Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,507 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 392,281
Pageviews Today: 566,777Threads Today: 164Posts Today: 3,407
05:39 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

 
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 41584964
United States
06/13/2013 12:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Because repeating it ad nauseum makes it true
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26076889


Repeating it has precisely the intent I said it did. Maybe if you hear the truth as many times as you hear nonsense such as hubbles Law and Einstein relativity it will finally sink in that I make a hell of a lot more sense than they do and my conclusions do not defy logic or observation.

We are told for instance the farther away a galaxy is the faster it is moving away from us and this is confirmed by the doppler shift of the frequency of light they emit. The only PROBLEM is, and it is a big one (lmao) , is that the way astronomers are concluding how far galaxies are from our own is by the red shift they exhibit! If you don't understand what I am saying you never will, There is no real evidence any red shift is actually occurring that cannot be explained by the rotation of the galaxies and astronomers admit that distant galaxies in some instances appear to be getting closer.This is why the expanding universe theory is just that! What is more likely true is that the farther away a galaxy is, the more red biased the light it APPEARS to emit, because the higher frequencies are being absorbed by matter in intergalactic space.

the bottom line? Every one of you who knows mainstream, theory believes the universe is expanding when in fact there is no real evidence that it is! This is all to promote the big bang boom theory ..Now I just stuck my finger in your pie and pulled out a plum. Deal with it. I am innovation, i do not follow, I lead. I do not believe what I am told without proof, and I deal in empiricism and logic, not speculation
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 41584964
United States
06/13/2013 12:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I think it is relevant to mention considering the thread subject that the original premise has been proved beyond not just a reasonable doubt, but beyond ALL doubt, that is solar data is in fact being censored and fabricated. The evidence is so incontrovertible and so abundant that denying it marks one as a liar at this point.

When I first started monitoring internet based solar and space weather data 13 years ago, we had a real time feed refreshed every minute with some data and every 5 minutes wit most, and there was no censorship. Since WE paid for the equipment that is acquiring this data, WE are entitled to it in an uncensored and as near real time format as possible.
Aren't we?.how can we do independent studies without this capability?
?


_____________________________________________________________​_





here is a short list of correct predictions made years in advance of their occurrence by myself . I am only listing the most important and then only a few of them

1)holes or voids in the magnetosphere would be discovered

2) global warming would eventually be properly linked to solar changes and human caused global warming exposed as a fraud

3) A mass extinction event would commence

4)The purpose of 'chemtrails" would finally be firmly established as a geo engineering project to mitigate global warming

5) the effects of solar radiation storms would be magnified by the presence of an increasing density of non solar wind related plasma.

6)the magnetic field of Earth would become increasingly unstable and unpredictable

7) the magnetosphere would be discovered to be powered by the solar wind

8) It would be acknowledged that electrical currents are transmitted through space by magnetic fields

9) the effects of global warming would occur far faster than predicted by lamestream science

10) The Earth would be found to be heating internally causing a radical increase in geological instability and severe earthquakes.

11) [geological activity would be linked to solar radiation storms]

12)the heliosphere would continue to shrink despite the onset of a solar maximum

13) General relativity and special relativity would be disproved by empirical observation

14) Phil Plait would be laughed off the air (just thought I'd add that for a kick in the nuts)

15) Magnetic impulses would be discover to be instantaneous across any distance

16) Gamma ray bursts would increase in duration an intensity as the solar syatem neared the galactic plane

17) The solar maximum would be delayed

18) unprecedented weather systems never before seen would begin to develop

19) Ocean currents would be disrupted far faster than predicted by the mainstream scientists

20) humans would experience mental and physical problems that were previously unobserved at the rate they are currently occurring due to the effects of radiation on the brain and body.

21) lamestream physics would make no real advancement despite the input of many billions of dollars into research. No consensus on results would be reached

22)Increase in objects entering the Earths atmosphere

23) strange unexplained events would occur at an exponentially increasing rate (such as the sounds people are reporting worldwide)

24) I would be set up and falsely persecuted, and finally exonerated

25) My critics would continue to engage me despite their insistence that there is no point in doing so

26) MY critics would be found to be all working together, that is I have no legitimate critics or hecklers relying on honest debate tactics and real information. ( this is not to say I do not have skeptics who honestly question my conclusions, only that the entourage of unintelligent and uneducated disinformation operatives who engage me on a day to day basis are not honest nor do they believe what they are saying)

27) A general consensus amongst mainstream scientists would be reached that the human race and the Earth itself is on the verge of a catastrophic event that will effect every living thing on the planet, and it would be veiled from the public eye

This is a very short list of correct predictions. You can argue about their origin or claim I didn't make them all you like, or you can even deny they're correct (please do!), but one thing you CANNOT do is change any of it.


-------------------------------------------------------------​--



I have used this comment many times before because I find it to be so revealing and so undeniable that it really puts the jew science shills in a tizzy.

When I was a junior in high school I made a striking discovery. It seemed that students were being tested for who was really awake and who just committed what they were taught without questioning it, and when such an individual who thought independently and was awake was discovered, he (or in rare cases she) was singled out by jewish "teachers" for all sorts of "special treatment".

They were there to poison the futures of the 'gentiles' who showed promise.

As an example, I had a question that no one as yet been able to answer yet, and to my knowledge no one has ever attempted to answer it. When balancing equations in chemistry, electromagnetic energy released during an exothermic reaction was clearly defined and labeled in the equation as electrons, and by analyzing the sructure of the compounds and the various bonds being formed and accounting for all of the electrons in the balancing process,, it was easy to see there were extra electrons, and were they came from.

SO I asked the chemistry teacher why we were taught one thing in Chemistry and then next period in Physics we were taught another, that is that electromagnetic energy was composed of photons.. I asked how could both be correct.

he said, and I quote verbatim "because Einstein wasn't a chemist". The guy"s name was Leedom, and he was one of the best teachers I ever had in public school, because he clearly did not resent potential beyond his own as most teachers and professors do. and e recognized and admitted tat what was in the text books was not the law of God.

I knew at that point that there was a fundamental problem with quantum physics as it was being taught, that it did not logically correlate with other subjects nor scientific empiricism.

It seemed to me that it was exactly as the real father of physics Nicola Tesla claimed, a complex mathematical fiction fabricated by an idiot savant given cookies to create formulas that made no real sense.

[EVERY TIME YOU POST NONSENSE DISTRACTIONS AND ShUCK AND JIVE SPIN TO ThIS ThREAD I AM SIMPLY GOING TO REPOST ThE ABOVE MATERIAL AND SCROLL YOU OFF ThE PAGE.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 41584964
United States
06/13/2013 02:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I am certain you've probably been taught Hubble's law and wondered how and why I could conclude what I did in my previous posts concerning the expanding universe .
Hubble's law states that the farther away a galaxy is the faster it is moving away from us and this is confirmed by the doppler shift of the frequency of light they emit.

It is important to understand that like the Earth was once thought to be flat and the Earth at the center of the universe, science is continuously evolving and what at one time was accepted as fact is now known to be ridiculous, This pattern will continue, It is the nature of the evolution of scientific understanding. The PROBLEM with Hubble's conclusion is there might not actually be any real increase in the Doppler shift with distance at all.

There is no real evidence any REAL Doppler shift is actually occurring that cannot be explained by the rotation of the galaxies and astronomers admit that distant galaxies in some instances appear to be getting closer.This is why the expanding universe theory is just that!

