WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED! | |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 30047168 United States 06/04/2013 07:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | IDW/A.A, there are three claims you have made in the recent past that need supporting evidence. Quoting: 74444 - How often do sunspots appear 'near the exact center' over, say, a decade? And cite your sources, please. You have thus far FAILED to address this. - "The thread title has been proved to be correct beyond doubt, even admitted to by the ones involved." When and how was this supposedly admitted? Cite your source, please. You have thus far FAILED to address this. - What is your evidence that 'cosmic ray particles' have *exceeded* light speed? Citations please -- and, if possible, to sources other than yourself. You have thus far FAILED to address this. You demand citations, but won't give them yourself? Why is that? And as to your answers, I shan't hold my breath. I've observed your patterns for too long. Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 06/04/2013 07:05 AM A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Reality420 User ID: 40800078 United States 06/04/2013 07:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | LMFAO! You don't even understand that annular eclipses are normal, yet you have the gall to declare yourself an "extremely competent astrophysicist?" Yes, even annular eclipses where the moon's apparent diameter is about 90% of the sun's are normal, in fact it's been happening for a long time now, you just never noticed. Your only response to this fact is to automatically declare any evidence showing it to be fake. And don't even get me started on hybrid eclipses. Quoting: Dr. Astro You are not competent, let alone qualified to serve as "THE CITATION." You're just an arrogant, ignorant, racist who thinks he can "assume" cosmic rays beat the speed of light because Einstein was jewish. By the way, a 10 GeV 1 atomic mass unit particle would be traveling at about 0.99558842 the speed of light (taking .93828 GeV as the resting mass-energy of a 1 atomic mass particle). Total mass-energy of a particle = resting mass-energy/(sqrt(1-(velocity^2/speed of light^2))) In other words: velocity (fractional light speed) = sqrt(total mass-energy^2-resting mass-energy^2)/total mass-energy Ah, Astro beat me to it. Damn, I should really read ahead before I post, but slapping that arrogant Jooooboy IDWstein around is too tempting. Low fruit, I know, but still... Have fun. R |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 41109656 United Kingdom 06/04/2013 07:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Hydra User ID: 41081167 Germany 06/04/2013 08:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 41056508 United States 06/04/2013 08:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 41056508 United States 06/04/2013 08:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Berg: "Um, Stein, these energy levels of cosmic radiation coupled with their mass indicate matter is traveling in excess of the speed of light. What do we do? Re write all of jewish physics and expose ourselves as idiots? Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41056508 Stein:" No, why don't we just call up the publishers and make sure they call cosmic particle radiation 'rays' in all the textbooks, that way the dumbed down animals will never notice. |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 41056508 United States 06/04/2013 08:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Cosmic radiation has recently been measured at >100GeV energy levels. I lowballed intentionally. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41056508 Pretty slick, huh jewboy? Plugging 100 GeV into the formula = 0.999955982 times the speed of light. In case you didn't notice, by the nature of the way things work, no matter how much energy you throw into the equation the result will always be at least a tiny fraction less than 1. At some point eventually you'll run out of significant digits in your typical calculator and the rounding error will take it to be "1," but it's self-evident by looking at and understanding the formula that it's always some fraction just under 1 no matter how much energy you pour into it. It may be .9999999999999999999999999999998 which your calculator rounds up to 1, but in reality it's still .0000000000000000000000000000002 less than 1, and no amount of energy can make up all of that last .0000000000000000000000000000002, only some fraction of it. No sire, plugging in 10 GeV into the classic kinetic energy formula with out all the rest mass= energy bullshit, you're already well over C |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 41056508 United States 06/04/2013 08:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | While you're at it, here are over 200,000,000 hit's on "mass extinction underway": Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41056508 [link to www.bing.com] That is something