Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,446 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 884,600
Pageviews Today: 1,280,586Threads Today: 360Posts Today: 7,178
01:23 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

 
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1304066
United States
02/24/2013 02:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
No, no, no.
You remember, the death dealing X Ray flux penetrating to sea level from those scary (and imaginary) zooper zolar flares that killed those couple hundred people in France back in 2004.
The debunkers, mainly Dr P and I, laughed at your absurd claim that they didn't die from heatstroke but from being fried by X Rays from solar flares which would, according to you, only get worse as the year wore on and kill million if not billions.

Remember?

I think you were role playing as an engineer at that time.
Maybe it was during your Casino Magnate period where you owned a casino or two and made, what?, $200000 a weekend?

How's that biz these days?
(snicker)

Any time on those X Ray calcs. I think you've had plenty of time to do the simple calculations, young man. It only involved solving on Calculus equation, but you do have to know enough to determine the equation in the first place.


R.
 Quoting: Reality420


It was 10's of thousands of people that died in france and since then NASA has published information admitting their are huge voids in the magnetosphere JUST AS I CLAIMED> You are quite the idiot. That so called heat wave just happened to coincide with the arrival of a CME while the sun was directly overhead in france and the geomagnetic field was extremely unstable, all a matter of archived records..
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1181905


Oh, mea culpa, 10s of thousands.
All died from X Rays. The Riviera had bodies of the sunbathers stacked like chord wood on the beaches since they all received a lethal dose from old Sol?

Any time on those calculations, Mr. Astrophysicist.


R.
 Quoting: Reality420


Actually as I understand the situation, most of France's residences are constructed with metal roofs, copper mainly, and I personally believe it was the secondary radiation (Bremsstrahlung, the ability of beta particles to produce a secondary radiation , x-rays and gamma rays produced when beta particles or other electrons decelerate while passing near the nuclei of atoms) that was most deadly and the people who died were mostly old people and very young children, both who are sensitive to radiation. If the energy levels are high enough, Bremsstrahlung can produce deadly gamma radiation, whereas the particles though ionizing radiation may not show immediate effects until many years later and you die of cancer. I hope this explanation has been helpful. it is no coincidence that the arrival of a massive CME coincided with this mass death and another in India when the Sun was almost directly overhead and the particles had the least atmosphere to penetrate.
If you want the 'calculations' to prove it, go the the NRC's handbook on radiation and do them yourself. It is not possible to get an accurate result though, because we do not know the exact flux density and energy range of the particles involved when they came in contact with the metal roofing, but we can safely assume it quite energetic given the solar data for that day and the condition of the magnetosphere at the time being oriented south..
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1304066
United States
02/24/2013 02:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
No it is not. There was no lunar eclipse on January 30th, 1971. Furthermore, I already proved it was normal with my calculations. On January 30th, 1971, that is exactly what the moon should have looked like. It was a horizontal crescent phase.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


You're dealing with an obvious moron. As a child I remember seeing the moon appear as a horizontal crescent. My grandmother used to tell me, quite erroneously of course, that it was like a spoon and if it tipped, it meant it was going to rain. I recall seeing it in a tipped position and, coincidentally enough, it did rain the next day.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


Horse shit. There are literally thousand of pictures on the internet of the moon rising, show us ONE that can be time verified that does not come from a .gov source of the moon rising with horizontal terminator, and then for the sake of the people not so skilled in the art of deception explain how if the moon is in the approximate same plane as the earth is orbiting the sun that this is possible.
Menow
User ID: 636186
United States
02/24/2013 02:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
No it is not. There was no lunar eclipse on January 30th, 1971. Furthermore, I already proved it was normal with my calculations. On January 30th, 1971, that is exactly what the moon should have looked like. It was a horizontal crescent phase.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


You're dealing with an obvious moron. As a child I remember seeing the moon appear as a horizontal crescent. My grandmother used to tell me, quite erroneously of course, that it was like a spoon and if it tipped, it meant it was going to rain. I recall seeing it in a tipped position and, coincidentally enough, it did rain the next day.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