>>What is more likely true is that the farther away a galaxy is, the more red biased the light it APPEARS to emit, because more of the higher frequencies are being absorbed by matter in intergalactic space than the lower ones.<<<

We see this same effect with our own Sun and the Earth's atmosphere. The sun morphs from orange at sunrise to yellow at an hour after sunrise to a brilliant silver white at midday. This is because of the angle of incidence with the atmosphere of sunlight is changing as the day progresses and the fact that the light must penetrate more of the atmosphere in the early morning and late evening hours. The Sun doesn't change colors at all obviously, but it appears to and this APPEARS to be a frequency shift in the visible light spectrum emitted by the Sun over the course of day, but of course in reality it's not..Again, the apparent decrease in average frequency of light that SEEMS to indicate the farther away a galaxy is the faster it is moving away is more likely the result of the absorption of higher frequencies of light by matter in intergalactic space.
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
06/13/2013 02:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
here is a sort list of correct predictions made years in advance of their occurrence by myself . I am only listing the most important and then only a few of them
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Uh huh.


1)holes or voids in the magnetosphere would be discovered
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.


2) global warming would eventually be properly linked to solar changes and human caused global warming exposed as a fraud
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this. Where has this been exposed?



3) A mass extinction event would commence
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Ah, yes. Your claim that we've lost 67,000 species in the last year, and your inability to name any of them.



4)The purpose of 'chemtrails" would finally be firmly established as a geo engineering project to mitigate global warming
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


I admit I know little about the chemtrail debate, but given your track record on so many other subjects, I will remain doubtful of your position.


5) the effects of solar radiation storms would be magnified by the presence of an increasing density of non solar wind related plasma.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof.


6)the magnetic field of Earth would become increasingly unstable and unpredictable
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.


7) the magnetosphere would be discovered to be powered by the solar wind
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Has this been discovered? You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.



8) It would be acknowledged that electrical currents are transmitted through space by magnetic fields
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Um... it's been called the electromagnetic force for quite some time.


9) the effects of global warming would occur far faster than predicted by lamestream science
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You very well may have correctly predicted that Global Warming would occur faster than expected -- while citing no sources and giving no way to test your theory. That certainly sounds like something you'd do. So I'll give you that one. Stopped clock, twice daily.


10) The Earth would be found to be heating internally causing a radical increase in geological instability and severe earthquakes.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. Also I have yet to see any data pointing toward your claimed radical increase -- indeed, in the one link you have made prior in attempting to support your claim, the link itself said the rate of severe earthquakes has remained roughly static.



11) [geological activity would be linked to solar radiation storms]
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claimed link of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof.


12)the heliosphere would continue to shrink despite the onset of a solar maximum
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.



13) General relativity and special relativity would be disproved by empirical observation
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Where was this disproved? What was the experiment that did it? Why are relativistic formula still used today, including on things as mundane as the GPS system? What about Gravity B, and other experiments still proving the weirder predictions of relativity?



14) Phil Plait would be laughed off the air (just thought I'd add that for a kick in the nuts)
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Alas, I cannot help but notice that he still seems to find a lot more airtime than you do. Must be a kick in the ass that he is so much better known (see how pointless those quips are?) and respected.


15) Magnetic impulses would be discover to be instantaneous across any distance
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this. Where has this been discovered? What was the experiment confirming this remarkable finding?


16) Gamma ray bursts would increase in duration an intensity as the solar syatem neared the galactic plane
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.


16) The solar maximum would be delayed
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.

Oh, and why were there two #16s?

17) unprecedented weather systems never before seen would begin to develop
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


To what weather systems are you referring? Be specific. Also, mainstream science has been predicting such weather "worsening" for decades.


18) Ocean currents would be disrupted far faster than predicted by the mainstream scientists
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.


19) humans would experience mental and physical problems that were previously unobserved at the rate they are currently occurring due to the effects of radiation on the brain and body.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof.


20) lamestream physics would make no real advancement despite the input of many billions of dollars into research. No consensus on results would be reached
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Sure. Quantum Hall effect, cosmic inflation, Bose–Einstein condensate found by Wolfgang Ketterle, the Top quark found, the accelerating expansion of universe found, Slow light experimentally demonstrated by Lene Vestergaard Hau, the Tau neutrino found, WMAP observations of Cosmic microwave background radiation, the Higgs Boson found...

Sure has been a slow decade or two.


21)Increase in objects entering the Earths atmosphere
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Strangely your concrete prediction confirming this idea proved to be utterly false -- leading you to not make such concrete predictions anymore. A strange choice, but given your predilections, perhaps not so strange.


22) strange unexplained events would occur at an exponentially increasing rate (such as the sounds people are reporting worldwide)
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. And you can please cite sources where such happenings are increasing 'exponentially.'



23) I would be set up and falsely persecuted, and finally exonerated
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415

The only persecution I have seen is people disagreeing with you on a conspiracy message board (since it seems to be the only place you can air your ideas without *totally* being laughed out of the room), and making outlandish demands, such as evidence from other sources.

How *terrible.*

You'll be exonerated if 90 percent of the population is wiped out before the end of the current Solar Max. You'll forgive me for not rooting for you.


24) My critics would continue to engage me despite their insistence that there is no point in doing so
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Your old double standard again. If no one criticizes your ideas, you must be right! If anyone criticizes your idea, you must be right!

The evidence, and your specific predictions failing, demonstrates you are wrong quite often. Your solution? You stop making specific predictions. The height of intellectual dishonesty.


25) MY critics would be found to be all working together, that is I have no legitimate critics or hecklers relying on honest debate tactics and real information. ( this is not to say I do not have skeptics who honestly question my conclusions, only that the entourage of unintelligent and uneducated disinformation operatives who engage me on a day to day basis are not honest nor do they believe what they are saying)
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this. Where has this been found, other than your accusations? And your accusations are not evidence.


26) A general consensus amongst mainstream scientists would be reached that the human race and the Earth itself is on the verge of a catastrophic event that will effect every living thing on the planet, and it would be veiled from the public eye
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Where's this consensus?


This is a very sort list of correct predictions.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


My List of your failures is *quite* a lot longer.

You can argue about their origin or claim I didn't make them all you like
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Because there are a bunch where this is the case...

or you can even deny they're correct (please do!)
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


(Just did!)

but one thing you CANNOT do is change any of it.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


True. The only person who can correct their ideas in the light of better evidence or failed experimentation is you.

But you just don't *do* that, do you IDW/A.A?

So every time you do repost it, I suppose I should repost these innocuous questions that will show any passersby reasonableness in the face of your furious, repetitive hilarity -- and demonstrate that you cannot provide the least bit of evidence to back up your claims. And I see you corrected the #16 problem. Only took you, what, twelve reposts to actually proof your own stuff?

Last Edited by 74444 on 06/13/2013 02:35 AM
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
06/13/2013 02:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
[EVERY TIME YOU POST NONSENSE DISTRACTIONS AND ShUCK AND JIVE SPIN TO ThIS ThREAD I AM SIMPLY GOING TO REPOST ThE ABOVE MATERIAL AND SCROLL YOU OFF ThE PAGE.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41584964


Of course. Because that's what *real* scientists like IDW/A.A do in the face of criticism: silence it or ignore it at any cost, rather than *addressing* it.

Newton would be proud.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 41584964
United States
06/13/2013 02:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I think it is relevant to mention considering the thread subject that the original premise has been proved beyond not just a reasonable doubt, but beyond ALL doubt, that is solar data is in fact being censored and fabricated. The evidence is so incontrovertible and so abundant that denying it marks one as a liar at this point.

When I first started monitoring internet based solar and space weather data 13 years ago, we had a real time feed refreshed every minute with some data and every 5 minutes wit most, and there was no censorship. Since WE paid for the equipment that is acquiring this data, WE are entitled to it in an uncensored and as near real time format as possible.
Aren't we?.how can we do independent studies without this capability?
?


