WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

I DO wish the Freemasons would realize what has happened to their once honorable organization and clean house. As long as jews are calling the shots at the top they are simply a tool unknowingly doing the dirty work for the jews.

This is for the Freemasons who are targeting me now as tools of the jewish monolithic conspiracy, who have been instructed by their superiors to do so. They should know who these superiors are and why they want me gone.

My father was a Freemason and so was my grandfather. Both were sickened when they realized jews has taken over their lodges.

Ezekiel 38

[link to www.solarham.net]

Not yet, but this is the position on the Sun which the december 22 Sunspot was precisely and it is growing and will continue to grow and then shrink while geo effective. That's all I'm saying yet. It is also the same precise position on the Sun that produced the so called x45 or "y hole" flare during the last solar maximum. All of this indicates a solid iron core on the Sun, something the jews aren't ready to concede despite the overwhelming evidence.

I am not scientific enough to be able to comment. I take onboard both official and unofficial and draw my own conclusions privately.

I've been looking at sunspots for a year and a half now and the position and size of 1654 should make it interesting BUT... pretty much every sunspot weakens/decays as they face earth, releasing all their energy before they face us. If the Sun was a person it's almost like she takes a deep breath when facing us and breathes out again once past us.

Last Edited by WeAreOne on 01/08/2013 09:02 AM

Here comes one for ya AA.

Batter Up!

Thread: Sunspot as big as Jupiter com in' round the bend

I have already posted a non sensational version above. I am trying to quiet the neanderthals on that post who think this rather normal sunspot is "it". It will become inactive while geo effective. i know why, but I'm not ready to say. 70 more hours of this thread being open and I will

BUMP, Where are the disinfo Ops?

I definately am not this naive, but I do honestly believe that AA has set up bunkers, weapons, etc. If he has done this it is not a stretch to believe others could as well. AA's information is not based on facts, and more often than not the information he provides to back up his ideas is either inaccurate or flat out wrong. I personally believe that the only disinformation being handed out here is by the original poster. If he is outright lying about his facts, then you should have no problem with people pointing this out. This is what this forum is all about, providing proof. AA is using the same exact methods as Nancy Leider. He grabs any random fact or oddity and then claims it is proof of his prediction. He is claiming the mass extinction of 95 percent of the population. He also gave an exact date which has passed. He will give a new date and is of course using inaccurate information or outright lies again to prove the validity of a new upcoming date. At what point is it ok to just make things up? I will continue to point out information that is incorrect, against your protests because I do value truth, and I find it utterly distasteful for any one to propulgate an idea based on lies.

An event that wipes out 95 percent of the population is truly a doomsday event. 28 percent of the worlds population are children age 15 or younger, do you believe that they are unjust and deserve to be clensed?

It should be alright to build bunkers, regardless of if one is "misguided" in another persons opinion or not. I could even care less if people decide to take their own lives. It is only when people threaten others with violence or force where I would draw the line.

So when some nut job with weapons gets it in his mind that its better to kill his children rather than see them go through a horrific time of solar radiation and nuclear armagedon, is this where the line is drawn. Its not a far stretch to believe this when history has shown it happened before.

Yet *another* 74444 prediction gone right.

The disclaimer for this website...

DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS WEBSITE!

The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for our small staff to manually review each and every one of the more than 20,000 posts GodlikeProductions gets on a daily basis.

The content of posts on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or administration of GodlikeProductions. This site may contain adult language, if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.

Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to

USE DISCERNMENT

and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Godlikeproductions.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Godlikeproductions.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.

We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!

Full disclaimer here...

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

Last Edited by WeAreOne on 01/08/2013 12:13 PM

Heh. Some of the people I oppose on those other threads would disagree. That said, my attention was certainly less divided since Nancy Lieder left GLP.

And again, not 12 years. I encountered you about 2005.

And again, not a group. Just a guy.

Physician, heal thyself.

Again, this disclaimer is really only there to protect the website owners from liability should something go wrong, however it doesnt prevent some weak minded individual from buying into every word that AA claims.

uh, sure. The line would be drawn there. AA has never insinuated any such thing to my knowledge.

You seem as though you might just have some emotional involvement, in regards to AA.

What's your deal, and who's your daddy?

Lol, no personal or emotional involvement. I just believe that there are too many sheep who believe anything they read even if there is no real data to back it up.

Do you really think that someone who reads this and believes what AA is saying might also take the leap to act first as opposed to waiting to be attacked?

I suppose by the reckoning of some of the dis info ops here animal pornographic should be held liable for people who go out and do stupid shit because of their many doomsday shows which ARE in fact disinformation and lies encouraging people to do things which will only get them killed. I AM REMINDED OF ONE SPECIFIC SHOW CALLED 'PREPPERS' WHERE ARMED CHILDREN WERE PUT IN A STANDOFF SITUATION WITH ARMED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND TOLD "THiS IS IT, DEFEND OUR HOME "-BY THEIR FATHER.


Did you ever wonder why these shows like survivor man and duel survival show people doing some of the stupidest shit one could imagine, like wading through poisonous snakes barefooted and traversing dangerous chasms with improvised equipment than any sane man can see would result in death in real life? How about jumping off into a stream from 50 feet up when you have no idea how deep it is? This is what is being suggested by the same people who are trying so hard here to silence my message.
Why run down a rocky slope when you are lost alone in the woods or eat things that are bound to carry parasites without cooking them, or drink water out of a pool with dead animals floating in it?

