Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,528 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 674,856
Pageviews Today: 854,456Threads Today: 195Posts Today: 3,118
08:32 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3053681
United States
03/05/2012 03:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
[link to pubs.giss.nasa.gov]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9525784
United States
03/05/2012 03:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
AA, Can you tell me what the PHI stands for in this chart?

[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]

I've tried researching it's meaning and never find much.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1125970
United States
03/05/2012 04:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3053681


Excellent find. I bet these guys are dead by now. The information they present matches my ow findings precisely even though i have never heard of them before. the correlation of mass extinctions and the vertical periodic passage of the solar system through the galactic plane in an osculating pattern was known and is known and is being covered up. I was just banned because someone was reading my posts as I typed it for saying people have been falsely accused of crimes, claimed to be crazy or killed for repeating this information you just posted. This is because they want people to think people like myself are just nuts, and they can save themselves. Unfortunately, they are not planning to save the best of humanity, but the absolute worst.

This oscillation theory of the solar system through the galactic plane was an interdependent conclusion of my own and explains the Mayan long count ending. Their date is precisely correct.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1125970
United States
03/05/2012 04:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
AA, Can you tell me what the PHI stands for in this chart?

[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]

I've tried researching it's meaning and never find much.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9525784


I have to admit although i know what all of the other readings represent, that one is a mystery. but the range of 360 is a hint, the numbrr of drgrees in a complete circle.. let me thing about it.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1125970
United States
03/05/2012 04:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Oh, i see why I was banned now, the post that was removed made by myself in response to the person posting from the Uk.
Guess I must of nailed it. To claim there is no change just makes yourself look stupid, I don't even have to reply, you self incriminate yourself as an idiot and a liar. What is the point in banning me, proving I was right? haven't you figured it out yet, you're going to lose, the purpose of this is to cleanse the Earth. Hiding in the ground is not going to save you anyway.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1125970
United States
03/05/2012 04:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
damn you weren't kidding about some places showing exceptional UV readings. Bogoto Colombia is expected to hit 15.8 on thursday. That seems absurd.
 Quoting: 25153


I guarantee there have been times the uv index at your latitude has exceeded 13 near the summer solstice. There are archives to this , look though them.
UV radiation is what is killing the trees. Their leaves are thin and completely penetrated by it, and not designed or adapted for the 90% increase in uv radiation in the past 40 years. The conifers do between because of the structure of their leaves and the ability to shield themselves, they seem better adapted to it that flat leaved trees. Half of the trees in my yard are dead and 20 years ago they were all strong and healthy, My neighbor has lost three oaks known to be over over two hundred and fifty years old.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1245248


Killing trees? Where's that happening? Not round these parts.

You don't suppose you have some local pollution problem? Might also be what's impairing your vision so you think the Sun's colour has changed, because looks no different here.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2033927


Good luck to you, your future isn't bright. You're going to hell, quite literally. And I have absolutely no belief in any religion.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7844725
United States
03/05/2012 06:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
damn you weren't kidding about some places showing exceptional UV readings. Bogoto Colombia is expected to hit 15.8 on thursday. That seems absurd.
 Quoting: 25153


I guarantee there have been times the uv index at your latitude has exceeded 13 near the summer solstice. There are archives to this , look though them.
UV radiation is what is killing the trees. Their leaves are thin and completely penetrated by it, and not designed or adapted for the 90% increase in uv radiation in the past 40 years. The conifers do between because of the structure of their leaves and the ability to shield themselves, they seem better adapted to it that flat leaved trees. Half of the trees in my yard are dead and 20 years ago they were all strong and healthy, My neighbor has lost three oaks known to be over over two hundred and fifty years old.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1245248


Killing trees? Where's that happening? Not round these parts.

