Ah, so you are still about! Hope you are well.
Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
I will find it interesting to test your predictions, SG, after IDW/AA's likely fail on December 22nd. It's a pity he hasn't been around, but c'est la vie. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444
33 days to go. Things aren't looking to good for IDW/AA's predictions...
Unfortunately people are in a trance state and unable to see the most obvious of facts.
I believe this is the result of an ongoing continuous psychological war that is enabled by radio frequency brainwave control piggybacked on the cellular telephone network and through television.
I'd forgotten about the brainwave-control claim of yours. Thankfully, it's still on the List. But, for now, it is irrelevant to testing your claims.
Yes, they are managing to create what appears to be near seasonal temperatures but the tell tale sign that I am correct is the 10-15 degrees above normal temperatures in the arctic and sub arctic regions. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
But that isn't what you claimed would happen. And do 'they' have uber-powerful weather control devices, too? Why didn't you mention that, oh, a *year* ago?
There is no 'reservoir' of cold air that normally facilitates the manifestation of the season we call 'winter'. There will be no winter. Localized snowstorms that melt off the next few days are not 'winter'. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
I suppose we will see. However, again, climate change and warming have been predicted by traditional, non-IDW science for decades.
Yes, there is some refreezing of arctic ice, but it at the lowest level in recorded history and deceptive tactics are being used to make it appear there is more solid ice that actually exists. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
You, of course, can cite evidence for this.
The data we are given counts any area covered by are least 15% ice as frozen, as in the chart posted earlier.. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
You can, of course, cite evidence for this.
The largest storm in recorded history just hit the northeast, the magnetosphere is so unstable that daily fluctuations of 100 nanotesla are becoming the norm at any given latitude, and contrary to a sophisticated propaganda campaign dedicated to making you believe all is normal, every prediction I made is coming to past. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
Like that prediction you made, with your claimed 100% accuracy, that martial law would be enacted in 2004?
While the current solar maximum appears to be somewhat tame with few complex sunspots appearing as of yet, this will change. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
We'll see what we see. But, strangely, the predictions leading up to December you made yourself on this very thread don't seem to be fitting reality all that well. How unusual.
As I have repeatedly stated we are entering completely uncharted territory and predictions are hard to make with any great degree of accuracy, Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
Despite you repeatedly claiming 98.5% accuracy, without quantifying that in any way...
but one that I can make with certainty is that the current mass extinction will worsen, the intensity of weather systems and weather extremes will worsen ( the energy that powers the weather comes from the Sun) , and data will continue to be withheld. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
How convenient for you. I expect when there is winter in the Northeast, you'll say "they" are using their weather control devices just to make "you" look wrong.
"They" are not going to tell you the direness of the situation but rest assured they have made their preparations. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
"They" are setting up a situation which will pit the nuclear powers against each other in precise timing with when the global changes become so obvious that no one will deny it. It amazes me to see people here who are stating directly that my predictions have failed.
Strange. When I look at your predictions, it isn't people I see failing. Just you.
While it is true that I have not been completely accurate , Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
and are now a contender for the understatement of this very young decade...
there is no one in this world who has been more accurate and with the complex interactions of a multitude of totally new phenomenon it is simply not possible to predict with 100% accuracy ever contingency. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
Yet, if you look at traditional physicists, chemists, biologists, astronomers, engineers, they all seem to predict their fields with fantastically more accuracy than you. Strange, that.
But I do think I have been correct on my main points, Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
unusual and unprecedented geological activity, Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
Please cite evidence supporting this claim.
an increase in the effects of solar events on the planet, Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
Please cite evidence supporting this claim.
and rapidly changing and radical weather patterns. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
Which traditional climatologists have been predicting for quite some time...
The one thing that admittedly has taken me by surprise is the lack of complex sunspots and I have been off with my temperature predictions as a result. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
Among other things.
Do not let your guard down because a few people have concentrated on the failure of a few predictions to manifest in precisely the way I said they would. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
Yes. Certainly pointing out your past failed claims and repeated incompetence in any number of different subjects you have claimed to master, your inability to cite supporting evidence, and your ego repeatedly overwhelming your judgement is no reason to doubt you *this* time.
Remember, there is no history to look back to besides several mass extinctions and changes in atmospheric composition recorded in ice core samples that we know were directly related to solar activity and intentionally attributed to other causes. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
You can, of course, cite evidence of this.
"They" will coordinate a worldwide economic failure followed directly by an all out nuclear exchange participated in by all of the nuclear powers (which are all actually under the control of the 'monolithic worldwide conspiracy" Kennedy spoke of) destroying the major cities and huge slices of the population when the magnetometer completely or nearly completely fails and the solar maximum peaks, probability, 100%. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
And those who have watched you will know exactly what your 100% certainty on any subject is *really* worth.
This will occur during the time frame I set forth throughout this thread. The fact that the solar maximum has not been that impressive as of yet is not to be taken as a sign of future events. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
Again, how convenient.
If you are wondering why I have not posted here recently the honest answer is twofold, I have been very busy preparing and the message has already gotten out to those who are still capable of complex intellectual thought patterns, which is about 1/2 of 1% of the total population who can see the 'whole picture'. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
And you are tired of getting your ass handed to you by your supposed intellectual inferiors.
The television program "doomsday preppers" proves that not a single one of these people preparing realize all of their separate reasons and fears are connected to each other. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
And such a highbrow set of subjects!
I will not waste my time posting here any longer as there is nothing to gain at this point and it would have no productive result at this point. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
Other than proving you inferior to your own tasks, yet again. I, for one, think that's *quite* productive, honestly.
What amazes me is how effective the electronic and psychological mind control has been on such a large percentage of the population, all who sense something is very wrong as the water begins to boil in the pot, and so very very few of the frogs are sensing the increase in heat and jumping out other than into either a worst position or no real increase in chances of survival. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1212805
And what amazes me is how tenaciously one will hold onto an erroneous idea, despite reams of evidence to the contrary, and how many irrational and repeated logical fallacies one will cling to to protect one's ego.
I expect to be posting in 2013 on a functioning Internet, proving you wrong yet again. The question, then, will be whether you have to courage to post, as well.
I suppose we'll see.