WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

it's june 13

I think it is relevant to mention considering the thread subject that the original premise has been proved beyond not just a reasonable doubt, but beyond ALL doubt, that is solar data is in fact being censored and fabricated. The evidence is so incontrovertible and so abundant that denying it marks one as a liar at this point.

When I first started monitoring internet based solar and space weather data 13 years ago, we had a real time feed refreshed every minute with some data and every 5 minutes wit most, and there was no censorship. Since WE paid for the equipment that is acquiring this data, WE are entitled to it in an uncensored and as near real time format as possible.
Aren't we?.how can we do independent studies without this capability?
?


_____________________________________________________________​_





here is a short list of correct predictions made years in advance of their occurrence by myself . I am only listing the most important and then only a few of them

1)holes or voids in the magnetosphere would be discovered

2) global warming would eventually be properly linked to solar changes and human caused global warming exposed as a fraud

3) A mass extinction event would commence

4)The purpose of 'chemtrails" would finally be firmly established as a geo engineering project to mitigate global warming

5) the effects of solar radiation storms would be magnified by the presence of an increasing density of non solar wind related plasma.

6)the magnetic field of Earth would become increasingly unstable and unpredictable

7) the magnetosphere would be discovered to be powered by the solar wind

8) It would be acknowledged that electrical currents are transmitted through space by magnetic fields

9) the effects of global warming would occur far faster than predicted by lamestream science

10) The Earth would be found to be heating internally causing a radical increase in geological instability and severe earthquakes.

11) [geological activity would be linked to solar radiation storms]

12)the heliosphere would continue to shrink despite the onset of a solar maximum

13) General relativity and special relativity would be disproved by empirical observation

14) Phil Plait would be laughed off the air (just thought I'd add that for a kick in the nuts)

15) Magnetic impulses would be discover to be instantaneous across any distance

16) Gamma ray bursts would increase in duration an intensity as the solar syatem neared the galactic plane

17) The solar maximum would be delayed

18) unprecedented weather systems never before seen would begin to develop

19) Ocean currents would be disrupted far faster than predicted by the mainstream scientists

20) humans would experience mental and physical problems that were previously unobserved at the rate they are currently occurring due to the effects of radiation on the brain and body.

21) lamestream physics would make no real advancement despite the input of many billions of dollars into research. No consensus on results would be reached

22)Increase in objects entering the Earths atmosphere

23) strange unexplained events would occur at an exponentially increasing rate (such as the sounds people are reporting worldwide)

24) I would be set up and falsely persecuted, and finally exonerated

25) My critics would continue to engage me despite their insistence that there is no point in doing so

26) MY critics would be found to be all working together, that is I have no legitimate critics or hecklers relying on honest debate tactics and real information. ( this is not to say I do not have skeptics who honestly question my conclusions, only that the entourage of unintelligent and uneducated disinformation operatives who engage me on a day to day basis are not honest nor do they believe what they are saying)

27) A general consensus amongst mainstream scientists would be reached that the human race and the Earth itself is on the verge of a catastrophic event that will effect every living thing on the planet, and it would be veiled from the public eye

This is a very short list of correct predictions. You can argue about their origin or claim I didn't make them all you like, or you can even deny they're correct (please do!), but one thing you CANNOT do is change any of it.


-------------------------------------------------------------​--



I have used this comment many times before because I find it to be so revealing and so undeniable that it really puts the jew science shills in a tizzy.

When I was a junior in high school I made a striking discovery. It seemed that students were being tested for who was really awake and who just committed what they were taught without questioning it, and when such an individual who thought independently and was awake was discovered, he (or in rare cases she) was singled out by jewish "teachers" for all sorts of "special treatment".

They were there to poison the futures of the 'gentiles' who showed promise.

As an example, I had a question that no one as yet been able to answer yet, and to my knowledge no one has ever attempted to answer it. When balancing equations in chemistry, electromagnetic energy released during an exothermic reaction was clearly defined and labeled in the equation as electrons, and by analyzing the sructure of the compounds and the various bonds being formed and accounting for all of the electrons in the balancing process,, it was easy to see there were extra electrons, and were they came from.

