Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,529 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 497,686
Pageviews Today: 693,304Threads Today: 204Posts Today: 3,916
06:37 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

 
Dr. AstroModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
02/24/2013 01:50 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
fuck off, YOU LOST THAT ARGUMENT IN CASE YOU DIDN'T NOTICE. THE MOST SOPHISTICATED TELESCOPES IN THE WORLD MUST BE CALIBRATED NIGHTLY BY A PROCESS KNOWN AS MAPPING AND BY REFERENCING THE POSITIONS OF SEVERAL CELESTIAL OBJECTS .
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905


Nope. As I already showed, once you have done a mapping run on a paramount to train the drive system, it will save the alignment from session to session. It is not something you have to do nightly. And again I ask you, when was the last time the classic LX200 had a firmware update of any kind?
astrobanner2
Dr. AstroModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
02/24/2013 01:50 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
For 50 of my 52 years the moon rose as a vertical crescent or with the shadow of the terminator in a vertical position when it rose. It now rises with the terminator in in a horizontal position, a smilie face sort of when a crescent moon. This seems to defy what we know about the orbital path of the moon very near to the ecliptic, yet it is an undeniable fact observable by all and confirmed by literally hundreds of people on this website alone..
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905

Actually that behavior is perfectly normal and is predicted by simple calculations of the moon's position in the sky relative to the horizon:

 Quoting: Dr. Astro


NO SIR, IT IS NOT NORMAL AND NEVER HAS BEEN AND YOU HAVE NOT AND CANNOT AND WILL NOT EXPLAIN IT BECAUSE YOU SIMPLY ARE INCAPABLE OF DOING SO.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905


Yes, I did explain it. I proved that it was normal. Not only did I show it occurred far earlier than the "50th" of your "52" years, but I showed that it is exactly what the moon should be expected to look like based on calculations of its position in the sky relative to the sun. The proof is all right there:
[link to dropcanvas.com]
As you can see, the moon SHOULD be seen "horizontal" at times, including in that photograph from 1971.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro

Bump for the next page.
astrobanner2
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1181905
United States
02/24/2013 01:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
%2Fdropcanvas.com%2Fedwxo
As you can see, the moon SHOULD be seen "horizontal" at times, including in that photograph from 1971.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


No sir , it is not normal. The picture you referenced from 1971 is a lunar eclipse.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 979166
United States
02/24/2013 01:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
...

Thanks for your input, Keep up the good work man.
Some of us still appreciate your knowledge on these subjects.


Thread: 7 Mile Long SUPER POD Of Over 100,000 Dolphins Race Past San Diego - Experts Concerned

[link to www.dailymail.co.uk]

hmmm
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34936013


bump
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34936013

AA what's your take on all of these events going on?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 979166

The meteorites are as predicted and a result of the concentration of mass along the galactic plane, which includes plasma on up to planet size objects. I am certain many of the comets being observed in recent years are not in orbit around the Sun or have just been captured by it's gravitational field as they came close enough to be so influenced and drawn in toward it.

All of these things are just as I claimed, the result of changes that people can deny but nature can and does not. One failed prediction on my part concerning the timing of events was set upon like a pack of jackals on a kill on the Serengeti and repeated, if you go back and look at how many times that in itself becomes extremely suspicious in light of the many very accurate predictions I have made.

A migration or grouping of dolphins such as seen recently could be a result of a mass migration due to a poisoning of the ocean by geological activity and likely an attempt by these intelligent creatures (some believe they are more intelligent than humans) to communicate that something is not right in the oceans to the human population of the Earth, A WARNING.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1181905
United States
02/24/2013 01:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Winter storm watches have been issued across Oklahoma and Kansas in preparation of Winter Storm Rocky. This system is expected to be as significant, if not even worse, than Winter Storm Q two days ago. The NAM and GFS are putting out snowfall accumulations of greater than 2 feet in isolated areas of Kansas. [link to forecast.weather.gov]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34958115


There is somply no way to reason with those intent on being unreasonable, not way to educate those who resist learning the truth because they are uncomfortable with reality.

It would be prudent to prepare for a total failure of infrastructure and to prepare for the contingencies I have suggested are inevitable, No matter how many people or groups work to keep you from believing it, things have already changed radically planet wide, there is a mass extinction of species planet wide that is well documented as result by literally millions of search results on the internet, it is going to get much worst, and there is going to be a critical period where survival will be determined by preparedness.