Horse shit. There are literally thousand of pictures on the internet of the moon rising, show us ONE that can be time verified that does not come from a .gov source of the moon rising with horizontal terminator, and then for the sake of the people not so skilled in the art of deception explain how if the moon is in the approximate same plane as the earth is orbiting the sun that this is possible.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


Yes, there are thousands of images on the internet showing the moon in all different orientations relative to the horizon. Are you claiming they are ALL fake and that the moon's terminator line should ALWAYS be horizontal?
Menow
User ID: 636186
United States
02/24/2013 02:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
No it is not. There was no lunar eclipse on January 30th, 1971. Furthermore, I already proved it was normal with my calculations. On January 30th, 1971, that is exactly what the moon should have looked like. It was a horizontal crescent phase.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


You're dealing with an obvious moron. As a child I remember seeing the moon appear as a horizontal crescent. My grandmother used to tell me, quite erroneously of course, that it was like a spoon and if it tipped, it meant it was going to rain. I recall seeing it in a tipped position and, coincidentally enough, it did rain the next day.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


Horse shit. There are literally thousand of pictures on the internet of the moon rising, show us ONE that can be time verified that does not come from a .gov source of the moon rising with horizontal terminator, and then for the sake of the people not so skilled in the art of deception explain how if the moon is in the approximate same plane as the earth is orbiting the sun that this is possible.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


Yes, there are thousands of images on the internet showing the moon in all different orientations relative to the horizon. Are you claiming they are ALL fake and that the moon's terminator line should ALWAYS be horizontal?
 Quoting: Menow 636186


Sorry- Are you claiming the terminator should ALWAYS be vertical?
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1304066
United States
02/24/2013 02:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
[link to photography.nationalgeographic.com]


Notice on this page of a person who has been keeping a photo journal of the moon that all photos except the most recent once on Christmas that are NOT of an eclipse and labeled as such show a nearly vertical terminator.

[link to www.pbase.com]

Have a nice day.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1304066
United States
02/24/2013 02:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
No it is not. There was no lunar eclipse on January 30th, 1971. Furthermore, I already proved it was normal with my calculations. On January 30th, 1971, that is exactly what the moon should have looked like. It was a horizontal crescent phase.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


You're dealing with an obvious moron. As a child I remember seeing the moon appear as a horizontal crescent. My grandmother used to tell me, quite erroneously of course, that it was like a spoon and if it tipped, it meant it was going to rain. I recall seeing it in a tipped position and, coincidentally enough, it did rain the next day.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


Horse shit. There are literally thousand of pictures on the internet of the moon rising, show us ONE that can be time verified that does not come from a .gov source of the moon rising with horizontal terminator, and then for the sake of the people not so skilled in the art of deception explain how if the moon is in the approximate same plane as the earth is orbiting the sun that this is possible.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


Yes, there are thousands of images on the internet showing the moon in all different orientations relative to the horizon. Are you claiming they are ALL fake and that the moon's terminator line should ALWAYS be horizontal?
 Quoting: Menow 636186


I am saying it is simply impossible for the moon to rise with a horizontal terminator if it is in the ecliptic plane. I have shown photographic evidence that the change was very recent.
Menow
User ID: 636186
United States
02/24/2013 02:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
No it is not. There was no lunar eclipse on January 30th, 1971. Furthermore, I already proved it was normal with my calculations. On January 30th, 1971, that is exactly what the moon should have looked like. It was a horizontal crescent phase.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


You're dealing with an obvious moron. As a child I remember seeing the moon appear as a horizontal crescent. My grandmother used to tell me, quite erroneously of course, that it was like a spoon and if it tipped, it meant it was going to rain. I recall seeing it in a tipped position and, coincidentally enough, it did rain the next day.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


Horse shit. There are literally thousand of pictures on the internet of the moon rising, show us ONE that can be time verified that does not come from a .gov source of the moon rising with horizontal terminator, and then for the sake of the people not so skilled in the art of deception explain how if the moon is in the approximate same plane as the earth is orbiting the sun that this is possible.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


If there are no images of such a thing taking place, why are you claiming it has happened? What is YOUR evidence that such an event took place, abnormally?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 34753160
United States
02/24/2013 02:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Broken Circuit .... Did you finally retire from your job with the FL highway department picking up road kill, cans and dirty dippers ?

