WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

AA- At this important juncture wud request you to not divert ur attention to agent 74444 . Pls dont givin to what agent 74444 needs

I've observed this happen 5 or 6 times on this thread (and this thread only) over the last 9 months approx.

If you study the html code you see that the source of the problem is an initial doubling up of AA's GLP ID data (in whatever permutation or ID # that AA may be using at that time), in the "reply" page that is served out by GLP.

If you edit one of these posts with flawed quote attributions you will see what I mean.

I have not seen this happen, yet, on any other threads, and I have not seen the source error happen, yet, with the code error being located in any place but that of AA's ID info, whatever that may be at the time.

I am tickled beyond measure that you think I am so formidable enough to be considered an entire team of computer-aided super agents -- since in reality I consider myself a fairly average guy. It is equally funny that this fairly average guy causes your super-IQness no end of consternation.



I linked to entire experiments isolating the photon, and proving its existence -- experiments you can duplicate with the right equipment. I asked you questions specifically about validating what you claimed. I linked to all sorts of sources having exactly the information you claimed wasn't on the internet.



Exactly. And you provide no *proof* of your electromagnetic theory of everything. You give *no way* to falsify it. You propose *no experiment* to validate it.

It isn't science. It's the IDW-religion. As is your belief in my being anything but an individual posting counter to you on the Internet.

Your idea (it isn't robust enough to be considered a theory) will remain such until you do the work of experimental prediction, verification and falsification.

The closest thing we have to an experiment validating your ideas is to see how your prediction goes this December, in which the internet will be broken, millions of people killed, including me, by the 21st. If your prediction, which you gave better than a 98.5% of occurring fails to occur, it casts doubt on all the rest of your ideas.

Magnetometer off the charts

[link to www.youtube.com]


What say you AA?

[link to www.spacedaily.com]

one paragraph from the story you link to -

According to NOAA's August report, the earth's temperature has already risen about 0.62 degrees Celsius (1.12 degrees Fahrenheit) since the beginning of the 20th century as the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has grown from 290 parts per million to 379 parts per million.

So in other words, as they point out, there has been a little over a one degree F. rise in average temp in over a hundred years time,

and the portion of carbon dioxide composing the atmosphere has risen from ONE THIRD OF ONE HUNDREDTH OF ONE PERCENT, to more like TWO FIFTHS OF ONE HUNDREDTH OF ONE PERCENT.

In terms of the history of life on the planet these changes, at least as they and others have described, are infinitesimally small.

This all is part of the agenda of a false pretext to control (kill) people. From past experiences with AA's position on this subject, I believe that both him and I agree on the point that the human element in the (infinitesimal) change as they pointed out, is still very minor, and the sinister aspect of genocidal ideas of TPTB is reprehensible,

although AA would probably take issue with the amount of change taking place, that it would be more than the very tiny amount of change that they refer to in the story.

Last Edited by ehecatl on 10/16/2012 04:30 PM

Agreed...I wondered if he knew the people mentioned in this article

I guess you missed where they were caught fabricating data, huh?

No sir, you did not. If the existence of the photon had been proven and it had been isolated, it would not be considered theoretical. You might have tremendous technical resources at you disposal, but you have shit for brains. Too bad really.



There are and endless number of ways to disqualify my theory, but not if it's right. That's YOUR problem. You can't get past since my theory cannot be falisified that it is not falsifiable. You don;t even know what I said even means. If the theory is wrong the energy calculations won't add up, but THEY DO, with the electron's know mass.


As I have said before shitbreath, you are a disgrace and dishonor to yourself and any offspring that might have been unfortunate enough to spring forth from your loins. There is nothing more dishonorable that a professional liar. You're a bit like a lawyer defending a guilty client who want's to murder humanity. There is no person more worthy of eternal suffering. Justice is coming to us all. ARE YOU READY?.

YEAH, IT'S ME DOING IT! Please fuck off soft sell, if you're going to attack me at least have the dignity and the integrity to do it directly.

A DUMB was destroyed, it was a warning. I felt it here 70 miles west.

The Sun is firing up right on time, copy this x ray chart now and compare it to next weeks on Tuesday. Soon the baseline average will be in the "M" range, by early November at the current rates of increase.

[link to www.n3kl.org]

X rays are very high energy radiation, uv is intermediate. When the Suns 'total irradiance' (there is no such word BTW except by NASA and NOAA scientists)is calculated, for some odd reason they leave these out. "Radiance" is the real word. This just one of their many tricks to get around the fact they are lying using technicalities.

I'd also lay 1000 to one odds they are under representing the x ray flux and lower energy proton flux. I know for a fact they are systematically removing CME's not associated with x ray flares and replacing them with falsified images taken at a different time period. Sometimes you can see the minor sunspots simply appear and disappear and other times they travel in reverse to the suns rotation on the 'SOHO movie theater" which is a fucking joke.

Read the title of the thread.
"They" don't want people to know the truth, get that through your head. I know you already know this anyway, BTW. You wouldn't have a job if you didn't.


When you finish doing that , read about thousands of all time temperature records being set world wide, the record and alarming world wide glacial melting, the total disintegration of the northern polar ice cap this summer that leading experts in the field insist is the worst in 1 million years, and then ask yourself this, is an average change of less that 1 degree Celsius really possibly responsible for these EMPIRICAL OBSERVATIONS?

1:57 min mark in the video....what do you make of this?

Usually if not always caused by an highly elevated TEC

This is interesting...

Thread: Will 'A Knowledgeable Person' please explain

AA, can you please elaborate on the warning part of this?

Thanks!

Good CATCH, THANKS~

To put in laymens terms the chart referenced had to be changed because higher readings than ever expected are now being experienced.

In the last ten years this has happened with the X ray flux scale as well.(note the addition of new level above x class on this chart: [link to www.n3kl.org] ).

As many of you know,the exact same thing happened with the ultra violet scale which used to peak out at ten. What this indicates is the Sun and the area of space we are entering is changing, which though the shills will continue to deny and attack and distract me as much as possible, all I have o do is point out the undeniable empirical evidence , because it is all I rely on to make my conclusions, NOT THE MAYAN CALENDER AS MANY OF THEM CLAIM!. The fact that the Mayan calender long count ends on the date the Earth crosses the galactic plane was not known to me for certain until 2004, and I made my predictions well before that.. I have added this new chart to my list of resources and thank and give kudos to the individual who noticed and posted it. It generally indicates a rapid degradation in satellite transmission capabilities and is a very important resource.

It is indicative of the fact that we should expect a rapid reduction in geo stationary satellite reception and possibly total failure in the near future.

Since I expect a rapidly degrading situation overall, i will no longer be responding to off topic material or known and identified disinformation operatives, I don't have time to allow them to succeed in what is obviously their mission, to derail me from my mission of informing you the reader.

We have until a few days before Christmas to realize what is about to happen and prepare. The intelligent who have seen my message have already prepared. Those who haven't STILL HAVE TIME, the critical periods of dangerous radiation will be short lived, and where there is a will to live and faith in the creator there is ALWAYS HOPE.

If you have followed my thread you would already know the answer. I saw the damage on local news on a helicopter flyover of the area and it was two separate entry points of two separate projectiles hitting a forested area that caused the sound and vibration. What was destroyed, the actual target , was deep in the ground and most likely a DUMB associated with Barksdale Air Force base Strategic air Command SAC in Bossier City 50 miles west. Trees within feet of where the projectiles entered the Earth were undamaged. It WAS NOT AN EXPLOSION, at least not on the surface , and it was not a munitions bunker. My beliefs are probably so far removed from your own that to tell you **who** did it and why would cause you to think I am another GLP nut.

Sigh. Didn't even *look* at the links I brought up. Here they are again, for your convenience.

In 1986, Grangier, Roger, and Aspect performed an elegant
experiment to isolate single photons. Conceptually very simple, their approach was to examine correlations between photodetections at the transmission and reflection outputs of a 50/50 beamsplitter. To quote the experimenters, ‘‘a single photon can only be detected once!’’ Hence, if a single quantum of light is incident on the beamsplitter, it should be detected at the transmission output or at the reflection output, but not both: there should be no coincident detections between the two outputs.

The experiment is proof of the existence of photons.

[link to people.whitman.edu]

Others have repeated and refined the experiments.

[link to people.whitman.edu]

Here's a nice slideshow that even *you* can understand.

[link to people.whitman.edu]

See also:

[link to www.tp.physique.usherbrooke.ca]

[link to www.nobeliefs.com]

[link to www.bourbaphy.fr]

[link to www-d0.fnal.gov]

[link to www.eng.yale.edu]

[link to scienceblogs.com]

[link to www.bourbaphy.fr]




That's a laugh. I have several computers, an internet connection, and knowledge about how to actually DO research, and cite sources. What tremendous technical resources do I have that you don't?



Ad Hominem noted. As usual, it's all you have.



Of course it can! That's the whole point of a scientific theory!

