WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

I don't know, maybe he is. Then again maybe his ID will change as soon as he reboots his modem like nevermore else.
Funny you should claim I have government agents supporting my position when doing so would be counter to any logical reasoning.

Please excuse the 'auto illiterate' editing in my posts above, I should be typing them to wordpad and then copy pasting them to a post page here and hitting 'post' quickly to prevent this childish chicanery, but let them have their fun. I think it should be obvious I am not illiterate by now.
I noticed they are concentrating on replacing 'an' with 'and' a lot lately, but this would be corrected by the software I use.

As I have said, I have automated spelling and grammar correction as I am a notoriously poor English master, and some of these 'mistakes' could not possible be generated by it. What the fuck man, why do shit like this, it makes you look petty and childish, as well as unintelligent.

Nevermore, nevermore saith the raven

I have no hatred toward you. If you do, towards me, you should probably get that checked. Surely there is an Anger Management course nearby.




You did predict it was going to be a hot Summer. But you were hardly alone.




To be honest, I DON'T remember you predicting that, but you certainly might have.




Yes. But, again, traditional climatologists have been warning about warming for decades.



Because THAT is where you break from the 'traditional science' climatologists, and go onto huge predictive limbs all alone, citing the Mayan stuff, the 2012 stuff, and make a lot of other predictions sans evidence, and come up with outrageous 98.5% figures. That's where you part company with the traditionalists, and I think you will be wrong.



Before we get to that, I explained exactly why the bet isn't one sided. If you are right about the future, which you are **98.5%** certain of, and the fate of the world, you'd literally be rid of me UNTIL THE INTERNET FAILED. You have made it perfectly clear that you wish my speedy departure, you supposedly have filed complaints with government agencies because a person is posting counter to you on the internet (again, the horror!), you have wished for and attempted to silence me in a number of amusing and ineffective ways. Well, here is your chance to be rid of me, forever.

You just have to be *right.*

If you are right, you'd **never hear from me again,** because the Internet would fail, utterly, before I ever had a chance to come back to your thread. You have said you are *over 98% sure* you are right, that this gigantic failure WILL occur.

But, if I am going to risk big like that, you're going to need to risk something big in return. And there seems to be NOTHING more valuable to you than your own inflated ego and sense of self importance. So, that's why I was picking that as something to wager. And with less than a supposed 2% chance of you being wrong, you balk. UTTERLY.

Shows exactly how much you believe your OWN numbers.




How about the Windows calculator thing? Totally sure it doesn't go to enough digits without looking on your OWN computer. How about the Eccentricity of orbits you still get wrong (which means *calculus* is now part of the conspiracy), or the fact that the Moon doesn't have the lowest as you have claimed? That's PROVEN, by the way, as the eccentricities are known out to several decimal places -- you just reject the proof despite telescopes worldwide COUNTING on those predictions to work and allow them to track objects. How about your claims that water is the only compound that expands on freezing? How about the *myriad* of claims that you made that Apollo couldn't launch, separate, dock, transmit, receive, orbit the Moon, land... that, essentially, *everything* on Apollo was wrong? The engineers didn't get a SINGLE aspect of the mission right, in your worldview? That NUCLEAR reactors were on Apollo -- and, I suppose the Space Shuttle as well? Your threatened subpoenas? Missing mass in atomic reactions? That boats aren't grounded? The martial law prediction you made in *2004?* Your forthcoming bestseller? Selectively visible threads on GLP? Your spectacular chess playing? The difference between a scientific law and a scientific theory, and which is 'higher?' That asteroid velocities are under 4 kps? No gravity assisted trajectories? Who I am and who my father was? That meteor crater is only THEORIZED to be from a meteor -- despite 30 *tons* of samples found at the site? That computers are based on alien technology? That Moonrocks could be *created?* Or water being an organic compound?

What's worse? This is an *excerpt!* There is SO much more!




But we're not talking about me, or my record. After all, I claim to be a fairly average guy, which I am. My record seems fine, because I have bet against you in the past, and won, and expect, come December 22, that I will win again, and win handily.

What I notice is that YOU are unwilling to wager, even though, were you correct, you'd be rid of me until the end of the world as we know it.

Quite telling.

To be honest with you agent 74444, I find it therapeutic kicking you in the nuts repeatedly, and since you will simply post under another user id number, what's the point? Do you believe I am stupid?

Sire, you are not capable of outsmarting me.

I have repeatedly admitted I was wrong, just not when I wasn't/ You don't recognize that. There are several instances in this thread. And I fully admit the 98.5% chance i put on the events I forecast coming to past is an estimate based on all of the information I have available to me. ( I actually think the odds are even greater, but I am being conservative in my estimate)

It is inevitable. The internet is made to be very robust and resistant to interruptions, it utilizes buried fiber optics and I am sure the rest of the internet is just as resistant to failure, but if I am right there won't be that many people left to use it and eventually the publicly variable internet will fail completely due to the fact that most folks' computers will be damaged and they'll be more concerned with survival that what has become a useless waste of time.

As I said, a lair is a liar is a lair, I have nothing to gain. You'll continue to post, you and i both know it.
Maybe not as agent 74444, but I suspect you sock puppet yourself frequently. After a awhile, you get to where you can detect writing styles and personalities, and since you have no personality, it isn't that hard.




it was not an issue of how many digits it could ejaculate(lmao), it was an issue of accuracy. This argument took place nearly 9 years ago, and the windows calculator was notoriously inaccurate at the time.


No sire, I contend at those distances accurate measurements are impossible to make. Our moon has a very low eccentricity, and has the lowest *known* eccentricity. Many scientists make many claims of fact that are not facts. You are basing your science on mathematics, which is simply not valid without empirical verification. There is no telescope in existence that can measure the eccentricities of the moons you referenced, as you admitted yourself the eccentricities are calculate mathematically. Though mathematics has it's places in science, proofs is not one them.



Actually I think you are bit confused. You need to look up the difference between 'compound' and 'element'. Water expands by 8% and silicone beats it with 10%, but silicone is NOT A COMPOUND. I think we've covered this before.




I never said any of those things. I in fact that know it launched, docked, transmitted, received. The only thing I've said it didn't and couldn't do is land a man on the moon, and all of the bullshit that went with that lie.

As i recall there was one 'mission' where the astronauts reported a high relative velocity upon repeated unsuccessful docking and I said the LEM's structural integrity would have been compromised and it would have been ripped open. A quick look at the docking mechanism will prove this.. I also stated that firing the LEMS engine with the command and service modules docked as was claimed with A 13 was not possible, the LEM was not designed for structural strength, it was made very lightweight and this would have ripped it apart. Under no circumstances could the CM or LEM engine be ignited while the two were docked, the stress upon the docking mechanism and the LEM would cause failure.
The LEM was 1/3 of a millimeter in thickness in the cabin section and had very little structural re enforcement.

LOl, grounded boats! Yeah, I've grounded a few. Grounding means just what is sounds like, and electrical connection to the Earth. I postulated briefly (as a child)that it would be possible to create an electromagnetic field with a nuclear reactor and that there was possibly one on board Apollo. I also briefly entertained the possibility with a17, I thought for a awhile they might have actually tried it but later found evidence a17 was a fraud.

Then came the argument over whether the plutonium powered power supplies were in fact nuclear reactors. Your side ignorantly argued that artificially enhanced radioactive decay was not a nuclear reaction, and of of course as usual I proved you wrong. Nuclear decay produces heat and is therefor a nuclear reaction.

There are most definitely closed threads on GLP, proof of it has been produced on this thread, no one would take my challenge to play me a game of chess for 10,000 dollars,I don't know what you're referring to about sceintific law and theory, theories are unproved and laws are proved and universally recognized as fact by all real scientists, very simple really. I don't recall saying something as stupid as asteroids all travel under 4kps, reference please?

The only problem is sire, you are WRONG about everything and putting words in my mouth as well.







But we're not talking about me, or my record. After all, I claim to be a fairly average guy, which I am. My record seems fine, because I have bet against you in the past, and won, and expect, come December 22, that I will win again, and win handily.

No you haven't and you can't reference a single example for us all to see. You make claims , but they are always lies.

As I said, there is no telling how many sock puppets you already have,I've nothing to win and your honesty is on a par with Nixon. Ironic isn't it, he is the president that 'oversaw' the Apollo project.

Temper, temper, IDW! Must control ourselves.

Sorry -- don't hate you. Apologies if that sticks in your craw, but there you go.




Sigh. Link to it, then.



I don't.



I said exactly what is true: I don't remember seeing that specific prediction of yours, but I was pretty late coming to this thread, so you might of. Sorry -- it's the best I can do. If you link to where you said it, I'll certainly admit it. And don't you have archived everything you've ever written on this thread? You've claimed that, too. So search your archive.

If you predicted it, good on you. You *still* weren't alone, and thus...



Sorry to offend you. But others WERE predicting it. In the last 12 years, nine of them have been the hottest ever recorded. The trend is pretty clear.




Please link to this claim, and I will admit you were right. But if I link to other climatologists making similar claims, will you admit you are wrong?





Then why have you made numerous requests for my departure? Why have you threatened pointless legal actions and supposed investigations into my background? Do you want me to stick around, or don't you?

You are *so* bi-polar on this issue...




I can't post under another ID. If I did spoof my address, some important equipment would break: equipment that's a heck of a lot more important than your ramblings on a Conspiracy board.

So, sorry, wrong again. Unlike you, I keep my promises. If you agree to the wager, I will not post to your thread until after December 22nd, when you claim most of us will all be dead anyway.




You are misreading me. I am saying you can be rid of me forever, but your specific prognostications about the internet, the December 22nd date, and the 9/10th of the population wiped out must be right to do it. I have been *very* specific in explaining, but your reading comprehension seems to dip in proportion to how annoyed you get. Again, deep breathing. Don't pop anything.




Finally, the CRUX of the matter. If you are SO sure, why aren't you willing to wager on it? You go on to say the failure of the internet is inevitable. But you STILL aren't willing to wager on it. You don't believe your own crap, and you know it, and I've merely forced you to demonstrate it numerous times on this thread.

You don't have the courage of your convictions. I do. PROVE the courage of your convictions, and I won't post in your thread, under any ID whatsoever, until December 22nd. But, if I am right and you are wrong, and 90% of the human race is NOT wiped out, and the Internet and GLP are STILL here, you have to post the apologies I outlined before. That's the price for 3 months of being 74444-free.

The fact that you AREN'T game speaks very, very loudly about exactly how much faith you have in that December 22nd date. And your lack of faith in your own convictions isn't *my* fault.

Why do care? Just wondering. You have a possibly dangerous obsession.

agent 74444, you are officially obsessed with AA.

I really do think this guy is a mis/dis info agent or government agent type...
seriously.....he is stalking AA on this thread like a man possessed.

agent 74444 your stalking like posts do far worse to your credibility than AA swearing now and then.

Fascinating. So when IDW/AA was engaging others with far more zeal than I ever have posted here, THAT was okay. When someone engages IDW/AA with the same tenacity, that ISN'T okay.

I am, admittedly, enthusiastic about the posts at present and for the next few months because it has been very rare that IDW/AA has made such a *concrete* prediction about the future that can be tested with a date -- and predictions directly about my own person, I might add. And I'm not going to pass that opportunity up.

I only have a few months to wait, and continually point out that IDW/AA doesn't have the strength enough in his convictions to wager his poor ego.

I will also venture to guess that there could be no posts whatsoever that opposed IDW/AA that 25000443 WOULDN'T claim come from a mis/dis info agent, and that 25000443 can't qualify the difference between an 'appropriate' disagreement and 'stalking' disagreement. Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.

Views = 259,593
Replies = 9,707

In the alternate universe that the Incredible Dim Wits inhabits 259593/9707 = ~250, not ~27 as we dwellers in this universe would think.

Off by a factor of 10.
About par for the course for IDW.

Now, explain again how sheep's bladders may be employed to prevent earthquakes.
... and how photons are just really, really fast electrons.
<snicker>


R.

You've calculated the wrong way round, it should be
9707/259593
as the ratio is replies per views the replies figure should be first. At a ratio of 1 reply to 250 views the number of views would be 2,426,750. (9707 x 250).

I found this image on GLP posted by Bowman interesting and thought maybe it should be posted here. Is it authentic do you think?
:rthqkchrt2:

12 things and counting - all bets are off

[link to beyondprophecy.blogspot.ca]

My error didn't occur that way but I can see how you came to that conclusion. Somehow i entered the wrong number of views or responses into my calculator, either adding a decimal place inadvertently in the in the number of views or leaving one out of the number of responses I used the same method as you , I recall, so that is the only explanation for being off my a decimal place..

This is why one should always double check and triple check his work when using calculators, and they in my experience tend to frequently result in these kinds of mistakes when using scientific notation. It wasn't really that important to the subject matter of the thread and and again, I admit error. of I didn't make errors I would be "god", a claim I don't recall making, but it should be kept in mind the more you do the more likely you will make a mistake.