OR, did they fire you for the incompetent fool you are ?

You were SUCH an ass back in 2003, 04 and 05. You got sucked in by Nancy Lieder and couldn't let it GO !
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1304066
United States
02/24/2013 02:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
It is inexplicable given the facts we know about the basic facts about the orbits of the moon around the Earth and the earth around the Sun that the moon should rise with a horizontal terminator when it is not a lunar eclipse.

NO ONE has attempted to explain how it is possible, just claimed it is. It is obviously possible, we are observing the change and it seems permanent. Explain it.
Menow
User ID: 636186
United States
02/24/2013 02:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
...


You're dealing with an obvious moron. As a child I remember seeing the moon appear as a horizontal crescent. My grandmother used to tell me, quite erroneously of course, that it was like a spoon and if it tipped, it meant it was going to rain. I recall seeing it in a tipped position and, coincidentally enough, it did rain the next day.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


Horse shit. There are literally thousand of pictures on the internet of the moon rising, show us ONE that can be time verified that does not come from a .gov source of the moon rising with horizontal terminator, and then for the sake of the people not so skilled in the art of deception explain how if the moon is in the approximate same plane as the earth is orbiting the sun that this is possible.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


Yes, there are thousands of images on the internet showing the moon in all different orientations relative to the horizon. Are you claiming they are ALL fake and that the moon's terminator line should ALWAYS be horizontal?
 Quoting: Menow 636186


I am saying it is simply impossible for the moon to rise with a horizontal terminator if it is in the ecliptic plane. I have shown photographic evidence that the change was very recent.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


You mean completely, perfectly horizontal when viewed from any/all locations on Earth? So what? What is your point?
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1304066
United States
02/24/2013 02:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
If there are no images of such a thing taking place, why are you claiming it has happened? What is YOUR evidence that such an event took place, abnormally?
 Quoting: Menow 636186


No comprende, get lost
Menow
User ID: 636186
United States
02/24/2013 02:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
It is inexplicable given the facts we know about the basic facts about the orbits of the moon around the Earth and the earth around the Sun that the moon should rise with a horizontal terminator when it is not a lunar eclipse.

NO ONE has attempted to explain how it is possible, just claimed it is. It is obviously possible, we are observing the change and it seems permanent. Explain it.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


You are "observing the change"? Change from what to what- SPECIFICALLY? Where? When? Where is your proof that the moon recently rose with a horizontal terminator, since that seems to be the alleged phenomenon you claim is abnormal?
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1304066
United States
02/24/2013 02:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
You mean completely, perfectly horizontal when viewed from any/all locations on Earth? So what? What is your point?
 Quoting: Menow 636186


No , it shouldn't be perfectly vertical it should be 22 degrees off given the tilt of the earth to the ecliptic and should vary within the range of 0-22 degrees given the time of year. Position on the planet doesn't change the orientation of directions. East is still east and west is still west and north is still north.
Menow
User ID: 636186
United States
02/24/2013 02:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
If there are no images of such a thing taking place, why are you claiming it has happened? What is YOUR evidence that such an event took place, abnormally?
 Quoting: Menow 636186


No comprende, get lost
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


I see... I'm not supposed to ask for proof that the alleged "abnormal event" you say shouldn't have taken place, actually did occur. How droll.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1304066
United States
02/24/2013 02:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
If there are no images of such a thing taking place, why are you claiming it has happened? What is YOUR evidence that such an event took place, abnormally?
 Quoting: Menow 636186


No comprende, get lost
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


I see... I'm not supposed to ask for proof that the alleged "abnormal event" you say shouldn't have taken place, actually did occur. How droll.
 Quoting: Menow 636186


You are imparsable, lay down the pipe and come back later when you are not so high
Menow
User ID: 636186
United States
02/24/2013 02:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
You mean completely, perfectly horizontal when viewed from any/all locations on Earth? So what? What is your point?
 Quoting: Menow 636186