_____________________________________________________________​_





here is a short list of correct predictions made years in advance of their occurrence by myself . I am only listing the most important and then only a few of them

1)holes or voids in the magnetosphere would be discovered

2) global warming would eventually be properly linked to solar changes and human caused global warming exposed as a fraud

3) A mass extinction event would commence

4)The purpose of 'chemtrails" would finally be firmly established as a geo engineering project to mitigate global warming

5) the effects of solar radiation storms would be magnified by the presence of an increasing density of non solar wind related plasma.

6)the magnetic field of Earth would become increasingly unstable and unpredictable

7) the magnetosphere would be discovered to be powered by the solar wind

8) It would be acknowledged that electrical currents are transmitted through space by magnetic fields

9) the effects of global warming would occur far faster than predicted by lamestream science

10) The Earth would be found to be heating internally causing a radical increase in geological instability and severe earthquakes.

11) [geological activity would be linked to solar radiation storms]

12)the heliosphere would continue to shrink despite the onset of a solar maximum

13) General relativity and special relativity would be disproved by empirical observation

14) Phil Plait would be laughed off the air (just thought I'd add that for a kick in the nuts)

15) Magnetic impulses would be discover to be instantaneous across any distance

16) Gamma ray bursts would increase in duration an intensity as the solar syatem neared the galactic plane

17) The solar maximum would be delayed

18) unprecedented weather systems never before seen would begin to develop

19) Ocean currents would be disrupted far faster than predicted by the mainstream scientists

20) humans would experience mental and physical problems that were previously unobserved at the rate they are currently occurring due to the effects of radiation on the brain and body.

21) lamestream physics would make no real advancement despite the input of many billions of dollars into research. No consensus on results would be reached

22)Increase in objects entering the Earths atmosphere

23) strange unexplained events would occur at an exponentially increasing rate (such as the sounds people are reporting worldwide)

24) I would be set up and falsely persecuted, and finally exonerated

25) My critics would continue to engage me despite their insistence that there is no point in doing so

26) MY critics would be found to be all working together, that is I have no legitimate critics or hecklers relying on honest debate tactics and real information. ( this is not to say I do not have skeptics who honestly question my conclusions, only that the entourage of unintelligent and uneducated disinformation operatives who engage me on a day to day basis are not honest nor do they believe what they are saying)

27) A general consensus amongst mainstream scientists would be reached that the human race and the Earth itself is on the verge of a catastrophic event that will effect every living thing on the planet, and it would be veiled from the public eye

This is a very short list of correct predictions. You can argue about their origin or claim I didn't make them all you like, or you can even deny they're correct (please do!), but one thing you CANNOT do is change any of it.


-------------------------------------------------------------​--



I have used this comment many times before because I find it to be so revealing and so undeniable that it really puts the jew science shills in a tizzy.

When I was a junior in high school I made a striking discovery. It seemed that students were being tested for who was really awake and who just committed what they were taught without questioning it, and when such an individual who thought independently and was awake was discovered, he (or in rare cases she) was singled out by jewish "teachers" for all sorts of "special treatment".

They were there to poison the futures of the 'gentiles' who showed promise.

As an example, I had a question that no one as yet been able to answer yet, and to my knowledge no one has ever attempted to answer it. When balancing equations in chemistry, electromagnetic energy released during an exothermic reaction was clearly defined and labeled in the equation as electrons, and by analyzing the sructure of the compounds and the various bonds being formed and accounting for all of the electrons in the balancing process,, it was easy to see there were extra electrons, and were they came from.

SO I asked the chemistry teacher why we were taught one thing in Chemistry and then next period in Physics we were taught another, that is that electromagnetic energy was composed of photons.. I asked how could both be correct.

he said, and I quote verbatim "because Einstein wasn't a chemist". The guy"s name was Leedom, and he was one of the best teachers I ever had in public school, because he clearly did not resent potential beyond his own as most teachers and professors do. and e recognized and admitted tat what was in the text books was not the law of God.

I knew at that point that there was a fundamental problem with quantum physics as it was being taught, that it did not logically correlate with other subjects nor scientific empiricism.

It seemed to me that it was exactly as the real father of physics Nicola Tesla claimed, a complex mathematical fiction fabricated by an idiot savant given cookies to create formulas that made no real sense.

[EVERY TIME YOU POST NONSENSE DISTRACTIONS AND ShUCK AND JIVE SPIN TO ThIS ThREAD I AM SIMPLY GOING TO REPOST ThE ABOVE MATERIAL AND SCROLL YOU OFF ThE PAGE.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 41584964
United States
06/13/2013 02:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I am certain you've probably been taught Hubble's law and wondered how and why I could conclude what I did in my previous posts concerning the expanding universe .
Hubble's law states that the farther away a galaxy is the faster it is moving away from us and this is confirmed by the doppler shift of the frequency of light they emit.

It is important to understand that like the Earth was once thought to be flat and the Earth at the center of the universe, science is continuously evolving and what at one time was accepted as fact is now known to be ridiculous, This pattern will continue, It is the nature of the evolution of scientific understanding. The PROBLEM with Hubble's conclusion is there might not actually be any real increase in the Doppler shift with distance at all.

There is no real evidence any REAL Doppler shift is actually occurring that cannot be explained by the rotation of the galaxies and astronomers admit that distant galaxies in some instances appear to be getting closer.This is why the expanding universe theory is just that!

>>What is more likely true is that the farther away a galaxy is, the more red biased the light it APPEARS to emit, because more of the higher frequencies are being absorbed by matter in intergalactic space than the lower ones.<<<

We see this same effect with our own Sun and the Earth's atmosphere. The sun morphs from orange at sunrise to yellow at an hour after sunrise to a brilliant silver white at midday. This is because of the angle of incidence with the atmosphere of sunlight is changing as the day progresses and the fact that the light must penetrate more of the atmosphere in the early morning and late evening hours. The Sun doesn't change colors at all obviously, but it appears to and this APPEARS to be a frequency shift in the visible light spectrum emitted by the Sun over the course of day, but of course in reality it's not..Again, the apparent decrease in average frequency of light that SEEMS to indicate the farther away a galaxy is the faster it is moving away is more likely the result of the absorption of higher frequencies of light by matter in intergalactic space.
Solar Guardian

User ID: 41619287
Malaysia
06/13/2013 02:42 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
AA, what will happen on June 22 2013?
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 41584964
United States
06/13/2013 02:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I think it is relevant to mention considering the thread subject that the original premise has been proved beyond not just a reasonable doubt, but beyond ALL doubt, that is solar data is in fact being censored and fabricated. The evidence is so incontrovertible and so abundant that denying it marks one as a liar at this point.

When I first started monitoring internet based solar and space weather data 13 years ago, we had a real time feed refreshed every minute with some data and every 5 minutes wit most, and there was no censorship. Since WE paid for the equipment that is acquiring this data, WE are entitled to it in an uncensored and as near real time format as possible.
Aren't we?.how can we do independent studies without this capability?
?


_____________________________________________________________​_





here is a short list of correct predictions made years in advance of their occurrence by myself . I am only listing the most important and then only a few of them

1)holes or voids in the magnetosphere would be discovered

2) global warming would eventually be properly linked to solar changes and human caused global warming exposed as a fraud

3) A mass extinction event would commence

4)The purpose of 'chemtrails" would finally be firmly established as a geo engineering project to mitigate global warming

5) the effects of solar radiation storms would be magnified by the presence of an increasing density of non solar wind related plasma.