You don't suppose you have some local pollution problem? Might also be what's impairing your vision so you think the Sun's colour has changed, because looks no different here.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2033927


Good luck to you, your future isn't bright. You're going to hell, quite literally. And I have absolutely no belief in any religion.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1125970


Oh, the trees are dying. Personally, two years ago, one of my 75+ yrs old oak trees--southern facing--suddenly died. Then, last year, the two olders trees--alos southern facing oaks--suddenly died. I looked into it. There's a little (read, not at all understood) understood new conditon lilling oaks...called Sudden Oak Death. Google will reveal, the OP's theory explains this better than SOD...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1605109
United States
03/05/2012 07:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
X flare 3/5/2012. From sunspot AR1429. 4 hours ago.
[link to thewatchers.adorraeli.com]
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1125970
United States
03/05/2012 09:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
X flare 3/5/2012. From sunspot AR1429. 4 hours ago.
[link to thewatchers.adorraeli.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1605109


The weakly organized sunspot group 1429 WAS NOT the source if the x ray flux reading of X-1 last night. After repeatedly analyzing and comparing various videos of solar flares, I estimate that the 'eruption' from 1429 was a high c class flare that barely registered above background. The source of the Xray flux was at least ten degrees north of the group 1429 and behind the limb of the sun, as was the resulting CME.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1125970
United States
03/05/2012 09:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
...


I guarantee there have been times the uv index at your latitude has exceeded 13 near the summer solstice. There are archives to this , look though them.
UV radiation is what is killing the trees. Their leaves are thin and completely penetrated by it, and not designed or adapted for the 90% increase in uv radiation in the past 40 years. The conifers do between because of the structure of their leaves and the ability to shield themselves, they seem better adapted to it that flat leaved trees. Half of the trees in my yard are dead and 20 years ago they were all strong and healthy, My neighbor has lost three oaks known to be over over two hundred and fifty years old.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1245248


Killing trees? Where's that happening? Not round these parts.

You don't suppose you have some local pollution problem? Might also be what's impairing your vision so you think the Sun's colour has changed, because looks no different here.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2033927


Good luck to you, your future isn't bright. You're going to hell, quite literally. And I have absolutely no belief in any religion.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1125970


Oh, the trees are dying. Personally, two years ago, one of my 75+ yrs old oak trees--southern facing--suddenly died. Then, last year, the two olders trees--alos southern facing oaks--suddenly died. I looked into it. There's a little (read, not at all understood) understood new conditon lilling oaks...called Sudden Oak Death. Google will reveal, the OP's theory explains this better than SOD...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7844725


"P. ramorum was first reported in 1995, and the origins of the pathogen are still unclear but most evidence suggests it was introduced as an exotic species. Very few control mechanisms exist for the disease, and they rely upon early detection and proper disposal of infected plant material."

Interesting how the appearance of this 'disease; corresponds with the dramatic decrease in ozone and increase in uv radiation from the Sun, and the implementation of operation cloverleaf (chemtrails) a few years later,
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11956550
India
03/05/2012 09:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
X flare 3/5/2012. From sunspot AR1429. 4 hours ago.
[link to thewatchers.adorraeli.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1605109


The weakly organized sunspot group 1429 WAS NOT the source if the x ray flux reading of X-1 last night. After repeatedly analyzing and comparing various videos of solar flares, I estimate that the 'eruption' from 1429 was a high c class flare that barely registered above background. The source of the Xray flux was at least ten degrees north of the group 1429 and behind the limb of the sun, as was the resulting CME.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1125970


AA- Firstly dont just narrow your thinking and think that only events can happen only on Dec 21 11:11 EST. I would say open up. All sites/suntards say that the X-flare was from 1429. You might not want to trust the govt source but that doesnt mean that you shd not trust us.

We did have a X-flare.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11956550
India
03/05/2012 09:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
X flare 3/5/2012. From sunspot AR1429. 4 hours ago.
[link to thewatchers.adorraeli.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1605109


The weakly organized sunspot group 1429 WAS NOT the source if the x ray flux reading of X-1 last night. After repeatedly analyzing and comparing various videos of solar flares, I estimate that the 'eruption' from 1429 was a high c class flare that barely registered above background. The source of the Xray flux was at least ten degrees north of the group 1429 and behind the limb of the sun, as was the resulting CME.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1125970


Sunspot 1429 is a beta gamma delta configuration
Grateful One
User ID: 11959851
United States
03/05/2012 09:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
OP: just a quick word of THANKS[!] for your efforts. to expect a certain outcome of current events is oddly comforting. It's far easier to face the "unknown" when you can grasp the why/how.

Thanks again.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1125970
United States
03/05/2012 09:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
X flare 3/5/2012. From sunspot AR1429. 4 hours ago.
[link to thewatchers.adorraeli.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1605109


The weakly organized sunspot group 1429 WAS NOT the source if the x ray flux reading of X-1 last night. After repeatedly analyzing and comparing various videos of solar flares, I estimate that the 'eruption' from 1429 was a high c class flare that barely registered above background. The source of the Xray flux was at least ten degrees north of the group 1429 and behind the limb of the sun, as was the resulting CME.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1125970


AA- Firstly dont just narrow your thinking and think that only events can happen only on Dec 21 11:11 EST. I would say open up. All sites/suntards say that the X-flare was from 1429. You might not want to trust the govt source but that doesnt mean that you shd not trust us.