SO I asked the chemistry teacher why we were taught one thing in Chemistry and then next period in Physics we were taught another, that is that electromagnetic energy was composed of photons.. I asked how could both be correct.

he said, and I quote verbatim "because Einstein wasn't a chemist". The guy"s name was Leedom, and he was one of the best teachers I ever had in public school, because he clearly did not resent potential beyond his own as most teachers and professors do. and e recognized and admitted tat what was in the text books was not the law of God.

I knew at that point that there was a fundamental problem with quantum physics as it was being taught, that it did not logically correlate with other subjects nor scientific empiricism.

It seemed to me that it was exactly as the real father of physics Nicola Tesla claimed, a complex mathematical fiction fabricated by an idiot savant given cookies to create formulas that made no real sense.

[EVERY TIME YOU POST NONSENSE DISTRACTIONS AND ShUCK AND JIVE SPIN TO ThIS ThREAD I AM SIMPLY GOING TO REPOST ThE ABOVE MATERIAL AND SCROLL YOU OFF ThE PAGE.

I am certain you've probably been taught Hubble's law and wondered how and why I could conclude what I did in my previous posts concerning the expanding universe .
Hubble's law states that the farther away a galaxy is the faster it is moving away from us and this is confirmed by the doppler shift of the frequency of light they emit.

It is important to understand that like the Earth was once thought to be flat and the Earth at the center of the universe, science is continuously evolving and what at one time was accepted as fact is now known to be ridiculous, This pattern will continue, It is the nature of the evolution of scientific understanding. The PROBLEM with Hubble's conclusion is there might not actually be any real increase in the Doppler shift with distance at all.

There is no real evidence any REAL Doppler shift is actually occurring that cannot be explained by the rotation of the galaxies and astronomers admit that distant galaxies in some instances appear to be getting closer.This is why the expanding universe theory is just that!

>>What is more likely true is that the farther away a galaxy is, the more red biased the light it APPEARS to emit, because more of the higher frequencies are being absorbed by matter in intergalactic space than the lower ones.<<<

We see this same effect with our own Sun and the Earth's atmosphere. The sun morphs from orange at sunrise to yellow at an hour after sunrise to a brilliant silver white at midday. This is because of the angle of incidence with the atmosphere of sunlight is changing as the day progresses and the fact that the light must penetrate more of the atmosphere in the early morning and late evening hours. The Sun doesn't change colors at all obviously, but it appears to and this APPEARS to be a frequency shift in the visible light spectrum emitted by the Sun over the course of day, but of course in reality it's not..Again, the apparent decrease in average frequency of light that SEEMS to indicate the farther away a galaxy is the faster it is moving away is more likely the result of the absorption of higher frequencies of light by matter in intergalactic space.

I think it is relevant to mention considering the thread subject that the original premise has been proved beyond not just a reasonable doubt, but beyond ALL doubt, that is solar data is in fact being censored and fabricated. The evidence is so incontrovertible and so abundant that denying it marks one as a liar at this point.

When I first started monitoring internet based solar and space weather data 13 years ago, we had a real time feed refreshed every minute with some data and every 5 minutes wit most, and there was no censorship. Since WE paid for the equipment that is acquiring this data, WE are entitled to it in an uncensored and as near real time format as possible.
Aren't we?.how can we do independent studies without this capability?
?


_____________________________________________________________​_





here is a short list of correct predictions made years in advance of their occurrence by myself . I am only listing the most important and then only a few of them

1)holes or voids in the magnetosphere would be discovered

2) global warming would eventually be properly linked to solar changes and human caused global warming exposed as a fraud

3) A mass extinction event would commence

4)The purpose of 'chemtrails" would finally be firmly established as a geo engineering project to mitigate global warming

5) the effects of solar radiation storms would be magnified by the presence of an increasing density of non solar wind related plasma.

6)the magnetic field of Earth would become increasingly unstable and unpredictable

7) the magnetosphere would be discovered to be powered by the solar wind

8) It would be acknowledged that electrical currents are transmitted through space by magnetic fields

9) the effects of global warming would occur far faster than predicted by lamestream science

10) The Earth would be found to be heating internally causing a radical increase in geological instability and severe earthquakes.