6)the magnetic field of Earth would become increasingly unstable and unpredictable

7) the magnetosphere would be discovered to be powered by the solar wind

8) It would be acknowledged that electrical currents are transmitted through space by magnetic fields

9) the effects of global warming would occur far faster than predicted by lamestream science

10) The Earth would be found to be heating internally causing a radical increase in geological instability and severe earthquakes.

11) [geological activity would be linked to solar radiation storms]

12)the heliosphere would continue to shrink despite the onset of a solar maximum

13) General relativity and special relativity would be disproved by empirical observation

14) Phil Plait would be laughed off the air (just thought I'd add that for a kick in the nuts)

15) Magnetic impulses would be discover to be instantaneous across any distance

16) Gamma ray bursts would increase in duration an intensity as the solar syatem neared the galactic plane

17) The solar maximum would be delayed

18) unprecedented weather systems never before seen would begin to develop

19) Ocean currents would be disrupted far faster than predicted by the mainstream scientists

20) humans would experience mental and physical problems that were previously unobserved at the rate they are currently occurring due to the effects of radiation on the brain and body.

21) lamestream physics would make no real advancement despite the input of many billions of dollars into research. No consensus on results would be reached

22)Increase in objects entering the Earths atmosphere

23) strange unexplained events would occur at an exponentially increasing rate (such as the sounds people are reporting worldwide)

24) I would be set up and falsely persecuted, and finally exonerated

25) My critics would continue to engage me despite their insistence that there is no point in doing so

26) MY critics would be found to be all working together, that is I have no legitimate critics or hecklers relying on honest debate tactics and real information. ( this is not to say I do not have skeptics who honestly question my conclusions, only that the entourage of unintelligent and uneducated disinformation operatives who engage me on a day to day basis are not honest nor do they believe what they are saying)

27) A general consensus amongst mainstream scientists would be reached that the human race and the Earth itself is on the verge of a catastrophic event that will effect every living thing on the planet, and it would be veiled from the public eye

This is a very short list of correct predictions. You can argue about their origin or claim I didn't make them all you like, or you can even deny they're correct (please do!), but one thing you CANNOT do is change any of it.


-------------------------------------------------------------​--



I have used this comment many times before because I find it to be so revealing and so undeniable that it really puts the jew science shills in a tizzy.

When I was a junior in high school I made a striking discovery. It seemed that students were being tested for who was really awake and who just committed what they were taught without questioning it, and when such an individual who thought independently and was awake was discovered, he (or in rare cases she) was singled out by jewish "teachers" for all sorts of "special treatment".

They were there to poison the futures of the 'gentiles' who showed promise.

As an example, I had a question that no one as yet been able to answer yet, and to my knowledge no one has ever attempted to answer it. When balancing equations in chemistry, electromagnetic energy released during an exothermic reaction was clearly defined and labeled in the equation as electrons, and by analyzing the sructure of the compounds and the various bonds being formed and accounting for all of the electrons in the balancing process,, it was easy to see there were extra electrons, and were they came from.

SO I asked the chemistry teacher why we were taught one thing in Chemistry and then next period in Physics we were taught another, that is that electromagnetic energy was composed of photons.. I asked how could both be correct.

he said, and I quote verbatim "because Einstein wasn't a chemist". The guy"s name was Leedom, and he was one of the best teachers I ever had in public school, because he clearly did not resent potential beyond his own as most teachers and professors do. and e recognized and admitted tat what was in the text books was not the law of God.

I knew at that point that there was a fundamental problem with quantum physics as it was being taught, that it did not logically correlate with other subjects nor scientific empiricism.

It seemed to me that it was exactly as the real father of physics Nicola Tesla claimed, a complex mathematical fiction fabricated by an idiot savant given cookies to create formulas that made no real sense.

[EVERY TIME YOU POST NONSENSE DISTRACTIONS AND ShUCK AND JIVE SPIN TO ThIS ThREAD I AM SIMPLY GOING TO REPOST ThE ABOVE MATERIAL AND SCROLL YOU OFF ThE PAGE.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 41584964
United States
06/13/2013 02:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
AA, what will happen on June 22 2013?
 Quoting: Solar Guardian


?
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 41584964
United States
06/13/2013 02:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
The 'accelerating expanding universe; is a misinterpretation of observation caused by the influx of plasma into the solar system
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 41584964
United States
06/13/2013 02:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
[EVERY TIME YOU POST NONSENSE DISTRACTIONS AND ShUCK AND JIVE SPIN TO ThIS ThREAD I AM SIMPLY GOING TO REPOST ThE ABOVE MATERIAL AND SCROLL YOU OFF ThE PAGE.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41584964


Of course. Because that's what *real* scientists like IDW/A.A do in the face of criticism: silence it or ignore it at any cost, rather than *addressing* it.

Newton would be proud.
 Quoting: 74444


You don;t have any honest or meaningful rebuttals, and you're scientifically illiterate
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
06/13/2013 02:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
here is a sort list of correct predictions made years in advance of their occurrence by myself . I am only listing the most important and then only a few of them
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Uh huh.


1)holes or voids in the magnetosphere would be discovered
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.


2) global warming would eventually be properly linked to solar changes and human caused global warming exposed as a fraud
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this. Where has this been exposed?



3) A mass extinction event would commence
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Ah, yes. Your claim that we've lost 67,000 species in the last year, and your inability to name any of them.



4)The purpose of 'chemtrails" would finally be firmly established as a geo engineering project to mitigate global warming
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


I admit I know little about the chemtrail debate, but given your track record on so many other subjects, I will remain doubtful of your position.


5) the effects of solar radiation storms would be magnified by the presence of an increasing density of non solar wind related plasma.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof.


6)the magnetic field of Earth would become increasingly unstable and unpredictable
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.


7) the magnetosphere would be discovered to be powered by the solar wind
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Has this been discovered? You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.



8) It would be acknowledged that electrical currents are transmitted through space by magnetic fields
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Um... it's been called the electromagnetic force for quite some time.


9) the effects of global warming would occur far faster than predicted by lamestream science
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You very well may have correctly predicted that Global Warming would occur faster than expected -- while citing no sources and giving no way to test your theory. That certainly sounds like something you'd do. So I'll give you that one. Stopped clock, twice daily.


10) The Earth would be found to be heating internally causing a radical increase in geological instability and severe earthquakes.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. Also I have yet to see any data pointing toward your claimed radical increase -- indeed, in the one link you have made prior in attempting to support your claim, the link itself said the rate of severe earthquakes has remained roughly static.



11) [geological activity would be linked to solar radiation storms]
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claimed link of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof.


12)the heliosphere would continue to shrink despite the onset of a solar maximum
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.



13) General relativity and special relativity would be disproved by empirical observation
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Where was this disproved? What was the experiment that did it? Why are relativistic formula still used today, including on things as mundane as the GPS system? What about Gravity B, and other experiments still proving the weirder predictions of relativity?



14) Phil Plait would be laughed off the air (just thought I'd add that for a kick in the nuts)
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Alas, I cannot help but notice that he still seems to find a lot more airtime than you do. Must be a kick in the ass that he is so much better known (see how pointless those quips are?) and respected.


15) Magnetic impulses would be discover to be instantaneous across any distance
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this. Where has this been discovered? What was the experiment confirming this remarkable finding?


16) Gamma ray bursts would increase in duration an intensity as the solar syatem neared the galactic plane
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.


16) The solar maximum would be delayed
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.

Oh, and why were there two #16s?

17) unprecedented weather systems never before seen would begin to develop
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


To what weather systems are you referring? Be specific. Also, mainstream science has been predicting such weather "worsening" for decades.