No , it shouldn't be perfectly vertical it should be 22 degrees off given the tilt of the earth to the ecliptic and should vary within the range of 0-22 degrees given the time of year. Position on the planet doesn't change the orientation of directions. East is still east and west is still west and north is still north.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


Heh. Does the above actually make sense in your mind? Do you have no understanding of the ecliptic and it's location in the sky from day to night and how that changes during the year? if the ecliptic is nearly perpendicular to the horizon at a given moment and the moon is also near that horizon, the moon's terminator will be well more than 22 degrees out of "vertical". Look up "the seasons", as relates to the ecliptic and the moon's orientation in the sky. It's just simple geometry.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 30047168
United States
02/24/2013 02:56 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
No it is not. There was no lunar eclipse on January 30th, 1971. Furthermore, I already proved it was normal with my calculations. On January 30th, 1971, that is exactly what the moon should have looked like. It was a horizontal crescent phase.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


You're dealing with an obvious moron. As a child I remember seeing the moon appear as a horizontal crescent. My grandmother used to tell me, quite erroneously of course, that it was like a spoon and if it tipped, it meant it was going to rain. I recall seeing it in a tipped position and, coincidentally enough, it did rain the next day.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


Horse shit. There are literally thousand of pictures on the internet of the moon rising, show us ONE that can be time verified that does not come from a .gov source of the moon rising with horizontal terminator, and then for the sake of the people not so skilled in the art of deception explain how if the moon is in the approximate same plane as the earth is orbiting the sun that this is possible.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


Okay...here's one with a "tilted spoon" appearance I mentioned earlier:
[link to rantfarm.com]

Here's another one but in the opposite direction:
[link to 1.bp.blogspot.com]

Here's one with a half moon with the terminator horizontal:
[link to woofersthedog.com]

It's also very easy to explain. The Earth has an axial tilt of about 23.5 degrees. The moon's orbit is close to that of the orbital ecliptic - NOT Earth's equator and the Moon's orbital plane is inclined to the ecliptic by about 5.1 degrees. It's the combination of the two that allow the terminator to appear depending on where the moon is within its 27 day orbit around the Earth.

Guess you lose....again.

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 02/24/2013 03:05 PM
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Menow
User ID: 636186
United States
02/24/2013 02:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
If there are no images of such a thing taking place, why are you claiming it has happened? What is YOUR evidence that such an event took place, abnormally?
 Quoting: Menow 636186


No comprende, get lost
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


I see... I'm not supposed to ask for proof that the alleged "abnormal event" you say shouldn't have taken place, actually did occur. How droll.
 Quoting: Menow 636186


You are imparsable, lay down the pipe and come back later when you are not so high
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


How much more simple can I make it? You are claiming that something abnormal has allegedly taken place- that the moon rose with a horizontal terminator. Where is your proof that that alleged "abnomal event" actually occurred?
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1304066
United States
02/24/2013 03:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
The facts are as follows: It is simply impossible for the moon to rise with a horizontal terminator in any location near the equator. AT my latitude, the most it can POSSIBLY be off from vertical using simple geometry as guide is @ 42 degrees. It is NOT possible for it to rise with a horizontal terminator if it is in the ecliptic plane, not in Texas and not in Missouri. If you were standing on the north pole or within the artic circle, it is easy to understand how it IS possible to observe a horizontal terminator, since the orientation of the horizion in degrees to the ecliptic is proportional to your latitude. These observations are being made all over the world, it totally new and has never been observed before and is as of yet unexplained.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 30047168
United States
02/24/2013 03:08 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I am saying it is simply impossible for the moon to rise with a horizontal terminator if it is in the ecliptic plane. I have shown photographic evidence that the change was very recent.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


But it ISN'T in the ecliptic plane...it's close, but it is actually off by 5.1 degrees.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Menow
User ID: 636186
United States
02/24/2013 03:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
The facts are as follows: It is simply impossible for the moon to rise with a horizontal terminator in any location near the equator.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


Oh.. suddenly your claim includes "near the equator"?