11) [geological activity would be linked to solar radiation storms]

12)the heliosphere would continue to shrink despite the onset of a solar maximum

13) General relativity and special relativity would be disproved by empirical observation

14) Phil Plait would be laughed off the air (just thought I'd add that for a kick in the nuts)

15) Magnetic impulses would be discover to be instantaneous across any distance

16) Gamma ray bursts would increase in duration an intensity as the solar syatem neared the galactic plane

17) The solar maximum would be delayed

18) unprecedented weather systems never before seen would begin to develop

19) Ocean currents would be disrupted far faster than predicted by the mainstream scientists

20) humans would experience mental and physical problems that were previously unobserved at the rate they are currently occurring due to the effects of radiation on the brain and body.

21) lamestream physics would make no real advancement despite the input of many billions of dollars into research. No consensus on results would be reached

22)Increase in objects entering the Earths atmosphere

23) strange unexplained events would occur at an exponentially increasing rate (such as the sounds people are reporting worldwide)

24) I would be set up and falsely persecuted, and finally exonerated

25) My critics would continue to engage me despite their insistence that there is no point in doing so

26) MY critics would be found to be all working together, that is I have no legitimate critics or hecklers relying on honest debate tactics and real information. ( this is not to say I do not have skeptics who honestly question my conclusions, only that the entourage of unintelligent and uneducated disinformation operatives who engage me on a day to day basis are not honest nor do they believe what they are saying)

27) A general consensus amongst mainstream scientists would be reached that the human race and the Earth itself is on the verge of a catastrophic event that will effect every living thing on the planet, and it would be veiled from the public eye

This is a very short list of correct predictions. You can argue about their origin or claim I didn't make them all you like, or you can even deny they're correct (please do!), but one thing you CANNOT do is change any of it.


-------------------------------------------------------------​--



I have used this comment many times before because I find it to be so revealing and so undeniable that it really puts the jew science shills in a tizzy.

When I was a junior in high school I made a striking discovery. It seemed that students were being tested for who was really awake and who just committed what they were taught without questioning it, and when such an individual who thought independently and was awake was discovered, he (or in rare cases she) was singled out by jewish "teachers" for all sorts of "special treatment".

They were there to poison the futures of the 'gentiles' who showed promise.

As an example, I had a question that no one as yet been able to answer yet, and to my knowledge no one has ever attempted to answer it. When balancing equations in chemistry, electromagnetic energy released during an exothermic reaction was clearly defined and labeled in the equation as electrons, and by analyzing the sructure of the compounds and the various bonds being formed and accounting for all of the electrons in the balancing process,, it was easy to see there were extra electrons, and were they came from.

SO I asked the chemistry teacher why we were taught one thing in Chemistry and then next period in Physics we were taught another, that is that electromagnetic energy was composed of photons.. I asked how could both be correct.

he said, and I quote verbatim "because Einstein wasn't a chemist". The guy"s name was Leedom, and he was one of the best teachers I ever had in public school, because he clearly did not resent potential beyond his own as most teachers and professors do. and e recognized and admitted tat what was in the text books was not the law of God.

I knew at that point that there was a fundamental problem with quantum physics as it was being taught, that it did not logically correlate with other subjects nor scientific empiricism.

It seemed to me that it was exactly as the real father of physics Nicola Tesla claimed, a complex mathematical fiction fabricated by an idiot savant given cookies to create formulas that made no real sense.

[EVERY TIME YOU POST NONSENSE DISTRACTIONS AND ShUCK AND JIVE SPIN TO ThIS ThREAD I AM SIMPLY GOING TO REPOST ThE ABOVE MATERIAL AND SCROLL YOU OFF ThE PAGE.

yeppers

If it is drivel, you should have no problem *addressing the points.* Again, the fact that you cannot speaks quite loudly to the contrary, thank you.

You are spamming your own thread. You've, as usual, no one to blame but yourself. But it's *damn* funny.

Well, then, you *did* make predictions regarding June 22nd after all. You should keep better track of your own predictions, and be honest when you flub them.

For example, you never did answer my question about how often geo-effective sunspots occur over, say, the last decade, nor give any supporting evidence about them. Shocking, I know.

Uh huh.




I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.




You can, of course, cite evidence for this. Where has this been exposed?





