WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

AA, All Caps = Full Retard Mode.

never go full retard mode!

Im still following the thread here but AA seems to have changed, no?

Morning, AA, where ever you are !

Please DON'T give up this thread to the 'mentally challenged', unprepared or TO FRIGHTENED to act in any MEANINGFUL way. You info is good, your ideas/facts WELL within scientific parameters, and the information is vital to most of us here who may be able to read all the signs/scientific posting, but have some difficulty arriving at the conclusions the data present.

Thanks for your input to this point. Please continue !

Eagle

They don't want to admit there are no flares associated with these x ray bursts

It's fairly uncommon to have x ray bursts without flares though.WHy don't you find another thread to troll, t boy?
You're getting on my nerves.

There are movies of the flares all over the internet...so, the TRUTH gets on your nerves...Well now ya know how I felt when ya trolled mine...Do it again and I`ll be back...tenfold...now go play in your fairytale world...

Actually, the jet I flew on was specially manufactured for ALCOA.

I am not actually sure what the make and model of it it was, back then when I was 12 we called all corporate jets 'lear jets', kind of like you call a kleenex a kleenex ,It was not a run of the mill off the rack job and was a lot more spacious inside than the two models you linked. I asked the pilot how fast it would go and he said it had a top speed of a little over 700mph airspeed, and the only thing that limited it to that was the sound barrier, as it was not designed to exceed it structurally..

When it took off , the acceleration was two or three times that of a commercial jet, and it cruised at over 600mph, 540 knots to be very specific because I looked at the air speed gauge myself. There are several corporate jets that can exceed 600mph off the rack, btw.

The only thing is you don't know what a flare is or are simply being willfully belligerent. Go start your own thread and play with yourself, and quit rolling mine. I know what an x and an m class flare looklike. You showed a 'movie' of the x class burst that looked like a mid c class coming from 14 29
If you had looked at lasco you would have seen the CME associated with it came from a location 1-15 degrees north of susnpot 1429, and behind it, not even close to 1429

edit 10-15 degrees north of sunspot 1429

You are talking about two different flares..The double M didn`t have a CME associated with it. And nobody can look at a movie and determine what size the flare is..Good Lord you are so full of it...

Last Edited by <<LOOK`n thru YOU>> on 03/06/2012 12:32 PM

The 'double m" as you called it didn't have anything visible associated with it. Sunspots emit continuous flows of x rays, a flare is when the flux suddenly rises and visible flash of UV radiation extending far out from the sun is observed. If you look at the chart now

[link to www.swpc.noaa.gov]

, you will see a more or less continuous flow of x radiation between c and m class designation, and IT IS NOT COMING FORM THIS SUNSPOT: (ENTER START DATE 20120305 END DATE 20120306) , SELECT "EIT 304 FOR MAXIMUM UV VISIBILITY.
[link to sohodata.nascom.nasa.gov]


THE SUNSPOT YOU ARE CLAIMING IS PRODUCING THESE X RAY BURSTS SIMPLY IS NOT PRODUCING ANY CHANGING OUTPUT OR FLUX VALUES OVER A MIDDLE C CLASS.. IN FACT IT IS NOT ACTIVE AT ALL. Now we have m class x ray bursts without flares or CME's associated with them, and the proton flux is not being property represented by this graph, either: [link to www.n3kl.org]

TO INDUCE SECONDARY RADIATION IN THE GOES SATELLITE OF THE ENERGY VALUES WE ARE SEEING WOULD REQUIRE MUCH HIGHER ENERGY (FASTER) PROTONS. THE DATA IS BEING COMPLETELY FABRICATED AND FUDGED, AND UNDER PRESENTED.

[link to www2.nict.go.jp]



That's all i have to say at the moment besides this is indeed a simulation of a wonderful day in the neighborhood, s beutiful day in the neighborhood... would you be mine?


We need to find out fast if any of the big shits on a stick are above ground right now. I have elevated high energy proton and electron flux of a high in my location again, the magnetosphere is again making contact with the Earths surface here in East Texas.

The thing is, although I predicted this long ago, I was not sure precisely what the effects would be. The high density of matter in the 'neighborhood' is easily visible if you select lasco c3 and any start end date and run the movie.

[link to sohodata.nascom.nasa.gov]


In other words I don't know where the radiation is coming from (it might just be omnipresent in the area of space we have entered) but it sure as hell is coming and our shields are down. I tell you somersetting else, the magnetosphere simulation is a fucking joke.

