WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

Indeed he is. I can hardly recall a time where I have seen anyone else get so badly pwned on GLP by so many.

For those interested:

The book is public domain and available as a free download:
(Online reading, PDF, EPUB, Kindle, Daisy, Full Text, DjVu)

Fifty year canon of solar eclipses: 1986 - 2035
[link to archive.org]

.

The problem with your little theory here is that *I* am a guy who works in tech support who entertains himself by reading the rantings of the fringe element on conspiracy sites between calls.

Call it schadenfreude, call it stubbornness, but whatever you call it, whenever I encounter someone like you, even though I know your words are the product of mental illness and your real life situation is more than likely very sad and deserving of pity and kindness, I can't help but try to crack that shell of delusion with the hammer of reason.

I know I should leave you to it, if pretending you're a genius physicist being suppressed by demons and government agents bleeds a little bit of excitement into your life then I should just be happy for you, muse at your rantings, and move along, but you're just so damned arrogant about it all I can't help but poke at you like an animal in a cage.

So I think I'm going to make a better effort to leave you to it, but with one final counterpoint to your circus of crazy - I don't know if hell exists, but I'm reasonably sure that if it does, arguing with a guy on the Internet about whether or not we're entering a zone of charged particles is not a hell-worthy offense.

Surely some part of your schizophrenia-addled brain has enough of a tenuous grasp left on reality to realize that.

You have an absolutely perfect record, you have never been right and have always opposed the truth.
Everyone on this forum knows that.

Your criticism is an endorsement.

Horseshit , you work for the government and are paid to attack anyone who is trying to expose the truth. You have an IQ of around 95 and most of your remarks are pre-written generic comments. You post under a proxy.

I think what is most hilarious about it all is that you are stupid enough to believe you are valued asset.

Can you show where the information originated?




THOUGHT NOT

I bet I know, though.

Isn't it a bit pretentious to claim three different individuals posting under proxies on a closed thread and making obvious liars out of themselves with what they think are witty comments is owning someone you are not only stupid, you're delusional.

Getting paid to lie is your own albatross hanging around your neck, not mine, my conscious is clear. I would imagine your life stinks and no one in it has any respect for you..

Hey there agent 74444, but your moniker is not so clever

So the library system finally got my requested book, published July of 1987: the 50 Year Canon of Solar Eclipses 1986-2035.

Obviously, the book hasn't changed since it was published, unless darling elves rewrite charts in already existing books.

In it are all the Solar Eclipses from, you guessed it, 1987 to 2035, complete with the charts showing where on Earth each Eclipse will/has occurred.

So IDW/A.A: If the Moon were moving in any unpredictable ways as you claim it has, how can this book continue to be accurate regarding those eclipses? How can its predictions match the current predictions -- 25 years in advance?

I look forward to your strong silence demonstrating your acknowledgement of total defeat in this matter.

Alas, as usual, I will remind you that I only post under 74444. Sorry to be difficult, but there you go.

Reaction time, 2 minutes and 43 seconds.

...While you're down there....



They plagiarized the info from the Mayan astronomers you asshole. Most of what is actual scientific fact has been plagiarized and the originators never given credit.

If that is so:

*Why* would telescopes fail to track the Moon, as you claimed?

And, as an additional question: How did other cultures, whom you claim were not as astronomically advanced as the Maya, make similarly exact predictions (such as the transit of Venus) a century before the Mayan language was successfully translated?

Ad hominem noted

Since the eclipse data from the 1987 book are still correct,
and since you claim, the authors plagiarized the info from the Mayan astronomers,
please explain, how the Mayans knew, that the moon will be off nowadays?


.

Evasion noted. Nice to see that you admit you have nothing to support your claims (since you've provided nothing) and admit that your claims are without merit.

See? Was that so hard?

Prove it you ass. Where's your evidence? Present it. As I said before - failure to provide any evidence to support this claim of yours will be considered an admission that you have none and that said claim is without merit.


Uh oh - you're getting testy. A sure sign you're losing the argument.


LOL!! The irony of that statement. LOL!!!

Three individuals using a proxy? Where's your evidence of this? A close thread? Where's your evidence of this? Put up or shut up.


Getting paid? Where's your evidence of this? As stated before - when you resort to such tactics its done so in desperation to deflect from the fact that you have nothing to provide that will support your claims. Everyone who enters this thread can clearly see you have refused to look at the evidence presented to you and you refuse to present evidence of your own. And they've called you on it. But go ahead - keep acting like a child. It's quite amusing.

Where's your evidence of that? Even if what you say is true, it still doesn't address the fact that all the information in the book is correct, which it shouldn't be if the moon were moving about unpredictably.

Now, get up off the floor, dust yourself off and present some evidence before you get smacked down again. Somehow, I suspect you'll be finding yourself on the floor - again and again and again.

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 03/18/2013 04:42 AM

And I see AA's reaction time is ...

He won't answer this, he will wait for a few more people to post then jump on them, completely ignoring this.

It's funny how he claims this thread is closed to other people and yet I can access it as an AC from work with a completely different IP address, from my iPhone going through my cellular providers network or from any hotspot in my area.

Don't you just love how in AA's world free thought doesn't exist? Everyone MUST agree with his outlandish claims because he said they're right. If you don't it's because you're obviously paid to be here.

it appears to be a popular ploy with those unable to substantiate their claims with actual evidence.

Laugh all you want, but at the end of the day you're the schizo retard who's going to grow old and die alone, unfulfilled, unsuccessful and unknown, who's only accomplishment in life will be alienating everyone who might have ever loved him.

In the end, this thread full of delusion is all you have.

And to think, all you had to do was take your meds. How utterly ironic that ultimately it is your overblown ego which has led you down the path of self destruction.

See, among your problems, IDW/A.A, is that you don't even have any *internal* consistency.

So just to make sure it isn't lost in the commentary...



If that is so:

*Why* would telescopes fail to track the Moon, as you claimed?

And, as an additional question: How did other cultures, whom you claim were not as astronomically advanced as the Maya, make similarly exact predictions (such as the transit of Venus) a century before the Mayan language was successfully translated?

As I recall the last transit of Venus WAS NOT successfully predicted by lamestream science.

Oh, and BTW, couldn't you idiots make up just a few more user id's to make it look good?


Gee whiz

The first thing the conquistadors did was remove every single piece of Mayan literature and bring it back to the Vatican, where it is still kept. Mayans scribed were captured and tortured and forced to translate the language in the 1500's

There has been a change here. now maybe there will be more open responses. I have a feeling the shills are about to be blown out of the water

Still waiting for an answer:

Since the eclipse data from the 1987 book are still correct,
and since you claim, the authors plagiarized the info from the Mayan astronomers,
please explain, how the Mayans knew, that the moon will be off nowadays?


.

Because they were far superior astronomers?