Ah, yes. Your claim that we've lost 67,000 species in the last year, and your inability to name any of them.





I admit I know little about the chemtrail debate, but given your track record on so many other subjects, I will remain doubtful of your position.




You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof.




You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.




Has this been discovered? You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.





Um... it's been called the electromagnetic force for quite some time.




You very well may have correctly predicted that Global Warming would occur faster than expected -- while citing no sources and giving no way to test your theory. That certainly sounds like something you'd do. So I'll give you that one. Stopped clock, twice daily.




You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. Also I have yet to see any data pointing toward your claimed radical increase -- indeed, in the one link you have made prior in attempting to support your claim, the link itself said the rate of severe earthquakes has remained roughly static.





You can, of course, cite evidence for this claimed link of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof.




You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.





You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Where was this disproved? What was the experiment that did it? Why are relativistic formula still used today, including on things as mundane as the GPS system? What about Gravity B, and other experiments still proving the weirder predictions of relativity?





Alas, I cannot help but notice that he still seems to find a lot more airtime than you do. Must be a kick in the ass that he is so much better known (see how pointless those quips are?) and respected.




You can, of course, cite evidence for this. Where has this been discovered? What was the experiment confirming this remarkable finding?




You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.




I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.

Oh, and why were there two #16s?



To what weather systems are you referring? Be specific. Also, mainstream science has been predicting such weather "worsening" for decades.




You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.




You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof.




Sure. Quantum Hall effect, cosmic inflation, Bose–Einstein condensate found by Wolfgang Ketterle, the Top quark found, the accelerating expansion of universe found, Slow light experimentally demonstrated by Lene Vestergaard Hau, the Tau neutrino found, WMAP observations of Cosmic microwave background radiation, the Higgs Boson found...

Sure has been a slow decade or two.




You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Strangely your concrete prediction confirming this idea proved to be utterly false -- leading you to not make such concrete predictions anymore. A strange choice, but given your predilections, perhaps not so strange.




I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. And you can please cite sources where such happenings are increasing 'exponentially.'




The only persecution I have seen is people disagreeing with you on a conspiracy message board (since it seems to be the only place you can air your ideas without *totally* being laughed out of the room), and making outlandish demands, such as evidence from other sources.

How *terrible.*

You'll be exonerated if 90 percent of the population is wiped out before the end of the current Solar Max. You'll forgive me for not rooting for you.




Your old double standard again. If no one criticizes your ideas, you must be right! If anyone criticizes your idea, you must be right!

The evidence, and your specific predictions failing, demonstrates you are wrong quite often. Your solution? You stop making specific predictions. The height of intellectual dishonesty.




You can, of course, cite evidence for this. Where has this been found, other than your accusations? And your accusations are not evidence.




You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Where's this consensus?




My List of your failures is *quite* a lot longer.



Because there are a bunch where this is the case...



(Just did!)



True. The only person who can correct their ideas in the light of better evidence or failed experimentation is you.

But you just don't *do* that, do you IDW/A.A?

So every time you do repost it, I suppose I should repost these innocuous questions that will show any passersby reasonableness in the face of your furious, repetitive hilarity -- and demonstrate that you cannot provide the least bit of evidence to back up your claims. And I see you corrected the #16 problem. Only took you, what, twelve reposts to actually proof your own stuff?

You are like a case of the crabs, I am not going to waste my time with you

But you are going to waste time endlessly reposting your criticisms, but not dealing with the issues with said criticisms?

Again, I am certain Newton operated *just* that way.

I should hope, had you a case of the crabs, that you would take the time to *address the actual problem.* You can't just ignore them away. You need to take very specific steps.

You can make me go away as well. You just need to take very specific steps, as I have explained to your Lord High Intelligenship a few dozen times.

According to AA/IDW the "big cleansing v2".

Seems you still missed it, Incredible Dim Astrophysicist:



This thread is closed? LOL

No, you just lost all of your former supporters, because:
* you proved, you have no clue of even basic orbital mechanics.
* you proved, you have no clue of even basic basic astronomy.
* you proved, you have no clue of even basic physics or chemistry.
* your "predictions" are either so trivial, that even a fifth grader could have made them
* or your "predictions" are so vague, that you can bend them after the facts
* or your "predictions" don't simply come true.