I predicted BEFORE it began with a great deal of accuracy. Hit counts don't equate to accuracy. Oh, as a side note, you believe Google is a controlled site, but *BING* is not? Just checking. You have claimed we have lost some 200,000 in the last year. Name twenty. [link to wwf.panda.org] How many species are we losing? Well... this is the million dollar question. And one that’s very hard to answer. Firstly, we don’t know exactly what’s out there. It’s a big complex world and we discover new species to science all the time. "Scientists were startled in 1980 by the discovery of a tremendous diversity of insects in tropical forests. In one study of just 19 trees in Panama, 80% of the 1,200 beetle species discovered were previously unknown to science... Surprisingly, scientists have a better understanding of how many stars there are in the galaxy than how many species there are on Earth." WRI So, if we don’t know how much there is to begin with, we don’t know exactly how much we’re losing. But we do have lots of facts and figures that seem to indicate that the news isn’t good. / ©: MAR-ECO / Uwe Piatkowski © MAR-ECO / Uwe Piatkowski rel= © WWF Just to illustrate the degree of biodiversity loss we're facing, let’s take you through one scientific analysis... The rapid loss of species we are seeing today is estimated by experts to be between 1,000 and 10,000 times higher than the natural extinction rate.* These experts calculate that between 0.01 and 0.1% of all species will become extinct each year. If the low estimate of the number of species out there is true - i.e. that there are around 2 million different species on our planet** - then that means between 200 and 2,000 extinctions occur every year. But if the upper estimate of species numbers is true - that there are 100 million different species co-existing with us on our planet - then between 10,000 and 100,000 species are becoming extinct each year. *Experts actually call this natural extinction rate the background extinction rate. This simply means the rate of species extinctions that would occur if we humans were not around. ** Between 1.4 and 1.8 million species have already been scientifically identified. Unlike the mass extinction events of geological history, the current extinction challenge is one for which a single species - ours - appears to be almost wholly responsible. This is often referred to as the 6th extinction crisis, after the 5 known extinction waves in geological history. So without arguing about who’s right or wrong. Or what the exact numbers are. There can be little debate that there is, in fact, a very serious biodiversity crisis. |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 41056508 United States 06/04/2013 08:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And just so it doesn't get lost in page-itus... Quoting: 74444 - What is your evidence that 'cosmic ray particles' have *exceeded* light speed? Citations please -- and, if possible, to sources other than yourself. This IS the citation and the reference! Given the mass and energy levels involved, applying the most basic kinetic energy formula with the known values, that is mass and energy, the velocity has to be in excess of light speed. Neutrinos are another example of mass accelerated way beyond light speed. No competent physicist is ignorant of this. Then it should be no trick whatsoever to cite a source supporting your claim. A particle with a mass of 1 atomic unit delivering a 10GeV kinetic energy is traveling well over the speed of light. No physicist competent will deny this either. The simple math can't lie, unlike you. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41056508 Then surely you can point to an experiment where this has been measured, verified, or observed. That's why lamestream academia calls cosmic particle radiation "rays", so you don;t see the elephant in the relativity living room. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41056508 I still fail to see a citation for a radiation 'ray' exceeding light speed. Please provide one. Do your own research, everything Is stated is factual to the letter and can be confirmed by looking at a chart of cosmic radiation energy levels and their mass. Again I AM THE CITATION here. As an extremely competent though un glorified and groundbreaking physicist and astrophysicist that is independently educated, that does not in any way diminish facts. I told you the incontrovertible verifiable facts. that's all I have to do to be my OWN reference unless you care to DISPUTE anything I have stated as fact. BTW,This thread is about censorship and alteration of solar data. Let's try to say on topic |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 41056508 United States 06/04/2013 09:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There is a pattern here that is well established in these pages that while I the OP of this post is away, the shills post a shitstorm to bump back what I have said so it will not be seen. It is obvious Broken circuit is paid by the post as is agent 74444, and that dr Asstroll (the illustrious Phil Plait) is the ring leader of the whole goddamned circus. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 41056508 United States 06/04/2013 09:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Extremly[sic] competent by falsely claiming annular solar eclipses are something new! Quoting: Hydra I made no such statement, I said annular eclipses are rare and never have a lunar disk diameter less than 90% of the Suns, as measurable in your sig and Astrolls FAKED images. In his anyone can measure it themselves And proving proof it was. Extremly [sic]competent by falsely claiming parallax is not involved when watching the Venus transit! Quoting: Hydra Nope, never said that, I said it could not possibly account for five minutes of observational deviation. It is moving in different manner than ever observed before, AS EVIDENCED BY YOUR SIG |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 30047168 United States 06/04/2013 09:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There is a pattern here that is well established in these pages that while I the OP of this post is away, the shills post a shitstorm to bump back what I have said so it will not be seen. It is obvious Broken circuit is paid by the post as is agent 74444, and that dr Asstroll (the illustrious Phil Plait) is the ring leader of the whole goddamned circus. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41056508 Funny how you do the same thing while ignoring relevant questions that have been asked of you. Your hypocrisy "sir" truly knows no bounds. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 30047168 United States 06/04/2013 09:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why don't you try addressing these very valid points AA/IDW? Why do you keep running away? This should be very easy for someone who claims to be so superior and ultra intelligent compared to everyone else. IDW/A.A, there are three claims you have made in the recent past that need supporting evidence. Quoting: 74444 - How often do sunspots appear 'near the exact center' over, say, a decade? And cite your sources, please. You have thus far FAILED to address this. - "The thread title has been proved to be correct beyond doubt, even admitted to by the ones involved." When and how was this supposedly admitted? Cite your source, please. You have thus far FAILED to address this. - What is your evidence that 'cosmic ray particles' have *exceeded* light speed? Citations please -- and, if possible, to sources other than yourself. You have thus far FAILED to address this. You demand citations, but won't give them yourself? Why is that? And as to your answers, I shan't hold my breath. I've observed your patterns for too long. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Hydra User ID: 41081167 Germany 06/04/2013 10:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Cosmic radiation has recently been measured at >100GeV energy levels. I lowballed intentionally. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41056508 Pretty slick, huh jewboy? Plugging 100 GeV into the formula = 0.999955982 times the speed of light. In case you didn't notice, by the nature of the way things work, no matter how much energy you throw into the equation the result will always be at least a tiny fraction less than 1. At some point eventually you'll run out of significant digits in your typical calculator and the rounding error will take it to be "1," but it's self-evident by looking at and understanding the formula that it's always some fraction just under 1 no matter how much energy you pour into it. It may be .9999999999999999999999999999998 which your calculator rounds up to 1, but in reality it's still .0000000000000000000000000000002 less than 1, and no amount of energy can make up all of that last .0000000000000000000000000000002, only some fraction of it. No sire, plugging in 10 GeV into the classic kinetic energy formula with out all the rest mass= energy bullshit, you're already well over C How about plugging in 4 TeV, like they do in the LHC? Warp 9, or what? Dimwit. . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
Hydra User ID: 41081167 Germany 06/04/2013 10:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In case you missed it - or you tried to bury it: Dear Incredible Dim Astrophysicist Quoting: Hydra in the meantime you should have learned, that I hold records of your post and provide the corresponding links. Either your long-term memory has a dysfunction or you are extremely dumb. Extremly[sic] competent by falsely claiming annular solar eclipses are something new! Quoting: Hydra I made no such statement, I said annular eclipses are rare and never have a lunar disk diameter less than 90% of the Suns, as measurable in your sig and Astrolls FAKED images. In his anyone can measure it themselves Really? ASSHOLE,There is NO NORMAL SOLAR ECLIPSE where the entire disk of the moon passes in front of the Sun, and that much of the Sun is left visible, PERIOD. It is simply not possible given the orbital distance variations of the Earth around the Sun and the moon around the Earth. The photos you proudly display prove you're dumb asshole Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1485181 Oooops. Btw: Even the small picture in my signature shows a magnitude of 0.914 - the original photos show 0.9190 (predicted: 0.9190). And again for educational purpose (perhaps you should write it down somewhere, so you don't always make the same mistakes): The minimum magnitude if an annular solar eclipse is 0.9001, what means that the diameter of the moons disc is 90.01 percent of the diameter of the suns disk. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proving proof is the Incredible Dim Astrophysicist himself: Here is the actual timing of the transit of Venus, as observed: Quoting: Anon. Astro. 1301472 5–6 June 2012 22:09 -start 5 June 01:29 -Mid 6 June 04:49 -end 6 June Visible in its entirety from Hawaii, Alaska, Australia, New Zealand, the Pacific and Eastern Asia, with the beginning of the transit visible from North America and the end visible from Europe [link to en.wikipedia.org] ------------------------------------------------------- Here is the *predicted* timing of the transit: The 2012 Transit of Venus occurs on 5-6 June, with the whole event lasting slightly under seven hours. The transit starts at 23:04 [link to www.ras.org.uk] ------------------------------------------------------- While 1 hour and 5 minutes off may seem a trifling error to mention ,it is quite significant ... Kepler's laws and Gregorian timekeeping were used to make the erroneous 23:04 prediction and though Kepler's equations are likely very accurate the method of timekeeping used obviously is not. Full quote here: Thread: The forthcoming ELE asteroid - the FACTS.. please read (Page 30) Oooops. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Extremly [sic]competent by falsely claiming parallax is not involved when watching the Venus transit! Quoting: Hydra Nope, never said that, I said it could not possibly account for five minutes of observational deviation. Nope, you said that: ... Given the distances involved, parallax is a non issue, from any point on the planet where it is visible the transit should begin at nearly precisely the same instant. ... Quoting: Anon. Astro. 1301472 Full quote here: Thread: The forthcoming ELE asteroid - the FACTS.. please read (Page 30) Oooops. But the best: Later the Incredible Dim Astrophysicist made the parallax calculation himself: I will do the trig and see for my own satisfaction what result I come up with. Quoting: Anon. Astro. 1375231 ... so maximum deviation in time of transit from the earths surface facing the Sun and the transit at any given moment = 720 minutes X .o199 degrees , or 14 minutes, a very surprising result I must concede, and does equal precisely the + or - 7 minutes derived from the standard methods you posted references to. I must admit I am very surprised given the result, intuitively it does not seem possible given the large distance between Earth and Venus and the relatively small diameter of the Earth. Full quote here: Thread: The forthcoming ELE asteroid - the FACTS.. please read (Page 34) Oooops. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It is moving in different manner than ever observed before, AS EVIDENCED BY YOUR SIG We are all still waiting for your explanation, why GoTo telescopes can go to and track the moon, when it's "moving in a different manner than ever observed before". And don't come up with the update bullshit - the Meade ETX70 for sale since 1993 came with the AutoStar #494. No way to update the #494 because the memory chip is to small. Every attempt to update the #494 will result in the complete loss of the handbox. . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 41119791 United States 06/04/2013 11:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Is it a coup to restore the Constitution? Some of you fucks had better hope not. You're guilty of treason as far as I am concerned, materially aiding the enemy. I am for weeding you out and putting you on trial. I have collected 13 years of evidence of your subversive activities.. |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 41119791 United States 06/04/2013 11:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 41119791 United States 06/04/2013 11:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And in other news today, the military has unilaterally announced that they intend to actively suppress any uprising on American soil, independent of the Commander in chief and the joints chiefs of staff. They could call the subversion of the political process in Astonishing an 'uprising' of Zionist dual citizen criminals, couldn't they? Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41119791 Is it a coup to restore the Constitution? Some of you fucks had better hope not. You're guilty of treason as far as I am concerned, materially aiding the enemy. I am for weeding you out and putting you on trial. I have collected 13 years of evidence of your subversive activities.. Why was Washington changes to Astonishing? Auto spell check correction I recon? How did it get to Astonishing from Washington though? |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 41119791 United States 06/04/2013 11:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Your sig says it all fucktard, it clearly shows an annular eclipse where the moon obscures less than 85% of the solar disk, which is well outside anything every observed before.ANYONE can comp and past the image to an art page and do the measurement manually. As for Dr.Asstroller's faked image that supposedly appeared in an ancient magazine, the moon measures 78% the diameter of the Sun clearly proving it was fabricated purposely for the agenda of deception. The dumb fucker wanted the difference in size to be obvious so he just exaggerated it. What a buffoon. It is no wonder he is laughed off the stage and television. I wonder did he edit his posts? Well, no matter, he's wasting his time. |
Hydra User ID: 41081167 Germany 06/04/2013 11:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Since you irgnored it: Let's bump AA/IDWs LIES and FAILS again: Dear Incredible Dim Astrophysicist Quoting: Hydra in the meantime you should have learned, that I hold records of your post and provide the corresponding links. Either your long-term memory has a dysfunction or you are extremely dumb. Extremly[sic] competent by falsely claiming annular solar eclipses are something new! Quoting: Hydra I made no such statement, I said annular eclipses are rare and never have a lunar disk diameter less than 90% of the Suns, as measurable in your sig and Astrolls FAKED images. In his anyone can measure it themselves Really? ASSHOLE,There is NO NORMAL SOLAR ECLIPSE where the entire disk of the moon passes in front of the Sun, and that much of the Sun is left visible, PERIOD. It is simply not possible given the orbital distance variations of the Earth around the Sun and the moon around the Earth. The photos you proudly display prove you're dumb asshole Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1485181 Oooops. Btw: Even the small picture in my signature shows a magnitude of 0.914 - the original photos show 0.9190 (predicted: 0.9190). And again for educational purpose (perhaps you should write it down somewhere, so you don't always make the same mistakes): The minimum magnitude if an annular solar eclipse is 0.9001, what means that the diameter of the moons disc is 90.01 percent of the diameter of the suns disk. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proving proof is the Incredible Dim Astrophysicist himself: Here is the actual timing of the transit of Venus, as observed: Quoting: Anon. Astro. 1301472 5–6 June 2012 22:09 -start 5 June 01:29 -Mid 6 June 04:49 -end 6 June Visible in its entirety from Hawaii, Alaska, Australia, New Zealand, the Pacific and Eastern Asia, with the beginning of the transit visible from North America and the end visible from Europe [link to en.wikipedia.org] ------------------------------------------------------- Here is the *predicted* timing of the transit: The 2012 Transit of Venus occurs on 5-6 June, with the whole event lasting slightly under seven hours. The transit starts at 23:04 [link to www.ras.org.uk] ------------------------------------------------------- While 1 hour and 5 minutes off may seem a trifling error to mention ,it is quite significant ... Kepler's laws and Gregorian timekeeping were used to make the erroneous 23:04 prediction and though Kepler's equations are likely very accurate the method of timekeeping used obviously is not. Full quote here: Thread: The forthcoming ELE asteroid - the FACTS.. please read (Page 30) Oooops. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Extremly [sic]competent by falsely claiming parallax is not involved when watching the Venus transit! Quoting: Hydra Nope, never said that, I said it could not possibly account for five minutes of observational deviation. Nope, you said that: ... Given the distances involved, parallax is a non issue, from any point on the planet where it is visible the transit should begin at nearly precisely the same instant. ... Quoting: Anon. Astro. 1301472 Full quote here: Thread: The forthcoming ELE asteroid - the FACTS.. please read (Page 30) Oooops. But the best: Later the Incredible Dim Astrophysicist made the parallax calculation himself: I will do the trig and see for my own satisfaction what result I come up with. Quoting: Anon. Astro. 1375231 ... so maximum deviation in time of transit from the earths surface facing the Sun and the transit at any given moment = 720 minutes X .o199 degrees , or 14 minutes, a very surprising result I must concede, and does equal precisely the + or - 7 minutes derived from the standard methods you posted references to. I must admit I am very surprised given the result, intuitively it does not seem possible given the large distance between Earth and Venus and the relatively small diameter of the Earth. Full quote here: Thread: The forthcoming ELE asteroid - the FACTS.. please read (Page 34) Oooops. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It is moving in different manner than ever observed before, AS EVIDENCED BY YOUR SIG We are all still waiting for your explanation, why GoTo telescopes can go to and track the moon, when it's "moving in a different manner than ever observed before". And don't come up with the update bullshit - the Meade ETX70 for sale since 1993 came with the AutoStar #494. No way to update the #494 because the memory chip is to small. Every attempt to update the #494 will result in the complete loss of the handbox. . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
74444 User ID: 74444 United States 06/04/2013 12:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Since you irgnored it: Let's bump AA/IDWs LIES and FAILS again: Quoting: Hydra Dear Incredible Dim Astrophysicist Quoting: Hydra in the meantime you should have learned, that I hold records of your post and provide the corresponding links. Either your long-term memory has a dysfunction or you are extremely dumb. Extremly[sic] competent by falsely claiming annular solar eclipses are something new! Quoting: Hydra I made no such statement, I said annular eclipses are rare and never have a lunar disk diameter less than 90% of the Suns, as measurable in your sig and Astrolls FAKED images. In his anyone can measure it themselves Really? ASSHOLE,There is NO NORMAL SOLAR ECLIPSE where the entire disk of the moon passes in front of the Sun, and that much of the Sun is left visible, PERIOD. It is simply not possible given the orbital distance variations of the Earth around the Sun and the moon around the Earth. The photos you proudly display prove you're dumb asshole Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 1485181 Oooops. Btw: Even the small picture in my signature shows a magnitude of 0.914 - the original photos show 0.9190 (predicted: 0.9190). And again for educational purpose (perhaps you should write it down somewhere, so you don't always make the same mistakes): The minimum magnitude if an annular solar eclipse is 0.9001, what means that the diameter of the moons disc is 90.01 percent of the diameter of the suns disk. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proving proof is the Incredible Dim Astrophysicist himself: Here is the actual timing of the transit of Venus, as observed: Quoting: Anon. Astro. 1301472 5–6 June 2012 22:09 -start 5 June 01:29 -Mid 6 June 04:49 -end 6 June Visible in its entirety from Hawaii, Alaska, Australia, New Zealand, the Pacific and Eastern Asia, with the beginning of the transit visible from North America and the end visible from Europe [link to en.wikipedia.org] ------------------------------------------------------- Here is the *predicted* timing of the transit: The 2012 Transit of Venus occurs on 5-6 June, with the whole event lasting slightly under seven hours. The transit starts at 23:04 [link to www.ras.org.uk] ------------------------------------------------------- While 1 hour and 5 minutes off may seem a trifling error to mention ,it is quite significant ... Kepler's laws and Gregorian timekeeping were used to make the erroneous 23:04 prediction and though Kepler's equations are likely very accurate the method of timekeeping used obviously is not. Full quote here: Thread: The forthcoming ELE asteroid - the FACTS.. please read (Page 30) Oooops. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Extremly [sic]competent by falsely claiming parallax is not involved when watching the Venus transit! Quoting: Hydra Nope, never said that, I said it could not possibly account for five minutes of observational deviation. Nope, you said that: ... Given the distances involved, parallax is a non issue, from any point on the planet where it is visible the transit should begin at nearly precisely the same instant. ... Quoting: Anon. Astro. 1301472 Full quote here: Thread: The forthcoming ELE asteroid - the FACTS.. please read (Page 30) Oooops. But the best: Later the Incredible Dim Astrophysicist made the parallax calculation himself: I will do the trig and see for my own satisfaction what result I come up with. Quoting: Anon. Astro. 1375231 ... so maximum deviation in time of transit from the earths surface facing the Sun and the transit at any given moment = 720 minutes X .o199 degrees , or 14 minutes, a very surprising result I must concede, and does equal precisely the + or - 7 minutes derived from the standard methods you posted references to. I must admit I am very surprised given the result, intuitively it does not seem possible given the large distance between Earth and Venus and the relatively small diameter of the Earth. Full quote here: Thread: The forthcoming ELE asteroid - the FACTS.. please read (Page 34) Oooops. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It is moving in different manner than ever observed before, AS EVIDENCED BY YOUR SIG We are all still waiting for your explanation, why GoTo telescopes can go to and track the moon, when it's "moving in a different manner than ever observed before". And don't come up with the update bullshit - the Meade ETX70 for sale since 1993 came with the AutoStar #494. No way to update the #494 because the memory chip is to small. Every attempt to update the #494 will result in the complete loss of the handbox. . What I think is most amusing about your post, Hydra, is that I am convinced IDW/A.A *doesn't understand it.* He doesn't realize how you are *completely* undermining his ideas from go, and doesn't understand how the questions/observations blow his claims to smithereens. Here's another he won't understand: IDW/A.A, plot Mercury's orbit using only the physics that you approve of. Don't forget to show all your math. There's a good fellow, again. I expect he will never address this, and expect he doesn't understand why. Last Edited by 74444 on 06/04/2013 12:32 PM |
74444 User ID: 74444 United States 06/04/2013 12:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And in other news today, the military has unilaterally announced that they intend to actively suppress any uprising on American soil, independent of the Commander in chief and the joints chiefs of staff. They could call the subversion of the political process in Astonishing an 'uprising' of Zionist dual citizen criminals, couldn't they? Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41119791 Is it a coup to restore the Constitution? Some of you fucks had better hope not. You're guilty of treason as far as I am concerned, materially aiding the enemy. I am for weeding you out and putting you on trial. I have collected 13 years of evidence of your subversive activities.. Sigh. Of *course* you have. |
74444 User ID: 74444 United States 06/04/2013 12:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | IDW/A.A, there are three claims you have made in the recent past that need supporting evidence. - How often do sunspots appear 'near the exact center' over, say, a decade? And cite your sources, please. You have thus far FAILED to address this. - "The thread title has been proved to be correct beyond doubt, even admitted to by the ones involved." When and how was this supposedly admitted? Cite your source, please. You have thus far FAILED to address this. - What is your evidence that 'cosmic ray particles' have *exceeded* light speed? Citations please -- and, if possible, to sources other than yourself. You have thus far FAILED to address this. You demand citations, but won't give them yourself? Why is that? Your lack of answers seems to belie your claims. Surprising? Not so much. |
74444 User ID: 74444 United States 06/04/2013 12:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Little Baby Jesus User ID: 36900483 United States 06/04/2013 04:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's another to add to the list (we all know how much you like Lists!) above: Quoting: 74444 IDW/A.A, how many times has your ID# changed since the day this thread was created? A rough answer will do. Not happening(as you well know) due to AA/IDW being mathematically 'challenged.' BKK ----------------------- "A God of the Gaps is assigned responsibility for what we do not yet understand." Carl Sagan |
A. Einstein User ID: 8620349 United States 06/04/2013 05:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Talk about a shillstorm of shit! Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41056508 Hey people, thanks for the credibility it automatically entails to be heckled by this crowd! Nuff said for the time being. translation: <==AA They're not any more. What we have observed in the past month is what I fully expected, the beginning of the solar maximum. Like the calm before the storm, the complete inactivity of the Sun, the failure to produce any sunspots and the Quadra pole magnetic field forming were a sign things were about to get ugly. As this month ends and the June begins expect to see sunspots becoming active while visible on the eastern limb (right side of image) gradually coming to center around the end of June. This much is a virtual certainty. yup it's the right side of the image alright. IF YOU ARE LOOKING AT THE SUN FROM BEHIND. what a dumbass! ... Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 40437605 They're not any more. What we have observed in the past month is what I fully expected, the beginning of the solar maximum. Like the calm before the storm, the complete inactivity of the Sun, the failure to produce any sunspots and the Quadra pole magnetic field forming were a sign things were about to get ugly. As this month ends and the June begins expect to see sunspots becoming active while visible on the western limb (right side of image) gradually coming to center around the end of June. This much is a virtual certainty. Edited error and you STILL got it wrong! lol sunspots start rotating to earthfacing from the EASTERN LIMB on the LEFT side of the images. ... Quoting: rtsredux 8620349 and you STILL got it wrong! lol sunspots start rotating to earthfacing from the EASTERN LIMB on the LEFT side of the images. Yeah , but I wasn't referring to rotation of the Sun fucktardo, I was referring to where the sunspots would be active. You are too simple minded or brain damaged to do what you're trying to do. I think it's a good helpin' of both. b.s. you have made the exact same mistake in the past and still haven't figured it out. the person asking that question wasn't referring to how active the sunspots are when they are on the farside. dumbass |