18) Ocean currents would be disrupted far faster than predicted by the mainstream scientists
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.


19) humans would experience mental and physical problems that were previously unobserved at the rate they are currently occurring due to the effects of radiation on the brain and body.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof.


20) lamestream physics would make no real advancement despite the input of many billions of dollars into research. No consensus on results would be reached
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Sure. Quantum Hall effect, cosmic inflation, Bose–Einstein condensate found by Wolfgang Ketterle, the Top quark found, the accelerating expansion of universe found, Slow light experimentally demonstrated by Lene Vestergaard Hau, the Tau neutrino found, WMAP observations of Cosmic microwave background radiation, the Higgs Boson found...

Sure has been a slow decade or two.


21)Increase in objects entering the Earths atmosphere
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Strangely your concrete prediction confirming this idea proved to be utterly false -- leading you to not make such concrete predictions anymore. A strange choice, but given your predilections, perhaps not so strange.


22) strange unexplained events would occur at an exponentially increasing rate (such as the sounds people are reporting worldwide)
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. And you can please cite sources where such happenings are increasing 'exponentially.'



23) I would be set up and falsely persecuted, and finally exonerated
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415

The only persecution I have seen is people disagreeing with you on a conspiracy message board (since it seems to be the only place you can air your ideas without *totally* being laughed out of the room), and making outlandish demands, such as evidence from other sources.

How *terrible.*

You'll be exonerated if 90 percent of the population is wiped out before the end of the current Solar Max. You'll forgive me for not rooting for you.


24) My critics would continue to engage me despite their insistence that there is no point in doing so
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Your old double standard again. If no one criticizes your ideas, you must be right! If anyone criticizes your idea, you must be right!

The evidence, and your specific predictions failing, demonstrates you are wrong quite often. Your solution? You stop making specific predictions. The height of intellectual dishonesty.


25) MY critics would be found to be all working together, that is I have no legitimate critics or hecklers relying on honest debate tactics and real information. ( this is not to say I do not have skeptics who honestly question my conclusions, only that the entourage of unintelligent and uneducated disinformation operatives who engage me on a day to day basis are not honest nor do they believe what they are saying)
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this. Where has this been found, other than your accusations? And your accusations are not evidence.


26) A general consensus amongst mainstream scientists would be reached that the human race and the Earth itself is on the verge of a catastrophic event that will effect every living thing on the planet, and it would be veiled from the public eye
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Where's this consensus?


This is a very sort list of correct predictions.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


My List of your failures is *quite* a lot longer.

You can argue about their origin or claim I didn't make them all you like
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Because there are a bunch where this is the case...

or you can even deny they're correct (please do!)
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


(Just did!)

but one thing you CANNOT do is change any of it.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


True. The only person who can correct their ideas in the light of better evidence or failed experimentation is you.

But you just don't *do* that, do you IDW/A.A?

So every time you do repost it, I suppose I should repost these innocuous questions that will show any passersby reasonableness in the face of your furious, repetitive hilarity -- and demonstrate that you cannot provide the least bit of evidence to back up your claims. And I see you corrected the #16 problem. Only took you, what, twelve reposts to actually proof your own stuff?
Solar Guardian

User ID: 41619287
Malaysia
06/13/2013 02:48 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
AA, what will happen on June 22 2013?
 Quoting: Solar Guardian


?
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41584964


You said we will be crossing the Galactic Plane on June 22 2013, right? So, what events do you expect to happen by then. Unprecedented biggest GRB impact on Earth?

Last Edited by Solar Guardian on 06/13/2013 02:49 AM
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
06/13/2013 02:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
[EVERY TIME YOU POST NONSENSE DISTRACTIONS AND ShUCK AND JIVE SPIN TO ThIS ThREAD I AM SIMPLY GOING TO REPOST ThE ABOVE MATERIAL AND SCROLL YOU OFF ThE PAGE.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41584964


Of course. Because that's what *real* scientists like IDW/A.A do in the face of criticism: silence it or ignore it at any cost, rather than *addressing* it.

Newton would be proud.
 Quoting: 74444


You don;t have any honest or meaningful rebuttals, and you're scientifically illiterate
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41584964


Were that true, you'd be able to rebut my points line by line rather than resort to boring old ad hominems, and spamming your own thread.

The fact that you cannot speaks quite loudly to the contrary, thank you.
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
06/13/2013 02:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
As I have said before: attention span of a gypsy moth.


The fact that you are too stupid to understand what I said does not surprise me, what does surprise me is that you haven't figured out what I said yet.
Ley me make it crystal clear. as the month ends and june progresses, sunspots will become more active while further to the left on the sun as we see it in the sky. This will happen gradually, with eruptions first occurring towards the western limb and gradually occurring further and further towards the eastern limb .By june 22 , they will be most active while near the center of the suns disk left and right as seen from Earth, geo effective we call it.
 Quoting: Anon Astro 40459302
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 41584964
United States
06/13/2013 02:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Were that true, you'd be able to rebut my points line by line rather than resort to boring old ad hominems, and spamming your own thread.

The fact that you cannot speaks quite loudly to the contrary, thank you.
 Quoting: 74444


All of what you have posted is noting but drivel, you are spamming my tread with circular arguments that are intended to obfuscate and cover the truth and you have an obsession with me
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 41584964
United States
06/13/2013 02:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
As I have said before: attention span of a gypsy moth.


The fact that you are too stupid to understand what I said does not surprise me, what does surprise me is that you haven't figured out what I said yet.
Ley me make it crystal clear. as the month ends and june progresses, sunspots will become more active while further to the left on the sun as we see it in the sky. This will happen gradually, with eruptions first occurring towards the western limb and gradually occurring further and further towards the eastern limb .By june 22 , they will be most active while near the center of the suns disk left and right as seen from Earth, geo effective we call it.
 Quoting: Anon Astro 40459302

 Quoting: 74444


it's june 13
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 41584964
United States
06/13/2013 02:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I think it is relevant to mention considering the thread subject that the original premise has been proved beyond not just a reasonable doubt, but beyond ALL doubt, that is solar data is in fact being censored and fabricated. The evidence is so incontrovertible and so abundant that denying it marks one as a liar at this point.

When I first started monitoring internet based solar and space weather data 13 years ago, we had a real time feed refreshed every minute with some data and every 5 minutes wit most, and there was no censorship. Since WE paid for the equipment that is acquiring this data, WE are entitled to it in an uncensored and as near real time format as possible.
Aren't we?.how can we do independent studies without this capability?
?


_____________________________________________________________​_





here is a short list of correct predictions made years in advance of their occurrence by myself . I am only listing the most important and then only a few of them

1)holes or voids in the magnetosphere would be discovered

2) global warming would eventually be properly linked to solar changes and human caused global warming exposed as a fraud

3) A mass extinction event would commence

4)The purpose of 'chemtrails" would finally be firmly established as a geo engineering project to mitigate global warming

5) the effects of solar radiation storms would be magnified by the presence of an increasing density of non solar wind related plasma.

6)the magnetic field of Earth would become increasingly unstable and unpredictable

7) the magnetosphere would be discovered to be powered by the solar wind

8) It would be acknowledged that electrical currents are transmitted through space by magnetic fields

9) the effects of global warming would occur far faster than predicted by lamestream science

10) The Earth would be found to be heating internally causing a radical increase in geological instability and severe earthquakes.

