|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
Well, other than the satisfaction of seeing you proved wrong yet again,
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444 Actually, im my opinion it is lamestream science that was proved wrong, since the Mayan log count DID NOT end on December 21st. Ah, your justifications after the fact are truly priceless. And terribly dishonest. As I clearly stated, i simply made a gross error in judgement in trusting their announcements and promotion of that specific date.
Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1194140 And yet, you never posted any doubts prior to your failure! None! How could you quote such insanely high odds without looking into the Mayan Calendar at all? And isn't just the LEAST bit *possible* that it isn't the Mayans, the Calendar, or the announcements that are wrong: it's just YOU? You are human, after all. I knew a perfectly geo effective Sunspot would be present on that date which is extremely rare, tell me boy, was I wrong?
Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1194140 I don't believe you. Please link so sources demonstrating this sunspot, and to its rarity. Your word will not do it, for as you can see your credibility is quite low at the moment. and the satisfaction of seeing what your total confidence in any given idea is *truly* worth.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444 In other words it's personal, which would make what you're doing obsessive electronic stalking, which is illegal. Duck poopies. The fact that I get satisfaction seeing your core ideas being proved wrong does not a stalker make. Ad hominem noted, by the by.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
