WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED! | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 12/28/2012 12:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you take personal offense to his beliefs of religion, then I'd say you're not very confident in your said beliefs. To put it another way, someone who easily gets offended isn't very confident. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 Interesting. What does that say about IDW/A.A's confidence in his own beliefs? There's this thing called, oh what was it? It's so simple to understand, yet beyond the grasp of so many? Oh yeah righteous indignation And how do you know those IDW has attacked don't have similar righteous indignation? What is good for the goose, is good for the gander. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31009041 South Korea 12/28/2012 12:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In all honesty, who really cares? AA's egotistical madness remains in the forefront of his vile spew. Ad hominem attacks a regular feature when pinned down to hard fact. This thread should have petered out but 74444 has kept it going. Cottoned on yet? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30393843 Yes, I have. After all, this thread includes a *year* of IDW/A.A not only making a concrete prediction, showing no doubts whatsoever, but also using every fallacious argument in defending it, right up til hours after the event was supposed to have occurred, while touting an insanely high supposed accuracy that he gave no one any way of checking in advance, and *thoroughly* mistreating anyone who dared challenge him. It is quite gratifying to see -- not the least of which for the 95% of the population that was to have been wiped out, which, by the by, IDW/A.A seemed to show no concern for whatsoever -- and demonstrates thoroughly the failures in IDW/A.A's supposed logic, his failure to understand or apply the scientific method, and his inability to modify his idea in the light of further evidence. IDW/A.A has attacked me many times on personal levels, as a way of bolstering his arguments. I am hoping he learns such personal attacks on *anyone* detract from his ideas and arguments, and lead inevitably to such horrendous failures as the one that just passed. I feel IDW/A.A could have things to contribute if he learned to check his temper and his ego. I think he calls a spade a spade. Besides, I don't know where he ever made a threat involved in his knowledge of where someone lives, just that certain shills originate from a certain location. Quoting: AnonymousThen you haven't read the thread carefully, or are selectively letting IDW/A.A engage in behavior you'd decry in others. Despite numerous attacks IDW/A.A has made toward me personally, including claims of my being an agent, of being a Nazi, of being the child of a Nazi, being drunk, being gay etc., you may have noticed I have resisted making such attacks in return. I have belittled some of his ideas, and shown repeatedly a decided lack of evidence for his claims, evidence against his claims, and pointed out IDW/A.A's continued overuse of fallacious arguments. But I have remained polite. It is one of the reasons he refuses to engage me any more: I've given him nowhere to go, and done it using patience and keeping careful track of his claims, nothing more. Were he truly as hyper-intelligent as he claimed, you think he might have learned from this. Had he learned to be polite, learned not to shoot from the hip, and learned not to lie outright when he claims certain things, I likely would have stopped engaging him long ago. But, as this thread certainly proves, his ideas need a LOT of work to better describe reality. In a couple of years, he will claim this thread has been heavily edited to make him look like a dolt, and he will be lying, just as he has for threads past. And I will be there to point out the thread, keep track of his quotes, and maybe on *that* rerunning of this remedial course, he'll learn from his missteps. Or perhaps not. We'll see. You can spout sympathy for the devil all you want. You remain a stalker and a stalker forever more shall you be, even though assuredly the most annoying supposedly innocuous gnat or puppy dog that won't disattach from your face/behind/leg. You know you could just leave. It's really that simple. then you could spare us. but then part of your game I suspect is fatigue. And we do grow weary from every post you make. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31009041 South Korea 12/28/2012 12:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you take personal offense to his beliefs of religion, then I'd say you're not very confident in your said beliefs. To put it another way, someone who easily gets offended isn't very confident. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 Interesting. What does that say about IDW/A.A's confidence in his own beliefs? There's this thing called, oh what was it? It's so simple to understand, yet beyond the grasp of so many? Oh yeah righteous indignation And how do you know those IDW has attacked don't have similar righteous indignation? What is good for the goose, is good for the gander. Genius, genius post! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 12/28/2012 12:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29820852 What "truth" has been hidden in the thread that warranted AA lashing out? He has been asked many times to show evidence that data is being hidden and he has never done so other than his word and ad hoc observation locally. He often makes reference to home made instrumentation that is laughable at best with the "data" that he posts. He alone decides that people are government agents or such attempting to drive people who have the inclination to check actual facts and also to do research to discount highly improbable theories. Do you think he is to be listened to just because he gave himself the title "astrophysicist"? That is an old game of con men and bullshitters called appeal to authority and last I checked there are thousands of such with made up credentials all over the internet. What truth? Hmmm, let's see: official censorship of real-time data official coverup of the real nature of the universe which is electric, conscious, cyclical, and cataclysmic official placement of head tards like someone who couldn't do basic math, had a wife who could, who worked in a patent office to plagiarize etc official takeover of all media outlets in the western world controlled by those who can't stand to look in the mirror at their real selves and physical attributes (shouldn't take a genius to figure out which bodily part I'm referring to here) and this is just a bit of it that comes to mind at the moment mind you. Why is it so hard to believe that his data he provided in his younger