AT my latitude, the most it can POSSIBLY be off from vertical using simple geometry as guide is @ 42 degrees.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


Um... didn't you just say 22 degrees? So which is it, 22 degrees or 42 degrees?

It is NOT possible for it to rise with a horizontal terminator if it is in the ecliptic plane, not in Texas and not in Missouri.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


And? Are you claiming this has happened? Link? Image? Anything at all to prove this actually took place?

If you were standing on the north pole or within the artic circle, it is easy to understand how it IS possible to observe a horizontal terminator, since the orientation of the horizion in degrees to the ecliptic is proportional to your latitude. These observations are being made all over the world, it totally new and has never been observed before and is as of yet unexplained.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


If this [rising moon with horizontal terminator] is being observed all over the world, where is a recent image of it?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
02/24/2013 03:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
The facts are as follows: It is simply impossible for the moon to rise with a horizontal terminator in any location near the equator. AT my latitude, the most it can POSSIBLY be off from vertical using simple geometry as guide is @ 42 degrees. It is NOT possible for it to rise with a horizontal terminator if it is in the ecliptic plane, not in Texas and not in Missouri. If you were standing on the north pole or within the artic circle, it is easy to understand how it IS possible to observe a horizontal terminator, since the orientation of the horizion in degrees to the ecliptic is proportional to your latitude. These observations are being made all over the world, it totally new and has never been observed before and is as of yet unexplained.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


And yet old GOTO telescopes track the Moon, Sun, and stars perfectly -- with no updates or changes whatsoever: HOW?

Moon-rises and Moon-sets occur on time, even as far as old almanacs are concerned. If things in the sky are behaving abnormally: HOW?

What movement would be necessary for such an abnormality to actually occur? Let's see how much of an Astrophysicist you really *are.* Describe in detail exactly what would have to occur for what you are claiming to be true.

And if you wouldn't mind answering some of my sky questions in the earlier post, too. Thanks so much.
Dr. Astro
Comet Hustler

User ID: 33360181
United States
02/24/2013 03:14 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
The facts are as follows: It is simply impossible for the moon to rise with a horizontal terminator in any location near the equator. AT my latitude, the most it can POSSIBLY be off from vertical using simple geometry as guide is @ 42 degrees.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


Oh really? What is your latitude? Let me plug that into my excel sheet...
astrobanner2
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 30047168
United States
02/24/2013 03:18 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Um... didn't you just say 22 degrees? So which is it, 22 degrees or 42 degrees?
 Quoting: Menow 636186


I see you noticed that as well. Sounds like back pedaling to me.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1304066
United States
02/24/2013 03:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Gee whiz. The angle of the terminator of the moons shadow from the Sun should vary exactly the same degree as the tilt of the earth to the ecliptic from any given position on the earth through the year. If you are on the 22 latitude, this would mean the terminator would vary from a tilt of 0 degrees from vertical of a maximum of approximately 45 degrees, exactly what I have observed all of my life.. it is simply not possible to have a perfectly horizontal terminator anywhere south of the 67 latitude and yet these have been observed by hundreds of people on this website alone. Explain it.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1304066
United States
02/24/2013 04:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
The only possible explanation of the changes that have been observed is if the moon is no longer orbiting the barycenter of the Earth -moon dual planet system or it has changed it's inclination of orbit to the ecliptic and has been pulled into a substantially different orbit by some as of yet unexplained force that has changed significant.
No one who uses a telescope to view the moon uses a 'goto' program to do it, that would be asinine since it is clearly visible and much easier to simply point the telescope at it manually. I have shown as have my adversaries mounds of evidence that software from telescopes is periodically updated.