rtsredux User ID: 8620349 United States 06/04/2013 05:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Berg: "Um, Stein, these energy levels of cosmic radiation coupled with their mass indicate matter is traveling in excess of the speed of light. What do we do? Re write all of jewish physics and expose ourselves as idiots? Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41056508 Stein:" No, why don't we just call up the publishers and make sure they call cosmic particle radiation 'rays' in all the textbooks, that way the dumbed down animals will never notice. Sigh. So, by this conspiracy play above you just concocted out of thin air, you are admitting that you CANNOT cite a source nor experiment proving your rays-faster-than-light claim. Shocking. He never bumped my post re: his claim that the Sun does not emit cosmic radiation so I'm guessing he still believes that too? and the really funny thing is that he believes in cosmic radiation AT ALL, since it's discoverer had to flee his hero Hitler and move to the U.S.! you seem kind of obsessed dipshit. [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] soo..does that mean that you don't believe in cosmic radiation? dumbass |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 41154722 United States 06/05/2013 12:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What I think is most amusing about your post, Hydra, is that I am convinced IDW/A.A *doesn't understand it. Quoting: 74444 You don't understand it you dumb fucker,and you are so busy sucking this assholes ass that it is sickening. He never addresses the core issue, he obfuscates, just like you do. The image he posts at the bottom of every post displays a moon during an annular eclipse with the diameter of the moon easily discernible to be well outside the known normal range of annular eclipses of @ 90%. Asstrollers faked image shows a lunar diameter of 78% that of the Sun. ANSWER TO THIS, do not obfuscate. Do the measurements yourself! |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 41154722 United States 06/05/2013 12:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Question: This thread has only shills and 1 person pretending to be in agreement with me posting occasionally. Comparing this to the first 100 pages of the thread, it becomes obvious what has happened. What makes it totally transparent is that when I have attempted to post to this thread using any other computer besides this one with this ISP, I am auto banned. C'mon guys, who do you think you're fooling, ME? NOT POSSIBLE.Not with your IQ's I am wondering do your retards realize I am collecting evidence? I'm not here for any other purpose at this point. Some of you are the enemies of humanity and your activities here in suppressing this problem we as a race face goes well beyond criminal. You're under the delusion that what you represent will remain in power and the cash will just keep flowing. DUMB FUCKERS. |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 41154722 United States 06/05/2013 12:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Berg: "Um, Stein, these energy levels of cosmic radiation coupled with their mass indicate matter is traveling in excess of the speed of light. What do we do? Re write all of jewish physics and expose ourselves as idiots? Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41056508 Stein:" No, why don't we just call up the publishers and make sure they call cosmic particle radiation 'rays' in all the textbooks, that way the dumbed down animals will never notice. you seem kind of obsessed dipshit. [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] Says the person who shows a clear obsession with myself! Get off, and see just how obsessed I am with YOU. I wouldn't give you a seconds notice, this way you get the attention of your obsession just like agent 74444, who I think wants to blow me.. No, I don't think that jews should be able to take a fathers children simply because he agrees with Adolph Hitler's ideology, and that's what happened here. In this country people are supposed to be able to believe in whatever they want to, whether jews like it or not. And we all know what happens to children placed in the care of the state. Suicide, sex abuse, drug and achohol abuse,puppy farms, stats show that nearly all are ruined for life. Now whose agenda is that for the children of the gentiles? |