fully assembled, and live video was streamed from both the 14" and solar scopes and controlled by various users on GLP. Is it true they never could calibrate it and finally gave up? Quoting: IDWNo, I properly aligned the scopes. That has not been the hold-up. They were successfully used after I aligned them to allow GLP users to view whatever they wanted under the control of each user. ![]() |
| Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 1173362 02/19/2013 12:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | • Once a mapping run (page 47) has been completed, the Paramount ME can maintain extremely accurate pointing without additional synchronization." Quoting: Dr. Astro [link to www.ruf.rice.edu] Yeah, that night! What an idiot you are! |
| Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 1173362 02/19/2013 12:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Aren't you the reason they gave up on the GLP observatory, or was that just a scam to make money? Neither. They're still working on the software. That's not my department, so to speak. I saw photographs of the equipment but no evidence of it actually being purchased or put into operation by the people who claimed to, just a weird looking shed. Quoting: IDWThere were all kinds of photos and videos of it fully assembled, and live video was streamed from both the 14" and solar scopes and controlled by various users on GLP. Is it true they never could calibrate it and finally gave up? Quoting: IDWNo, I properly aligned the scopes. That has not been the hold-up. They were successfully used after I aligned them to allow GLP users to view whatever they wanted under the control of each user. That's funny, I completely missed out on that. *I think everyone else did to to tell the truth*. Can you give us ALL instructions on how to access and control the GLP telescopes so we can verify your claim? ![]() |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 14775968 02/19/2013 12:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 1387154 02/19/2013 01:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You called me a racist for outing jew science as a fraud. I asked you for proof jews were race. Where is it? YOU are a racist, especially if you are a jew, which you are. Do you deny jews are the worst racists on the planet? Have you taken a look at their policies on race in Israel? |
| Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 1387154 02/19/2013 01:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Figured I share the wealth tonight. This thread has exceeded its useful life and is now only filled with repitative, 'fabricated' fear mongering nonsense. Therefore, I claim; Quoting: BS Smeller ![]() to the nth degree. I see your bs flag, and I raise you more!!!Do you get paid by the flag or the cock you suck? |
| Dr. Astro Not to be confused with Phil Plait User ID: 4211721 02/19/2013 01:15 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Aren't you the reason they gave up on the GLP observatory, or was that just a scam to make money? Neither. They're still working on the software. That's not my department, so to speak. I saw photographs of the equipment but no evidence of it actually being purchased or put into operation by the people who claimed to, just a weird looking shed. Quoting: IDWThere were all kinds of photos and videos of it fully assembled, and live video was streamed from both the 14" and solar scopes and controlled by various users on GLP. Is it true they never could calibrate it and finally gave up? Quoting: IDWNo, I properly aligned the scopes. That has not been the hold-up. They were successfully used after I aligned them to allow GLP users to view whatever they wanted under the control of each user. That's funny, I completely missed out on that. *I think everyone else did to to tell the truth*. Can you give us ALL instructions on how to access and control the GLP telescopes so we can verify your claim? They're not available right now, the software is being worked on. It did happen, however. Thread: **Breaking** FIRST UFO on GLP Observatory!! Comet/Object Flying Through Space!! ![]() |
| Dr. Astro Not to be confused with Phil Plait User ID: 4211721 02/19/2013 01:16 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Notice: He has no answer for this. He also still has no response for this: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] And now he thinks that permanently aligned telescopes need constant adjustment. They do not. "Homing The Paramount ME can be initialized to exactly the same position using a process called homing. Essentially, the homing procedure slews the mount to an absolute position. Using this home position and an accurate time base (obtained from TheSky6 Professional Edition), the control system can be initialized very accurately from session to session. Homing provides many other benefits. • Homing (page 34) permits software imposed slew limits, or “soft limits,” so the mount cannot crashe into itself, even if an improper synchronization occurs. • Once a mapping run (page 47) has been completed, the Paramount ME can maintain extremely accurate pointing without additional synchronization." [link to www.ruf.rice.edu] Notice, no response to this either. ![]() ![]() |
| Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 1387154 02/19/2013 01:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They're not available right now, the software is being worked on. It did happen, however. Quoting: Dr. Astro Thread: **Breaking** FIRST UFO on GLP Observatory!! Comet/Object Flying Through Space!! ![]() Give it up, and answer the jew race question |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1387154 02/19/2013 01:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | • Once a mapping run (page 47) has been completed, the Paramount ME can maintain extremely accurate pointing without additional synchronization." Quoting: Dr. Astro [link to www.ruf.rice.edu] Yeah, that night! What an idiot you are! |
| Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 1387154 02/19/2013 01:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Dr. Astro Not to be confused with Phil Plait User ID: 4211721 02/19/2013 01:20 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They're not available right now, the software is being worked on. It did happen, however. Quoting: Dr. Astro Thread: **Breaking** FIRST UFO on GLP Observatory!! Comet/Object Flying Through Space!! ![]() Give it up, and answer the jew race question Like I said, regardless of whether you consider someone a jew by race OR by religion, I am not a jew. ![]() |
| Dr. Astro Not to be confused with Phil Plait User ID: 4211721 02/19/2013 01:20 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Notice: He has no answer for this. He also still has no response for this: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] And now he thinks that permanently aligned telescopes need constant adjustment. They do not. "Homing The Paramount ME can be initialized to exactly the same position using a process called homing. Essentially, the homing procedure slews the mount to an absolute position. Using this home position and an accurate time base (obtained from TheSky6 Professional Edition), the control system can be initialized very accurately from session to session. Homing provides many other benefits. • Homing (page 34) permits software imposed slew limits, or “soft limits,” so the mount cannot crashe into itself, even if an improper synchronization occurs. • Once a mapping run (page 47) has been completed, the Paramount ME can maintain extremely accurate pointing without additional synchronization." [link to www.ruf.rice.edu] Notice, no response to this either. ![]() Chest beating, but no substantive response. It's clear that I am right indeed. ![]() |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 14775968 02/19/2013 01:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 02/19/2013 01:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And yet, out of the box, with no updates whatsoever, they track flawlessly. Updates are good -- they fix bugs and add objects to the database. But the models I mentioned have no mechanisms whatsoever without removing the chips altogether. Yet, they work. Can you *explain* that, IDW/A.A? Do you believe that all telescopes manufactured before 2000 are unable to track the heavens? Autostar has been good about updates; there was one in January 2013 and the earlier version is from August 2012. Both, of course, require connecting the controller to a computer, but the telescopes will track without the upgrade just fine. Celestron hasn't issued an update since 2007. Does that mean all Celestron GOTO telescopes are now broken? How would a STARWHEEL work if there was unpredicted motions of the Earth? How do you IMAGINE it would get updated? Why can you use a Starwheel from 30 years ago and still find constellations rising and setting on time? You really *don't* know what you are claiming, and I notice you avoiding all the hard questions posed to you once again. Do you ever get tired of this pattern of claiming utterly incorrect things, and then defending them ad absurdum? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25401201 02/19/2013 10:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 02/19/2013 11:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Any individual who has any experience in astronomy knows that because the position of the Earth relative to the universe is moving in several different vectors, a few which are unknowns, the chandler wobble is totally unpredictable , there is no such thing as an immovable mount and that the Gregorian method of timekeeping is grossly inaccurate, that it would be impossible for clockwork or computer software to inaccurately locate celestial objects over more than few months period of time at best. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1173362 How are eclipses, transits, and occultations predicted so accurately, then -- some *centuries* in advance? |
| BS Smeller User ID: 7127676 02/20/2013 01:12 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1365624 02/20/2013 01:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | • Once a mapping run (page 47) has been completed, the Paramount ME can maintain extremely accurate pointing without additional synchronization." Quoting: Dr. Astro [link to www.ruf.rice.edu] Yeah, that night! What an idiot you are! |
| Dr. Astro Not to be confused with Phil Plait User ID: 33360181 02/20/2013 01:41 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1365624 02/20/2013 01:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Dr. Astro Not to be confused with Phil Plait User ID: 33360181 02/20/2013 01:54 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |