|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Astrophysicist. |
|
Post Content
|
Is this thread having 'server problems' again? Seems odd not even the hard core shit slingers aren't posting.
PHIL PLAIT IS AN INCOMPETENT 'FANCY BOY', NASA'S DISGRACE, AND THAT IS BEING NICE. COME ON IN HERE, BOY! JAY WINDLEY SUCKS COCK AND DOESN'T KNOW SUBLIMATION FROM NUCLEAR FISSION.
WHY ARE ALL OF NASA'S PROPAGANDISTS MORAL DEGENERATES?
Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1104458 I have noticed they do this when a few of us AC's start posting in your support.....they leave you alone for a few days perhaps a week or so....then they return.. it is SO obvious. In my experience the post you quoted would have brought them in mass. I think maybe they figured out by posting they are bumping the thread, but they won't leave it alone if it gets any significance views or posts, not a chance. If I post new material that goes against mainstream science, this will also bring them in. I have been very busy lately with what is a distraction I cannot ignore, one 'they' created. I don't know what my future holds , but one thing that has always been dangerous is teaching revolutionary ideas. Many men have died doing so, and went through all sorts of suffering. I knew the costs going into it, and the likely outcome. It is not that I put little value on my life, it is more a hope that through knowledge will come advancement in the human condition, that more of the right people will survive instead of the hellish future our planet has in store for it if only the least worthy are preserved. It is something worth dying for. But not worth something to risk your oh-so-precious-ego, I notice. Ah, so amusing. If people post counter to you, its a conspiracy. If they don't post counter to you, it's a conspiracy. And so much drama! If the admins had all the nifty powers you give them credit for, why don't they make this thread 'selectively visible' as you claimed they have done in the past? I am just patiently awaiting the chance to *test* another of your supposed revolutionary ideas, the results of which are forthcoming in December. I expect to be alive and posting to the still-working internet, without the population having been reduced by ninety percent. You claim a better than 98% chance (do you have any idea what that really means?) that I will be wrong on all those counts. Somehow, I think despite the ridiculously high odds you have given your predictions, that they will fail again. You think so, too, or you would have been willing to wager on it. I want you to give me a one word answr to sinple question forgetting all of the history we have nad the personal hatred we have for each other: Do you admit my predictions made on this thread have been extremely accurate, including going way out on a limb and predicting the total breakup of the polar ice cap (please note the PEER REVIEWED paper referenced here where the worlds leading TRADITIONALLY EDUCATED experts say this has been the most melting of the polar ice cap in over a million years and the many visual satellite images that graphically show the total breakup)), thousands of all time record temperatures worldwide,and the hottest summer on record have all been correct? If not , please give a detailed explanation of where you think my predictions failed, with PEER REVIEWED references please.  Now, I have one more question for you, assuming you're not going make and ass out of yourself an attempt to claim these predictions were not correct, WHAT THE HELL MAKES YOU THINK I AM WRONG ABOUT THE PREDICTIONS I MADE THAT TAKE PLACE CHRONOLOGICALLY IN THE FUTURE FROM THIS TIME FORWARD? Now that the astrophysics and meteorology columns in "GLP JEOPARDY" have been expended, let me ask you this question and you are welcome to reference any post I have made on the internet. When have you OR ANY OF THE INDIVIDUALS YOU INSISTED I APOLOGIZE TO IF I LOSE MY ONES SIDED NO WIN POSSIBLE BET WITH YOU EVER proved me wrong? Not called into question, not claimed it, but Plainly and obviously using empirical evidence as your only backing proved me wrong, about anything? And don't mention anything bases on unproved mathematical based theories where I out of principal refused to give and answer or any 10^5 bullshit. In my textbooks there is no number 10^5. I was traditionally educated during a different time, when the numbing down had not yet taken firm hold. Quite a record you have there, sport. You're batting a thousand.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