[link to www2.nict.go.jp]


It's a lie. They censored or changed the address of the one piece of data that shows us when the magnetosphere is failing to protect the earth right after we started discussing it here:

[link to ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov]

Page not found, huh?

Thanks for they reply, AA. As usual, your info is enlightening to say the lease. As the Brits would say " Carry on ! "

Eagle

Great day to go fishing

Last Edited by <<LOOK`n thru YOU>> on 03/06/2012 02:55 PM

I wish you would

Ok, just to add my observations from 19 degrees latitude and 7000 feet altitude in Central Mexico.

I've regularly measured radiation levels here for 8 years and for the last few months while reading this thread. I have also measured filters (for hot particles, ala Fukushima). A few concrete structures I have measured have been a little hot, sometimes hitting 50 or 60 cpm, but where I have been the last few years seems relatively clean.

My readings are fairly consistent, with average CPM around 15-20, lows of 10 and highs of 25. I am reading alpha, beta, gamma and X.

If it is midday and AA is talking proton levels or of the proton belt dipping low, I put the Geiger counter out in the sun sometimes to see if there seems to be high levels caused by protons. True, my meter is on only sometimes, but up until now I have not come across high readings yet.

The trees seem healthy on all sides, and usually the birds and wild animals are out most of the day, except for the early afternoon.

I suspect that other things may be affecting trees in the US and Europe, like the chemicals they are releasing into the atmosphere, and radioactive releases from Fuku, etc. I read about these "tests" they have been doing starting decades ago in science magazines. Most people do not read science journals though so they think it is false conspiracy, when in fact it is true and well documented for a long time. What's the line from Jurassic Park? "God help us, we are in the hands of engineers!" Very apropos.

It is true we get very high UV at midday here, but that is normal for high altitude central Mexico, and why people wear broad hats, and have the saying, "only mad dogs and gringos are out walking around at mid-day."

However the data I see at [link to www.n3kl.org] does seem to indicate that the current high proton levels (in space) are not caused by the sun, and do know that the earth is moving through ribbons of plasma at the center of the disk of the galactic plain. I know that what AA writes is all possible in theory, perhaps in the next year, and for that reason I follow his posts and appreciate his work.

Anyhow, not to detract from your posts or theories AA, please keep up the good work, but I just wanted to add my measurements and observations to the picture.

Last Edited by ehecatl on 03/06/2012 02:53 PM

[link to sohodata.nascom.nasa.gov]


I have repeatedly played all of the movies in every spectrum available with a start date of before the x class event to the present and there simply has been no solar flare activity whatsoever from any of the visible sunspots on the suns surface. Confidence, 100% . I am not sure where the elevated x ray flux and the steady proton flux in the range of > 10 million electron volts is originating, but it is not the Sun.
I say I am not sure, but I am almost sure this is simply the energy range of the protons in the plasma cloud we have entered, which is represented by the satellites relative velocity with the plasma cloud. A proton has a fixed mass, the energy formula is 1/2 mass X velocity squared. so the energy level is simply the speed of the proton relative to the sensor. In other words this proton flux will probably not go away and will gradually increase as we close in on the galactic plane. The good news is they are relatively low energy compared to what they could be , if you have watched this for long you know that protons from a CME tend to be of a pretty large range of energy level whereas these are all >10MeV.

The really concerning situation is that we had and X class rated X ray flux without any solar flare and a massive high density coronal mass ejection barely off the western limb of the sun at a high latitude.

I think these vents will gradually worsen, 'they' will continue to downplay the significance and alter the data and by the time most people realize what is happening they will be too sick to do anything about it. I have observed sunspot 1429 directly repeatedly and the images of it are greatly exaggerated on the official sources.. It is loosely associated complex of tiny pinhole sunspots ans is simply not the source of this radiation. It is the galactic plane itself. BTW, for those of you not aware, I did predict this. I did not know what the exact readings and results would be. but I did know this would happen. The magnetosphere will continue to weaken in response to the constantly changing polarity strength of the galaxies own magnetic field. The heliosphere and the magnetosphere will continue to become more unstable and weaken and eventually totally fail/

So these are fake?? I could list more...





How is that welders mask working out for ya...

