WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

Um, it's the third time they've done that -- and its still up there.

Read *that.*

Well, maybe if you had shown how you came to your conclusions, others could have helped you discover the flaw in your reasoning before the event occurred.



As you do with most of your from-the-hip claims -- which is just about all of them, near as I can tell.



I don't think you took anything into account but your gut -- but since you never show your work, we'll never know. All we *do* know is your conclusion, which you were terribly sure about, was flat-out wrong.



Argumentum ad populum. And since when do *you* care about popularity of your ideas? You've been fixating on rating here on GLP, too -- why do you *believe* those ratings, when you claim so much else is so trivially manipulated? For what reasons wouldn't they manipulate so *simple* a thing to manipulate? You've apparently postulated entire fake libraries being created just to prove you wrong, yet they wouldn't muck about with GLP ratings? It makes no logical sense, even in internally-IDW-Logic(tm).



Well, that is both pleasing and sad. It is pleasing, because you are admitting your ideas' colossal failings. It is sad that you will, rather than alter the idea, refuse to make any more concrete predictions, simply because you are afraid of looking *more* foolish, and the predictions were *too hard.*



I will certainly stipulate to that.



Now, let me make sure I understand you: before the end of 2013, right? Because if you are just predicting a Tunguska event *someday* in the future, why then you and traditional science agree completely.

How quaint. When confronted with video proof that you're wrong, simply claim it was all made up. What's it like living in Fantasyland?

LOL! He confronts you with your own words, which proves you failed, and he's the idiot? HA HA HA HA HA HA HA.

Believe what you want but your credibility is shot now that you've been caught redhanded lying posting as some anonymous person and then denying you were really AA/IDW.

Why do you promote fear, hate and lies?

Sure he is...and probably quite imaginary as well.

Still trying to deny your own homosexuality I see. It's quite clear that your comments are some deep rooted sexual fantasy of yours.

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 06/01/2013 06:55 AM

Yawn! More empty threats.

Always with the homosexual overtones. You should really think about admitting your own sexual deviations. The truth will set you free. That said - the only one exposed here is you. Video proof that shows you're wrong and the BEST you can rebuttal with is that everything was made up. Wow....simply WOW! The measures you'll go to to keep from admitting you're wrong.

Your denial is so funny. Please continue. This better than any sitcom on TV.


You know this? How? Considering YOU'RE the one constantly making comments about substance abuse and sex, I'd say you're the one with the problem. Project much?



How does a video prove he's lying? Your logic is EXTREMELY flawed...and anyone with an average IQ can see you're wrong but refusing to admit it.

Yes, it is...you lost. Big time and now you're throwing a childish tantrum.

Keep saying it...you might actually be able to convince yourself that it's true. After all, you've convinced yourself of so many other things.

Call it whatever you want...you're a pro at it.

Ah, yes, because everyone can see you're wrong and no one is posting in support of you (other than you), it must be proof that people are being blocked. Have you ever thought about seeking professional mental help?

Where did that happen? I must have missed it somehow. It appears to me that they've been mopping the floor with your ass.

Yes, he does...at you.

I wish a mod would clean the creche kids out of this thread again. A good thread ruined by ego babble.

All I see from you is excuses but never any substance.

Posting through a proxy again, eh?

Circuit Breaker, I see that you have an obsession to respond to all posts from some members here in a way that is meant to ridicule them or disprove their theories. Are you paid to do so?

Does it matter what I say? Because regardless of how honestly I answer the question, you're going to believe whatever you want. If you do, however, choose to believe I'm "paid to be here", then please provide a link to where I can actually apply for such a job. I've been accused of it enough I might as well actually get paid to be here. That way - when someone accuses me of it, they wouldn't be lying. It's funny, though, over the last 10 years I've asked for someone...anyone...to provide such a link and not ONE person has ever come through. Which leads me to conclude that no such job actually exists.