We did have a X-flare.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11956550

I am quite aware there will many increasingly intense and odd events between now and then, but I am also aware the source of this X-1.5 x ray burst was not and could not have been sunspot group1429. You are entitled to believe whoever and whatever you want to.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1125970
United States
03/05/2012 09:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
X flare 3/5/2012. From sunspot AR1429. 4 hours ago.
[link to thewatchers.adorraeli.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1605109


The weakly organized sunspot group 1429 WAS NOT the source if the x ray flux reading of X-1 last night. After repeatedly analyzing and comparing various videos of solar flares, I estimate that the 'eruption' from 1429 was a high c class flare that barely registered above background. The source of the Xray flux was at least ten degrees north of the group 1429 and behind the limb of the sun, as was the resulting CME.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1125970


Sunspot 1429 is a beta gamma delta configuration
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11956550

"Sunspot 1429" is actually four tiny and loosely organized sunspots:
[link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1125970
United States
03/05/2012 09:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
[link to theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.com]


this is the type and size of sunspot that typically produces low x class rating flares.
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1125970
United States
03/05/2012 09:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
[link to theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.com]


this is the type and size of sunspot that typically produces low x class rating flares.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1125970


Notice the size of the larger spot, which is where the flare actually erupted from. It is well organized and four times as large as ay of the group 1429
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11956550
India
03/05/2012 09:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
[link to theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.com]


this is the type and size of sunspot that typically produces low x class rating flares.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1125970


Do you think this will have a glancing blow on earth or is a non event??
Anonymous Astrophysicist
User ID: 1125970
United States
03/05/2012 10:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
[link to theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.com]


this is the type and size of sunspot that typically produces low x class rating flares.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1125970


Do you think this will have a glancing blow on earth or is a non event??
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11956550


If you look at the data you will see the protons from it arrived simultaneously with the x ray flux, which is very unusual.

[link to www.n3kl.org]

[link to www.n3kl.org]

This was not a normal solar flare.
<<LOOK`n thru YOU>>

User ID: 922574
United States
03/05/2012 10:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
initial particles from a solar flare can reach the earth in 8 to 10 minutes...The CME follows later..not that unusual..The protons have been rising all morning
Anonymosu Astrophysicst
User ID: 1129078
United States
03/05/2012 11:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
initial particles from a solar flare can reach the earth in 8 to 10 minutes...The CME follows later..not that unusual..The protons have been rising all morning
 Quoting: <<LOOK`n thru YOU>>


Yes, I know (believe it or not). but this time the protons arrive at exactly the same time as the x ray flux, no delat at all. They rise correspondingly with the rise in x ray flux.This was a different kind of event and everyone who thinks the source is sunspot group 1429 is simply WRONG. I've been observing this stuff every day for 12 years , patterns develop. The sunspot that developed on the surface of the sun where 1429 is produces weak flares. Never over low M.

There is another spot ten degrees north and slightly behind it that routinely produces up to mid x range flares.. Oh and since the protons arrived simultaneously with the electromagnetic x ray flux, This means they moving at light speed. This translates into it is time to bury Einsteins old fables for once and for all, especially if there were ANY proton or neutrons moving in the opposite direction, which we know there has to have been.

This is why they are reluctant to report on what I just told you. Look at the graphs, there is NO DELAY WHATSOEVER.

They already know I'm right, that's why they dwell on every word I say trying to glean something they can put their name to. I don't mind, getting credit is unimportant so long as Tesla occupies his rightful place as the new 'god of science' and the idiots ideas are finally discarded and forgotten. To the intelligent physicist, SR, GR and quantum physics are hodge podge of fictional particles and conflicting ideas, none of which anyone truly understands. i have challenged their proponents repeatedly to explain basic precepts of the 'theories' they support like time dilation and the bending of the space-time contimuim being the source of gravity, always with the same result.
Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean the person that wrote it has any idea what they're talking about and are super smart. Sometimes is just means they are babbling idiots.
Anonymosu Astrophysicst
User ID: 1129078
United States
03/05/2012 11:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
initial particles from a solar flare can reach the earth in 8 to 10 minutes...The CME follows later..not that unusual..The protons have been rising all morning
 Quoting: <<LOOK`n thru YOU>>


Yes, I know (believe it or not). but this time the protons arrive at exactly the same time as the x ray flux, no delat at all. They rise correspondingly with the rise in x ray flux.This was a different kind of event and everyone who thinks the source is sunspot group 1429 is simply WRONG. I've been observing this stuff every day for 12 years , patterns develop. The sunspot that developed on the surface of the sun where 1429 is produces weak flares. Never over low M.