11) [geological activity would be linked to solar radiation storms]

12)the heliosphere would continue to shrink despite the onset of a solar maximum

13) General relativity and special relativity would be disproved by empirical observation

14) Phil Plait would be laughed off the air (just thought I'd add that for a kick in the nuts)

15) Magnetic impulses would be discover to be instantaneous across any distance

16) Gamma ray bursts would increase in duration an intensity as the solar syatem neared the galactic plane

17) The solar maximum would be delayed

18) unprecedented weather systems never before seen would begin to develop

19) Ocean currents would be disrupted far faster than predicted by the mainstream scientists

20) humans would experience mental and physical problems that were previously unobserved at the rate they are currently occurring due to the effects of radiation on the brain and body.

21) lamestream physics would make no real advancement despite the input of many billions of dollars into research. No consensus on results would be reached

22)Increase in objects entering the Earths atmosphere

23) strange unexplained events would occur at an exponentially increasing rate (such as the sounds people are reporting worldwide)

24) I would be set up and falsely persecuted, and finally exonerated

25) My critics would continue to engage me despite their insistence that there is no point in doing so

26) MY critics would be found to be all working together, that is I have no legitimate critics or hecklers relying on honest debate tactics and real information. ( this is not to say I do not have skeptics who honestly question my conclusions, only that the entourage of unintelligent and uneducated disinformation operatives who engage me on a day to day basis are not honest nor do they believe what they are saying)

27) A general consensus amongst mainstream scientists would be reached that the human race and the Earth itself is on the verge of a catastrophic event that will effect every living thing on the planet, and it would be veiled from the public eye

This is a very short list of correct predictions. You can argue about their origin or claim I didn't make them all you like, or you can even deny they're correct (please do!), but one thing you CANNOT do is change any of it.


-------------------------------------------------------------​--



I have used this comment many times before because I find it to be so revealing and so undeniable that it really puts the jew science shills in a tizzy.

When I was a junior in high school I made a striking discovery. It seemed that students were being tested for who was really awake and who just committed what they were taught without questioning it, and when such an individual who thought independently and was awake was discovered, he (or in rare cases she) was singled out by jewish "teachers" for all sorts of "special treatment".

They were there to poison the futures of the 'gentiles' who showed promise.

As an example, I had a question that no one as yet been able to answer yet, and to my knowledge no one has ever attempted to answer it. When balancing equations in chemistry, electromagnetic energy released during an exothermic reaction was clearly defined and labeled in the equation as electrons, and by analyzing the sructure of the compounds and the various bonds being formed and accounting for all of the electrons in the balancing process,, it was easy to see there were extra electrons, and were they came from.

SO I asked the chemistry teacher why we were taught one thing in Chemistry and then next period in Physics we were taught another, that is that electromagnetic energy was composed of photons.. I asked how could both be correct.

he said, and I quote verbatim "because Einstein wasn't a chemist". The guy"s name was Leedom, and he was one of the best teachers I ever had in public school, because he clearly did not resent potential beyond his own as most teachers and professors do. and e recognized and admitted tat what was in the text books was not the law of God.

I knew at that point that there was a fundamental problem with quantum physics as it was being taught, that it did not logically correlate with other subjects nor scientific empiricism.

It seemed to me that it was exactly as the real father of physics Nicola Tesla claimed, a complex mathematical fiction fabricated by an idiot savant given cookies to create formulas that made no real sense.

[EVERY TIME YOU POST NONSENSE DISTRACTIONS AND ShUCK AND JIVE SPIN TO ThIS ThREAD I AM SIMPLY GOING TO REPOST ThE ABOVE MATERIAL AND SCROLL YOU OFF ThE PAGE.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 41584964
United States
06/13/2013 02:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I am certain you've probably been taught Hubble's law and wondered how and why I could conclude what I did in my previous posts concerning the expanding universe .
Hubble's law states that the farther away a galaxy is the faster it is moving away from us and this is confirmed by the doppler shift of the frequency of light they emit.

It is important to understand that like the Earth was once thought to be flat and the Earth at the center of the universe, science is continuously evolving and what at one time was accepted as fact is now known to be ridiculous, This pattern will continue, It is the nature of the evolution of scientific understanding. The PROBLEM with Hubble's conclusion is there might not actually be any real increase in the Doppler shift with distance at all.

There is no real evidence any REAL Doppler shift is actually occurring that cannot be explained by the rotation of the galaxies and astronomers admit that distant galaxies in some instances appear to be getting closer.This is why the expanding universe theory is just that!

>>What is more likely true is that the farther away a galaxy is, the more red biased the light it APPEARS to emit, because more of the higher frequencies are being absorbed by matter in intergalactic space than the lower ones.<<<

We see this same effect with our own Sun and the Earth's atmosphere. The sun morphs from orange at sunrise to yellow at an hour after sunrise to a brilliant silver white at midday. This is because of the angle of incidence with the atmosphere of sunlight is changing as the day progresses and the fact that the light must penetrate more of the atmosphere in the early morning and late evening hours. The Sun doesn't change colors at all obviously, but it appears to and this APPEARS to be a frequency shift in the visible light spectrum emitted by the Sun over the course of day, but of course in reality it's not..Again, the apparent decrease in average frequency of light that SEEMS to indicate the farther away a galaxy is the faster it is moving away is more likely the result of the absorption of higher frequencies of light by matter in intergalactic space.
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
06/13/2013 02:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
The two things I DID predict WILL happen on June 22 of this year, a nearly perfectly centered Sunspot will form that has the potentialto cause a solar radiation storm that penetrates to the surface and destroys a significant part of the atmosphere, while disabling most of our technological infrastructure. There is currently no way to accurately predict the timing of solar eruptions that is reliable, since we have entered a different area of space with far different characteristics than during the last solar maximum.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 40844066
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 41584964
United States
06/13/2013 02:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
I think it is relevant to mention considering the thread subject that the original premise has been proved beyond not just a reasonable doubt, but beyond ALL doubt, that is solar data is in fact being censored and fabricated. The evidence is so incontrovertible and so abundant that denying it marks one as a liar at this point.

When I first started monitoring internet based solar and space weather data 13 years ago, we had a real time feed refreshed every minute with some data and every 5 minutes wit most, and there was no censorship. Since WE paid for the equipment that is acquiring this data, WE are entitled to it in an uncensored and as near real time format as possible.
Aren't we?.how can we do independent studies without this capability?
?


_____________________________________________________________​_





here is a short list of correct predictions made years in advance of their occurrence by myself . I am only listing the most important and then only a few of them

1)holes or voids in the magnetosphere would be discovered

2) global warming would eventually be properly linked to solar changes and human caused global warming exposed as a fraud

3) A mass extinction event would commence

4)The purpose of 'chemtrails" would finally be firmly established as a geo engineering project to mitigate global warming

5) the effects of solar radiation storms would be magnified by the presence of an increasing density of non solar wind related plasma.

6)the magnetic field of Earth would become increasingly unstable and unpredictable

7) the magnetosphere would be discovered to be powered by the solar wind

8) It would be acknowledged that electrical currents are transmitted through space by magnetic fields

9) the effects of global warming would occur far faster than predicted by lamestream science

10) The Earth would be found to be heating internally causing a radical increase in geological instability and severe earthquakes.

11) [geological activity would be linked to solar radiation storms]

12)the heliosphere would continue to shrink despite the onset of a solar maximum

13) General relativity and special relativity would be disproved by empirical observation

14) Phil Plait would be laughed off the air (just thought I'd add that for a kick in the nuts)

15) Magnetic impulses would be discover to be instantaneous across any distance

16) Gamma ray bursts would increase in duration an intensity as the solar syatem neared the galactic plane

17) The solar maximum would be delayed

18) unprecedented weather systems never before seen would begin to develop

19) Ocean currents would be disrupted far faster than predicted by the mainstream scientists

20) humans would experience mental and physical problems that were previously unobserved at the rate they are currently occurring due to the effects of radiation on the brain and body.