What I find odd about your statement is that you claim I respond to all posts from some members and they are done in a way to that is meant to ridicule or disprove their theories. Looking back, it appears to me that my posts are pretty much all directed at AA/IDW. But as far as disproving his theories, I'd have to say that he and the others have done a far better job of that because I don't pretend to know a lot about the subject of astronomy. But I learn from the others...and by that I mean Dr. Astro, 7444 and Hydra. Why you might ask? Because when they say something, the back it up with something. They provide their calculations and they tell you where one can find the information. All one has to do is look it up. AA/IDW, who claims to be an astrophysicist, should know how the scientific method works. But, if he does, he obviously chooses to ignore or abandon it whenever it suits him. And, because the information posted by others proves him wrong, he now claims it is all "made up" and "planted" in an effort to discredit him. But anyone can look up the material themselves and easily verify whether the information is correct or not by performing their own observations and calculations. On top of that, it appears that AA/IDW chooses not to base his predictions on years of historical data. No. Instead, he prefers to go with his "gut" or intuition.

That all said - why do you claim my posts are also meant to ridicule and yet you overlook all of AA/IDW's posts? Is he not guilty of the same behavior you accuse me of? His posts are constantly filled with vulgar and obscene insults - most of which are racial/religious or sexual in nature (which I honestly believe is his way of denying his own heritage and sexual orientation, but I digress). My responses are quite tame by comparison. Dr. Astro, 74444 and Hydra have all pretty much responded quite politely considering the circumstances and provocation they've endured from AA/IDW. So, why do you think what I post is somehow worse than anything that AA/IDW has posted?

And why do you support AA/IDW when he has not backed up his claims with verifiable data and has not shown his calculations? Do you believe things based solely on intuition as well, or simply because someone said so?

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 06/01/2013 10:22 AM

Already in my records (including link to his post).

I'll be happy to present it Jan 1st 2014.


.

Double negative - thus your quote means: "give me fucking english lesson, either.

LOL

I think you need some.

.

It would be a major progress, if you even could admit your meaningless mistakes.


Except the Incredible Dim Astrophysicst.

LOL

.

We already proved your claim to be wrong - how often do we have to present your miserable fail again?


.

Well, maybe if you had shown how you came to your conclusions, others could have helped you discover the flaw in your reasoning before the event occurred.



As you do with most of your from-the-hip claims -- which is just about all of them, near as I can tell.



I don't think you took anything into account but your gut -- but since you never show your work, we'll never know. All we *do* know is your conclusion, which you were terribly sure about, was flat-out wrong.



Argumentum ad populum. And since when do *you* care about popularity of your ideas? You've been fixating on rating here on GLP, too -- why do you *believe* those ratings, when you claim so much else is so trivially manipulated? For what reasons wouldn't they manipulate so *simple* a thing to manipulate? You've apparently postulated entire fake libraries being created just to prove you wrong, yet they wouldn't muck about with GLP ratings? It makes no logical sense, even in internally-IDW-Logic(tm).



Well, that is both pleasing and sad. It is pleasing, because you are admitting your ideas' colossal failings. It is sad that you will, rather than alter the idea, refuse to make any more concrete predictions, simply because you are afraid of looking *more* foolish, and the predictions were *too hard.*



I will certainly stipulate to that.



Now, let me make sure I understand you: before the end of 2013, right? Because if you are just predicting a Tunguska event *someday* in the future, why then you and traditional science agree completely.

I would have thought that your epic fail rate regarding your *intergalactic contacts* may have precluded you from making yourself appear even more stupid than usual. Apparently not.

Last Edited by Elemental on 06/01/2013 04:17 PM

OK, I am only up to page 480, as I catch up, but really this is astonishing comedy gold.

Dr. Astro is Phil Plait? Good grief. I know exactly who Dr. Astro is. It ain't Phil Plait. It isn't that hard to find who he really is, though I won't be revealing that in deference to his choices. Hell, you could easily find who I really am, if you had a modicum of intelligence. (Dr. Astro likely already knows, but I have not a problem with that, our paths have randomly crossed elsewhere in a brief manner), but jeez claiming Dr. A is Phil Plait? That gets crackpot of the month for me.

I shall read on through the remaining 10 pages, I expect no improvement in the crackpots claims.