There is another spot ten degrees north and slightly behind it that routinely produces up to mid x range flares.. Oh and since the protons arrived simultaneously with the electromagnetic x ray flux, This means they moving at light speed. This translates into it is time to bury Einsteins old fables for once and for all, especially if there were ANY proton or neutrons moving in the opposite direction, which we know there has to have been.

This is why they are reluctant to report on what I just told you. Look at the graphs, there is NO DELAY WHATSOEVER.

They already know I'm right, that's why they dwell on every word I say trying to glean something they can put their name to. I don't mind, getting credit is unimportant so long as Tesla occupies his rightful place as the new 'god of science' and the idiots ideas are finally discarded and forgotten. To the intelligent physicist, SR, GR and quantum physics are hodge podge of fictional particles and conflicting ideas, none of which anyone truly understands. i have challenged their proponents repeatedly to explain basic precepts of the 'theories' they support like time dilation and the bending of the space-time contimuim being the source of gravity, always with the same result.
Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean the person that wrote it has any idea what they're talking about and are super smart. Sometimes is just means they are babbling idiots.
 Quoting: Anonymosu Astrophysicst 1129078


Oh, and BTW, they unreported the energy levels of the incoming protons or their instruments misread the velocity due to never having been designed to expect light speed protons, they had to be well over 10 MeV to be moving that fast, because as you know a proton has a fixed mass value. It is simply that their instruments were never designed to measure matter traveling at light speed. Einsteins theory was already disproved during the last solar max when cmes on opposite sides of the sun produced simultaneous CME's with protons moving way from each other (relatively) at a speed well in excess of C. PUT A FORK IN IT ALREADY AND LEST GET TO SOME REAL PHYSICS AND SOLVE SOME REAL PROBLEMS.
Anonymosu Astrophysicst
User ID: 1129078
United States
03/05/2012 11:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
If you wonder why i misspell my monker, it's because they've put it on autoban. I wonder why?
cruise
Anonymosu Astrophysicst
User ID: 1129078
United States
03/05/2012 11:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
[link to theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.com]


this is the type and size of sunspot that typically produces low x class rating flares.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1125970


Do you think this will have a glancing blow on earth or is a non event??
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11956550


It will have effects and it is dfficult to predict what.

This is something totally new.Matter moving at C inside the solar system relative to the Earth
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11965272
United States
03/05/2012 12:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
X flare 3/5/2012. From sunspot AR1429. 4 hours ago.
[link to thewatchers.adorraeli.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1605109


The weakly organized sunspot group 1429 WAS NOT the source if the x ray flux reading of X-1 last night. After repeatedly analyzing and comparing various videos of solar flares, I estimate that the 'eruption' from 1429 was a high c class flare that barely registered above background. The source of the Xray flux was at least ten degrees north of the group 1429 and behind the limb of the sun, as was the resulting CME.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1125970


Could one be feeding another that would be out of sight?say behind..other side?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8675787
United States
03/05/2012 12:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
initial particles from a solar flare can reach the earth in 8 to 10 minutes...The CME follows later..not that unusual..The protons have been rising all morning
 Quoting: <<LOOK`n thru YOU>>


Yes, I know (believe it or not). but this time the protons arrive at exactly the same time as the x ray flux, no delat at all. They rise correspondingly with the rise in x ray flux.This was a different kind of event and everyone who thinks the source is sunspot group 1429 is simply WRONG. I've been observing this stuff every day for 12 years , patterns develop. The sunspot that developed on the surface of the sun where 1429 is produces weak flares. Never over low M.

There is another spot ten degrees north and slightly behind it that routinely produces up to mid x range flares.. Oh and since the protons arrived simultaneously with the electromagnetic x ray flux, This means they moving at light speed. This translates into it is time to bury Einsteins old fables for once and for all, especially if there were ANY proton or neutrons moving in the opposite direction, which we know there has to have been.