I am providing information that will enable the prudent to factually weather the specific events I KNOW are in our mediated future, and these disinfo ops are the same ones behind these television programs BECAUSE THEY WANT YOU TO DIE.

I am warning he who has the wisdom to hear it of reality, and it is going to happen, and you should be putting every single available resource into it if you want you and your loved ones to come through it. Maybe that's part of natural selection. The species will evolve because those who were too stupid to prepare will be gone. The writing is on the wall, no matter the specifics, it is obvious we are headed for a mass extinction event, in fact it has already began over ten years ago.

"no personal"? Does that imply professional emotional involvement? Probably reading too much into it, and would not be surprised one way or the other.

As far as generalities I don't necessarily agree most people will believe "anything", but those who promote particular causes or ideas have some personal motive to make it sound to some as if many people believe them. Just because people puts their attention on what another person says, does not mean they believe them.

But on the other hand there are too many sheep willing to believe "everything", when for example it is main stream media and government giving an obviously patently false and physically impossible explanation of how building 7 and the twin towers fell. But then we don't know how much people really believe that either in general.

In general it is shills who make far reaching assumptions about peoples beliefs.

In my opinion, crazy people, be they a few or many, or be they government false flags, should not be the pretext to circumvent constitutional rights. Fear and death, of a few, or of many, should not be such a pretext to curtail the rights of the innocent either.

I agree 100% with everything you said here, but when rational thought is circumvented by statements that hold no factual basis, then it is the equivalent of screaming fire when in fact there is no fire.

Admittedly strong stuff on the part of AA, but he does not seem to be suggesting that anyone do anything in regards to a specific situation.

I have not read most of AA's/IDWs posts and had not read this one either till you posted it, but at its face the statement means little to me. Let's not jump the gun. Either he has a right to have his guns and play around with them and talk about it, or he doesn't.

I too have been concerned about the hypothetical of seeing AA cross some line in blogging that he shouldn't legally, like threats or whatever, and maybe he already has but I don't know, but I have not seen it, from what I have read of him at least.

On the other hand he has given indications at times that he honors and protects the lives of innocents in his vicinity.

Ehc have you spent any time on boards that have the full report linked where they go through the physics?

I too was quite convinced that the official story of the mechanics of the collapses was "impossible" until I spent enough time researching sites that discusses the report in detail the details when laid out showed much of my own seat viewpoint was far from accurate.

I find that the situations of just who was involved and how the event came to happen have been conveniently obscured by so many who claim expertise but refuse to even read the report.

Even AA himself I have come across is some of these discussions and he does far more good to help the ones covering up the real situation. Ego and boasting of persons like AA here make them shills without them even realizing their participation.

At this point in time I am still not totally convinced about building 7 but am quite convinced that the twin towers' collapse were closely given accurate explanation.

The externals to offer other "cover spin" like the names of the hijackers and the way the evidence was found in cars as well as passports on the ground in the rubble I most decidedly do not believe.

I will leave off the Pentagon and the PA downed plane as they are also far from explained well to my limited looking into them.

I actually owe AA a word of thanks for giving me the impetus to look deeper into the report and research the details of the report as I would likely still hold erroneous "belief" by what I recall watching on television as well as reading "research" from various conspiracy sites which which when you look deeper at their theories you discover that they are not at all possible.

I forgot the mention this fact.

A true shill knows the importance of "belief" over "factual evidence"

AA appears through his own and his sock puppet posts to also know this value.

"It doesn't matter what actually happens only what people believe happened"

I swear I still get the strong feeling that AA is both an op and a troll extrodinaire at various points on time.

His Korean proxy alter ego sure looks like a well played role play exercise and I imagine that sort of thing would be great fun fro participants.

Sorry, I don't care how much you've read and think you know, but not only has a modern steel frame high-rise never been brought down by fire, one would never be able to be brought down straight vertical and terminal velocity by fire.

Only precisely placed explosives and thermite can do that, and people have gotten very used to seeing videos of buildings being brought down that way.

Period.

I know enough to know that any argument to the contrary is pure (govt.) bullshit.

Last Edited by ehecatl on 01/08/2013 03:55 PM

be careful MexMan, you just might convince me you're the real deal!

I was at the Pentagon on 9/12 somewhere I'm sure AA wasn't, so if anybody wants to test me on my knoweledge of what I saw, something that AA couldn't possibly know personally...even though he knows the truth of the matter...I'd be happy to oblige. Or any other matters Korean. Been here a little while. Dont' think AA has ever been. Won't convince AA I'm not a soft sell shill in his words, but that's okay, I'm still on his side, even though I'm still confused what brought his wrath on me. I thought he also would protect to the death his own and his family? But I shouldn't go there I know...

Forget that last part.

Your ability to post in thread when nobody else except "shills" were able to. So, either he was lying about the thread being locked, or you are shill(at least according to him). Now of course there is the other alternative that is you are just him using a proxy, who knows its all so confusing isnt it. But unfortunately if he ever admits you arent a shill he will have to admit the thread was always open, so no matter what you say from here out you are going to be treated as the enemy it is the only way for him to continue to claim a conspiracy against him speaking his mind.

Last Edited by cantlive4ever on 01/08/2013 04:44 PM