21) lamestream physics would make no real advancement despite the input of many billions of dollars into research. No consensus on results would be reached

22)Increase in objects entering the Earths atmosphere

23) strange unexplained events would occur at an exponentially increasing rate (such as the sounds people are reporting worldwide)

24) I would be set up and falsely persecuted, and finally exonerated

25) My critics would continue to engage me despite their insistence that there is no point in doing so

26) MY critics would be found to be all working together, that is I have no legitimate critics or hecklers relying on honest debate tactics and real information. ( this is not to say I do not have skeptics who honestly question my conclusions, only that the entourage of unintelligent and uneducated disinformation operatives who engage me on a day to day basis are not honest nor do they believe what they are saying)

27) A general consensus amongst mainstream scientists would be reached that the human race and the Earth itself is on the verge of a catastrophic event that will effect every living thing on the planet, and it would be veiled from the public eye

This is a very short list of correct predictions. You can argue about their origin or claim I didn't make them all you like, or you can even deny they're correct (please do!), but one thing you CANNOT do is change any of it.


-------------------------------------------------------------​--



I have used this comment many times before because I find it to be so revealing and so undeniable that it really puts the jew science shills in a tizzy.

When I was a junior in high school I made a striking discovery. It seemed that students were being tested for who was really awake and who just committed what they were taught without questioning it, and when such an individual who thought independently and was awake was discovered, he (or in rare cases she) was singled out by jewish "teachers" for all sorts of "special treatment".

They were there to poison the futures of the 'gentiles' who showed promise.

As an example, I had a question that no one as yet been able to answer yet, and to my knowledge no one has ever attempted to answer it. When balancing equations in chemistry, electromagnetic energy released during an exothermic reaction was clearly defined and labeled in the equation as electrons, and by analyzing the sructure of the compounds and the various bonds being formed and accounting for all of the electrons in the balancing process,, it was easy to see there were extra electrons, and were they came from.

SO I asked the chemistry teacher why we were taught one thing in Chemistry and then next period in Physics we were taught another, that is that electromagnetic energy was composed of photons.. I asked how could both be correct.

he said, and I quote verbatim "because Einstein wasn't a chemist". The guy"s name was Leedom, and he was one of the best teachers I ever had in public school, because he clearly did not resent potential beyond his own as most teachers and professors do. and e recognized and admitted tat what was in the text books was not the law of God.

I knew at that point that there was a fundamental problem with quantum physics as it was being taught, that it did not logically correlate with other subjects nor scientific empiricism.

It seemed to me that it was exactly as the real father of physics Nicola Tesla claimed, a complex mathematical fiction fabricated by an idiot savant given cookies to create formulas that made no real sense.

[EVERY TIME YOU POST NONSENSE DISTRACTIONS AND ShUCK AND JIVE SPIN TO ThIS ThREAD I AM SIMPLY GOING TO REPOST ThE ABOVE MATERIAL AND SCROLL YOU OFF ThE PAGE.

Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 41584964
United States
06/13/2013 02:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
The two things I DID predict WILL happen on June 22 of this year, a nearly perfectly centered Sunspot will form that has the potentialto cause a solar radiation storm that penetrates to the surface and destroys a significant part of the atmosphere, while disabling most of our technological infrastructure. There is currently no way to accurately predict the timing of solar eruptions that is reliable, since we have entered a different area of space with far different characteristics than during the last solar maximum.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 40844066

 Quoting: 74444

yeppers
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
06/13/2013 02:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Were that true, you'd be able to rebut my points line by line rather than resort to boring old ad hominems, and spamming your own thread.

The fact that you cannot speaks quite loudly to the contrary, thank you.
 Quoting: 74444


All of what you have posted is noting but drivel, you are spamming my tread with circular arguments that are intended to obfuscate and cover the truth and you have an obsession with me
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41584964


If it is drivel, you should have no problem *addressing the points.* Again, the fact that you cannot speaks quite loudly to the contrary, thank you.

You are spamming your own thread. You've, as usual, no one to blame but yourself. But it's *damn* funny.
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
06/13/2013 03:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
The two things I DID predict WILL happen on June 22 of this year, a nearly perfectly centered Sunspot will form that has the potentialto cause a solar radiation storm that penetrates to the surface and destroys a significant part of the atmosphere, while disabling most of our technological infrastructure. There is currently no way to accurately predict the timing of solar eruptions that is reliable, since we have entered a different area of space with far different characteristics than during the last solar maximum.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 40844066

 Quoting: 74444

yeppers
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41584964


Well, then, you *did* make predictions regarding June 22nd after all. You should keep better track of your own predictions, and be honest when you flub them.

For example, you never did answer my question about how often geo-effective sunspots occur over, say, the last decade, nor give any supporting evidence about them. Shocking, I know.
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
06/13/2013 03:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
here is a sort list of correct predictions made years in advance of their occurrence by myself . I am only listing the most important and then only a few of them
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Uh huh.


1)holes or voids in the magnetosphere would be discovered
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.


2) global warming would eventually be properly linked to solar changes and human caused global warming exposed as a fraud
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this. Where has this been exposed?



3) A mass extinction event would commence
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Ah, yes. Your claim that we've lost 67,000 species in the last year, and your inability to name any of them.



4)The purpose of 'chemtrails" would finally be firmly established as a geo engineering project to mitigate global warming
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


I admit I know little about the chemtrail debate, but given your track record on so many other subjects, I will remain doubtful of your position.


5) the effects of solar radiation storms would be magnified by the presence of an increasing density of non solar wind related plasma.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof.


6)the magnetic field of Earth would become increasingly unstable and unpredictable
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.


7) the magnetosphere would be discovered to be powered by the solar wind
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Has this been discovered? You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.



8) It would be acknowledged that electrical currents are transmitted through space by magnetic fields
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Um... it's been called the electromagnetic force for quite some time.


9) the effects of global warming would occur far faster than predicted by lamestream science
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You very well may have correctly predicted that Global Warming would occur faster than expected -- while citing no sources and giving no way to test your theory. That certainly sounds like something you'd do. So I'll give you that one. Stopped clock, twice daily.


10) The Earth would be found to be heating internally causing a radical increase in geological instability and severe earthquakes.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. Also I have yet to see any data pointing toward your claimed radical increase -- indeed, in the one link you have made prior in attempting to support your claim, the link itself said the rate of severe earthquakes has remained roughly static.



11) [geological activity would be linked to solar radiation storms]
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claimed link of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof.


12)the heliosphere would continue to shrink despite the onset of a solar maximum
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.



13) General relativity and special relativity would be disproved by empirical observation
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Where was this disproved? What was the experiment that did it? Why are relativistic formula still used today, including on things as mundane as the GPS system? What about Gravity B, and other experiments still proving the weirder predictions of relativity?



14) Phil Plait would be laughed off the air (just thought I'd add that for a kick in the nuts)
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Alas, I cannot help but notice that he still seems to find a lot more airtime than you do. Must be a kick in the ass that he is so much better known (see how pointless those quips are?) and respected.


15) Magnetic impulses would be discover to be instantaneous across any distance
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this. Where has this been discovered? What was the experiment confirming this remarkable finding?


16) Gamma ray bursts would increase in duration an intensity as the solar syatem neared the galactic plane
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.


16) The solar maximum would be delayed
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.

Oh, and why were there two #16s?

17) unprecedented weather systems never before seen would begin to develop
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


To what weather systems are you referring? Be specific. Also, mainstream science has been predicting such weather "worsening" for decades.


