WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

fuck off, YOU LOST THAT ARGUMENT IN CASE YOU DIDN'T NOTICE. THE MOST SOPHISTICATED TELESCOPES IN THE WORLD MUST BE CALIBRATED NIGHTLY BY A PROCESS KNOWN AS MAPPING AND BY REFERENCING THE POSITIONS OF SEVERAL CELESTIAL OBJECTS .

Yes, I did explain it. I proved that it was normal. Not only did I show it occurred far earlier than the "50th" of your "52" years, but I showed that it is exactly what the moon should be expected to look like based on calculations of its position in the sky relative to the sun. The proof is all right there:
[link to dropcanvas.com]
As you can see, the moon SHOULD be seen "horizontal" at times, including in that photograph from 1971.

%2Fdropcanvas.com%2Fedwxo
As you can see, the moon SHOULD be seen "horizontal" at times, including in that photograph from 1971.

The meteorites are as predicted and a result of the concentration of mass along the galactic plane, which includes plasma on up to planet size objects. I am certain many of the comets being observed in recent years are not in orbit around the Sun or have just been captured by it's gravitational field as they came close enough to be so influenced and drawn in toward it.

All of these things are just as I claimed, the result of changes that people can deny but nature can and does not. One failed prediction on my part concerning the timing of events was set upon like a pack of jackals on a kill on the Serengeti and repeated, if you go back and look at how many times that in itself becomes extremely suspicious in light of the many very accurate predictions I have made.

A migration or grouping of dolphins such as seen recently could be a result of a mass migration due to a poisoning of the ocean by geological activity and likely an attempt by these intelligent creatures (some believe they are more intelligent than humans) to communicate that something is not right in the oceans to the human population of the Earth, A WARNING.

There is somply no way to reason with those intent on being unreasonable, not way to educate those who resist learning the truth because they are uncomfortable with reality.

It would be prudent to prepare for a total failure of infrastructure and to prepare for the contingencies I have suggested are inevitable, No matter how many people or groups work to keep you from believing it, things have already changed radically planet wide, there is a mass extinction of species planet wide that is well documented as result by literally millions of search results on the internet, it is going to get much worst, and there is going to be a critical period where survival will be determined by preparedness.

The weather this year has been more 'normal' than in the past 12 years but it is far from normal. We have seen totally different weather patterns that what are considered normal and it is systematically being concealed.

Many scientists, physicists, astrophysicists and even NASA have warned that a solar cycle of unprecedented proportions is in our immediate future. These people will be heard only by the intelligent, which I believe is the intent. One way or another a rapid evolution of the human species will be the result. It is an unintelligent individual that does not perceive that things are changing rapidly and that the 'elite' are reacting to a threat they see in our immediate future.
All of the weather forecasts and telescope distractions aren't going to change anything, but they are keeping the truth under wraps by derailing this thread. No one here will dare deny space weather information is being censored and withheld and that many sources have simply disappeared as we watched in real time throughout the history of this thread.

They have narrowed down our sources to government filtered and censored data and we have proved they have altered data. Now read the title of the thread, and if you want to talk about telescopes or some weather channel production about some 'superstorm', go start your own thread.

If you think the weather is normal your an idiot or a liar.

The failed prediction has already been acknowledged and I believe adequately explained in full detail, which begs the question, why do you feel the need to repeat it over and over and over again?
In real science we do not berate another fellow scientist for a failed prediction based on theory, we move on and maybe try to determine what the failed prediction means and why it occurred. YOU ARE NOT A SCIENTIST, you have absolutely no scientific base of knowledge about the subject matter, and are nothing but a government funded disinformation troll and internet stalker.

By trying to keep people from preparing you are guilty of conspiring to murder them.

Thread: 4 Comets now!!!! WTF? Panstarrs,Lemmon,Ison,Enke.Huge Media Cover-up.

The meteorites are as predicted and a result of the concentration of mass along the galactic plane, which includes plasma on up to planet size objects. I am certain many of the comets being observed in recent years are not in orbit around the Sun or have just been captured by it's gravitational field as they came close enough to be so influenced and drawn in toward it.