The weather this year has been more 'normal' than in the past 12 years but it is far from normal. We have seen totally different weather patterns that what are considered normal and it is systematically being concealed.

Many scientists, physicists, astrophysicists and even NASA have warned that a solar cycle of unprecedented proportions is in our immediate future. These people will be heard only by the intelligent, which I believe is the intent. One way or another a rapid evolution of the human species will be the result. It is an unintelligent individual that does not perceive that things are changing rapidly and that the 'elite' are reacting to a threat they see in our immediate future.
All of the weather forecasts and telescope distractions aren't going to change anything, but they are keeping the truth under wraps by derailing this thread. No one here will dare deny space weather information is being censored and withheld and that many sources have simply disappeared as we watched in real time throughout the history of this thread.

They have narrowed down our sources to government filtered and censored data and we have proved they have altered data. Now read the title of the thread, and if you want to talk about telescopes or some weather channel production about some 'superstorm', go start your own thread.

If you think the weather is normal your an idiot or a liar.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1181905
United States
02/24/2013 01:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
By the way, the prediction of 90 degrees on Christmas day in the northern states was very conservative, and will mist likely be worst. By that time it won't matter anyway, because there will be no way to say "I told you so", no do i revel in being able to beat my chest and take credit for predicting that probability.

 Quoting: A. Astro-physicist 1347517


Alas, that doesn't do him much good, either.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


The failed prediction has already been acknowledged and I believe adequately explained in full detail, which begs the question, why do you feel the need to repeat it over and over and over again?
In real science we do not berate another fellow scientist for a failed prediction based on theory, we move on and maybe try to determine what the failed prediction means and why it occurred. YOU ARE NOT A SCIENTIST, you have absolutely no scientific base of knowledge about the subject matter, and are nothing but a government funded disinformation troll and internet stalker.

By trying to keep people from preparing you are guilty of conspiring to murder them.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1181905
United States
02/24/2013 01:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1181905
United States
02/24/2013 01:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34936013

AA what's your take on all of these events going on?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 979166

The meteorites are as predicted and a result of the concentration of mass along the galactic plane, which includes plasma on up to planet size objects. I am certain many of the comets being observed in recent years are not in orbit around the Sun or have just been captured by it's gravitational field as they came close enough to be so influenced and drawn in toward it.

All of these things are just as I claimed, the result of changes that people can deny but nature can and does not. One failed prediction on my part concerning the timing of events was set upon like a pack of jackals on a kill on the Serengeti and repeated, if you go back and look at how many times that in itself becomes extremely suspicious in light of the many very accurate predictions I have made.

A migration or grouping of dolphins such as seen recently could be a result of a mass migration due to a poisoning of the ocean by geological activity and likely an attempt by these intelligent creatures (some believe they are more intelligent than humans) to communicate that something is not right in the oceans to the human population of the Earth, A WARNING.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1181905
United States
02/24/2013 01:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
For 50 of my 52 years the moon rose as a vertical crescent or with the shadow of the terminator in a vertical position when it rose. It now rises with the terminator in in a horizontal position, a smilie face sort of when a crescent moon. This seems to defy what we know about the orbital path of the moon very near to the ecliptic, yet it is an undeniable fact observable by all and confirmed by literally hundreds of people on this website alone..
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905

Actually that behavior is perfectly normal and is predicted by simple calculations of the moon's position in the sky relative to the horizon:

 Quoting: Dr. Astro


NO SIR, IT IS NOT NORMAL AND NEVER HAS BEEN AND YOU HAVE NOT AND CANNOT AND WILL NOT EXPLAIN IT BECAUSE YOU SIMPLY ARE INCAPABLE OF DOING SO.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1181905
United States
02/24/2013 01:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
What I find interesting and somewhat intriguing is that if you carefully review the interactions between myself and the troll/disinfo op/stalkers you will see they became very active and agitated concentrating on repeating my failed prediction and posting pages of information on telescope ( all of which confirmed what I was claiming in the first place, paradoxically) when I asked the following question, which has not been answered yet by any of them:

For 50 of my 52 years the moon rose as a vertical crescent or with the shadow of the terminator in a vertical position when it rose. It now rises with the terminator in in a horizontal position, a smilie face sort of when a crescent moon. This seems to defy what we know about the orbital path of the moon very near to the ecliptic, yet it is an undeniable fact observable by all and confirmed by literally hundreds of people on this website alone..