It is in fact authentic.
It is also very predictable.
The connection between electromagnetic forces form space and geological activity is well established in part as a result of my contributions.

One of the things I would be interested to see is the graph entries post 2008,, which oddly and without explanation has been left out. What is the date that graph was generated, can anyone do the footwork on this?

Hey 74444 and company, you jumped on that like a vulture in an abandoned caucus . So Since In made a mistake entering am incorrect figure into a calculator EVERYTHING I have said must be totally discounted as having any credibility. I see.


THE MANNED MOON LANDING WAS A TOTAL FRAUD AND GIVEN 30 MINUTES OF UNEDITED DEBATE ON TELEVISION WITH NASA'S MOST KNOWLEDGEABLE PROPAGANDIST, I CAN CONVINCE THE WORLD USING ONLY UNIMPEACHABLE DATA AND FACTS AND THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD, AND THIS IS EXACTLY WHY YOU HOUND ME

*I hate that cheap trick with the auto illiterate editor, here's mud in your eye.

sheep's bladders prevent earthquakes? I've heard some pretty wild shit on GLP though the years and I understand the tactic, but do really think anyone who has read two or three of my posts is actually going to believe I said something like that?
And the <snicker> gave you away agent 74444, you are the ONLY person I ever saw use that series of symbols and that word in that order, which as far as I am concerned is an almost certain confirmation that you sock puppet yourself here, probably as several different posters. Your associates have been so demoralized and made fools of they cannot appear here under their old screen ids like halcyon daze an Nomuse, and the big dogs sure as hell aren't coming out from under the porch because every time they do NASA loses more credibility as I consistently make them look like lying, childish fools.

Wrong, on all counts. R420 and others here are not me. I cannot change my ID number, as I have explained before.

I don't play the views/posts game, because I feel it is irrelevant. I couldn't care less about the number of posts nor views.

I have never used the "snicker" tag in any post I have done, ever -- simply because I feel 'sound effects' detract from effective writing/communicating. So you have the wrong guy. But what else is new?

So, sorry. Your fabulous sense of sock-puppetry fails again. In my mind, there is no need for such shenanigans: fact is not determined by the majority. It is determined by the evidence. Whether I post alone, or others support my position is irrelevant.

You are merely using that excuse as a vehicle to avoid my suggested wager. I would have no problem avoiding posting on this thread altogether until after December 22nd, if you agreed to the wager, simply because the payoff *when* you failed (and you will) would be awesome (assuming you were man enough to take the wager and honor your word). This also, again, shows you how little your supposed 98.5% certainty is worth -- even to yourself.

Just like your utter failure to prove you know who I am, and who my father was (and your excuses then were equally pathetic), this also demonstrates your complete cowardice and lack of faith in your own prognostications and convictions.

Nothing more.

AA- Can u comment on the LA sink hole and is it a ELE event ?

was that link with those predictions like this in 2010?
nothing on the wayback machine:
[link to archive.org]

hmmm

The LA sinkhole is not in itself and ELE and the appearance of sinkholes all over the planet is on an exponential rise. This one , however, seems to have been caused by irresponsible human activity. If I were anywhere near it i would be packing up and leaving though.

It is important to realize that geological activity of all types is on a radical rise since we have neared the galactic plane and entered it's electromagnetic and gravitational influence, as evidenced by the previous referenced chart.

"predictions" 1,2,3,4,9 and 11 were all originally theorized or noted by myself and none of them are actually predictions, but more or less observations of fact confirming predictions or postulations I made in the past. Whoever is authoring that blog is closely following everything I say and has been for quite some time from the looks of things.

BTW,When I first suggested a link between solar activity and geological activity, ALL of mainstreams mouthpieces openly ridiculed me. It is now known to be fact.

The same is true when I suggested the geomagnetic field had holes or voids that were allowing particle radiation easily reach Earths surface. I think many of them knew at that time but were covering it up.

SO your father wasn't a paper clipped NAZI scientist?
I see.


And by the way, there are examples of you using the <snicker> thang here on this post.

Nope.



Doubtful.



Please feel free to link to them. If they aren't 74444, they aren't me.

AA- what I heard is atmosphere contracts during solar minimum and expands during solar max. Since we had a long solar minimum we need to have a strong solar max . from the looks , solar cycle 24 looks very weak. what do u say??

It's delayed, not weak. The end of cycle 23 was delayed. It seems the 11 year cycle has been somehow skewed. Haven't I answered this before?