All of these things are just as I claimed, the result of changes that people can deny but nature can and does not. One failed prediction on my part concerning the timing of events was set upon like a pack of jackals on a kill on the Serengeti and repeated, if you go back and look at how many times that in itself becomes extremely suspicious in light of the many very accurate predictions I have made.

A migration or grouping of dolphins such as seen recently could be a result of a mass migration due to a poisoning of the ocean by geological activity and likely an attempt by these intelligent creatures (some believe they are more intelligent than humans) to communicate that something is not right in the oceans to the human population of the Earth, A WARNING.

NO SIR, IT IS NOT NORMAL AND NEVER HAS BEEN AND YOU HAVE NOT AND CANNOT AND WILL NOT EXPLAIN IT BECAUSE YOU SIMPLY ARE INCAPABLE OF DOING SO.

What I find interesting and somewhat intriguing is that if you carefully review the interactions between myself and the troll/disinfo op/stalkers you will see they became very active and agitated concentrating on repeating my failed prediction and posting pages of information on telescope ( all of which confirmed what I was claiming in the first place, paradoxically) when I asked the following question, which has not been answered yet by any of them:

For 50 of my 52 years the moon rose as a vertical crescent or with the shadow of the terminator in a vertical position when it rose. It now rises with the terminator in in a horizontal position, a smilie face sort of when a crescent moon. This seems to defy what we know about the orbital path of the moon very near to the ecliptic, yet it is an undeniable fact observable by all and confirmed by literally hundreds of people on this website alone..

Why are they doing so much of this simply because I asked this question?

fuck off, YOU LOST THAT ARGUMENT IN CASE YOU DIDN'T NOTICE. THE MOST SOPHISTICATED TELESCOPES IN THE WORLD MUST BE CALIBRATED NIGHTLY BY A PROCESS KNOWN AS MAPPING AND BY REFERENCING THE POSITIONS OF SEVERAL CELESTIAL OBJECTS . COMPUTERIZED SOFTWARE CONTROLLING TELESCOPES HAS TO BE UPDATED PERIODICALLY. NOW FUCK OFF

No sir , it is not normal. The picture you referenced from 1971 is a lunar eclipse.

for the next page

No sir , it is not normal. The picture you referenced from 1971 is a lunar eclipse.

I will not allow you to bury my responses. I know this tactic all to well

No it is not. There was no lunar eclipse on January 30th, 1971. Furthermore, I already proved it was normal with my calculations. On January 30th, 1971, that is exactly what the moon should have looked like. It was a horizontal crescent phase.

No it is not. There was no lunar eclipse on January 30th, 1971. Furthermore, I already proved it was normal with my calculations. On January 30th, 1971, that is exactly what the moon should have looked like. It was a horizontal crescent phase.

:trollspray:
Where are your calculations of the moon's position and orientation? Where are AA's? Oh, you idiots don't have any!

Correct. [link to eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov]

Prove the date the photo was taken.

Prove it wasn't a partial lunar eclipse / There is NO WAY the moon can rise with a horizontal terminator unless something fundamental has changed in the relative positions if the Earth Sun and moon

So your calculations of the moon tell you that everything is normal with the subjects mentioned above,

Read the title of the thread again and then notice the .gov in the link., lamebrain. These are the same people we have PROVED have been lying to us systematically in this thread. There were two eclipses in 1971. To not have at least a partial lunar eclipse somewhere on Earth in any given year would be quite unusual.

Read the title of the thread again and then notice the .gov in the link., lamebrain. These are the same people we have PROVED have been lying to us systematically in this thread. There were two eclipses in 1971. To not have at least a partial lunar eclipse somewhere on Earth in any given year would be quite unusual.

I would like to add I have seen no independent confirmation of the date the photo was taken and there WAS in fact a partial or total lunar eclipse wheresoever on the planet in over 98% of years. Sorry, .gov data is not accepted as proof of anything since we all know the government lies to us every day

[
LOLZ! Independent confirmation right here:
[link to apollomissionphotos.com]
Not a .gov! I win!

What is the original source of the photos again?
Sorry, doesn't qualify as independent .