Why are they doing so much of this 5a simply because I asked this question?
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 979166
United States
02/24/2013 01:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Please keep discussion about telescopes and the weather channel on another thread, and keep on topic. Start your won thread astro idiot and see if anyone gives a shit.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905


You were perfectly happy to talk about telescopes until I came on the thread and started asking questions and pointing out facts that would be extremely damaging for you to answer or acknowledge. Thanks for letting me know that I won, but I'm not sure beating you is important enough to make an entire thread about it. Frankly, it was easy...
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


I wish I had a big "BONE" to throw in another thread so Astro would let us talk to AA who knows obviously more about astronomy.
Just because you have a PHD in shillganomics does make you smarter!!!!!
I SAID NOW GET!!!!!! YA DAMN DOG!!!!
Let us talk to the man!

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 979166


dogcatclappa
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 979166


bump for the next page
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1181905
United States
02/24/2013 01:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Please keep discussion about telescopes and the weather channel on another thread, and keep on topic. Start your won thread astro idiot and see if anyone gives a shit.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905


You were perfectly happy to talk about telescopes until I came on the thread and started asking questions and pointing out facts that would be extremely damaging for you to answer or acknowledge. Thanks for letting me know that I won, but I'm not sure beating you is important enough to make an entire thread about it. Frankly, it was easy...
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


fuck off, YOU LOST THAT ARGUMENT IN CASE YOU DIDN'T NOTICE. THE MOST SOPHISTICATED TELESCOPES IN THE WORLD MUST BE CALIBRATED NIGHTLY BY A PROCESS KNOWN AS MAPPING AND BY REFERENCING THE POSITIONS OF SEVERAL CELESTIAL OBJECTS . COMPUTERIZED SOFTWARE CONTROLLING TELESCOPES HAS TO BE UPDATED PERIODICALLY. NOW FUCK OFF
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1181905
United States
02/24/2013 01:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I will not allow you to bury my responses. I know this tactic all to well
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1181905
United States
02/24/2013 01:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
%2Fdropcanvas.com%2Fedwxo
As you can see, the moon SHOULD be seen "horizontal" at times, including in that photograph from 1971.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


No sir , it is not normal. The picture you referenced from 1971 is a lunar eclipse.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905
Dr. AstroModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
02/24/2013 02:05 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
...


You were perfectly happy to talk about telescopes until I came on the thread and started asking questions and pointing out facts that would be extremely damaging for you to answer or acknowledge. Thanks for letting me know that I won, but I'm not sure beating you is important enough to make an entire thread about it. Frankly, it was easy...
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


I wish I had a big "BONE" to throw in another thread so Astro would let us talk to AA who knows obviously more about astronomy.
Just because you have a PHD in shillganomics does make you smarter!!!!!
I SAID NOW GET!!!!!! YA DAMN DOG!!!!
Let us talk to the man!

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 979166


dogcatclappa
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 979166


bump for the next page
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 979166

trollspray
Where are your calculations of the moon's position and orientation? Where are AA's? Oh, you idiots don't have any!
astrobanner2
Dr. AstroModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
02/24/2013 02:06 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
%2Fdropcanvas.com%2Fedwxo
As you can see, the moon SHOULD be seen "horizontal" at times, including in that photograph from 1971.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


No sir , it is not normal. The picture you referenced from 1971 is a lunar eclipse.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905


No it is not. There was no lunar eclipse on January 30th, 1971. Furthermore, I already proved it was normal with my calculations. On January 30th, 1971, that is exactly what the moon should have looked like. It was a horizontal crescent phase.
astrobanner2
Dr. AstroModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
02/24/2013 02:07 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I will not allow you to bury my responses. I know this tactic all to well
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905

You're the one trying to bury my responses.
astrobanner2
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1181905
United States
02/24/2013 02:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I think we need to re evaluate the ascertain I originally made with my original post on this thread and the title of the thread itself, after all this thread has taken quite few tangents not that mind related material being posted.