I have also shown with proof from a majpr observatory that major observatories allign their telescopes nightly by mapping the position of celestial objects so they can use their mechanized 'goto' systems to observe particular areas of space. Small computer guided telescopes use exactly the same methodology.I was answered with nothing but pure unadulterated horse manure that conflicted with the information the disinfo ops themselves had presented, which is paradoxical to me.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
02/24/2013 04:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
The only possible explanation of the changes that have been observed is if the moon is no longer orbiting the barycenter of the Earth -moon dual planet system or it has changed it's inclination of orbit to the ecliptic and has been pulled into a substantially different orbit by some as of yet unexplained force that has changed significant.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


Were that the case, how can GOTO telescopes track it? Surely such a motion would be utterly unpredictable, and fly in the face of Newtonian Mechanics, which underlies the entire GOTO concept.

No one who uses a telescope to view the moon uses a 'goto' program to do it, that would be asinine since it is clearly visible and much easier to simply point the telescope at it manually.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


Oh? Pray, how would the telescope track it for more than a few minutes, then, particularly at high magnifications? You can set up a GOTO and it will track the Moon so you don't have to readjust every few minutes, and will follow it all night (and even into the day, if you want). How is it doing this, particularly when you are, say, way zoomed in watching the terminator, or particular features ON the Moon?

In short: How does the telescope KNOW?

I have shown as have my adversaries mounds of evidence that software from telescopes is periodically updated.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


I have given you links and information and examples directly contradicting you. The information you referenced also said nothing about changing existing motions or standard assumptions, but merely about adding new objects to the database and bug fixes. Once again, Celestron hasn't offered a patch since 2007. You have also failed to address how old starguides, starwheels, pre-GOTO telescopes, and even sextants could still be tracking and working given a supposed unpredictable sky. Until you can address these observations which directly and provably contradict your claim, your idea remains mere fantasy.


I have also shown with proof from a majpr observatory that major observatories allign their telescopes nightly by mapping the position of celestial objects so they can use their mechanized 'goto' systems to observe particular areas of space.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


Were there unpredictable motion of the Earth, **how would the telescope know how to compensate?**

Even *if* they lined up their scopes every night, were they off by a *fraction* of a degree, astrophotography would be impossible, because the *assumptions* built into the telescope would be wrong. How can you not understand this, particularly claiming that you are a supposed astrophysicist?


Small computer guided telescopes use exactly the same methodology.I was answered with nothing but pure unadulterated horse manure that conflicted with the information the disinfo ops themselves had presented, which is paradoxical to me.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


The only paradoxes that have been presented have been your own. How can guides like the 1966 Pictorial Astronomy still be correct if the Earth or Moon were moving in any unpredicted ways?
Dr. Astro
Comet Hustler

User ID: 33360181
United States
02/24/2013 04:45 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
it is simply not possible to have a perfectly horizontal terminator anywhere south of the 67 latitude and yet these have been observed by hundreds of people on this website alone. Explain it.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


Wrong. Already explained, mathematically as well:

[link to www.youtube.com]

Last Edited by Dr. Astro on 02/24/2013 04:45 PM
astrobanner2
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 30047168
United States
02/24/2013 05:04 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
The only possible explanation of the changes that have been observed is if the moon is no longer orbiting the barycenter of the Earth -moon dual planet system or it has changed it's inclination of orbit to the ecliptic and has been pulled into a substantially different orbit by some as of yet unexplained force that has changed significant.
No one who uses a telescope to view the moon uses a 'goto' program to do it, that would be asinine since it is clearly visible and much easier to simply point the telescope at it manually.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


No one uses a GOTO program to watch the moon? You know this how? You obviously haven't asked everyone because a friend of mine in Sierra Vista does just that. His telescope uses GPS to find his location. Once is location is calculated, all he has to do is align it using two stars. Once that's done, he can sit back and watch the moon all night without having to touch the telescope. If the moon were moving about unpredictably or had moved from its previous orbital planet then he wouldn't be able to do this. Considering he can do it with ease proves there's nothing wrong with the moon or its orbit. Sorry.

Care to try again?

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 02/24/2013 05:08 PM
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Menow
User ID: 636186
United States
02/24/2013 05:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
The only possible explanation of the changes that have been observed... (snip)
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1304066


Sorry? What alleged changes? You are apparently claiming that the moon recently rose(abnormally) with the terminator horizontal. Where are any images demonstrating that this alleged event actually took place?

News