18) Ocean currents would be disrupted far faster than predicted by the mainstream scientists
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction.


19) humans would experience mental and physical problems that were previously unobserved at the rate they are currently occurring due to the effects of radiation on the brain and body.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof.


20) lamestream physics would make no real advancement despite the input of many billions of dollars into research. No consensus on results would be reached
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Sure. Quantum Hall effect, cosmic inflation, Bose–Einstein condensate found by Wolfgang Ketterle, the Top quark found, the accelerating expansion of universe found, Slow light experimentally demonstrated by Lene Vestergaard Hau, the Tau neutrino found, WMAP observations of Cosmic microwave background radiation, the Higgs Boson found...

Sure has been a slow decade or two.


21)Increase in objects entering the Earths atmosphere
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Strangely your concrete prediction confirming this idea proved to be utterly false -- leading you to not make such concrete predictions anymore. A strange choice, but given your predilections, perhaps not so strange.


22) strange unexplained events would occur at an exponentially increasing rate (such as the sounds people are reporting worldwide)
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. And you can please cite sources where such happenings are increasing 'exponentially.'



23) I would be set up and falsely persecuted, and finally exonerated
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415

The only persecution I have seen is people disagreeing with you on a conspiracy message board (since it seems to be the only place you can air your ideas without *totally* being laughed out of the room), and making outlandish demands, such as evidence from other sources.

How *terrible.*

You'll be exonerated if 90 percent of the population is wiped out before the end of the current Solar Max. You'll forgive me for not rooting for you.


24) My critics would continue to engage me despite their insistence that there is no point in doing so
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Your old double standard again. If no one criticizes your ideas, you must be right! If anyone criticizes your idea, you must be right!

The evidence, and your specific predictions failing, demonstrates you are wrong quite often. Your solution? You stop making specific predictions. The height of intellectual dishonesty.


25) MY critics would be found to be all working together, that is I have no legitimate critics or hecklers relying on honest debate tactics and real information. ( this is not to say I do not have skeptics who honestly question my conclusions, only that the entourage of unintelligent and uneducated disinformation operatives who engage me on a day to day basis are not honest nor do they believe what they are saying)
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this. Where has this been found, other than your accusations? And your accusations are not evidence.


26) A general consensus amongst mainstream scientists would be reached that the human race and the Earth itself is on the verge of a catastrophic event that will effect every living thing on the planet, and it would be veiled from the public eye
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Where's this consensus?


This is a very sort list of correct predictions.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


My List of your failures is *quite* a lot longer.

You can argue about their origin or claim I didn't make them all you like
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


Because there are a bunch where this is the case...

or you can even deny they're correct (please do!)
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


(Just did!)

but one thing you CANNOT do is change any of it.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415


True. The only person who can correct their ideas in the light of better evidence or failed experimentation is you.

But you just don't *do* that, do you IDW/A.A?

So every time you do repost it, I suppose I should repost these innocuous questions that will show any passersby reasonableness in the face of your furious, repetitive hilarity -- and demonstrate that you cannot provide the least bit of evidence to back up your claims. And I see you corrected the #16 problem. Only took you, what, twelve reposts to actually proof your own stuff?
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 41584964
United States
06/13/2013 03:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Were that true, you'd be able to rebut my points line by line rather than resort to boring old ad hominems, and spamming your own thread.

The fact that you cannot speaks quite loudly to the contrary, thank you.
 Quoting: 74444


All of what you have posted is noting but drivel, you are spamming my tread with circular arguments that are intended to obfuscate and cover the truth and you have an obsession with me
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41584964


If it is drivel, you should have no problem *addressing the points.* Again, the fact that you cannot speaks quite loudly to the contrary, thank you.

You are spamming your own thread. You've, as usual, no one to blame but yourself. But it's *damn* funny.
 Quoting: 74444


You are like a case of the crabs, I am not going to waste my time with you
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
06/13/2013 03:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Were that true, you'd be able to rebut my points line by line rather than resort to boring old ad hominems, and spamming your own thread.

The fact that you cannot speaks quite loudly to the contrary, thank you.
 Quoting: 74444


All of what you have posted is noting but drivel, you are spamming my tread with circular arguments that are intended to obfuscate and cover the truth and you have an obsession with me
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41584964


If it is drivel, you should have no problem *addressing the points.* Again, the fact that you cannot speaks quite loudly to the contrary, thank you.

You are spamming your own thread. You've, as usual, no one to blame but yourself. But it's *damn* funny.
 Quoting: 74444


You are like a case of the crabs, I am not going to waste my time with you
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41584964


But you are going to waste time endlessly reposting your criticisms, but not dealing with the issues with said criticisms?

Again, I am certain Newton operated *just* that way.

I should hope, had you a case of the crabs, that you would take the time to *address the actual problem.* You can't just ignore them away. You need to take very specific steps.

You can make me go away as well. You just need to take very specific steps, as I have explained to your Lord High Intelligenship a few dozen times.
Hydra

User ID: 41604231
Germany
06/13/2013 03:56 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
AA, what will happen on June 22 2013?
 Quoting: Solar Guardian


According to AA/IDW the "big cleansing v2".

Whats supposed to happen june 22?
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41584964

I don't recall saying anything would happen on june 22.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41584964


Oooops:
it could be the Summer solstice, and given the fact that the Earth will be on the side of the Sun that is now showing all of the solar activity, it is definitely a possibility, smart ass.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1194140

 Quoting: Hydra

If the Moon is off, if Earth wobbles or if there is a pole shift
how can things like this, predicted decades ago, happen?

aseindia
Annular Solar Eclipse - January 15, 2010 - Rameshwaram, India
Hydra

User ID: 41604231
Germany
06/13/2013 03:59 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Seems you still missed it, Incredible Dim Astrophysicist:

It isn't closed near as I can tell
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 41263444

Then you are a moron of the highest order. Compare pages 1-180 with pages 400-520. You were getting slaughtered until the thread was closed and the point at which it was is pretty clearly defined by the content of the responses and the limited number of persons responding, ie the same garbage that are known to be professional lairs and smear artists by all on this forum and others.

Also look at the thread rating. it's pretty high considering every one of you one starred it, isn't it?
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41528755


This thread is closed? LOL

No, you just lost all of your former supporters, because:
* you proved, you have no clue of even basic orbital mechanics.
* you proved, you have no clue of even basic basic astronomy.
* you proved, you have no clue of even basic physics or chemistry.
* your "predictions" are either so trivial, that even a fifth grader could have made them
* or your "predictions" are so vague, that you can bend them after the facts
* or your "predictions" don't simply come true.

If you had made such groundbreaking researches and discoveries, why do you hang around in a forum in a "closed" thread? Why not make it public, puplish peer-reviewed papers?
Oh, I know: all jews, that will suppress your "truth".

But why don't you publish your "groundbreaking researches and discoveries" on an own webpage? Even dumbasses like Marshal Masters, James McCanney or Poleshit-Nancy can do it. Or are you on social welfare and can't afford the $50 or so a year?
Oh, I see: anonymity.
Anonymity on the Internet? LOL. If 'they' want to get you, it wouldn't take one hour until 'they' knock on your door.

May be your 1% or so native american blood is of interest for Americans - for the rest of the world it's just meaningless and a stupid claim.
Superiority? Yes, you are superior - in spreading bullshit and nonsense.


You are just an attention seeking whore, a very poor soul.


.
If the Moon is off, if Earth wobbles or if there is a pole shift
how can things like this, predicted decades ago, happen?

aseindia
Annular Solar Eclipse - January 15, 2010 - Rameshwaram, India

News








Proud Member Of The Angry Mob