WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

I'm patient. Remember, I was willing to vacate this thread altogether until the 22nd if you took my wager. I must say, I am glad you didn't. It has been far more entertaining engaging you rather than forced to sit on the sidelines, just chomping at the bit to reply. Much more satisfying this way. I thank you.



Making quite a few assumptions that Spaceweather doesn't seem to be making. Ah, well. How often you try to mangle patterns into your preconceived ideas of how they OUGHT to look.



And when I am not destroyed, you will have to accept that the Universe doesn't agree with you as to who is wicked and who isn't. Should be sobering. Possibly even enlightening.

Then again, perhaps it won't be. You tend toward stubbornness.

Oh crap, go away 74444 - ! I need to ask AA..


So, it is pm??? I thought Mayan time zone would be behind US-EST.

Hey, IDW just requested me!

And in IDW's prediction, it was 11:11 GMT. Just for the record.

No. You predicted summer-like temperatures, and that there would be no winter.

Blizzard counts as Winter, I should think. As I said before: Strike Two.

Someone said in above thread:

' The 2012 Galactic Alignment as seen by ISS -- Amazing'

that the shape looked like a dual tetrahedron..........

For real, what is wrong with you? Pleasse go away.


4 min video capture of shape from ISS:



[link to www.youtube.com]

I don't know what to make of that, personally. It was quite odd for a lens flare if that is what it was.

Nice shot from the ISS.




What? You asked a question: I let you have IDW/A.A's answer.

Here's the place he said it:

Thread: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED! (Page 40)

What, specifically, are you claiming is wrong with me?

One blizzard does not make a winter. Saudi Arabia had a snowstorm in July, was that winter?

Nope, certainly doesn't. However, combine blizzard with thirty and forty degree temps across the North and Northeast, and compare that to your predictions of summer-like conditions and no snow, and a pattern emerges that does not seem to conform to your predictions.

I would guess what is wrong with you is that you are obsessed with me on a personal level to what I find an alarming degree, that you see me as a superior intellect and spirit that you have a psychological need to tear down, that you're a nothing to anyone and you believe that by heckling a someone you can gain recognition by being right, just once.

Oh, and my mistake: IDW claimed 11:11 EST, not GMT.

Mea Culpa.

The period of time normally called winter is not over with yet, nor is December.

You are a mistake.

Ah, a slew of ad hominem and personal attacks. The usual.

I've been correct more frequently than you have when we have engaged, both on this thread and others.

It looks likely I will be again, too.

11:11am EST ; 12:11 pm Mayan time. An odd thing I noticed about the time and date is that it is binary in nature, all 1's and 2's.

But that isn't what you claimed, is it?

You claimed many outlandish things would be occurring by now. They haven't. You predicted many outlandish thing occurring on December 21st. They haven't (so far). You 'calculated (though you never showed your math) a 98.5% chance that you were correct, and called that a conservative estimate. You predicted a huge cleansing, a nuclear exchange, and better than 90% of the species being wiped out, along with the complete failure of the internet.

You may notice: it's still here. Strike Two and a half.

You need to stop drinking and lying, the two don't go together well.




Maybe, but I wouldn't bank on it.

Uh, binary is 1's and 0's.

Just saying.

But the numbers are kind of cool.

Cut/ your reading comprehension and attention to detail are very poor considering your line of work, you need have someone hold your hand and talk you through what I actually said , paying particular attention to what events will occur when.

Take you own advice. Your accusation of drinking never ceases to tickle me, though.



I already demonstrated that I *was* willing to bank on it.

*YOU* weren't. QED.

Binary could be 7's and 4's, it simply means limited to two digits. You are revering to computer code binary. Bi means two, not 1's and zero's

Really? Tell me what I got wrong. Be specific.

That's fair.

Thread: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED! (Page 100)

So it hasn't began yet? That's a hell of surprise to me and everyone else who has a clue as to what is going on in the world. In case you didn't notice I stated they would synchronize the major offensive it with the first notice of natural caused deaths

Ah, so the inevitable push to 'my predictions will merely occur *LATER.*' How Nancy Lieder of you.

I asked AA a question, not you.

You LET me have the answer? I didn't go looking for it, but turns out, my memory was more accurate than your link??? How long ago was that?? How did you find the info so quickly??

What could possibly be wrong with you to stalk him like this??? Do you want me to start a thread just for you?

I'm really trying not to be too mean to you, 7444, you need to go back to silent-stalking.

Well, certainly more accurate than my my quick reading of the link. Again, mea culpa.



Remember I compiled a list with links not too long ago. I do lists a lot, as IDW can attest.



It's the end of a very long experiment. Forgive my enthusiasm, but it's been a long time coming.




Unnecessary, but thank you for the offer.