NOT to digress AA, but why have you twice said a few pages back, that underground sheltered people would" fry' (?)/die ? I would think that by being underground, the earth would dissipate any heat created on the surface and temperatures would be a LOT lower than on the surface.

NOT trying to annoy you; just need information on this, as my families survival has been based on such plans for many years, for other than what is being caused by protons an plasma clouds we are passing through.

Thanks in advance for any answer.

Eagle

X is attenuated by the atmosphere unless the sun is directly or nearly directly overhead during an x ray flare, so pointing the probe at the sun on a normal day isn't going to register x ray or gamma ray flux. Try the x ray selection when a solar flare occurs during midday in the summer, and you will get a significant flux reading.

Its more or less like UV, except that UV output of the Sun is rather continuous. In order to measure flux readings of beta or alpha particle originating from the Sun or from space, it is necessary to have a directional probe, not the 180 degree omni directional one that comes with your counter. This probe has to be oriented perpendicular to the ground, facing upwards or towards the Sun to get an accurate count.


Again, the failure of the magnetosphere is not total and can be very localized. You must also have a directional probe to get an accurate reading. It could be you just haven't tried it at the right time. i suggest trying it during the miday hours while the magnetosphere on this chart is reading below 25 nanotesla and a CME is arriving:

[link to www.n3kl.org]
You will obtain a rather high reading at that time.



I believe this is mostly because of your location, the tress there have evolved to deal with elevated UV due to the altitude. I have also noticed that trees on mountains here in the US are also healthy.

I am not meaning to be argumentation, but I am almost positive it is UV radiation since the decline in the vegetation correlates dirctly with the increase in UV radiation

Yes, but since trees can seek shade, they must adapt over many years, evolve to resit UV radiation.


BINGO



Your comments are appreciated and helpful in determining precisely what is going on.

They have made their bunkers deep in the ground, too deep, hundreds of feet. I know the oil industry pretty well having been working in the field for 25 years on and off, and the temperatures oil is coming out of the ground at a given depth IS INCREASING GRADUAL. This is because influxes of charged particles have the ability to heat the earths core, and this heat is radiated outward. This is also responsible for much of the geological instability. You only need to be 4 to feet down to block the radiation we are going to experience, and should have a way to get out quick if there is geological instability so you are buried alive.

The first movie shows a flare not originating anywhere near 1429

The second two show CME's coming off the back side of the sun just beyond the western limb 10-15 degrees north of susnpot 1429

Thanks for the support

fine, but does that jibe with how proton levels rose 48 hours ago. and have stayed flat steady high since then on this graph?

[link to www.n3kl.org]

Dont worry about this guy, he;s a know nothing blowhard with a poor sense of who to make an enemy out of.
He shot his whole load and backed up what I've been saying all along by doing research FOR ME to prove what I said. The fist movie obviously shows a flare past the western limb and definitely not from 1429 as he has been claiming, he's just an airhead an an amateur suntard or gov disinfo op. The CME's are obviously coming from and area beyonf the western lim and 10 to 15 degrees north of the susnpot group 1429. The protons we are seeing now ar NOT from this CME.

Earlier in the thread it was pointed out that the protons came simultaneously with the x ray event, even seeming to preceed it slightly, this can easily be confirmed by looking at the charts. This is not normal solar flare activity, it is something totally different.

GLP screwing with your text again AA?

It has been pointed out by my prime detractor that my methods of observation are promitive, yet I don't see anywhere in any of his movies the location of any of the sunspots, which CAN be directly observed with the 'primitive' tools I suggested using.

One thing I have to say, it's not hat you've got, it's how you use it.

I have told people here simple ways to detect particle flux using everyday stuff that they already have because most don't have the money to spend on an 800-1500 geiger counter or a 4000 dollar telescope. besides that, why would I need to look at the sun through a telescope when ten thousand other people are at any given time and posting their observations on the internet. I had a telescope of some quality years ago but lost interest and gave it to a child, this was before 1999.

That doesn't show on my post they must be screwing with you.




BTW, If you're Mexican you and I are closely genetically related since Mexicans are mostly native American genetically. In fact, the racists in my area single me out due to my dark complexion, they wouldn't even let me go to their church because I looked indian or mexican, they wern't sure which.

true story

AA.....which recent movie that you have seen, & in your opinion would be a close match as to what we can expect in the near future. There has been a few apocalypic types over the last few years. Tks.