I want to ask the shills here to answer this simple question: is my original ascertain and the basic subject of this thread correct and has it been proved conclusively as such or not?
BoxerLvr

User ID: 885750
United States
02/24/2013 02:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
%2Fdropcanvas.com%2Fedwxo
As you can see, the moon SHOULD be seen "horizontal" at times, including in that photograph from 1971.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


No sir , it is not normal. The picture you referenced from 1971 is a lunar eclipse.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905


No it is not. There was no lunar eclipse on January 30th, 1971. Furthermore, I already proved it was normal with my calculations. On January 30th, 1971, that is exactly what the moon should have looked like. It was a horizontal crescent phase.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro



Correct. [link to eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov]
It is precisely because it is fashionable for Americans to know no science, even though they may be well educated otherwise, that they so easily fall prey to nonsense. They thus become part of the armies of the night, the purveyors of nitwittery, the retailers of intellectual junk food, the feeders on mental cardboard, for their ignorance keeps them from distinguishing nectar from sewage. — Isaac Asimov
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1181905
United States
02/24/2013 02:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
%2Fdropcanvas.com%2Fedwxo
As you can see, the moon SHOULD be seen "horizontal" at times, including in that photograph from 1971.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


No sir , it is not normal. The picture you referenced from 1971 is a lunar eclipse.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905


No it is not. There was no lunar eclipse on January 30th, 1971. Furthermore, I already proved it was normal with my calculations. On January 30th, 1971, that is exactly what the moon should have looked like. It was a horizontal crescent phase.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Prove the date the photo was taken. Prove it wasn't a partial lunar eclipse / There is NO WAY the moon can rise with a horizontal terminator unless something fundamental has changed in the relative positions if the Earth Sun and moon
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 979166
United States
02/24/2013 02:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
...


I wish I had a big "BONE" to throw in another thread so Astro would let us talk to AA who knows obviously more about astronomy.
Just because you have a PHD in shillganomics does make you smarter!!!!!
I SAID NOW GET!!!!!! YA DAMN DOG!!!!
Let us talk to the man!

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 979166


dogcatclappa
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 979166


bump for the next page
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 979166

:trollspray:
Where are your calculations of the moon's position and orientation? Where are AA's? Oh, you idiots don't have any!
 Quoting: Dr. Astro

So your calculations of the moon tell you that everything is normal with the subjects mentioned above, so what would explain in your brilliant theories what is going on with our crazy world right now.
Because everything going on in space more like a plausible answer.
Do you think 100,000 dolphin's got together to talk about who will win American Idol?
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1181905
United States
02/24/2013 02:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
%2Fdropcanvas.com%2Fedwxo
As you can see, the moon SHOULD be seen "horizontal" at times, including in that photograph from 1971.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


No sir , it is not normal. The picture you referenced from 1971 is a lunar eclipse.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905


No it is not. There was no lunar eclipse on January 30th, 1971. Furthermore, I already proved it was normal with my calculations. On January 30th, 1971, that is exactly what the moon should have looked like. It was a horizontal crescent phase.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro



Correct. [link to eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov]
 Quoting: BoxerLvr


Read the title of the thread again and then notice the .gov in the link., lamebrain. These are the same people we have PROVED have been lying to us systematically in this thread. There were two eclipses in 1971. To not have at least a partial lunar eclipse somewhere on Earth in any given year would be quite unusual.
Dr. AstroModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
02/24/2013 02:16 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
%2Fdropcanvas.com%2Fedwxo
As you can see, the moon SHOULD be seen "horizontal" at times, including in that photograph from 1971.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


No sir , it is not normal. The picture you referenced from 1971 is a lunar eclipse.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905


No it is not. There was no lunar eclipse on January 30th, 1971. Furthermore, I already proved it was normal with my calculations. On January 30th, 1971, that is exactly what the moon should have looked like. It was a horizontal crescent phase.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Prove the date the photo was taken.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905

NASA No. 108-KSC-71P-74

30 January 1971
[link to apollomissionphotos.com]
Prove it wasn't a partial lunar eclipse / There is NO WAY the moon can rise with a horizontal terminator unless something fundamental has changed in the relative positions if the Earth Sun and moon
 Quoting: AA

Already proven.

Nothing changed, that's how it SHOULD look - crescent phase, horizontal. In order to be any kind of lunar eclipse the phase would have to be reading 100% - lunar eclipses only happen during the time of a full moon. The calculations show it to be a normal horizontal crescent. I already presented those calculations, they're all right there in the excel sheet.

Last Edited by Dr. Astro on 02/24/2013 02:18 AM
astrobanner2
Dr. AstroModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
02/24/2013 02:17 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
So your calculations of the moon tell you that everything is normal with the subjects mentioned above,
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 979166


Yup.
astrobanner2
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1181905
United States
02/24/2013 02:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
...


No sir , it is not normal. The picture you referenced from 1971 is a lunar eclipse.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905


No it is not. There was no lunar eclipse on January 30th, 1971. Furthermore, I already proved it was normal with my calculations. On January 30th, 1971, that is exactly what the moon should have looked like. It was a horizontal crescent phase.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro



Correct. [link to eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov]
 Quoting: BoxerLvr


Read the title of the thread again and then notice the .gov in the link., lamebrain. These are the same people we have PROVED have been lying to us systematically in this thread. There were two eclipses in 1971. To not have at least a partial lunar eclipse somewhere on Earth in any given year would be quite unusual.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905

I would like to add I have seen no independent confirmation of the date the photo was taken and there WAS in fact a partial or total lunar eclipse wheresoever on the planet in over 98% of years. Sorry, .gov data is not accepted as proof of anything since we all know the government lies to us every day
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1181905
United States
02/24/2013 02:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
...


No sir , it is not normal. The picture you referenced from 1971 is a lunar eclipse.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905


No it is not. There was no lunar eclipse on January 30th, 1971. Furthermore, I already proved it was normal with my calculations. On January 30th, 1971, that is exactly what the moon should have looked like. It was a horizontal crescent phase.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro



Correct. [link to eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov]
 Quoting: BoxerLvr


Read the title of the thread again and then notice the .gov in the link., lamebrain. These are the same people we have PROVED have been lying to us systematically in this thread. There were two eclipses in 1971. To not have at least a partial lunar eclipse somewhere on Earth in any given year would be quite unusual.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905
Dr. AstroModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
02/24/2013 02:20 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
...


No it is not. There was no lunar eclipse on January 30th, 1971. Furthermore, I already proved it was normal with my calculations. On January 30th, 1971, that is exactly what the moon should have looked like. It was a horizontal crescent phase.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro



Correct. [link to eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov]
 Quoting: BoxerLvr


Read the title of the thread again and then notice the .gov in the link., lamebrain. These are the same people we have PROVED have been lying to us systematically in this thread. There were two eclipses in 1971. To not have at least a partial lunar eclipse somewhere on Earth in any given year would be quite unusual.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905

I would like to add I have seen no independent confirmation of the date the photo was taken and there WAS in fact a partial or total lunar eclipse wheresoever on the planet in over 98% of years. Sorry, .gov data is not accepted as proof of anything since we all know the government lies to us every day
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905


LOLZ! Independent confirmation right here:
[link to apollomissionphotos.com]
Not a .gov! I win!
astrobanner2
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1181905
United States
02/24/2013 02:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
[
LOLZ! Independent confirmation right here:
[link to apollomissionphotos.com]
Not a .gov! I win!
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


What is the original source of the photos again?
Sorry, doesn't qualify as independent .
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1181905
United States
02/24/2013 02:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
If nothing else has been proved here, one thing has been conclusively. Not only is the government lying to us and actively conspiring to conceal information and data as well as fabricate and censor it, there are people active on the internet who are actively engaged in lying for them.Pardon me for being blunt but every one of them is a piece of shit unworthy of life.
Dr. AstroModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
02/24/2013 02:32 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
[
LOLZ! Independent confirmation right here:
[link to apollomissionphotos.com]
Not a .gov! I win!
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


What is the original source of the photos again?
Sorry, doesn't qualify as independent .
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905


Yes it does, it's not a NASA source, therefore it's independent. Having some of those KSC photos in my own possession I happen to know that they're all stamped right on the back with the identification number and date, which is how the guy selling that photo knew when it was taken. And sure enough, it matched up perfectly with my own calculations for how the moon should have looked on that date at that location!
astrobanner2