Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,922 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,072,990
Pageviews Today: 2,958,385Threads Today: 934Posts Today: 15,168
06:42 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Poster Handle AnonPhysicist
Post Content
Doh. Take 2.


No one has ever attempted to disqualify this theory, though it is falsifiable hundreds of different ways experimentally.

 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist


Carefully and completely spell out five different experiments that would specifically falsify and disqualify your theory.

And watch my surprise when you can't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


Doh. Take 2.


No one has ever attempted to disqualify this theory, though it is falsifiable hundreds of different ways experimentally.

 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist


Carefully and completely spell out five different experiments that would specifically falsify and disqualify your theory.

And watch my surprise when you can't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


1)Prove the production of electricity from a photovoltaic cell is not the result of electrons in the form of light being intercepted by the atomic structure of the photovoltaic material and converted to normal low electrons. (By the way, the function of photovoltaic cells is most succinctly explained by my theory)

2)Prove that light frequency energy cannot be conducted by the same materials as electricity in the non EMR form. Radio antennae and wires being used to conduct EMR are in almsot every electronic device, and are conductors of electrons. Repeated experiments mentioned in early debates involving plants producing photosynthesis in total darkness using metal plates and conductors will get in your way though,as well

3)Prove that the energy of electromagnetic radiation is not directly related to it's velocity, speed amplitude and frequency, in other words prove that the particle I suggest is not moving the precise distance and velocity to produce the energy it does using the classic 1/2M X V2 formula. (I give the simple math proving this in my theorem)

4)Prove that and momentum can exist without mass

5)Isolate and fully describe the "photon"


Agent, I could go on an on and on if you wish.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1406242


None of those experiments seem to *prove YOUR theory.* These experiments seem to be about disproving the mainstream theories. And, in fact, they aren't experiments at all. Your attempts at disqualification of the mainstream theory (which is a classic argument from ignorance) have nothing to do with experimentally verifying YOUR theories. The closest you got was with plants, in #2.

You are the one proposing the idea. Propose with each of the above a specific experiment that will be explained and predicted by your theory, and if the experiment fails, will FALSIFY your theory. Do you understand? Can you?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


You asked for me to provide five methods of disqualifying my theory, and any one of these will do.
You obviously know nothing of the scientific process. As the "Mexican" shill pointed out, it is very difficult to prove a negative, thus quantum theory is still be tacked onto with gaudy science fiction
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:



News