and more naive years has been systemically removed? Shit, you're on a conspiracy website. Do try and believe in at least one conspiracy while you're here. there's lots of gov't agents in play, of that there should be no doubt. He's definitely an astrophysicist because no one can match his replies. I've seen it over and over, and to say I'm convinced is a supreme understatement. If you're not, then I offer you a few simple tests, take your pick: What's this dark matter? Black holes are real? What creates a south and north pole polarity? What fuels the sun? Are the orbits of the planets circular, and ellipse, or what? Is the speed of light a constant? What's the purpose of chemtrails? What evidence is there that any censorship has taken place other than AAs pronouncement that it is so? I will say it again as well he has no instrumentation that could give and useful information but rather does seat of the pants guesses using the web. He has been shown numerous times to use information from the very same sources out of ignorance of the source material origin. Him saying you can see particle radiation if you get in some shade was hilarious. Perhaps we can explore your points one at a time. What evidence is there to support the very title of the thread? If you think there's no hiding of data, you're really out of touch. Nothing else need be said. Except the hiding of IDW's RESULT, which would be un-hideable. His result was wrong, and the data that IDW has been claiming was wrong or hidden predicted this result, while IDW himself didn't. The DATA wasn't at fault. Reality has spoken. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 12/28/2012 12:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444 Interesting. What does that say about IDW/A.A's confidence in his own beliefs? There's this thing called, oh what was it? It's so simple to understand, yet beyond the grasp of so many? Oh yeah righteous indignation And how do you know those IDW has attacked don't have similar righteous indignation? What is good for the goose, is good for the gander. Genius, genius post! Thank you. I aim to please. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29820852 United States 12/28/2012 12:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29820852 What "truth" has been hidden in the thread that warranted AA lashing out? He has been asked many times to show evidence that data is being hidden and he has never done so other than his word and ad hoc observation locally. He often makes reference to home made instrumentation that is laughable at best with the "data" that he posts. He alone decides that people are government agents or such attempting to drive people who have the inclination to check actual facts and also to do research to discount highly improbable theories. Do you think he is to be listened to just because he gave himself the title "astrophysicist"? That is an old game of con men and bullshitters called appeal to authority and last I checked there are thousands of such with made up credentials all over the internet. What truth? Hmmm, let's see: official censorship of real-time data official coverup of the real nature of the universe which is electric, conscious, cyclical, and cataclysmic official placement of head tards like someone who couldn't do basic math, had a wife who could, who worked in a patent office to plagiarize etc official takeover of all media outlets in the western world controlled by those who can't stand to look in the mirror at their real selves and physical attributes (shouldn't take a genius to figure out which bodily part I'm referring to here) and this is just a bit of it that comes to mind at the moment mind you. Why is it so hard to believe that his data he provided in his younger and more naive years has been systemically removed? Shit, you're on a conspiracy website. Do try and believe in at least one conspiracy while you're here. there's lots of gov't agents in play, of that there should be no doubt. He's definitely an astrophysicist because no one can match his replies. I've seen it over and over, and to say I'm convinced is a supreme understatement. If you're not, then I offer you a few simple tests, take your pick: What's this dark matter? Black holes are real? What creates a south and north pole polarity? What fuels the sun? Are the orbits of the planets circular, and ellipse, or what? Is the speed of light a constant? What's the purpose of chemtrails? What evidence is there that any censorship has taken place other than AAs pronouncement that it is so? I will say it again as well he has no instrumentation that could give and useful information but rather does seat of the pants guesses using the web. He has been shown numerous times to use information from the very same sources out of ignorance of the source material origin. Him saying you can see particle radiation if you get in some shade was hilarious. Perhaps we can explore your points one at a time. What evidence is there to support the very title of the thread? If you think there's no hiding of data, you're really out of touch. Nothing else need be said. So you just "know" there has been..... No wonder you stayed in the bunker as you believe in crackpot ideas and anecdotal evidence rather than reasearch into scientific study. AA talks all the time about "science" but he does not actually "do" any science whatsoever. You are a fellow parishioner with AA in the church of cataclysmic doom and follow the dogma which you just showed by this reply. Of course AA is at least a Bishop in this church no doubt. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 12/28/2012 12:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In all honesty, who really cares? AA's egotistical madness remains in the forefront of his vile spew. Ad hominem attacks a regular feature when pinned down to hard fact. This thread should have petered out but 74444 has kept it going. Cottoned on yet? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30393843 Yes, I have. After all, this thread includes a *year* of IDW/A.A not only making a concrete prediction, showing no doubts whatsoever, but also using every fallacious argument in defending it, right up til hours after the event was supposed to have occurred, while touting an insanely high supposed accuracy that he gave no one any way of checking in advance, and *thoroughly* mistreating anyone who dared challenge him. It is quite gratifying to see -- not the least of which for the 95% of the population that was to have been wiped out, which, by the by, IDW/A.A seemed to show no concern for whatsoever -- and demonstrates thoroughly the failures in IDW/A.A's supposed logic, his failure to understand or apply the scientific method, and his inability to modify his idea in the light of further evidence. IDW/A.A has attacked me many times on personal levels, as a way of bolstering his arguments. I am hoping he learns such personal attacks on *anyone* detract from his ideas and arguments, and lead inevitably to such horrendous failures as the one that just passed. I feel IDW/A.A could have things to contribute if he learned to check his temper and his ego. I think he calls a spade a spade. Besides, I don't know where he ever made a threat involved in his knowledge of where someone lives, just that certain shills originate from a certain location. Quoting: AnonymousThen you haven't read the thread carefully, or are selectively letting IDW/A.A engage in behavior you'd decry in others. Despite numerous attacks IDW/A.A has made toward me personally, including claims of my being an agent, of being a Nazi, of being the child of a Nazi, being drunk, being gay etc., you may have noticed I have resisted making such attacks in return. I have belittled some of his ideas, and shown repeatedly a decided lack of evidence for his claims, evidence against his claims, and pointed out IDW/A.A's continued overuse of fallacious arguments. But I have remained polite. It is one of the reasons he refuses to engage me any more: I've given him nowhere to go, and done it using patience and keeping careful track of his claims, nothing more. Were he truly as hyper-intelligent as he claimed, you think he might have learned from this. Had he learned to be polite, learned not to shoot from the hip, and learned not to lie outright when he claims certain things, I likely would have stopped engaging him long ago. But, as this thread certainly proves, his ideas need a LOT of work to better describe reality. In a couple of years, he will claim this thread has been heavily edited to make him look like a dolt, and he will be lying, just as he has for threads past. And I will be there to point out the thread, keep track of his quotes, and maybe on *that* rerunning of this remedial course, he'll learn from his missteps. Or perhaps not. We'll see. You can spout sympathy for the devil all you want. You remain a stalker and a stalker forever more shall you be, even though assuredly the most annoying supposedly innocuous gnat or puppy dog that won't disattach from your face/behind/leg. Heh. Maybe you are IDW using a proxy? That would be a hoot. You know you could just leave. It's really that simple. then you could spare us. but then part of your game I suspect is fatigue. And we do grow weary from every post you make. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 Your wearniess is not my concern. And IDW can make me leave any time he wants, by not engaging in the behavior I have repeatedly pointed out. Heck, this thread could have been 74444-free months ago, if IDW had taken my wager. But then, he would have LOST, wouldn't of he? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 12/28/2012 12:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444 Interesting. What does that say about IDW/A.A's confidence in his own beliefs? There's this thing called, oh what was it? It's so simple to understand, yet beyond the grasp of so many? Oh yeah righteous indignation And how do you know those IDW has attacked don't have similar righteous indignation? What is good for the goose, is good for the gander. Genius, genius post! By the by, you do realize that your being able to post belies IDW's claim that none of his supporters can post to the thread, yes? So thank you for proving IDW wrong yet again. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31009041 South Korea 12/28/2012 12:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 What truth? Hmmm, let's see: official censorship of real-time data official coverup of the real nature of the universe which is electric, conscious, cyclical, and cataclysmic official placement of head tards like someone who couldn't do basic math, had a wife who could, who worked in a patent office to plagiarize etc official takeover of all media outlets in the western world controlled by those who can't stand to look in the mirror at their real selves and physical attributes (shouldn't take a genius to figure out which bodily part I'm referring to here) and this is just a bit of it that comes to mind at the moment mind you. Why is it so hard to believe that his data he provided in his younger and more naive years has been systemically removed? Shit, you're on a conspiracy website. Do try and believe in at least one conspiracy while you're here. there's lots of gov't agents in play, of that there should be no doubt. He's definitely an astrophysicist because no one can match his replies. I've seen it over and over, and to say I'm convinced is a supreme understatement. If you're not, then I offer you a few simple tests, take your pick: What's this dark matter? Black holes are real? What creates a south and north pole polarity? What fuels the sun? Are the orbits of the planets circular, and ellipse, or what? Is the speed of light a constant? What's the purpose of chemtrails? What evidence is there that any censorship has taken place other than AAs pronouncement that it is so? I will say it again as well he has no instrumentation that could give and useful information but rather does seat of the pants guesses using the web. He has been shown numerous times to use information from the very same sources out of ignorance of the source material origin. Him saying you can see particle radiation if you get in some shade was hilarious. Perhaps we can explore your points one at a time. What evidence is there to support the very title of the thread? If you think there's no hiding of data, you're really out of touch. Nothing else need be said. Except the hiding of IDW's RESULT, which would be un-hideable. His result was wrong, and the data that IDW has been claiming was wrong or hidden predicted this result, while IDW himself didn't. The DATA wasn't at fault. Reality has spoken. You are wrong on all counts. His data can be hidden, that's all too easy to do on the internet. Read: removed. All the all-telling signs leading up to catastrophe remain. A yellow sun turning blue/white has more fuel. it's just that simple. And that extra fuel will have to be released. Just because albinos tampered with the date means squat. I mean remember that little video Spock made? In it was claimed the end of the mayan calendar was in 2011. then it was made for 2012. they can't even make up their own minds beforehand what date to pick. It's just that obvious. And what's a few months anyway? Reality has still yet to speak. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31009041 South Korea 12/28/2012 12:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 There's this thing called, oh what was it? It's so simple to understand, yet beyond the grasp of so many? Oh yeah righteous indignation And how do you know those IDW has attacked don't have similar righteous indignation? What is good for the goose, is good for the gander. Genius, genius post! Thank you. I aim to please. Your commanding bird presence has done lots of aiming in your time. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31009041 South Korea 12/28/2012 01:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 What truth? Hmmm, let's see: official censorship of real-time data official coverup of the real nature of the universe which is electric, conscious, cyclical, and cataclysmic official placement of head tards like someone who couldn't do basic math, had a wife who could, who worked in a patent office to plagiarize etc official takeover of all media outlets in the western world controlled by those who can't stand to look in the mirror at their real selves and physical attributes (shouldn't take a genius to figure out which bodily part I'm referring to here) and this is just a bit of it that comes to mind at the moment mind you. Why is it so hard to believe that his data he provided in his younger and more naive years has been systemically removed? Shit, you're on a conspiracy website. Do try and believe in at least one conspiracy while you're here. there's lots of gov't agents in play, of that there should be no doubt. He's definitely an astrophysicist because no one can match his replies. I've seen it over and over, and to say I'm convinced is a supreme understatement. If you're not, then I offer you a few simple tests, take your pick: What's this dark matter? Black holes are real? What creates a south and north pole polarity? What fuels the sun? Are the orbits of the planets circular, and ellipse, or what? Is the speed of light a constant? What's the purpose of chemtrails? What evidence is there that any censorship has taken place other than AAs pronouncement that it is so? I will say it again as well he has no instrumentation that could give and useful information but rather does seat of the pants guesses using the web. He has been shown numerous times to use information from the very same sources out of ignorance of the source material origin. Him saying you can see particle radiation if you get in some shade was hilarious. Perhaps we can explore your points one at a time. What evidence is there to support the very title of the thread? If you think there's no hiding of data, you're really out of touch. Nothing else need be said. So you just "know" there has been..... No wonder you stayed in the bunker as you believe in crackpot ideas and anecdotal evidence rather than reasearch into scientific study. AA talks all the time about "science" but he does not actually "do" any science whatsoever. You are a fellow parishioner with AA in the church of cataclysmic doom and follow the dogma which you just showed by this reply. Of course AA is at least a Bishop in this church no doubt. That's exactly right, because suredly there has never ever ever been any cataclysm in Earth's history suddenly. That's just fantastical. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31009041 South Korea 12/28/2012 01:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In all honesty, who really cares? AA's egotistical madness remains in the forefront of his vile spew. Ad hominem attacks a regular feature when pinned down to hard fact. This thread should have petered out but 74444 has kept it going. Cottoned on yet? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30393843 Yes, I have. After all, this thread includes a *year* of IDW/A.A not only making a concrete prediction, showing no doubts whatsoever, but also using every fallacious argument in defending it, right up til hours after the event was supposed to have occurred, while touting an insanely high supposed accuracy that he gave no one any way of checking in advance, and *thoroughly* mistreating anyone who dared challenge him. It is quite gratifying to see -- not the least of which for the 95% of the population that was to have been wiped out, which, by the by, IDW/A.A seemed to show no concern for whatsoever -- and demonstrates thoroughly the failures in IDW/A.A's supposed logic, his failure to understand or apply the scientific method, and his inability to modify his idea in the light of further evidence. IDW/A.A has attacked me many times on personal levels, as a way of bolstering his arguments. I am hoping he learns such personal attacks on *anyone* detract from his ideas and arguments, and lead inevitably to such horrendous failures as the one that just passed. I feel IDW/A.A could have things to contribute if he learned to check his temper and his ego. I think he calls a spade a spade. Besides, I don't know where he ever made a threat involved in his knowledge of where someone lives, just that certain shills originate from a certain location. Quoting: AnonymousThen you haven't read the thread carefully, or are selectively letting IDW/A.A engage in behavior you'd decry in others. Despite numerous attacks IDW/A.A has made toward me personally, including claims of my being an agent, of being a Nazi, of being the child of a Nazi, being drunk, being gay etc., you may have noticed I have resisted making such attacks in return. I have belittled some of his ideas, and shown repeatedly a decided lack of evidence for his claims, evidence against his claims, and pointed out IDW/A.A's continued overuse of fallacious arguments. But I have remained polite. It is one of the reasons he refuses to engage me any more: I've given him nowhere to go, and done it using patience and keeping careful track of his claims, nothing more. Were he truly as hyper-intelligent as he claimed, you think he might have learned from this. Had he learned to be polite, learned not to shoot from the hip, and learned not to lie outright when he claims certain things, I likely would have stopped engaging him long ago. But, as this thread certainly proves, his ideas need a LOT of work to better describe reality. In a couple of years, he will claim this thread has been heavily edited to make him look like a dolt, and he will be lying, just as he has for threads past. And I will be there to point out the thread, keep track of his quotes, and maybe on *that* rerunning of this remedial course, he'll learn from his missteps. Or perhaps not. We'll see. You can spout sympathy for the devil all you want. You remain a stalker and a stalker forever more shall you be, even though assuredly the most annoying supposedly innocuous gnat or puppy dog that won't disattach from your face/behind/leg. Heh. Maybe you are IDW using a proxy? That would be a hoot. You know you could just leave. It's really that simple. then you could spare us. but then part of your game I suspect is fatigue. And we do grow weary from every post you make. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 Your wearniess is not my concern. And IDW can make me leave any time he wants, by not engaging in the behavior I have repeatedly pointed out. Heck, this thread could have been 74444-free months ago, if IDW had taken my wager. But then, he would have LOST, wouldn't of he? His forte is scientific acumen. Mine is the command of English and words. If you can't see an obvious difference in style and ability, you're sure not as smart as you think you are. He can engage in any behavior he damn well wants or pleases. You're just like the miserable soul who decries...why THEY make me angry, it's THEIR fault. Pretty pathetic. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31009041 South Korea 12/28/2012 01:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444 Yes, I have. After all, this thread includes a *year* of IDW/A.A not only making a concrete prediction, showing no doubts whatsoever, but also using every fallacious argument in defending it, right up til hours after the event was supposed to have occurred, while touting an insanely high supposed accuracy that he gave no one any way of checking in advance, and *thoroughly* mistreating anyone who dared challenge him. It is quite gratifying to see -- not the least of which for the 95% of the population that was to have been wiped out, which, by the by, IDW/A.A seemed to show no concern for whatsoever -- and demonstrates thoroughly the failures in IDW/A.A's supposed logic, his failure to understand or apply the scientific method, and his inability to modify his idea in the light of further evidence. IDW/A.A has attacked me many times on personal levels, as a way of bolstering his arguments. I am hoping he learns such personal attacks on *anyone* detract from his ideas and arguments, and lead inevitably to such horrendous failures as the one that just passed. I feel IDW/A.A could have things to contribute if he learned to check his temper and his ego. ... Then you haven't read the thread carefully, or are selectively letting IDW/A.A engage in behavior you'd decry in others. Despite numerous attacks IDW/A.A has made toward me personally, including claims of my being an agent, of being a Nazi, of being the child of a Nazi, being drunk, being gay etc., you may have noticed I have resisted making such attacks in return. I have belittled some of his ideas, and shown repeatedly a decided lack of evidence for his claims, evidence against his claims, and pointed out IDW/A.A's continued overuse of fallacious arguments. But I have remained polite. It is one of the reasons he refuses to engage me any more: I've given him nowhere to go, and done it using patience and keeping careful track of his claims, nothing more. Were he truly as hyper-intelligent as he claimed, you think he might have learned from this. Had he learned to be polite, learned not to shoot from the hip, and learned not to lie outright when he claims certain things, I likely would have stopped engaging him long ago. But, as this thread certainly proves, his ideas need a LOT of work to better describe reality. In a couple of years, he will claim this thread has been heavily edited to make him look like a dolt, and he will be lying, just as he has for threads past. And I will be there to point out the thread, keep track of his quotes, and maybe on *that* rerunning of this remedial course, he'll learn from his missteps. Or perhaps not. We'll see. You can spout sympathy for the devil all you want. You remain a stalker and a stalker forever more shall you be, even though assuredly the most annoying supposedly innocuous gnat or puppy dog that won't disattach from your face/behind/leg. Heh. Maybe you are IDW using a proxy? That would be a hoot. You know you could just leave. It's really that simple. then you could spare us. but then part of your game I suspect is fatigue. And we do grow weary from every post you make. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 Your wearniess is not my concern. And IDW can make me leave any time he wants, by not engaging in the behavior I have repeatedly pointed out. Heck, this thread could have been 74444-free months ago, if IDW had taken my wager. But then, he would have LOST, wouldn't of he? His forte is scientific acumen. Mine is the command of English and words. If you can't see an obvious difference in style and ability, you're sure not as smart as you think you are. He can engage in any behavior he damn well wants or pleases. You're just like the miserable soul who decries...why THEY make me angry, it's THEIR fault. Pretty pathetic. And to clarify, he's certainly no slouch in English! It's actually pretty rare that someone of his scientific standing has the amazing ability to write with the clarity and simplicity for the avg Joe to even try to grasp. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 12/28/2012 01:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29820852 What evidence is there that any censorship has taken place other than AAs pronouncement that it is so? I will say it again as well he has no instrumentation that could give and useful information but rather does seat of the pants guesses using the web. He has been shown numerous times to use information from the very same sources out of ignorance of the source material origin. Him saying you can see particle radiation if you get in some shade was hilarious. Perhaps we can explore your points one at a time. What evidence is there to support the very title of the thread? If you think there's no hiding of data, you're really out of touch. Nothing else need be said. Except the hiding of IDW's RESULT, which would be un-hideable. His result was wrong, and the data that IDW has been claiming was wrong or hidden predicted this result, while IDW himself didn't. The DATA wasn't at fault. Reality has spoken. You are wrong on all counts. His data can be hidden, that's all too easy to do on the internet. Read: removed. There are many other sources of data other than the Internet. All the all-telling signs leading up to catastrophe remain. A yellow sun turning blue/white has more fuel. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 Yet somehow the spectrum from a prism remain unchanged. I am sure, if the positions were reversed, that IDW would accept this argument. I also see no evidence OTHER than IDW's failure that the date was or *could* have been *tampered with.* I mean remember that little video Spock made? In it was claimed the end of the mayan calendar was in 2011. then it was made for 2012. they can't even make up their own minds beforehand what date to pick. It's just that obvious. And what's a few months anyway? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 I would like to see evidence of 2011 being a date touted, not that it matters much. So, when June comes and goes, is that long enough? How about 2014? 2015? When can we conclude that IDW/A.A is merely wrong? Ever? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 12/28/2012 01:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444 And how do you know those IDW has attacked don't have similar righteous indignation? What is good for the goose, is good for the gander. Genius, genius post! Thank you. I aim to please. Your commanding bird presence has done lots of aiming in your time. I fail to grok this sentence. What are you saying? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31009041 South Korea 12/28/2012 01:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 There's this thing called, oh what was it? It's so simple to understand, yet beyond the grasp of so many? Oh yeah righteous indignation And how do you know those IDW has attacked don't have similar righteous indignation? What is good for the goose, is good for the gander. Genius, genius post! By the by, you do realize that your being able to post belies IDW's claim that none of his supporters can post to the thread, yes? So thank you for proving IDW wrong yet again. I'm Quick, however, not being tied down to one location. They'll have to ban all of Korea to keep me from posting. Which they've done in the past, but so far, not that I've seen on this thread. Doesn't prove your point at all. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31009041 South Korea 12/28/2012 01:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31025067 United Kingdom 12/28/2012 01:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31009041 South Korea 12/28/2012 01:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 If you think there's no hiding of data, you're really out of touch. Nothing else need be said. Except the hiding of IDW's RESULT, which would be un-hideable. His result was wrong, and the data that IDW has been claiming was wrong or hidden predicted this result, while IDW himself didn't. The DATA wasn't at fault. Reality has spoken. You are wrong on all counts. His data can be hidden, that's all too easy to do on the internet. Read: removed. There are many other sources of data other than the Internet. All the all-telling signs leading up to catastrophe remain. A yellow sun turning blue/white has more fuel. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 Yet somehow the spectrum from a prism remain unchanged. I am sure, if the positions were reversed, that IDW would accept this argument. I also see no evidence OTHER than IDW's failure that the date was or *could* have been *tampered with.* I mean remember that little video Spock made? In it was claimed the end of the mayan calendar was in 2011. then it was made for 2012. they can't even make up their own minds beforehand what date to pick. It's just that obvious. And what's a few months anyway? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 I would like to see evidence of 2011 being a date touted, not that it matters much. So, when June comes and goes, is that long enough? How about 2014? 2015? When can we conclude that IDW/A.A is merely wrong? Ever? I think the true test is when you decide to stop posting. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 12/28/2012 01:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444 Yes, I have. After all, this thread includes a *year* of IDW/A.A not only making a concrete prediction, showing no doubts whatsoever, but also using every fallacious argument in defending it, right up til hours after the event was supposed to have occurred, while touting an insanely high supposed accuracy that he gave no one any way of checking in advance, and *thoroughly* mistreating anyone who dared challenge him. It is quite gratifying to see -- not the least of which for the 95% of the population that was to have been wiped out, which, by the by, IDW/A.A seemed to show no concern for whatsoever -- and demonstrates thoroughly the failures in IDW/A.A's supposed logic, his failure to understand or apply the scientific method, and his inability to modify his idea in the light of further evidence. IDW/A.A has attacked me many times on personal levels, as a way of bolstering his arguments. I am hoping he learns such personal attacks on *anyone* detract from his ideas and arguments, and lead inevitably to such horrendous failures as the one that just passed. I feel IDW/A.A could have things to contribute if he learned to check his temper and his ego. ... Then you haven't read the thread carefully, or are selectively letting IDW/A.A engage in behavior you'd decry in others. Despite numerous attacks IDW/A.A has made toward me personally, including claims of my being an agent, of being a Nazi, of being the child of a Nazi, being drunk, being gay etc., you may have noticed I have resisted making such attacks in return. I have belittled some of his ideas, and shown repeatedly a decided lack of evidence for his claims, evidence against his claims, and pointed out IDW/A.A's continued overuse of fallacious arguments. But I have remained polite. It is one of the reasons he refuses to engage me any more: I've given him nowhere to go, and done it using patience and keeping careful track of his claims, nothing more. Were he truly as hyper-intelligent as he claimed, you think he might have learned from this. Had he learned to be polite, learned not to shoot from the hip, and learned not to lie outright when he claims certain things, I likely would have stopped engaging him long ago. But, as this thread certainly proves, his ideas need a LOT of work to better describe reality. In a couple of years, he will claim this thread has been heavily edited to make him look like a dolt, and he will be lying, just as he has for threads past. And I will be there to point out the thread, keep track of his quotes, and maybe on *that* rerunning of this remedial course, he'll learn from his missteps. Or perhaps not. We'll see. You can spout sympathy for the devil all you want. You remain a stalker and a stalker forever more shall you be, even though assuredly the most annoying supposedly innocuous gnat or puppy dog that won't disattach from your face/behind/leg. Heh. Maybe you are IDW using a proxy? That would be a hoot. You know you could just leave. It's really that simple. then you could spare us. but then part of your game I suspect is fatigue. And we do grow weary from every post you make. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 Your wearniess is not my concern. And IDW can make me leave any time he wants, by not engaging in the behavior I have repeatedly pointed out. Heck, this thread could have been 74444-free months ago, if IDW had taken my wager. But then, he would have LOST, wouldn't of he? His forte is scientific acumen. Mine is the command of English and words. If you can't see an obvious difference in style and ability, you're sure not as smart as you think you are. You certainly seem to imitate his penchant for fallacious attacks, though, don't you? He can engage in any behavior he damn well wants or pleases. You're just like the miserable soul who decries...why THEY make me angry, it's THEIR fault. Pretty pathetic. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 Funny. IDW/A.A has blamed me in the past for making him angry, and that the fault for so many of his failures is mine. So, let me get this straight: IDW/A.A can "engage in any behavior he pleases," but those opposing IDW/A.A may *NOT.* Are you listening to yourself? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31025067 United Kingdom 12/28/2012 01:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29820852 United States 12/28/2012 01:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29820852 What evidence is there that any censorship has taken place other than AAs pronouncement that it is so? I will say it again as well he has no instrumentation that could give and useful information but rather does seat of the pants guesses using the web. He has been shown numerous times to use information from the very same sources out of ignorance of the source material origin. Him saying you can see particle radiation if you get in some shade was hilarious. Perhaps we can explore your points one at a time. What evidence is there to support the very title of the thread? If you think there's no hiding of data, you're really out of touch. Nothing else need be said. Except the hiding of IDW's RESULT, which would be un-hideable. His result was wrong, and the data that IDW has been claiming was wrong or hidden predicted this result, while IDW himself didn't. The DATA wasn't at fault. Reality has spoken. You are wrong on all counts. His data can be hidden, that's all too easy to do on the internet. Read: removed. All the all-telling signs leading up to catastrophe remain. A yellow sun turning blue/white has more fuel. it's just that simple. And that extra fuel will have to be released. Just because albinos tampered with the date means squat. I mean remember that little video Spock made? In it was claimed the end of the mayan calendar was in 2011. then it was made for 2012. they can't even make up their own minds beforehand what date to pick. It's just that obvious. And what's a few months anyway? Reality has still yet to speak. Having websites close is hardly removing his "work" AA has a tendency to now always claim that his predictions were stated in 2004 because the archives here only go back to 2005 when the site was sold and opened under new management. Some of his choicer rants and posts with threats have been removed wholesale from other sites there can be no doubt. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 12/28/2012 01:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444 Except the hiding of IDW's RESULT, which would be un-hideable. His result was wrong, and the data that IDW has been claiming was wrong or hidden predicted this result, while IDW himself didn't. The DATA wasn't at fault. Reality has spoken. You are wrong on all counts. His data can be hidden, that's all too easy to do on the internet. Read: removed. There are many other sources of data other than the Internet. All the all-telling signs leading up to catastrophe remain. A yellow sun turning blue/white has more fuel. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 Yet somehow the spectrum from a prism remain unchanged. I am sure, if the positions were reversed, that IDW would accept this argument. I also see no evidence OTHER than IDW's failure that the date was or *could* have been *tampered with.* I mean remember that little video Spock made? In it was claimed the end of the mayan calendar was in 2011. then it was made for 2012. they can't even make up their own minds beforehand what date to pick. It's just that obvious. And what's a few months anyway? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 I would like to see evidence of 2011 being a date touted, not that it matters much. So, when June comes and goes, is that long enough? How about 2014? 2015? When can we conclude that IDW/A.A is merely wrong? Ever? I think the true test is when you decide to stop posting. Quite funny. So my opposing IDW/A.A's ideas is verification of his ideas. What an interesting world you inhabit, and how powerful I seem to be in it. So when June comes and goes, and the world is still here, and I am still opposing IDW, THAT means he's right? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31009041 South Korea 12/28/2012 01:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 You can spout sympathy for the devil all you want. You remain a stalker and a stalker forever more shall you be, even though assuredly the most annoying supposedly innocuous gnat or puppy dog that won't disattach from your face/behind/leg. Heh. Maybe you are IDW using a proxy? That would be a hoot. You know you could just leave. It's really that simple. then you could spare us. but then part of your game I suspect is fatigue. And we do grow weary from every post you make. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 Your wearniess is not my concern. And IDW can make me leave any time he wants, by not engaging in the behavior I have repeatedly pointed out. Heck, this thread could have been 74444-free months ago, if IDW had taken my wager. But then, he would have LOST, wouldn't of he? His forte is scientific acumen. Mine is the command of English and words. If you can't see an obvious difference in style and ability, you're sure not as smart as you think you are. You certainly seem to imitate his penchant for fallacious attacks, though, don't you? He can engage in any behavior he damn well wants or pleases. You're just like the miserable soul who decries...why THEY make me angry, it's THEIR fault. Pretty pathetic. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 Funny. IDW/A.A has blamed me in the past for making him angry, and that the fault for so many of his failures is mine. So, let me get this straight: IDW/A.A can "engage in any behavior he pleases," but those opposing IDW/A.A may *NOT.* Are you listening to yourself? I don't think they're fall-acious at all. Rather, well-deserved. You deserve it madame, if anybody does. You bring it upon yourself post after post, day after day, year after bloody year! Nope, not listening to you. (puts hands to ears and says) la la la la! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31009041 South Korea 12/28/2012 01:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 12/28/2012 01:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31009041 South Korea 12/28/2012 01:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 If you think there's no hiding of data, you're really out of touch. Nothing else need be said. Except the hiding of IDW's RESULT, which would be un-hideable. His result was wrong, and the data that IDW has been claiming was wrong or hidden predicted this result, while IDW himself didn't. The DATA wasn't at fault. Reality has spoken. You are wrong on all counts. His data can be hidden, that's all too easy to do on the internet. Read: removed. All the all-telling signs leading up to catastrophe remain. A yellow sun turning blue/white has more fuel. it's just that simple. And that extra fuel will have to be released. Just because albinos tampered with the date means squat. I mean remember that little video Spock made? In it was claimed the end of the mayan calendar was in 2011. then it was made for 2012. they can't even make up their own minds beforehand what date to pick. It's just that obvious. And what's a few months anyway? Reality has still yet to speak. Having websites close is hardly removing his "work" AA has a tendency to now always claim that his predictions were stated in 2004 because the archives here only go back to 2005 when the site was sold and opened under new management. Some of his choicer rants and posts with threats have been removed wholesale from other sites there can be no doubt. Get a clue dude! P Geryl, how ever you spell his name, blatantly took his predictions and ran with it. That's just one example. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31009041 South Korea 12/28/2012 01:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 You are wrong on all counts. His data can be hidden, that's all too easy to do on the internet. Read: removed. There are many other sources of data other than the Internet. All the all-telling signs leading up to catastrophe remain. A yellow sun turning blue/white has more fuel. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 Yet somehow the spectrum from a prism remain unchanged. I am sure, if the positions were reversed, that IDW would accept this argument. I also see no evidence OTHER than IDW's failure that the date was or *could* have been *tampered with.* I mean remember that little video Spock made? In it was claimed the end of the mayan calendar was in 2011. then it was made for 2012. they can't even make up their own minds beforehand what date to pick. It's just that obvious. And what's a few months anyway? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 I would like to see evidence of 2011 being a date touted, not that it matters much. So, when June comes and goes, is that long enough? How about 2014? 2015? When can we conclude that IDW/A.A is merely wrong? Ever? I think the true test is when you decide to stop posting. Quite funny. So my opposing IDW/A.A's ideas is verification of his ideas. What an interesting world you inhabit, and how powerful I seem to be in it. So when June comes and goes, and the world is still here, and I am still opposing IDW, THAT means he's right? You're like the small commander in the military, esp the Chair Force, who gets to a certain position, divorced from all reality, but has that luxury from the seat he or she sits in. But a more appropriate visual term wouldn't be 'chair' and 'sitting', but 'bed' and 'laying'. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 12/28/2012 01:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444 Heh. Maybe you are IDW using a proxy? That would be a hoot. ... Your wearniess is not my concern. And IDW can make me leave any time he wants, by not engaging in the behavior I have repeatedly pointed out. Heck, this thread could have been 74444-free months ago, if IDW had taken my wager. But then, he would have LOST, wouldn't of he? His forte is scientific acumen. Mine is the command of English and words. If you can't see an obvious difference in style and ability, you're sure not as smart as you think you are. You certainly seem to imitate his penchant for fallacious attacks, though, don't you? He can engage in any behavior he damn well wants or pleases. You're just like the miserable soul who decries...why THEY make me angry, it's THEIR fault. Pretty pathetic. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 Funny. IDW/A.A has blamed me in the past for making him angry, and that the fault for so many of his failures is mine. So, let me get this straight: IDW/A.A can "engage in any behavior he pleases," but those opposing IDW/A.A may *NOT.* Are you listening to yourself? I don't think they're fall-acious at all. Rather, well-deserved. You deserve it madame, if anybody does. You bring it upon yourself post after post, day after day, year after bloody year! Nope, not listening to you. (puts hands to ears and says) la la la la! A more logical argument from the believer I have rarely seen. What, specifically, about my posts makes the attack 'well-deserved?' And do you believe IDW/A.A can "engage in any behavior he pleases," but those opposing IDW/A.A may *NOT?* Because that seems to be exactly what you are saying. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29820852 United States 12/28/2012 01:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 You can spout sympathy for the devil all you want. You remain a stalker and a stalker forever more shall you be, even though assuredly the most annoying supposedly innocuous gnat or puppy dog that won't disattach from your face/behind/leg. Heh. Maybe you are IDW using a proxy? That would be a hoot. You know you could just leave. It's really that simple. then you could spare us. but then part of your game I suspect is fatigue. And we do grow weary from every post you make. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31009041 Your wearniess is not my concern. And IDW can make me leave any time he wants, by not engaging in the behavior I have repeatedly pointed out. Heck, this thread could have been 74444-free months ago, if IDW had taken my wager. But then, he would have LOST, wouldn't of he? His forte is scientific acumen. Mine is the command of English and words. If you can't see an obvious difference in style and ability, you're sure not as smart as you think you are. He can engage in any behavior he damn well wants or pleases. You're just like the miserable soul who decries...why THEY make me angry, it's THEIR fault. Pretty pathetic. And to clarify, he's certainly no slouch in English! It's actually pretty rare that someone of his scientific standing has the amazing ability to write with the clarity and simplicity for the avg Joe to even try to grasp. He at best can write like a 4th grade c student. His mental concepts and theories are around the same age group. You supporters almost act as if you are giving him money to show such an penchant to make him out to be something that he is most decidedly not. I am still laughing about him boasting that he is both an Indian and a Knight Templar as the two are opposite ends of the spectrum. This will no doubt bring a threat of having my entire family erased from history as he has done in the thread already. |