This is why they are reluctant to report on what I just told you. Look at the graphs, there is NO DELAY WHATSOEVER.

They already know I'm right, that's why they dwell on every word I say trying to glean something they can put their name to. I don't mind, getting credit is unimportant so long as Tesla occupies his rightful place as the new 'god of science' and the idiots ideas are finally discarded and forgotten. To the intelligent physicist, SR, GR and quantum physics are hodge podge of fictional particles and conflicting ideas, none of which anyone truly understands. i have challenged their proponents repeatedly to explain basic precepts of the 'theories' they support like time dilation and the bending of the space-time contimuim being the source of gravity, always with the same result.
Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean the person that wrote it has any idea what they're talking about and are super smart. Sometimes is just means they are babbling idiots.
 Quoting: Anonymosu Astrophysicst 1129078


Relativity is wrong and you are right. Got it.
Not Einstein
User ID: 11959851
United States
03/05/2012 12:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
UMMM: isn't relativity still just a theory?
grefey

User ID: 11426992
United States
03/05/2012 12:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
AA do your really think it is worthwhile moving to a greater latitude in the long run. Aren't the solar flares and CME's going to effect the earth in other ways like EQ, Volcano's, flooding, Ice age, Pole Shift, etc in the long run. Like you said this is a purification process and we need it. I mean I am 62 and for some strange reason I started to realize what was happening in 2006. I have to say that even prior to that I started to notice people were acting weird.

I have prepared for everything, seriously, I live in VA at about the 39 parallel. The point is after I finished building and preparing I got this feeling like what is going to happen is going to be so big it will not matter in the least that I prepared.

I have the means to move northward but to be honest I do not have the desire or the energy. The one thing and perhaps the most important thing about the last 8 yrs. is boy did I learn a lot about myself and others. I found that I have the ability to face the truth no matter how unpleasant and most people don't.
Anonymosu Astrophysicst
User ID: 1129078
United States
03/05/2012 12:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
X flare 3/5/2012. From sunspot AR1429. 4 hours ago.
[link to thewatchers.adorraeli.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1605109


The weakly organized sunspot group 1429 WAS NOT the source if the x ray flux reading of X-1 last night. After repeatedly analyzing and comparing various videos of solar flares, I estimate that the 'eruption' from 1429 was a high c class flare that barely registered above background. The source of the Xray flux was at least ten degrees north of the group 1429 and behind the limb of the sun, as was the resulting CME.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1125970


Could one be feeding another that would be out of sight?say behind..other side?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11965272

Look at the dark gash in the surface of the sun in this image taken with a lens that filters all but light with a green wavelength. If you get a welders lens with a number 11 green tinted lens you can see this gash yourself. IT IS NOT A CORONAL HOLE, IT SOMETHING TOTALLY NEW, I have NEVER been able to see coronal holes with welders lenses because the contrast was never this great, this is a gash in the layer of the sun below the photosphere effecting the magnetic field that actually shows up to some degree on the magneto gram:

[link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]


this is the source of the x ray event of last night.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1129078
United States
03/05/2012 12:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
X flare 3/5/2012. From sunspot AR1429. 4 hours ago.
[link to thewatchers.adorraeli.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1605109


The weakly organized sunspot group 1429 WAS NOT the source if the x ray flux reading of X-1 last night. After repeatedly analyzing and comparing various videos of solar flares, I estimate that the 'eruption' from 1429 was a high c class flare that barely registered above background. The source of the Xray flux was at least ten degrees north of the group 1429 and behind the limb of the sun, as was the resulting CME.
 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1125970


Could one be feeding another that would be out of sight?say behind..other side?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11965272

Look at the dark gash in the surface of the sun in this image taken with a lens that filters all but light with a green wavelength.

[link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]


If you get a welders lens with a number 11 green tinted lens you can see this gash yourself. IT IS NOT A CORONAL HOLE, IT SOMETHING TOTALLY NEW, I have NEVER been able to see coronal holes with welders lenses because the contrast was never this great, this is a gash in the layer of the sun below the photosphere effecting the magnetic field that actually shows up to some degree on the magneto gram:

[link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]


this is the source of the x ray event of last night.
 Quoting: Anonymosu Astrophysicst 1129078


edit, accidentally omitted the link

News