If you had made such groundbreaking researches and discoveries, why do you hang around in a forum in a "closed" thread? Why not make it public, puplish peer-reviewed papers?
Oh, I know: all jews, that will suppress your "truth".

But why don't you publish your "groundbreaking researches and discoveries" on an own webpage? Even dumbasses like Marshal Masters, James McCanney or Poleshit-Nancy can do it. Or are you on social welfare and can't afford the $50 or so a year?
Oh, I see: anonymity.
Anonymity on the Internet? LOL. If 'they' want to get you, it wouldn't take one hour until 'they' knock on your door.

May be your 1% or so native american blood is of interest for Americans - for the rest of the world it's just meaningless and a stupid claim.
Superiority? Yes, you are superior - in spreading bullshit and nonsense.


You are just an attention seeking whore, a very poor soul.


.

Nothing but more excuses from you I see.

And more excuses. So, basically, what you're telling others who happen to find this thread is that they should believe you simply because you said so. Yeah, how's that working out for you?

For the new page.



This thread is closed? LOL

No, you just lost all of your former supporters, because:
* you proved, you have no clue of even basic orbital mechanics.
* you proved, you have no clue of even basic basic astronomy.
* you proved, you have no clue of even basic physics or chemistry.
* your "predictions" are either so trivial, that even a fifth grader could have made them
* or your "predictions" are so vague, that you can bend them after the facts
* or your "predictions" don't simply come true.

If you had made such groundbreaking researches and discoveries, why do you hang around in a forum in a "closed" thread? Why not make it public, puplish peer-reviewed papers?
Oh, I know: all jews, that will suppress your "truth".

But why don't you publish your "groundbreaking researches and discoveries" on an own webpage? Even dumbasses like Marshal Masters, James McCanney or Poleshit-Nancy can do it. Or are you on social welfare and can't afford the $50 or so a year?
Oh, I see: anonymity.
Anonymity on the Internet? LOL. If 'they' want to get you, it wouldn't take one hour until 'they' knock on your door.

May be your 1% or so native american blood is of interest for Americans - for the rest of the world it's just meaningless and a stupid claim.
Superiority? Yes, you are superior - in spreading bullshit and nonsense.


You are just an attention seeking whore, a very poor soul.


.

Thread: Weird Manetic Filaments outbreak all over Sun, No sunspots, kaboom coming

What is your take on this AA?

Good post :) expectantly awaiting the answer.

No comment

Oooh, *surprised face*.

Posting here is carefully monitored and everyone but sills and myself is banned automatically them they attempt to post. This as been confirmed independently by criminal investigators, a state representative, and an air force officer.

It seems that I have created quite the sensation over at the BAUT and clavius forums behind the scenes as well.

There would be no need for this type of activity if there was nothing to hide, something that effects us all.

Given the level of distrust of NASA on this forum ,anywhere the people posting to this thread appear elsewhere on this forum, they are quickly beaten down and exposed.

I already told you, you're not going to get anything useful from me until everyone is allowed to participate, record the proceedings and verify were the information originated.

Wh y ask me a question if my opinion is not valued?

[link to i302.photobucket.com]

BTW, the answer to the question posed has already been given, your just too dim to see where. It is a fundamental aspect of my work , my predictions and my conclusions. The way mainstream science is running around like a chicken with it's head cut off on the current events is extremely revealing of their total ignorance and refusal to accept the electric universe.

IDIOT, you're obviously totally ignorant of the subject matter and unintelligent, I wonder , do those that pay you believe you are helping their stance?

Go post your ill conceived idiocy elsewhere, child

I didn't ask a question, merely showed my surprise when you failed to commit to an answer.

Answer or more lack of commitment?

Last Edited by Elemental on 06/13/2013 12:32 PM

I am not committed to giving my enemy information that could help it.

Make no error in judgement, you ARE the enemy, not just of me in particular, but your own children and everyone else in this world besides a select few that wish to preserve the status quo. In the future when your children ask you (if they are able) what side were you on, what are you going to tell them? The .01%, or the rest of humanity?

FOOLS

[you can always lie to them, after all, it is what you do best, but don't expect them to believe you]