A scientific theory must:

- be empirically testable or lead to testable predictions or retrodictions (use present information or ideas to infer or explain a past event or state of affairs)
- make verified predictions and/or retrodictions
- lead to reproducible results so others can double-check
- include criteria for determine whether data is factual, artifactual, anomalous or irrelevant

A scientific theory must help us understand the nature of our data. Some data may be factual (verify the theory's predictions or retrodictions); some may be artifactual (result of secondary or accidental influences); some are anomalous (valid, but at odds with predictions or retrodictions); some are irreproducable and thus invalid; and some are irrelevant.

You not only create experiments that succeed if your idea is true, you also design experiments that will FAIL if your idea is true. But you haven't spelt out a way to test your theory at ALL.

Above is spelt out exactly the experiment used to isolate photons, step by step. Why can't you design something similar? What experiment do you propose, as the creator of the Electromagnetic Everything theory, that will fail if your idea is correct? Spell it out. If you CAN'T, it is NOT a scientific theory. A true scientist should be the loudest single critic of his or her own theory. Otherwise, it's just an idea. Why is this so difficult for you to understand?





Excellent! Let's see some of those added-up calculations, step by step, line by line, truth table by truth table. If Archimedes can do it with floating bodies, surely you can with your hyper-intellect.




Ad Hominem noted. Oh, how you have wounded me.




Ad Hominem noted. You're a little like a kid who thinks he has super-powers staring hard at someone he doesn't like convinced their brains will explode at any moment now. And yet they don't.

See how pointless those kinds of lines are? Yet you use them so often and so fervently and so ineffectively.





Yes. But I am expecting justice will be in the form of you being utterly wrong on December 22nd, and the torrent of excuses you'll be using thereafter. You know that you'll be wrong, too, or you'd take me up on that wager you're too cowardly to accept.

How convenient.

That's all right. I'll still be here on December 22nd, pointing out how wrong you were. And providing sources which you still seem unable to do.

Carry on.

I am actually 115 miles west of the area of impact.

I don't know why I said 70, which is actually the approximate distance of Shreveport from the impacted area.

I felt I need to be as accurate as possible and in this case, the distance which the impact was felt is indicative of the energy released by it. Since there is very little visible damage on the surface, obviously it was underground where the energy was released and it occurred to me the plume of debris had to be ejected from the hole the projectiles made. This is why they are being so secretive about it, to admit the truth would be to admit their entire nuclear 'deterrent' is easily targeted and disabled.

The creator is not going to allow them to complete their plans to kill off the human race using thermonuclear weapons and disease as a maximizer of death and destruction.

Those targeted by the cleansing cannot escape, and this and a few other warnings I know of (one was the destruction of huge DUMB near Washington that resulted in literally a crack in their phallic symbol and a 6.0 'earthquake') were meant to spell it out in plain language they can understand, without words, and yet in stupid , arrogant disobedience they ignored the warnings and continued with their plans.

Absolutely. I bought a few fluorescent lights for night, and they've been flickering like crazy at night, not hooked up. Especially 3 nights ago. This thing's really a go isn't it? This weekend will be the two month mark. I believe it, but sometimes I wish it were yet a dream.

Maja--exactly in Korean. I never do.

The total electron count(TEC) on the planets surface has been off scale at times in many places, and the geomagnetic field strength follows it.
Korea just happens to be one of the places where it has been extremely elevated according to the charts, indicating a strong magnetic field line is intersecting the Earth there.

Florescent tubes will glow on the presence of high voltage electrons because the phosphorus in them glows no matter where the source of electrons is coming from. The person who described the photovoltaic powered toy is experiencing a similar phenomenon, where a capacitor in the circuit is being charged by electrons from the sun penetrating and perhaps convicting along the metal framework of the building he or she occupies. Certain areas are more susceptible to this phenomenon since the electrons follow the magnetic field of the Earth, entering it where the magnetic field lines do and these areas are constantly changing. I had a whole box full of fluorescent tubes glowing in the box in my storage shed yesterday, but I haven't noticed ones that are installed in electrical circuits glowing.

BUMP for any new information anyone might have came across.

I am wondering how this is tied into the incident in Monroe Louisiana, just have a strong feeling it is what I said before.

Shameless bump for any new observations or data I missed.

With all that is going on now it is understandable how this thread might not be getting the attention it requires, but remember , they are constantly distracting you from the one thing they don't want you to know, and this is IT.

The electron count on the solar wind is moderately elevated and the baseline average x ray flux continues in a pattern of a steady rise over the last two months. It is now 90 degrees her where I live in east texas,@ 20 degrees above normal.

I firmly believe the proton data and the cosmic particle data is being altered, there is no way we can see these kinds of geomagnetic effects without a causative CME or some other source of particle radiation. I have personally witnessed CME's without any significant rise in x ray flux repeatedly scrubbed from the SOHO sat elite's image database.