The total disintegration of the polar ice cap DID in fact occur. This information is readily available and MAINSTREAM scientists admitted that this was the greatest melting that has occurred in over 1 million years.
There is fact and article referenced on this thread with leading scientists in the field making this statement and warning there may be no real polar ice cap within 5 years, winter or summer.
Though there was patchy ice still present , for all intents and purposes it totally disintegrated, just as I predicted. I went on to predict that the refreezing this winter would be incomplete and thus far though refreezing should be occurring by now, it isn't on any measurable scale. The temperatures across the arctic areas are still well above freezing during the daylight hours.
Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1104458 This data source shows that the ice pack is continuing to grow as of several weeks. What data source do you have?
[
link to nsidc.org]
I said refreezing isn't occurring on an measurable scale and I was in error. The amount of increase in coverage is very small for the 2012 line on the graph, but it is measurable. I was looking at the same graph you were, perhaps my wording could have been better,, that there had been no significant refreezing and daytime temperatures are still averaging well over freezing. Pleas note the article I posted on this being the least ice coverage in over a million years.But I must admit, I need to edit my posts more carefully and choose my words a bit better.
These are "big deals" and I deserve recognition for my accuracy,they are predictions I nailed.
The reason I can make these types of predictions and persons trained in meteorology and others trained in astrophysics couldn't is simple, their education is compartmentalized and they have no dynamic knowledge of science, like for instance they have for the most part no idea the effects a plasma field can have on temperatures, or a cme , coronal hole or x ray flare. I know through observing patterns and correlations in data for over ten years now.
. I admit, I am no expert in every discipline involved, but my dynamic knowledge of science exceeds that of ANY TRADITIONALLY EDUCATED SCIENTIST, period....(don't bother calling the cia, 'cause they don't catch turtles anyway)-quoting 'Turtle man's" banjo playing partner.
Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1104458 Hey AA, I'm no astrophysicist, but just from my off the cuff logic, if the Cosmic Ray, or Neutron field of view is very diffuse, not showing clear sources, it would seem logical that this would be because some force, electromagnetism, gravity, whatever, to easily causes these particles or rays to curve and alter course, whatever they may be, and that would mean that even if their sources were very specific and possibly sporadic, that they could still appear as a diffuse haze by the time they get to earth. This would probably rule out the sun as a source though.
Quoting: ehecatl Yes, precisely! A galaxy is a vortex formed by forces upon matter, electromagnetic forces and gravitational forces, the more signification being electromagnetic. To me this seems obvious and has since I was a young child of 10.
I haven't seen it but I will take a look, I must be honest with you, I am very suspicious and unconvinced by anything coming from JPL, NASA or any source filtered by them. Note the title of the thread. Also please re read the last few pages for a description of my latest easily confirmable detection of fabrication of data.
For instance few realize that the only people in 'contact' with the Voyager' probe is JPL. No one else is in contact with it (and neither is JPL). More and more we are seeing massive funding for projects that produce data that makes no sense or as in the case of the Mars probe is amateuristically (is that word? If it isn't it needs to be and is now) fabricated.
